# data[].attributes.headline
Summer Project - Bridging the Gap y12-y13. Part 1. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Summer Project - Bridging the Gap y12-y13. Part 1. 

# data[].attributes.body
Hi all. Your task is to complete the handouts. This first one

# data[].attributes.body
1. Revision Handouts to be completed on the 3 topics covered in class

# data[].attributes.body
Groups for Kahoot quiz or Catchphrase - entire year 1 course

# data[].attributes.body
this is only COG BEH and SLT approaches - NOT biological!!!

# data[].attributes.body
As I did not have the group who did retrieval failure's powerpoint, I have uploaded ones I would have used if I taught thea lesson.

# data[].attributes.body
Essay plans

# data[].attributes.body
Essay plans for:
Cognitive Approach
Behaviourist Approach
Social Learning Theory
These will be checked and you will be assessed with timed essay and Mock for the whole course in the next 2 weeks.

# data[].attributes.body
4 handouts + WMM essay + Group experiment

# data[].attributes.body
Essay - Wundt (Introspection)
Essay SLT (Bandura)

# data[].attributes.body
Essay questions for:
1. Working Memory Model
2. Forgetting - Interference
3. Forgetting - Retrieval Failure (Masuma's powerpoint)

# data[].attributes.headline
Memory - Working Memory Model - David, Muneera, Masuma

# data[].attributes.subject
Memory - Working Memory Model - David, Muneera, Masuma

# data[].attributes.body
1. Folder check
2. Memory group presentations (teaching the lessons!)
3. Psychopathology End of Unit test
4. Catch up on overdue work

# data[].attributes.body
Biological Approach OCD (more visual images with this ppt)

# data[].attributes.body
Biological Treatments OCD

# data[].attributes.body
Biological Explanations OCD

# data[].attributes.body
Cognitive approach to Treating Depression

# data[].attributes.body
Cognitive Approach to Explaining Depression

# data[].attributes.body
Behavioural approach to explaining Phobias

# data[].attributes.body
Behavioural approach to treating
phobias

# data[].attributes.body
Mental Disorders

# data[].attributes.body
For Memory & Psychopathology

# data[].attributes.body
Definitions of Abnormality 2

# data[].attributes.body
Definitions of abnormality 1

# data[].attributes.body
RM glossary bookle

# data[].attributes.headline
Resistance to social influence - Locus of Of Control (LOC)

# data[].attributes.subject
Resistance to social influence - Locus of Of Control (LOC)

# data[].attributes.body
Institutionalisation

# data[].attributes.headline
Attachment L2 - Stages of attachment (Prezi Link)

# data[].attributes.subject
Attachment L2 - Stages of attachment (Prezi Link)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
 Using the cards, put in order the stages of attachment 

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
STAGES OF ATTACHMENT 1. Unreliable data: Mother's reports are subjective and bias as it depends on their sensitive response infants . Challenges validity of data 2.Biased sample: Working class population sample cannot represent other social groups; 1960's sample with different

# data[].attributes.headline
Attachment L1 - Reciprocity & Interactional Synchrony 

# data[].attributes.subject
Attachment L1 - Reciprocity & Interactional Synchrony 

# data[].attributes.headline
Schaffer & Emerson study (L2 Attachment)

# data[].attributes.subject
Schaffer & Emerson study (L2 Attachment)

# data[].attributes.headline
Attachment L5 Bowlbys Theory of Monotropy

# data[].attributes.subject
Attachment L5 Bowlbys Theory of Monotropy

# data[].attributes.headline
Attachment L8 Bowlby Maternal Deprivation PEEL task resource

# data[].attributes.subject
Attachment L8 Bowlby Maternal Deprivation PEEL task resource

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
By guest blogger Ginny Smith

Fifty years ago, in Connecticut, a series of infamous experiments were taking place. The volunteers believed they were involved in an investigation into learning and memory, and that they would be administering shocks to a test subject whenever he answered questions incorrectly. But despite pretences, the scientist behind the research, Stanley Milgram, wasn't actually interested in learning. The real topic of study? Obedience.

