# data[].attributes.headline
WYNYARD QUARTER: What is the problem with Auckland?

# data[].attributes.subject
WYNYARD QUARTER: What is the problem with Auckland?

# data[].attributes.body
Kia ora Joe

Absolutely thrilled to receive this request and we would welcome this opportunity.

Would you like to have a chat in the next week to confirm the approach, engagement with the team and our touch points with the school.

Many thanks for reaching out,

Jen

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Great cities have great public transport

Investing in high capacity, quality, rapid transport is critical to developing a modern, connected city. Driving housing and job growth, light rail will help regenerate neighbourhoods and create people-friendly streets by getting cars off the road.

Aucklanders deserve to have easy, reliable and efficient transport choices and Auckland Light Rail is our opportunity to dramatically expand our rapid transit network to make Tāmaki Makaurau a better place to live now and in the future.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Auckland Light Rail is our chance to reshape our neighbourhoods to work better for us and change how our city grows. Get to know the Auckland Light Rail Project.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Create a new document and edit with others at the same time -- from your computer, phone or tablet. Get stuff done with or without an internet connection. Use Docs to edit Word files. Free from Google.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The government's decision to move forward with Auckland light rail is nothing more than a "dream", the National Party says.

The government has chosen to build a half tunnelled - half surface light rail system from the city centre to Auckland Airport. It will run from Wynyard Quarter to Mt Roskill before surfacing and running alongside SH20 to the airport.

The option - which would cost about $14.6 billion - was recommended by the Auckland light rail establishment unit.

National infrastructure spokesperson Simon Bridges said the project was wasted spending.

"Today we hear the government is going to spend another $50 million on a business case. That's $100m of taxpayers' money spent before they've even got spades in the ground.

"If it ever goes ahead it will be at least $15b of wasted spending. Their light rail dream is just that - a dream."

Transport Minister Michael Wood told Checkpoint they acknowledged the project required significant Crown investment.

On the finance said, he said they also continued to work with the local government about what their contribution might be, as well as the confirmation today that "value capture" was part of the project.

"It's estimated that could be $2 billion to $3 billion of the total contribution over time," Wood said of the value capture.

"If someone was making a large private gain out of all this public investment, it's not unreasonable to expect there might be a contribution, that's generally how these projects work overseas."

Transport spokesperson Simeon Brown said the project's plan had been through so many iterations Aucklanders had given up believing it will happen.

The government should prioritise a second crossing over the Waitematā Harbour, Brown said.

"Aucklanders are sick and tired of this government trying to sell light rail in multiple different ways and that's just the latest iteration.

"What we need is a second Harbour Crossing and that needs to be the number one priority for our city."

Wood said the business case for a second harbour crossing was going ahead and public consultation would happen later this year, with decisions expected next year.

"There's not just one choke point in Auckland ... we're not just going to focus on one thing at a time. The whole point of this announcement is that we need a system-wide approach to better transport in Auckland."

ACT's transport spokesperson Simon Court described the project as a "disaster."

"We've spent four years trying to figure out how to make a political promise from Jacinda Ardern work. In the meantime, we've seen billions of dollars moved away from road building, projects cancelled, rescoped and deferred, fuel taxes increased, and regions neglected. New Zealanders deserve better."

Green MP Ricardo Menéndez March said the party would prefer street-level light rail down Dominion Road.

"It's a missed opportunity to not have gone with surface light rail because it would have enabled us to complete the project faster and start reducing emissions sooner, as well as give people more options for how they get around our city."

It was time to get on with the project, Menéndez March said, so the government had to ensure the end result was accessible to all communities.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Government's Auckland light rail plan 'wasted spending' and a 'dream' - National

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The government's decision to move forward with Auckland light rail is nothing more than a "dream", the National Party says. The government has chosen to build a half tunnelled - half surface light rail system from the city centre to Auckland Airport.

# data[].attributes.body
A - Based on the RNZ interview develop an argument against the ALR.

B - Discuss potential for additional guest speakers. Would be great to have some opposition (Melissa Lee - National Mt Albert).

C - Offer (constructive) feedback to the organisation of Expo plans.

D - Work together in your groups to prepare to answer your question.

# data[].attributes.body
Jake, Calvin, Max

# data[].attributes.body
ruby pip callum

# data[].attributes.headline
KINGSLAND: Who is in favour of ALR and why?

# data[].attributes.subject
KINGSLAND: Who is in favour of ALR and why?

# data[].attributes.body
Suhail, Nabil, William

# data[].attributes.headline
MT ROSKILL: Who is opposed to ALR and why?

# data[].attributes.subject
MT ROSKILL: Who is opposed to ALR and why?

# data[].attributes.body
Katie, Sofia, Dileesha, Dhruv, Lucy

# data[].attributes.body
Kenz and Will

# data[].attributes.headline
AIRPORT: Why the ALR should not go ahead. 

# data[].attributes.subject
AIRPORT: Why the ALR should not go ahead. 

# data[].attributes.body
Will,