# data[].attributes.body
I'm worried about the balance in the 'Evaluation' section. Since this is a movie case study, should the comparison with my interviewee be a separate paragraph at the end, or should I weave it throughout the analysis? For example, 'Keating does X, whereas my interviewee Mr.Z does Y'?" I feel very puzzled about my writing structure, and I am not sure the proportion about every section because there are many parts I need to mention.

# data[].attributes.body
Do we need to reduce the AI rate to below 30%, as many assignments in other courses have such requirements?

# data[].attributes.body
Will the length of case studies and personal reflections (if exceeding 100-200 words) affect the overall grade?

# data[].attributes.body
For the 'Cultural Transfer' section, I want to make sure I go deep enough. Is it expected that we use specific academic concepts to explain the Chinese context, or is a general description of the Chinese school system sufficient?

# data[].attributes.body
The assignment instructions state: 80% of citations should be from academic sources provided by module instructors of the course. In this personal reflection assignment, could most of the references be sourced from the relevant authoritative and more appropriate literature that I have personally found? Because each group interviewed different leaders, and would come up with more specific suggestions and viewpoints. I think many of these require us to find relevant literature to support them.

# data[].attributes.body
The case study requirement says the literature review should 'lead to' a theoretical framework. Does this mean I should briefly discuss multiple relevant theories before selecting the best one to show my selection process? Or should I strictly focus the 15% word count on defining the one theory I will use?

# data[].attributes.body
Is the case study about selecting one of the films to write a film review? And what is the specific word count requirement?

# data[].attributes.body
Regarding Point 3 of the final paper assignment requirements, is it sufficient to only analyze the leadership practices in the film using the theoretical framework? Do we not need to apply the theory to analyze the interviewee? Thank you, Professor!

Point 3 of the assignment requirements is as follows: Evaluation of Leadership Practices [35% of the assessment mark]: reference the theoretical framework, contextual as well as cultural suitability, to the leadership practices, and provide your rationale to determine whether the leadership practices are effective and/or ineffective (LO2); how the leadership described in the case is similar or different to the real leader that you interviewed in your other assignment.

# data[].attributes.body
Is there a requirement for the AI rate to be below a certain level?

# data[].attributes.body
2.The essay must have a filename in this format: StudentFirstLastInitial_EDS405Essay coursework

I'm not quite clear about the naming format for the homework. Could you please give me an example, teacher? Is it XinS or XS?Thanks

# data[].attributes.body
Questions about culture and leadership

in week 3, introduced GLOBE study about leadership style, which identified six primary leadership behavior patterns, like human-oriented leadership, could i use these as my theoretical framework?

# data[].attributes.body
question for approach.

I'm confused that whether these approaches ( like situational approach, practice approach) belong to theoretical framework?

# data[].attributes.body
What is the essential difference between educational leadership and other leadership? Are they the same thing, when the leader in education field it be the educational leadership?

# data[].attributes.body
Assessment1 Handbook

Part 3asked us to refer to theoretical framework,I want to know whether the theory we used must comply with part2 literature review we used. And the last part asked us to transfer the same case to local culture.The case is in the movie we chose right?

# data[].attributes.body
"Assessment 1 (Handbook):

Does the "critical evaluation of the practice of educational leadership" include the analysis of the failure scenario of the practice in the context of multiculturalism? Or just focus on the situation in the case?"

# data[].attributes.body
“Assessment 1 (Handbook)：

When citing the policy document of the Ministry of Education of China, if there is no official English translation of the document, how should the APA 7th format handle the title translation and source annotation?

# data[].attributes.body
80%references can include what resource? The resources in Learning mall are all ok? And how many references should we use at least

# data[].attributes.body
Can we quote/ref things from the course PPT? If so, what's the reference going to look like?

Can I use reference like this:

EDS405 course material. (2025).EDS405-W5-Introduction to Design Thinking (Oct 18). Unpublished lecture slides.

Or should I dig into what the course material document as references?

Additionally, can I ref someone cited by Northouse from Northouse's book? How does that work?

# data[].attributes.body
"Case Study, AssessmentI (Resit). On page5, I. Essay Marking Descriptors for the [Resit] Case Study part, are the following four sections include in Literature part or these four sectons shouls be in different sections?"

# data[].attributes.body
EXAMPLE

“Case Study, Module Handbook. On page 5, the Handbook says we must follow the predetermined structure for the 2,000-word analysis. Could you clarify what counts as enough use of theory in each section?”

# data[].attributes.body
EXAMPLE

“Lecture 11, Transformational Leadership. On p. 167 of Northouse (2016), idealised influence is described as leaders acting as strong role models. I don't understand. Could you clarify how this differs from charisma when analysing school leadership?”