# data[].attributes.body
Emily

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Other interrelated functions of the WTO that operate in support of its main purpose include providing a forum for negotiations among countries and serving as a dispute settlement mechanism. When conflict arises between member nations, the countries bring their cases before the WTO, where virtually all decisions are made by consensus and are ratified by member nations' legislative or governing bodies. Settling conflicts through the WTO reduces the risk of disputes spilling over into political or military conflict.

Another main function of the WTO is the oversight of the development, implementation and administration of WTO agreements. The WTO oversees at least 60 agreements that have the status of international legal texts. These agreements, negotiated and signed by governments, are contracts that guarantee important trade rights to WTO member countries. The WTO agreements also bind governments to keep their trade policies within agreed limits.

The WTO officially was formed in 1995 under the Marrakesh Agreement. It grew out of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, which was signed in 1947.
Learn more about Economics

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
What Are the Functions of the World Trade Organization?

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Other interrelated functions of the WTO that operate in support of its main purpose include providing a forum for negotiations among countries and serving as a dispute settlement mechanism. When conflict arises between member nations, the countries bring their cases before the WTO, where virtually all decisions are made by consensus and are ratified by member nations' legislative or governing bodies.

# data[].attributes.body
Emily

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Read this article to learn about the World Trade Organization (WTO) and its objectives and functions!

The Uruguay round of GATT (1986-93) gave birth to World Trade Organization. The members of GATT singed on an agreement of Uruguay round in April 1994 in Morocco for establishing a new organization named WTO.

It was officially constituted on January 1, 1995 which took the place of GATT as an effective formal, organization. GATT was an informal organization which regulated world trade since 1948.

Contrary to the temporary nature of GATT, WTO is a permanent organization which has been established on the basis of an international treaty approved by participating countries. It achieved the international status like IMF and IBRD, but it is not an agency of the United Nations Organization (UNO).

Structure:

The WTO has nearly 153 members accounting for over 97% of world trade. Around 30 others are negotiating membership. Decisions are made by the entire membership. This is typically by consensus.

A majority vote is also possible but it has never been used in the WTO and was extremely rare under the WTO's predecessor, GATT. The WTO's agreements have been ratified in all members' parliaments.

The WTO's top level decision-making body is the Ministerial Conferences which meets at least once in every two years. Below this is the General Council (normally ambassadors and heads of delegation in Geneva, but sometimes officials sent from members' capitals) which meets several times a year in the Geneva headquarters. The General Council also meets as the Trade Policy Review Body and the Disputes Settlement Body.

At the next level, the Goods Council, Services Council and Intellectual Property (TRIPs) Council report to the General Council. Numerous specialized committees, working groups and working parties deal with the individual agreements and other areas such as, the environment, development, membership applications and regional trade agreements.

Secretariat:

The WTO secretariat, based in Geneva, has around 600 staff and is headed by a Director-General. Its annual budget is roughly 160 million Swiss Francs. It does not have branch offices outside Geneva. Since decisions are taken by the members themselves, the secretariat does not have the decision making the role that other international bureaucracies are given.

The secretariat s main duties to supply technical support for the various councils and committees and the ministerial conferences, to provide technical assistance for developing countries, to analyze world trade and to explain WTO affairs to the public and media. The secretariat also provides some forms of legal assistance in the dispute settlement process and advises governments wishing to become members of the WTO.

Objectives:

The important objectives of WTO are:

1. To improve the standard of living of people in the member countries.

2. To ensure full employment and broad increase in effective demand.

3. To enlarge production and trade of goods.

4. To increase the trade of services.

5. To ensure optimum utilization of world resources.

6. To protect the environment.

7. To accept the concept of sustainable development.

Functions:

The main functions of WTO are discussed below:

1. To implement rules and provisions related to trade policy review mechanism.

2. To provide a platform to member countries to decide future strategies related to trade and tariff.

3. To provide facilities for implementation, administration and operation of multilateral and bilateral agreements of the world trade.

4. To administer the rules and processes related to dispute settlement.

5. To ensure the optimum use of world resources.

6. To assist international organizations such as, IMF and IBRD for establishing coherence in Universal Economic Policy determination.
Table: 2 WTO Ministerial Conference:
WTO Agreements:

The WTO's rule and the agreements are the result of negotiations between the members. The current sets were the outcome to the 1986-93 Uruguay Round negotiations which included a major revision of the original General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATI).

