# data[].attributes.body
would love it if you could share more about how you did this - what kind of info, how do you agree info that all can provide, understand and bring about a common view of reality

EDIT - I see the proforma helps answer this! :)

# data[].attributes.body
Could I get a copy of the proforma please

# data[].attributes.body
Were there particular advantages in carrying out an internal review / evaluation rather than for example commissioning an independent external evaluation?  Was it challenging to maintain good working relationships given the review must have felt ‘current’ and led to some difficult conversations when identifying lower value services/initiatives (even though you mentioned drawing a line under historical issues/challenges)

# data[].attributes.body
Do you have any principles for deciding what additional funding you pool? And deciding what in your plan gets funded from core funding or additional funding?

# data[].attributes.body
There is scope to share so much more across all localities on what is happening in the health, social care and the importance of housing.

# data[].attributes.body
Did you find any differences of opinion around the purposes of the BCF? Anything you can comment on coming to a joint understanding and vision? Was there a role for the HWB in this, or did it happen more outside of that?

# data[].attributes.body
What would your priority be for prevention?

# data[].attributes.headline
General Question for all participants: Could there be/should there be a duty of trust between public sector leaders to cut through the tentative relationship building and navigation through egos?

# data[].attributes.subject
General Question for all participants: Could there be/should there be a duty of trust between public sector leaders to cut through the tentative relationship building and navigation through egos?

# data[].attributes.headline
Decisions and engagement from ICB perspective

# data[].attributes.subject
Decisions and engagement from ICB perspective

# data[].attributes.body
Does the ICB have any principles in place for what decisions they need to take centrally, vs what decisions can be taken by their place-based officers?

# data[].attributes.body
Really interesting to hear their approach to reviewing BCF

# data[].attributes.body
Q could go to Herefordshire as well: is there a completely pooled budget and combined risk-sharing approach?

# data[].attributes.body
Common theme of these systems being able to demonstrate and have trust between partners. How do you increase trust?

# data[].attributes.headline
Excellent presentation. Our table wondered how the approach in Staffordshire aligns or diverges from the approach taken to review the BCF in SoT and what synergies/challenges this creates?

# data[].attributes.subject
Excellent presentation. Our table wondered how the approach in Staffordshire aligns or diverges from the approach taken to review the BCF in SoT and what synergies/challenges this creates?

# data[].attributes.body
How are under- and over-spends managed in these new arrangements?

# data[].attributes.body
How do you find the right colleagues to initiate the review process?

# data[].attributes.body
Would be great to see a copy of the MOU if happy to share?

# data[].attributes.body
How did you make the case for having joint, BCF-funded roles, and do you feel system partners are feeling the benefits of that?

# data[].attributes.body
What are the roles in place in the team? Any secondees? And how are the roles being funded?

# data[].attributes.body
Goes to show that focusing on what matters to people is cost-effective as well as being beneficial to individuals

# data[].attributes.body
Do you utilise funding from elsewhere as well such as welfare grants through local authorities?