Milgram recorded how far his participants were willing to go when told to deliver larger and larger shocks. In one version of the study, 26 out of 40 participants continued to the highest shock level - two steps beyond the button labelled "Danger: severe shock".

But this was 50 years ago - surely the same wouldn't happen if the experiment were conducted today? That's what a group of researchers from SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities in Poland aimed to find out, in a "partial replication" of Milgram published recently in Social Psychological and Personality Science.

Today's ethical guidelines meant Dariusz Doliński and his colleagues couldn't recreate Milgram's experiment completely. However, they took advantage of the fact that in the original experiments, the 10th shock level seemed especially important, a kind of "point of no return". The overwhelming majority of the participants who went this far continued to the end of the experiment, administering the 30th and final shock level (labelled XXX), even though there's evidence some of them believed the shock may have been lethal.

So Doliński and his team used just 10 shock levels, to speed things up and reduce the stress of the task on their 80 participants (aged 18 to 69; attempts were made to exclude those likely to be familiar with the original Milgram research). The researchers assumed that the portion of participants who agreed to administer this 10th shock (labelled 450 volts) would give a good assessment of the proportion who would have been prepared to go all the way in the original version of the research.

Just like Milgram, and other replication attempts in the US and elsewhere, the team found the majority (90 per cent in this case) of "teachers" were willing to continue to the highest shock level, even after hearing screams of pain from the "learner". The researchers also went a step further, attempting to find out whether the sex of the "learner" had any effect on the "teacher's" behaviour. However because so few "teachers" refused to continue to the end, there was too small a sample size to see if disobedience was higher when the 'learner' was male or female.

So what does this tell us? First, it suggests that despite the so-called replication crisis currently gripping psychology, there are still some classic findings that are reliable, albeit that there is fierce debate over how to interpret participants' behaviour and whether it truly reflects obedience or not. Second, it highlights the fact that obedience - if that is what's on display - is common across cultures. Poland, and other Eastern European countries around it, have experienced huge political changes over the last 80 years, with heavily controlled communism giving way to democratic freedoms. Now, the pendulum is starting to swing again, with the socially conservative "Law and Justice" party winning the 2015 Polish elections and remaining hugely popular. But despite all these changes, and the issues that have come with them, the instinct to submit to authority still seems to be strong.

- Would You Deliver an Electric Shock in 2015? Obedience in the Experimental Paradigm Developed by Stanley Milgram in the 50 Years Following the Original Studies

Post written for BPS Research Digest by Ginny Smith (@GinnyFBSmith). Ginny studied Natural Sciences at the University of Cambridge, specialising in Psychology and Neuroscience. Since graduating, she has had to opportunity to spread her love of science as a science communicator. She has developed a range of science shows about the brain which she performs at science festivals and to school groups around the country, as well as teaching at the University of Cambridge's Institute of Continuing Education.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
New Milgram replication in Poland finds 90 per cent of participants willing to deliver highest shock

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
By guest blogger Ginny Smith Fifty years ago, in Connecticut, a series of infamous experiments were taking place. The volunteers believed they were involved in an investigation into learning and memory, and that they would be administering shocks to a test subject whenever he answered questions incorrectly.

# data[].attributes.headline
L7 Agentic State & legitimacy of Authority

# data[].attributes.subject
L7 Agentic State & legitimacy of Authority

# data[].attributes.body
Psychopayhology & Research Methods

# data[].attributes.body
Work reminder
Please read the first lesson on Psychopathology and write down key words with notes. Any questions please note. You will be assessed on the Ao1. Please revise every week as you will have spot tests on Research Methods!
Complete outstanding essays as per work record half term. Collecting this on Friday.

# data[].attributes.headline
YOUR AO3 evaluation points on Milgram ! 

# data[].attributes.subject
YOUR AO3 evaluation points on Milgram ! 

# data[].attributes.headline
AS frame - 12 markers - BEN + LOUIS ONLY 

# data[].attributes.subject
AS frame - 12 markers - BEN + LOUIS ONLY 