# data[].attributes.body
Reich’s argument that America’s free market needs more government influence to protect our liberties is false because if we were to give them more power then they would not let the people have their free to choose and it would be tyranny at that point. Instead, the market needs less government regulation to protect our liberties because no matter how much power the government makes it will only be benefitting the top one percent.

# data[].attributes.body
Friedman’s argument that the free market, without government influence, would protect our liberties is not true because there is much inequality within the way the government is set up by that 1%. On the contrary, the free market threatens our liberties because there is a vicious cycle of inequality through the different types of social classes.

# data[].attributes.body
Friedman’s argument that the free market, without government influence, would protect our liberties is not true because there is inequality within the government on leaning with the 1 percenters more than others.

On the contrary, the free market threatens our liberties because there is many 1 percenters that try to benefit themselves than others.

# data[].attributes.body
Reich’s argument that America’s free market needs more government influence to protect our liberties is false because the government is only helping those with high income rather than the middle class.

Instead, the market needs less government regulation to protect our liberties because the governemnt needs less regulations to protect our liberties because with free market there is more of a comfortable space for people to be able to say their needa and wants.

# data[].attributes.body
Reich’s argument that America’s free market needs more government influence to protect our liberties is false because of the fact that giving the government more power to as well control the way our economy moves and functions shows that we won’t have as much freedom because one again we are under that control.

Instead, the market needs less government regulation to protect our liberties because we need to be able to still have that control in how we spend our own money.

# data[].attributes.body
Friedman’s argument that the free market, without government influence, would protect our liberties is not true because if it was true then the middle class wouldn't be coming across the several issues it has to deal with.
On the contrary, the free market threatens our liberties because it causes for there to be people who are very rich, meaning that there are too many higher ups with too much cash not allowing for the majority to have a fair chance.

# data[].attributes.body
Friedman’s argument that the free market, without government influence, would protect our liberties is not true because it has been 100 years since inequality has risen and it shows no sign of stopping, which is a problem that the government must control.
On the contrary, the free market threatens our liberties because it gives the government too much power which can cause tyranny and a division between society and the government.

# data[].attributes.body
Friedman’s argument that the free market, without government influence, would protect our liberties is not true because of the middle class not having so much money like the rich, it is not a fair wealth distribution.
On the contrary, the free market threatens our liberties because we are all treated differently since the middle class is struggling to keep the economy stable.

# data[].attributes.body
Friedman’s argument that the free market, without government influence, would protect our liberties is not true because it has caused for thousands of americans to now struggle with paying basic needs such as groceries.

On the contrary, the free market threatens our liberties because it also allows for the big business owners to have power the majority of the money in the economy.

# data[].attributes.body
Friedman’s argument that the free market, without government influence, would protect our liberties is not true because… currently we see the market only benefiting one class that is not the majority of Americans.

On the contrary, the free market threatens our liberties because…  the middle class is being left vulnerable to being taken advantage of by the top 1%

# data[].attributes.body
Friedman’s argument that the free market, without government influence, would protect our liberties is not true because there is a cycle of inequality within the government that supports only the upper classes.
On the contrary, the free market threatens our liberties because lower class people do not realize that they are supporting the upper class and that there is a vicious cycle happening.

# data[].attributes.body
Reich’s argument that America’s free market needs more government influence to protect our liberties is false because the government rules only benefit the rich instead of those in the middle class.

Instead, the market needs less government regulation to protect our liberties because the government is controlling middle class wages which affects them because they are struggling to keep living and they are the main reason for our economy.

# data[].attributes.body
Reich’s argument that America’s free market needs more government influence to protect our liberties is false because that would mean that many people would be restricted on the amount of money they can spend and it would be overruling of the government to do so.

Instead, the market needs less government regulation to protect our liberties because that would mean that people would freely spend their money and if being told on how much money can be spend, it is less likely that people would want to add on to the economy.

# data[].attributes.body
Friedman’s argument that the free market, without government influence, would protect our liberties is not true because of the inequality in the government.

On the contrary, the free market threatens our liberties because a richer person would have more power than a person from a lower class.

# data[].attributes.body
The free market would protect our liberties if there was no government influence, that is why Friedman's argument is true.

# data[].attributes.body
Reich’s argument that America’s free market needs more government influence to protect our liberties is false because the rich will always be superior which makes the lives of the middle class much harder to face.

Instead, the market needs less government regulation to protect our liberties because with a free market economy the people are able to share their own wants and needs which will benefit the people as a whole.

# data[].attributes.headline
Friedman’s argument that the free market, without government influence, would protect our liberties is not true because of the inequality in the government.On the contrary, the free market threatens our liberties because a richer person would have more power than a person from a lower class.

# data[].attributes.subject
Friedman’s argument that the free market, without government influence, would protect our liberties is not true because of the inequality in the government.On the contrary, the free market threatens our liberties because a richer person would have more power than a person from a lower class.

# data[].attributes.body
Reich’s argument that America’s free market needs more government influence to protect our liberties is false because… having the government influencing our economy will lead to them having too much power over the people which can lead to tyranny.
Instead, the market needs less government regulation to protect our liberties because… people will then be able to choose freely and not have anyone in particular be powerful.