# data[].attributes.body
I think that sample one had really good word choice. This includes commanding as one of the good pieces of word choice

# data[].attributes.body
Sample 4's evaluation is different from sample 2's evaluation because sample 4 explains how the conch has a powerful tone and is a "guiding beacon" while sample 2 explains the conch is more of a way that it brings the boys together.

# data[].attributes.body
Sample 4's evaluation is different from sample 2's because in sample 4 it describes how the boys are in a crisis and the conch helped them and in sample 2 is it describes how Ralph was elected as chief because of the conch.

# data[].attributes.body
The analysis in this example is the explanation of the power that the conch shell gives one of the boys.

# data[].attributes.body
In sample 2, the evaluation explains how Ralph was a leader because he had the conch. Differently, sample 2 explains that Ralph

# data[].attributes.body
In sample 3, the analysis comes after the claim. The group explains into further detail why the conch is viewed as "forceful".

# data[].attributes.body
Something this group did well in Sample 1 was showing how Ralph was the obvious leader

# data[].attributes.body
In sample 5, I feel that they analyzed the conch in their first sentence. Yes, I do think that one could further analyze "booming" because it shows the "booming" noises' impact.

# data[].attributes.body
In sample 3 the analysis is where it says the conch was a "guiding beacon"

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that this group analyzed the text well, and used word choice that correctly represents the conch and noise

# data[].attributes.body
The analysis in Sample 3 is that the "booming" noise given from the conch shell unites the boys and is the reason for their collectiveness.

# data[].attributes.body
In sample 2 the evaluate part of SIIC was towards the end of the this explanation. The point of evaluating, was to gather all ideas into one final sentence.

# data[].attributes.body
The evaluation is in the last sentence when they say, "portrays his role as a leader." This quote evaluates and it also explains the reason why Ralph was chosen to be cheif.

# data[].attributes.body
the evaluate is in the last sentence.

# data[].attributes.body
The evaluation is in the last  sentence of the writing. The last sentence shows how and why Ralph is a leader.

# data[].attributes.body
Sample two was showing how the conch shows leadership because Ralph forced the sound while sample 4 wanted to show the force of the conch because of its unity for the boys.

# data[].attributes.body
Sample 4's evaluation is different from Sample 2's because they are viewing the conch as a way that brought the boys together while Sample 2 believes that the conch is used as some sort of authority and that is why it caught the boys attention to go to where the "forceful" sound was.

# data[].attributes.body
They analyse in the middle by say "The shell is viewed..." A specific line that analysis "Booming" is when they say "guiding beacon".

# data[].attributes.body
The "evaluate" in this sample is the last sentence. The point of the evaluate in this sample was to bring everything together.

# data[].attributes.body
This group analyzed the word booming by describing the noise was what brought the boys together.

# data[].attributes.body
The evaluation in sample 4 is different than in sample 2 because in sample 4 they use what the shell is associated with or what is associated with the shell, in sample 2, they use how the shell affects the beholder.

# data[].attributes.body
In sample 1, the group had very good word choice and clearly showed why Ralph was a good leader.

# data[].attributes.body
Sample 2 shows that the word booming has an authoritative tone and in sample 4, the word has a forceful tone.

# data[].attributes.body
The evaluate is in the last sentence when they say," Therefore since Ralph controlled the forceful sound it portrays his role as leader." This is the evaluate because it explains why Ralph was picked as leader.

# data[].attributes.body
The lest sentence i feel best  evaluated and summed up the whole  answer.

# data[].attributes.body
The evaluation seems to be in the last sentence. Ths sentence acts as a conclusion to show the reader the purpose of the explanation in the previous paragraph

# data[].attributes.body
the evaluate is when they mention that since he was controlling the sound he was the leader

# data[].attributes.body
The analysis in sample 3 is more so at the end of the response  where it states " Ralph was elected leader because he was the first person to be in posession of the conch when he brought the boys together." This line analyzes the word booming by describing the noise that gathered the boys together and told us who controlled the sound.

# data[].attributes.body
The evaluation is the last sentence. The purpose of this evaluation was to explain how Ralph is a leader by what he did.

