# data[].attributes.headline
5. Wal-Mart and Blitz agreed to a proposed $161 million fund to settle all remaining unresolved cases concerning the defective cans, with Wal-mart contributing about $25 million of that amount. I agree that it is a fair amount owned to the public because people were killed and burned tremendously. 

# data[].attributes.subject
5. Wal-Mart and Blitz agreed to a proposed $161 million fund to settle all remaining unresolved cases concerning the defective cans, with Wal-mart contributing about $25 million of that amount. I agree that it is a fair amount owned to the public because people were killed and burned tremendously. 

# data[].attributes.headline
4. The defendant is the Blitz gas can company and Wal-mart. The plaintiff is the consumers or the people that buy these cans. the people sued the company over and over again so what they did was recalled all of the cans and fixed them. the case was filed In December 2013 in Oregon.

# data[].attributes.subject
4. The defendant is the Blitz gas can company and Wal-mart. The plaintiff is the consumers or the people that buy these cans. the people sued the company over and over again so what they did was recalled all of the cans and fixed them. the case was filed In December 2013 in Oregon.

# data[].attributes.headline
3. some key points the blitz gas can company removed a safety device called a flame arrester that prevented gas cans from exploding and over 100 children and adult have been killed or burned by these gas cans. there are over 50 cases reported about these cans.

# data[].attributes.subject
3. some key points the blitz gas can company removed a safety device called a flame arrester that prevented gas cans from exploding and over 100 children and adult have been killed or burned by these gas cans. there are over 50 cases reported about these cans.

# data[].attributes.headline
1. This case is a strict liability case.

# data[].attributes.subject
1. This case is a strict liability case.

# data[].attributes.headline
2. Yes they found a problem in the product. In tort law, strict liability is the imposition of liability on a party without a finding of fault. The claimant need only prove that the tort occurred and that the defendant was responsible. The law imputes strict liability to situations it considers to be inherently dangerous. 

# data[].attributes.subject
2. Yes they found a problem in the product. In tort law, strict liability is the imposition of liability on a party without a finding of fault. The claimant need only prove that the tort occurred and that the defendant was responsible. The law imputes strict liability to situations it considers to be inherently dangerous. 