# data[].attributes.headline
Everyone can write at Wikipedia and therefore it's not reliable, but you can use it to search for references with a critical view

# data[].attributes.subject
Everyone can write at Wikipedia and therefore it's not reliable, but you can use it to search for references with a critical view

# data[].attributes.body
everyone can rewrite and edit wikipedia, so we don't know if he or she is scholar or not. So it is not scholarly material. It is not peer reviewed. you can look at its references if it is related to you paper, but you should not use the actual articles.

# data[].attributes.headline
The scholar method is respected and there is a real and well made bibliography. We checked their names on Google and they are teachers at Stockholm University. Then, it's a reliable article that we can use to argument our scholarly text. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The scholar method is respected and there is a real and well made bibliography. We checked their names on Google and they are teachers at Stockholm University. Then, it's a reliable article that we can use to argument our scholarly text. 

# data[].attributes.body
This is a scholarly article, both the authors are researchers at Stockholm University, it is published by Duke University Press, follows the appropriate format and builds on previous research/data. This can be used as a main source for a scholarly text.

# data[].attributes.body
Newspaper shouldn't be the main source of information but could be a first approach. Also depends on what newspaper it is, and whether it is more reliable than others.

# data[].attributes.body
Can be used in a scholarly text because it is a university published article written by a scholar

# data[].attributes.body
Can be used carefully to exemplify arguments and theory. You need to look at the references and see where the date are coming from. Always use a critical eye on it.

# data[].attributes.headline
We are not sure that it is a page written only by searchers. Even if there are sources and references, we can't guarantee their liability. Moreover, there is no strict method of development. We can use the page to discover new references on the topic after carefully checking them. 

# data[].attributes.subject
We are not sure that it is a page written only by searchers. Even if there are sources and references, we can't guarantee their liability. Moreover, there is no strict method of development. We can use the page to discover new references on the topic after carefully checking them. 

# data[].attributes.body
You cannot call this article a scholarly material because it is not peer reviewed or published by university or research institutions. But you can use it as a news paper, which can be used as a complementary of your own article, but not the core of the argument.

# data[].attributes.body
Wikipedia isn't a reliable source and many people can edit the text, meaning content could be false.

# data[].attributes.body
University press research article. Is a reliable source as it has also been peer reviewed.

# data[].attributes.body
Can be used in an introduction of a paper or in an outlining of the field of study/problem area (what is said in society about this topic, etc.), because news articles state what is going on

# data[].attributes.headline
A press article can be used for a press review or to give like an example but it can't be the main source for scholarly text. Moreover, the article says "the researchers" without quoting its own sources, references,...

# data[].attributes.subject
A press article can be used for a press review or to give like an example but it can't be the main source for scholarly text. Moreover, the article says "the researchers" without quoting its own sources, references,...