GATT is now the WTO's principal rule-book for trade in goods. The Uruguay Round also created new rules for dealing with trade in services, relevant aspects of intellectual property, dispute settlement and trade policy reviews.

The complete set runs to some 30,000 pages consisting of about 30 agreements and separate commitments (called schedules) made by individual members in specific areas such as, lower customs duty rates and services market-opening.

Through these agreements, WTO members operate a non-discriminatory trading system that spells out their rights and their obligations. Each country receives guarantees that its exports will be treated fairly and consistently in other countries' markets. Each country promises to do the same for imports into its own market. The system also gives developing countries some flexibility in implementing their commitments.

It all began with trade in goods. From 1947 to 1994, GATT was the forum for negotiating lower customs duty rates and other trade barriers; the text of the General Agreement spelt out important, rules, particularly non-discriminations since 1995, the updated GATT has become the WTO s umbrella agreement for trade in goods.

It has annexes dealing with specific sectors such as, agriculture and textiles and with specific issues such as, state trading, product standards, subsidies and action taken against dumping.

Banks, insurance firms, telecommunication companies, tour operators, hotel chains and transport companies looking to do business abroad can now enjoy the same principles of free and fair that originally only applied to trade in goods.

These principles appear in the new General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). WTO members have also made individual commitments under GATS stating which of their services sectors, they are willing to open for foreign competition and how open those markets are.

(c) Intellectual Property:

The WTO's intellectual property agreement amounts to rules for trade and investment in ideas and creativity. The rules state how copyrights, patents, trademarks, geographical names used to identify products, industrial designs, integrated circuit layout designs and undisclosed information such as trade secrets "intellectual property" should be protected when trade is involved.

The WTO's procedure for resolving trade quarrels under the Dispute Settlement Understanding is vital for enforcing the rules and therefore, for ensuring that trade flows smoothly.

Countries bring disputes to the WTO if they think their rights under the agreements are being infringed. Judgments by specially appointed independent experts are based on interpretations of the agreements and individual countries' commitments.

The system encourages countries to settle their differences through consultation. Failing that, they can follow a carefully mapped out, stage-by-stage procedure that includes the possibility of the ruling by a panel of experts and the chance to appeal the ruling on legal grounds.

Confidence in the system is bourne out by the number of cases brought to the WTO, around 300 cases in eight years compared to the 300 disputes dealt with during the entire life of GATT (1947-94).

The Trade Policy Review Mechanism's purpose is to improve transparency, to create a greater understanding of the policies that countries are adopting and to assess their impact. Many members also see the reviews as constructive feedback on their policies.

All WTO members must undergo periodic scrutiny, each review containing reports by the country concerned and the WTO Secretariat.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
World Trade Organization (WTO): Objectives and Functions

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
ADVERTISEMENTS: Read this article to learn about the World Trade Organization (WTO) and its objectives and functions! The Uruguay round of GATT (1986-93) gave birth to World Trade Organization. The members of GATT singed on an agreement of Uruguay round in April 1994 in Morocco for establishing a new organization named WTO.

# data[].attributes.body
Emily

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Together with citizens all over the world, Global Exchange has organized against the global rulemakers, because we believe in a vision of global economic integration that values worker's rights, fair trade, and environmental protection over corporate profits.

We take action to uphold democracy and our right to participate in decisions about our lives and environment, to protect the human dignity of every single one of us, to protect the environment and to save lives.

The fight for fair and just economic system that puts workers and the environment above profit continues today. See our current work, Trade Justice Under in the Age of Trump for the latest.

The Battle in Seattle - Shut Down the World Trade Organization

In the late 1990s Global Exchange worked with hundreds of national and national groups and organizing spaces to mobilize tens of thousands of nonviolent protesters to converge and challenge the WTO in Seattle. This now-legendary meeting and protest has become known as The Battle in Seattle and inspired generations of activists to fight for a better global and local economy, better planet, and better conditions for workers and the global citizenry.