# data[].attributes.body
What i think this group did well was the word choice they used.

# data[].attributes.body
In sample 3, the analysis was towards the end of the response where it states "bringing the boys together."  The line that states "beacon" analyzes the sound of the word booming

# data[].attributes.body
Sample 3 made a good explanation about how the conch's sound brought all the boys togetehr

# data[].attributes.body
The last sentence of sample 2 is evaluating the word "booming" and the analysis they made.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that sample 2 did well with explaining why the conch is important and how it resembles power.

# data[].attributes.body
The "evaluate" is in the last sentence. The point of the  evaluate is that it shows why Ralph is a leader.

# data[].attributes.body
Sample 4 and 2 are different because sample 4 is a lot more vigorous while sample 2 uses the word authoritative which is more about being dependable.

# data[].attributes.body
The analysis for "booming" is that it helps bring the boys together

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that the evaluation is in the last sentence. The point of it was to close up the response and leave people with the writers strongest ideas.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that this group had very good word choice and good details that supported the claim.

# data[].attributes.body
The "evaluate" is made up of the last two sentences since they both specifically elaborate on the conch's authority and the power that it gave Ralph.

# data[].attributes.body
The group clearly explained why Ralph was the obvious choice well, describing why they put that.

# data[].attributes.body
The last sentence of the sample is the 'evaluate' part. Its purpose is to gather all the thoughts from the previous sentences and give it meaning.

# data[].attributes.body
In Sample 1, the group did well in using more effective word choice to make their sentences flow better. I believe the usage of words such as "signaled" and "commanding" were nice.

# data[].attributes.body
In sample 2, the evaluation is the last sentence. The point of evaluating this was to explain how Ralph is viewed as a charcacter.

# data[].attributes.body
Something specific the explanation that the group did well is how they used the word unexpected because it was the perfect word to describe the conch and the scene including the shell.

# data[].attributes.body
In sample one, the group clearly explained why Ralph was shown as a good leader.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that sample 1 did well when they said," Unexpected to the boys." because it shows why the boy came to the sound so quickly.

# data[].attributes.body
The analysis in this sample is where the group says, "The shell is viewed......" The specific lines that analyze the word "booming" are lines 6-11.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that this group used good word choice specifically with the word "unexpected".

# data[].attributes.body
I felt like this group did well explaining why the boys picked Ralph as the leader, they mentioned how he blow the conch and what impression it had on the kids.

# data[].attributes.body
The group used synonyms for commanding instead of stating the same words already.

# data[].attributes.body
In this sample, the group did well on explaining and giving an example from the book of why what they thought about the word "booming".

# data[].attributes.body
In sample 3, the analysis is where the group says how the shell and noise are represented. "The shell is viewed as a guiding beacon," and "boys collectiveness" is part of the analysis because it states the tone and mood that the shell sets.

# data[].attributes.body
I felt when they mentioned that he was the obvious leader it really supported the claim

# data[].attributes.body
Something this group did well is explaining how the word "booming" was a commanding tone by using how the boys came together after they heard the sound to support the groups reason.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that this group executed their word choice well and explained their reasoning swiftly

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that in sample one the group did well in choosing their words, such as how they used the word unexpected to describe how the loud noise was introduced to the boys.

# data[].attributes.body
Something that I feel this group did well was using the work "unexpected". I thought that this was strong because it supports the fact that none of the boys knew that the sound of the conch was coming.

# data[].attributes.body
I liked their word choice. They used "unexpected".

# data[].attributes.body
Sample 4 says the the word booming has a forceful tone, while sample 2 says that the word booming had an authoritative tone.

# data[].attributes.body
I feel that this  group had very good word choice. I say this because they used the words "commanding"  and "obvious."

# data[].attributes.body
Where is the analysis in this sample? Can you further analyze "booming" from the argument that is presented here (dominant tone?)

# data[].attributes.body
How is sample 4's evaluation different from sample 2's? What is sample 2 evaluating?

# data[].attributes.body
Where is the analysis in this sample? What specific lines analyze the sound of the "booming?"

# data[].attributes.body
Identify where in this sample the "evaluate' is? In your own words, what was the point of the evaluate in this sample?

# data[].attributes.body
Name something specific in this explanation that you felt the group did well.