# data[].attributes.body
'These men were universally grateful to read something about anti-maskers that didn’t

shame or demonize them,”she wrote.“It made them want to hear what else I had to say about why it might be worth wearing a mask.'
Shows that Warzel wants to understand every viewpoint (logos), and not judge. This shows credibility because he seems unbiased, so the reader feels that the information is coming straight from the source.

"Warzel utilizes this piece of evidence in a great way to support his claim that demonizing the other side of the pandemic will not provide a solution." - Jaxon Hill

# data[].attributes.body
"She cites lessons learned from the H.I.V. epidemic, suggesting that shaming and stigma backfire. “We have to do everything we can to attempt to understand” she said, “and then acknowledge why people may not be adopting strategies."'
This comparison by using the HIV epidemic makes the reader think about Covid and how they're both very similar when it comes to the stigma. If someone has covid, its common not to want to see the person, but in many cases it comes to a point where actions and emotions towards the person with the virus may change. This is also very prevalent to the asian hate especially towards the Chinese community. By many people believing conspiracy theories about how China created covid, this caused separation and segregation in different forms. This evidence of the HIV epidemic makes Warzel seem very logical, bringing in yet another example of what has happened in the past. THE PAST REPEATS ITSELF CONSTANTLY.

# data[].attributes.body
"Mark Navin, an expert in the ethics of public health at Oakland University, said we need

to dismiss the notion that what we’re facing is new."
This establishes the appeal of ethos, but more logos. It's logical to think that what is happening is new, although people want to act like it's something they can handle and can make good decisions on - we are all in the same boat. This is new for everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
"Thailand, a country of 70 million, hasn't had an instance of local coronavirus transmission in seven weeks, as of last Thursday. And yet Americans are staring down nearly 150,000 virus deaths while governors and health officials pleading with citizens to wear masks are starting to sound like substitute teachers who have lost control of the classroom."
Warzel uses juxtaposition by describing substitute teachers and americas Covid situation through a contrasting effect. He also uses an appeal to ethos with this quote (by using numbers, and statistics) makes him seem more credible.

# data[].attributes.body
"the people Dr. Niang encountered weren't selfish or anti-science. They were scared and felt stripped of dignity by officials who didn't respect them or understand their traditions."
This claim provides another opinion on the view of anti-maskers one that isn't negative. This makes the audience more diverse, (people want to hear what they agree with, and will believe those who state things that they believe in). Warzel can get a bigger variety of people to believe in and read his article because he chose to agree with multiple opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
"I said, 'I hear you," - "I want to and will help. But we still have an epidemic spreading and we need your help, too. We need to take your temperatures and we need to trace this virus."
The approach of Pathos is used, this helps the reader understand how Dr. Niang spoke to those impacted by the virus. Rhetorical Strategy through a quote because Dr. Niang was convincing and gained the trust of those he was helping through his thoughtful statement.

# data[].attributes.body
Warzel begins the passage by speaking about ebola. This is a good transition into speaking about covid (both being pandemics) and can connect emotionally to those reading the article in the present day. Parallel connection.