50,000 people went to Seattle to challenge this corporate agenda and to demand a more democratic, socially just and environmentally sustainable global economy. The protests succeeded in shutting down the trade talks and derailing the expansion of the WTO. Global Exchange stood with those outside the halls and rooms where lobbyists and government delegates negotiated, loudly declaring our opposition to the WTO because:

WTO rules are written by and for corporations, putting profits above people and the planet.

WTO rules trample labor and human rights.

WTO rules render environmental protections illegal.

WTO rules stand between dying people and the medicine that will save their lives.

The Fight for Fair not "Free" Trade Agreements

Together with citizens all over the world, Global Exchange has organized against bilateral and multilateral trade agreements, because we believe in a vision of global economic integration that values workers' rights, fair trade, and environmental protection over corporate profits. See our latest here.

Ultimately, the bilateral and multilateral free trade agreements made by our governments aggregate even more power in the hands of already powerful and destructive transnational corporations, and lead to serious declines in the welfare of citizens.

When NAFTA, the North American Free Trade Agreement, was signed in 1994 by the governments of the USA, Canada and Mexico, it was supposed to have been a boon to consumers, boosted employment and strengthened economies north and south of the border. Reality has been very different. In Mexico thousands of farmers have been forced out of their livelihood when U.S. agricultural conglomerates dumped cheap corn and hogs on the market.

NAFTA also installed a corporate bill of rights, allowing corporations to launch legal challenges against governments when the legislations of one of the 'partner' countries proves a barrier to that corporation's bid for profit. Court decisions have been vacated by NAFTA tribunals that are completely unaccountable to the citizenry. Most recently, TransCanada is using this system to sue the U.S. government (taxpayers to foot the bill) for the 'billions' lost in profit over the canceled Keystone XL pipeline.

Global Exchange has organized cross-border and global resistance to these proposed trade agreements for decades - from the Battle in Seattle to organizing protests and civil society pressure against the AFTA, CAFTA, FTAA , and - the latest - the TPP.

While the future of trade under Trump is uncertain, one thing remains clear: people need to continue to fight for a fair trade system that is democratic, and puts people and planet before corporate profits.

We urge you to learn more about the impacts of past free trade agreements and join Global Exchange in action against any new free trade agreements that put corporate profit ahead of the needs of human beings and the planet.

Global Econ 101

Understanding how the current global economy works is essential to creatively design and implement the kind of global economy we want. Millions of people across the globe are already doing this - acting locally to challenge corporations in their communities, creating local, living economies. Countries are working together in international networks to fight free trade, climate change and corporate practice.

Learn more about how the global economy functions and how we can continue the fight for a more just world.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Together with citizens all over the world, Global Exchange has organized against the global rulemakers, because we believe in a vision of global economic integration that values worker's rights, fair trade, and environmental protection over corporate profits.

# data[].attributes.body
melane mor

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
UNDERSTANDING THE WTO: THE ORGANIZATION

members since , with dates of WTO membership.

Click any member to see key information on trade statistics, WTO commitments, disputes, trade policy reviews, and notifications.

Share

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Any state or customs territory having full autonomy in the conduct of its trade policies may join ("accede to") the WTO, but WTO members must agree on the terms. Countries negotiating membership are WTO "observers". List of WTO Members and Observers.

# data[].attributes.body
melane mor

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Introduction

The World Trade Organization (WTO) is the principal forum for setting the rules of international trade. In its two decades, it has helped reduce barriers to trade in both goods and services and created a dispute resolution system that supporters say has reduced the threat of trade wars. However, the institution is under considerable pressure. Negotiations on a comprehensive development agenda have foundered on disagreements over agricultural subsidies and intellectual property rights, while members have increasingly turned to separate bilateral and regional free trade agreements to advance their trade interests. Meanwhile, U.S. President Donald J. Trump has criticized the WTO for what he sees as its weakness in confronting China's trade abuses and constraints on U.S. sovereignty, placing the future of global trade rules into doubt.

What is the WTO?

The WTO is responsible for overseeing the rules of international trade. It facilitates trade negotiations among its members, which have increased from 123 in 1994 to 164 in 2018. The organization also monitors the implementation of those trade agreements, produces research on global trade and economic policy, and serves as a forum for settling trade disputes between nations.

