# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Robotic Surgery
Stakeholders:
1. Surgeons
2. Patients
Event:
1.The desire to have a better, faster, easier recovery after undergoing surgery.
Ethical questions:
1. Will autonomous robots actually make the surgery faster?
2. How will these robots treat unreliable patients that are in critical condition?
3. If humans program robots, what makes people think these robots will be flawless?
4. Are the autonomous robots  worth paying more money?
Solutions:
1. Scientists continue doing research on how to make these robots less reliable on people and more capable of doing larger surgeries without disrupting the current flow on the surgery.

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Vaccines causing autism
Stakeholders:
1. Parents
2. Doctors/pediatricians
3. Vaccine distributors
Event that caused controversy:
Many kids getting autism after their vaccinations
Ethical questions:
1. Should parents refuse to give their children vaccinations due to studies?
2. Although some scientific and medical researchers  say there is no connection between autism and vaccines, should parents still be worried?
3. How can pediatricians convince parents that vaccinations are important?
4. Could this impact the distribution of vaccines and their companies?
Solutions:
1. scientists are doing further research

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: FaceID mass spying
Stakeholders: Apple inc, Apple consumers, Citizens, Other companies
Event: Apple's new Face ID system could be used by the government for their own purposes
Ethical Questions:
1.Should the government be able to spy on citizens in order to keep communities safe?
2.Will this prevent people from buying newer technology?
3. How would mass spying affect people's lives?
4. Is it unconstitutional so spy on citizens?
Solutions: For Apple to make the FaceID database so secure that they do not even have access to it
Heart of Controversy: The Privacy of peoples' lives is at risk.

# data[].attributes.body
Topic:Animal testing
Stakeholders:Animals, and people
Event/Context: Many animals are being tested on
Controversy: They want to stop animal testing
Ethical Questions: How will stopping animal testing affect the certain things?
How many animals are dying because they are being tested on?
Should scientist test humans instead?
How can this affect the future?
Solutions: Stop testing on animals for the things humans use.

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Law enforcement with Non-lethal weapons
stakeholders:
law enforcement
Citizens of the united states
event: many deaths are occurring from the police and they seem like they are targeting a certain race and creating conflict
questions-
1.If police used more non-lethal weapons, will it create a safer community?
2.Can non-lethal weapons be just as dangerous as lethal weapons?
3.Should we change police weapons from lethal to non-lethal so they can put an end to all the killings?
4.Will non-lethal weapons create danger to policemen since they won't have the right weapons to protect themselves with?
solutions-
some solutions that they are considering is limiting the weapons that policemen have access to or changing their lethal weapons to non-lethal weapons.
Another solution would be to listen to the officer when he says to keep your hands up and not make yourself look suspicious because then the police would feel threatened and would cause them to shoot.

# data[].attributes.body
Topic:
Stakeholders:
1.
2.
3.
Event/context that caused controversy:
Ethical questions raised:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Solutions to the issue proposed by stakeholders?
What is the heart of the controversy?

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Video games and the youth
Stakeholders: Children, Parents, Game Makers, Citizens
Event/Context that caused controversy: The release of the first violent game, Mass shootings, violence, bullying, juvenile crime, massacres by violent video gamer's
Ethical questions raised (4): Is it fair to believe violent games cause violence in kids, when there is contradicting evidence? Should there be an age limit on violent games? Is it the parents fault for letting their children play such games? Should it be illegal to sell adult content games to children?
Solutions to the issue proposed by stakeholders: Put age limit on certain video games.  Continue to allow them to play the games to relieve stress. Parents only let their children play those games when they are mature enough.

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Should robots be as smart as humans?
Stakeholders:
1. Religious individuals
2. Robot engineers
3. Job holders
4. Corporations
Event: Invention and acceleration of the robots growth potential
Questions:
1. Will they replace people in jobs ?
2. Could they become more intelligent and take over?
3. Are they a threat to religious practices?
4. Is there a possibility that they could actually create jobs?
Solutions:
1. fail safe in the AI system
2. reconstruct our economic system in place
3. have people oversee the robotic workforce as jobs
4. implement more technological job education in early school.

The center debate stems from concerns with our well being as humans when compared to equally intelligent machines that we created . How will it end up affecting us and the rest of the world?

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Student Cellphone addiction is no joke
Stakeholders:
1. Students
2. Teachers
3. School Board staff
4. Parents
Event:  Cellphones developed and advanced quickly over a short period in the 21st century resulting in an addiction by most teenagers to the device.
Ethical Questions:
1. Why have students grown so attached to these devices?
2. Why has there been no therapy systems developed to help the issue?
3. Are students growing more interested in their phones then in life itself?
4. How can you break a teenager from a cellphone addiction and help them focus more on school?
Solutions:
1. Parental disciplinary action
2. Therapy sessions to break the addiction
3.Restrictions on cellphones in school zones
Heart of the controversy:  The majority of students that are engrossed in the technologically advancing cellphone and everything that comes with it.