Established in 1995 and based in Geneva, Switzerland, the WTO is the successor to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), an organization founded in 1948 whose rules created the modern multilateral trading system. WTO decision-making happens at the Ministerial Conference, generally held every two years. There have been eleven such ministerials since the inaugural conference in Singapore in 1996. With a few exceptions, agreements reached at these conferences are made by consensus, meaning that all members must agree, and decisions are binding. WTO rules are enforced by individual member nations, which can impose retaliatory trade sanctions on states that break them.

While the specifics of the WTO's trade rules are hashed out in negotiations, the organization is based on several founding principles. The most basic is a commitment to openness, meaning reducing tariffs as well as limiting quotas, import bans, distorting subsidies, and other barriers to trade. Another central plank is nondiscrimination, in which WTO members must treat trade from all other members equally. The WTO also seeks transparency and predictability in trade-related regulations and promotes international standards to give citizens, companies, and investors stability. And the WTO is also committed, in principle, to giving less-developed countries greater flexibility and accommodations to help them adjust to new rules.

How does the WTO deal with conflicts?

The WTO's trade dispute mechanism has been used extensively over the past two decades, helping to avoid unilateral responses to disputes and potential trade wars. Since 1995, members have filed more than five hundred disputes with the WTO. Most of these are settled in consultations or by agreement before advancing to litigation.

Upon joining, all members agree to a dispute settlement mechanism, in which WTO-appointed trade experts can render binding judgments. When one member files a complaint against another, the countries must first attempt to resolve the issue through consultation, and only if that fails is a panel chosen by the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body to hear the case. A panel's recommendations, if not overturned on appeal, must be implemented by the offending country. If the country fails to respond, the plaintiff can then take targeted retaliatory measures, such as blocking imports or raising tariffs.

The United States is the most active participant in the system, having filed 116 complaints and served as defendant in 136 cases. China has become a particular target for U.S. policymakers, who have increasingly used the WTO process to challenge Chinese government support for domestic industries, restrictions on imports, abuse of intellectual property, and other state-led trade policies. Between 2009 and 2017, the Obama administration brought twenty-five cases to the WTO, more than any other country in that period, and sixteen of those targeted China. The administration won seven of its WTO cases against China, including limits on Chinese agriculture and aircraft subsidies and steel import duties; the others are ongoing.

While Trump has denounced China's trade practices, his administration's 2018 report on trade with China [PDF] maintains that the WTO is incapable of dealing with the problem. Instead, Trump has sidestepped the WTO system. He has applied tariffs targeting overproduction of steel and aluminum by China and others based on a little-used national security law, as well as announced further measures to retaliate against China's investment restrictions. CFR's Edward Alden has called Trump's willingness to bypass the WTO the death of the institution.

The appeals system is also under pressure. The Obama administration drew criticism from many members for a May 2016 decision to block the reappointment of a South Korean judge to the WTO's Appellate Body, the first time any country blocked the appointment of a judge from another country. Trump has continued to block new appointments, leaving three judgeships out of seven vacant and hobbling much of the court's work.

What is the Doha Development Agenda?

At the ministerial conference in Doha, Qatar, in 2001, WTO members agreed to a new round of negotiations that promised to put developing countries at the center. This became known as the Doha Development Agenda, or the Doha Round.

Liberalizing global agricultural trade was the linchpin of the agenda. Many of the world's poorest nations depend on exporting basic agricultural products but struggle to compete against richer nations that support their farmers with subsidies. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) estimates that these subsidies total nearly $300 billion annually. Analysts say that agricultural lobbies in the United States, Europe, and Japan have consistently exercised their considerable political clout to convince lawmakers to maintain such subsidies.

Liberalizing global agricultural trade was the linchpin of the Doha development agenda.

Developing countries argue that without a reduction in developed countries' subsidies, they must maintain tariffs and maintain their own domestic subsidies. A major sticking point has been the terms of a proposed " special safeguard mechanism," which would allow developing countries to temporarily raise tariffs to protect their farmers from sudden price drops or import surges.

The Doha agenda also sought to further reduce barriers to trade in services, such as business and financial services, and nonagricultural goods. The Doha talks operated on the principle of " special and differential treatment," promising to give developing countries more time to implement changes and the financial and technical support to help them do so. However, by 2008 negotiations had collapsed due to disagreement on agriculture subsidies and the special safeguard mechanism.

What is the status of the Doha Round?

Negotiations continued after the 2008 global financial crisis with low expectations. But the 2013 ministerial in Bali, Indonesia, delivered a significant achievement, the first multilateral agreement since the creation of the WTO. This was the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA), which aims to speed up customs procedures and make trade easier, faster, and cheaper. The WTO estimates [PDF] that this could increase global trade by some $1 trillion. The talks also reached an interim agreement on "public stockholding," continuing exceptions that allow developing countries to stockpile agricultural products to protect against food shortages.

The TFA was only a small slice of the larger Doha agenda, but the successful deal was a cause for optimism: Director-General Ricardo Azevedo proclaimed that the WTO was "back in business." In Nairobi in 2015, members made progress on a number of issues, including the phasing out of agriculture export subsidies and an agreement among some members to cut tariffs on information technology (IT) products.

However, for many observers, Nairobi signaled the end of the Doha talks, a sentiment that intensified after the 2016 election of Trump. At the 2017 ministerial, in Buenos Aires, members failed to find any agreement, with India blocking an attempt to reduce fishing subsidies. With members unable to agree even on a final statement, EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmstrom labeled the meeting a failure, while U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer called for a "fresh start."

What are the criticisms of the WTO?

Criticism range from farmers and labor groups that accuse the WTO of focusing too narrowly on corporate interests to environmentalists who worry about deregulation to U.S. policymakers who allege that the institution has failed to handle Chinese abuses. The primary concerns include:

Intellectual property. The WTO's intellectual property agreement, Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS), draws criticism from experts who have argued that WTO rules on drug patents have limited access to medicines in poorer countries. The WTO says that enforcing patent protections is central to expanding global trade.

Sovereignty and regulation. Other critics say WTO rules overrule national sovereignty, and in doing so erode environmental and labor protections. Environmental groups have criticized WTO decisions on genetically modified foods, as well as recent WTO rulings against what it considers discriminatory environmental labeling, as in the case of U.S. dolphin-safe labeling. Labor unions in the United States argue that the WTO is inadequate for protecting U.S. wages from being undercut by unfair labor practices abroad, alleging, for instance, that China violates basic workers' rights to lower the cost of its exports. Developing countries counter that attempts to address labor standards at the WTO are a form of protectionism in disguise.

Trump has been a vociferous critic of Chinese state-led development policy.

Import competition. Some economists allege that by promoting imports and encouraging firms to move their operations abroad, WTO-led tariff reductions hurt U.S. jobs and wages. The Economic Policy Institute's Robert E. Scott and Will Kimball estimate that China's entrance into the WTO in 2001 led to the loss of more than three million U.S. jobs, as U.S. firms were forced to compete with China's much cheaper imports. Some estimates find [PDF] a smaller, but still substantial, loss of around two million jobs, while other experts contend that technological changes, not China, were responsible for those losses. Trade proponents including Dartmouth College economist Douglas Irwin say that increased trade with China benefited the U.S. economy by lowering prices, increasing productivity, and expanding exports.

Response to China. Trump has been a vociferous critic of Chinese state-led development policy, arguing that while the United States has adhered to global trade rules, other countries-primarily China-have gained an advantage by ignoring them. CFR's Alden says that Washington and its allies "did too little for too long," failing to confront China's abuses at the WTO.

What are the alternatives to the WTO system?

Even with Doha stalled, WTO talks have continued on what are known as plurilateral negotiations, or agreements among subsets of WTO members. Plurilateral deals are easier to negotiate, as they focus on narrower issues and not all members are bound by their terms.

At the 2015 Nairobi talks, for instance, fifty-three WTO members concluded an expansion of the Information Technology Agreement, or ITA, which reduces trade tariffs on a raft of IT products. The agreement means that more than 97 percent of all global IT trade is now covered by WTO rules. A major potential plurilateral in progress is the Trade in Services Agreement (TISA), under negotiation since 2013 [PDF] among twenty-three members, including the EU but not China. Backers of TISA hope to use the talks to further the WTO's liberalization of the global services trade, the rules for which haven't been updated since 1995.