# data[].attributes.body
Topic:
Using animals for scientific research is no longer needed
Stakeholders:
1. Scientist
2. Companies
3. Animal rights activist
Event:
Undercover investigations taking place, releasing footage, and photos.
Questions:
1. If there are other alternatives why continue to use animals?
2. Do companies that test on animals actually care about negative comments received?
3. Do animals have rights like humans?
4. Do scientist agree that it is a moral problem as well?
Solutions:
1. Switch to cruelty free methods.
2. Advance scientific research so animals aren't need at all anymore.
3. Laws protecting animals be improved and enforced.
Heart of controversy:
Testing on animals is no longer acceptable when other methods exist.

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Drones as Warfare

Stakeholders:
American soldiers
Civilians (of places that are under attack)
The U.S.

Event/Context that caused controversy:
Terrorism
War
Too expensive
Not safe
Not ethical

Ethical Questions:
Are Drones safe enough to use them as warfare?
Should we use drones as warfare even when there is a possibility of it attacking civilians from the place that the U.S. is attacking?
Is it better to use Drones as warfare instead of human soldiers?
Is technology going too far with drones?

Solution to the issue proposed by Stakeholders:
(In favor) The U.S should continue to use drones as warfare since they bring a higher possibility of winning wars.
(Against) The U.S. should stop using drones as warfare since it will make other countries hate us, or make them want to attack us.

What is  at the heart of the controversy?
The heart of the controversy is that using drones as warfare is too dangerous, since there has been accidents where innocent civilians from other countries have been injured or even killed.

# data[].attributes.body
Robot Swarms/Swarm Warfare
stakeholders: Military, regular people, people with hazardous jobs, people in other countries, Developers of the technology
Trigger: Military funding of development
Questions of controversy:
-How will these drones be used in offense and defense?
-Who will be responsible for humans or property harmed by the autotomic drones?
-How can we prevent malfunction and/or interference of the drones software?
-How long until these drones are used for more offensive measures?
Solutions:
-To just not creating drones with weapons on them.
-Take extra precaution when developing and encrypting the software implemented on the drones.
What is it about?: protecting lives and to use a technology for good whether your good is fighting in a war or your good is cleaning up oil spills, and what's the consequences that may appear from this technology

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Non-lethal weapons
stakeholders: citizens, soldiers, government
Event/context that caused controversy: The Trayvon Martin case, the 12-year-old Tamir Rice case
Ethical questions raised: How will it help us in war?
What will it do to society, with us having the right to bare arms?

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: non lethal weapons
Stakeholders: the police,citizens of the U.S,those in the weapon making industry
Event/Context that caused controversy: death of Laquan McDonald
Solutions to the proposed by stakeholders? Equip police with less guns and more non lethal tools such as tasers
Ethical questions raised:  If the police are already equipped with non lethal weapons, why aren't they using them? Would giving the police less guns solve the issue with officer shootings? Should all police officers stop carrying lethal weapons all together? Would non lethal weapons result in more or less people wanting to commit crime?

What is the heart of the controversy? The heart of the controversy is that the their are too many deaths at the hands of a police officer's gun that can easily be avoided if they were equipped with non lethal alternatives such as tasers or pepper spray.

# data[].attributes.body
Topic: Artificial wombs and ethics
Stakeholders: Scientists, women, future premature children, abortion workers, men's rights activists
Event/Context that caused controversy: A lamb was recently able to be nurtured and grow through the use of an artificial womb.
Ethical Questions Raised:
Should the image of women be considered when thinking to create these artificial wombs?
Is it fair to think the artificial wombs may end the debate of abortions?
How will the use of artificial wombs effect the lives of preemie babies?
How will the growth in an artificial womb effect babies when they grow as adults?
Solutions to the issue proposed by stakeholders:
Continue working on artificial wombs
Consider the roles of women before continuing with the work of artificial wombs
Allow more regulations and research to be done before further tests.
What is at the heart of the controversy?
The primary concern of the controversy is what artificial wombs will do to the image of women and the ethics of how it will effect preemies down the road.

# data[].attributes.body
Topic:
Stakeholders(identify 3)
Event/Context that caused Controversy:
Ethical Questions Raised (4):
Solutions to the issue proposed by stakeholders?:
What is at the heart of the controversy?