In 2012, nineteen members agreed to update the Government Procurement Agreement (GPA), which seeks to further open government procurement markets. And in 2014, fourteen members, including the United States, China, the EU, and Japan, opened negotiations on a proposed Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA), which would liberalize trade in environmental products, such as wind turbines and solar technology.

Many countries have also turned to bilateral free trade agreements (FTAs) or larger regional ones. The Obama administration pushed for so-called mega-regional deals, such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and the U.S.-EU Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). But Trump is deeply skeptical of multilateralism, preferring to deal with trading partners on a bilateral basis. He withdrew from the TPP immediately upon taking office, and the remaining members completed the deal without the United States. Even as U.S. allies advanced FTAs without him, Trump began pursuing unilateral measures to confront China and other countries on trade, raising serious doubts about the future of the WTO.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The World Trade Organization (WTO) is the principal forum for setting the rules of international trade. In its two decades, it has helped reduce barriers to trade in both goods and services and created a dispute resolution system that supporters say has reduced the threat of trade wars.

# data[].attributes.body
melane

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The World Trade Organization ruled on Monday that a tax break from Washington State to help Boeing develop its new 777X jetliner was a prohibited subsidy. The ruling was a setback for the aerospace giant as it seeks victory in a parallel case against its European rival, Airbus.

The trade organization said the subsidy came in the form of a renewed cut in Washington State's main business tax for aerospace. The state agreed to the tax cut in 2013, when Boeing was considering where to assemble the latest member of its long-haul jet family.

It is the third time that taxpayer support for Boeing or Airbus has been faulted by the World Trade Organization in a trans-Atlantic trade spat dating back 12 years and involving mutual accusations of tens of billions of dollars of aid.

The ruling can be appealed by either side. The United States is considering sanctions against the European Union over Airbus subsides that were previously ruled illegal.

The trade organization did not give a value for the banned aid in its latest ruling, but the European Union estimated it at $5.7 billion out of an $8.7 billion tax package in Washington, where most Boeing factories are based.

Airbus said the measures had cost it $50 billion in sales.

Boeing said the aid in question would kick in only from 2020 and would be worth $50 million a year, a fraction of the total amount at stake in what has been called the world's largest trade dispute.

The ruling backed European Union claims that another six measures provided subsidies to Boeing, but rejected arguments that these fell into the most toxic category being reviewed by its panel.

It urged the United States to withdraw the prohibited subsidy in 90 days, but did not say how this should be done, prompting disagreements between American and European representatives about how much Boeing would have to give up and when.

Boeing officials and lawyers played down the prospect of having to pay back any support, noting there was no money to discuss until deliveries of the new jet started in 2020.

They said they were confident the ruling would be overturned on appeal and insisted the tax breaks were dwarfed by $22 billion in subsidized loans by European governments to Airbus, adding that these could spur United States retaliation within a year.

A version of this article appears in print on , on Page B5 of the New York edition with the headline: Trade Group Rules Against Boeing on Tax Break for Jet. Order Reprints | Today's Paper | Subscribe

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
World Trade Organization Rules Against Boeing Tax Break for New Jet

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The World Trade Organization ruled on Monday that a tax break from Washington State to help Boeing develop its new 777X jetliner was a prohibited subsidy. The ruling was a setback for the aerospace giant as it seeks victory in a parallel case against its European rival, Airbus.

# data[].attributes.headline
The World Trade Organization: Definition, History, Purpose & Members

# data[].attributes.subject
The World Trade Organization: Definition, History, Purpose & Members

# data[].attributes.body
Lilli Schulte

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The World Trade Organization

Have you ever wondered who helped make all the rules and regulations for how businesses and countries trade goods with each other? Today's global marketplace is extremely complex, with thousands of moving parts. Many of the electronics, clothes you wear, or food you enjoy may be partly made possible by the agreements and policies that the World Trade Organization has helped establish.

The World Trade Organization (WTO) is a global organization that helps countries and producers of goods deal fairly and smoothly with conducting their business across international borders. It mainly does this through WTO agreements, which are negotiated and signed by a large majority of the trading nations in the world. These documents act as contracts that provide the legal framework for conducting business among nations. There are several groups within the WTO, with the highest decision-making authority going to a group known as the Ministerial Conference, which can make decisions on all matters and trade disputes among members.

History

The WTO was officially created in January of 1995 and essentially replaced the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which had been in force since 1948, a few years after the Second World War. Before the WTO was created, an initiative to start something similar known as the International Trade Organization (ITO) took place. Unfortunately, the ITO treaty was not approved by the U.S. and a few other countries and ultimately never went into effect.

In the 1980s, as the world economies became more global in trade and business, it became evident that GATT was not built or structured to address many of the new global trading challenges that were arising. As a result, the biggest trade negotiating event on record began in 1986. It was known as the Uruguay Round, seeing as it took place in Punta del Este, Uruguay. One of the final accomplishments of this round was the creation of the WTO. The WTO is currently working on new negotiations and agreements, known as the Doha Development Agenda, and these started in 2001.

Purpose

As stated earlier, the WTO is a complex international organization with many moving parts. Simply stated though, its main purpose is to help trade flow smoothly for all member nations so that they may increase the well-being of their countries and standards of living for their citizens. It works to educate and inform companies and governments on the acceptable rules that govern trade (i.e., imports and exports). When issues arise, it works to settle disputes based on the legal agreements that the countries have adopted and ratified in their governments.

In short, the WTO does many things. Here are just a few of its main focuses:

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
the world trade organization: definition

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
purpose & members - video & lesson transcript | study.com

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The World Trade Organization: Definition, History, Purpose & Members - Video & Lesson Transcript | Study.com

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Have you ever wondered who helped make all the rules and regulations for how businesses and countries trade goods with each other? Today's global marketplace is extremely complex, with thousands of moving parts. Many of the electronics, clothes you wear, or food you enjoy may be partly made possible by the agreements and policies that the World Trade Organization has helped establish.

# data[].attributes.body
Lilli Schulte

# data[].attributes.body
Lilli Schulte

# data[].attributes.headline
World Trade Organization Rules Against Boeing Tax Break for New Jet

# data[].attributes.subject
World Trade Organization Rules Against Boeing Tax Break for New Jet

# data[].attributes.body
Lilli Schulte

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The World Trade Organization ruled on Monday that a tax break from Washington State to help Boeing develop its new 777X jetliner was a prohibited subsidy. The ruling was a setback for the aerospace giant as it seeks victory in a parallel case against its European rival, Airbus.

The trade organization said the subsidy came in the form of a renewed cut in Washington State's main business tax for aerospace. The state agreed to the tax cut in 2013, when Boeing was considering where to assemble the latest member of its long-haul jet family.

It is the third time that taxpayer support for Boeing or Airbus has been faulted by the World Trade Organization in a trans-Atlantic trade spat dating back 12 years and involving mutual accusations of tens of billions of dollars of aid.

The ruling can be appealed by either side. The United States is considering sanctions against the European Union over Airbus subsides that were previously ruled illegal.

The trade organization did not give a value for the banned aid in its latest ruling, but the European Union estimated it at $5.7 billion out of an $8.7 billion tax package in Washington, where most Boeing factories are based.

Airbus said the measures had cost it $50 billion in sales.

Boeing said the aid in question would kick in only from 2020 and would be worth $50 million a year, a fraction of the total amount at stake in what has been called the world's largest trade dispute.

The ruling backed European Union claims that another six measures provided subsidies to Boeing, but rejected arguments that these fell into the most toxic category being reviewed by its panel.

It urged the United States to withdraw the prohibited subsidy in 90 days, but did not say how this should be done, prompting disagreements between American and European representatives about how much Boeing would have to give up and when.

Boeing officials and lawyers played down the prospect of having to pay back any support, noting there was no money to discuss until deliveries of the new jet started in 2020.

They said they were confident the ruling would be overturned on appeal and insisted the tax breaks were dwarfed by $22 billion in subsidized loans by European governments to Airbus, adding that these could spur United States retaliation within a year.

A version of this article appears in print on , on Page B5 of the New York edition with the headline: Trade Group Rules Against Boeing on Tax Break for Jet. Order Reprints | Today's Paper | Subscribe

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
World Trade Organization Rules Against Boeing Tax Break for New Jet

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The World Trade Organization ruled on Monday that a tax break from Washington State to help Boeing develop its new 777X jetliner was a prohibited subsidy. The ruling was a setback for the aerospace giant as it seeks victory in a parallel case against its European rival, Airbus.