# data[].attributes.body
As long as items used are cited and credit is given it seems to be okay. There isn't enough information to make an actual judgement.

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted yes because only a portion was used for parody in an educational setting.  It's hard to judge   weather it was for classroom learning but it was a reflection on the year and maybe they were studying parody.  

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted yes because only a portion was used for parody in an educational setting.  It's hard to judge   weather it was for classroom learning but it was a reflection on the year and maybe they were studying parody.  

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted no because I don't feel that we have enough information. It didn't state if the music used was under 30 seconds.  Also, the youtube video is wrapping up the school year and there isn't really an educational purpose.

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted no because I don't feel that we have enough information. It didn't state if the music used was under 30 seconds.  Also, the youtube video is wrapping up the school year and there isn't really an educational purpose.

# data[].attributes.headline
No.  Although it is a fun idea, the teacher is taking another person's and images and making them their own, and not really for instruction or classroom learning.   There really isn't an educational purpose.

# data[].attributes.subject
No.  Although it is a fun idea, the teacher is taking another person's and images and making them their own, and not really for instruction or classroom learning.   There really isn't an educational purpose.

# data[].attributes.headline
No.  It is my understanding it may not be required to have permission from the copy right holder for a musical parody.  But, it appears to be have a grey area for debut... how much was changed, what is it used for.. I would rather be safe then sorry.  Once it is posted on youtube the rules change.  It only takes one irritated person to cause problems.

# data[].attributes.subject
No.  It is my understanding it may not be required to have permission from the copy right holder for a musical parody.  But, it appears to be have a grey area for debut... how much was changed, what is it used for.. I would rather be safe then sorry.  Once it is posted on youtube the rules change.  It only takes one irritated person to cause problems.

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes.  With the details given I don't feel they are copyrighting.  Cite. Time?

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes.  With the details given I don't feel they are copyrighting.  Cite. Time?

# data[].attributes.headline
I agree as long as the entire isnt used and the teachers cites any copyrighted material.

# data[].attributes.subject
I agree as long as the entire isnt used and the teachers cites any copyrighted material.

# data[].attributes.headline
There are many more things that need to be considered in order to finalize opinion. Teachers use this in order to gain student attention, therefore it would be educational. But we truly do not know enough.

# data[].attributes.subject
There are many more things that need to be considered in order to finalize opinion. Teachers use this in order to gain student attention, therefore it would be educational. But we truly do not know enough.

# data[].attributes.headline
I don't think this would be fair use because it is not for educational purposes.  Sharing it on Youtube isn't “dedicated to faceto-faceinstruction.”• Use should be instructional, not forentertainment or reward. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I don't think this would be fair use because it is not for educational purposes.  Sharing it on Youtube isn't “dedicated to faceto-faceinstruction.”• Use should be instructional, not forentertainment or reward. 

# data[].attributes.body
This presentation should be shared in class and could focus on reviewing the learning experiences the class had during the year.

# data[].attributes.headline
NO. There is no educational purposes and does not specify if the music used was less than 30 seconds.

# data[].attributes.subject
NO. There is no educational purposes and does not specify if the music used was less than 30 seconds.

# data[].attributes.headline
No.  The teacher modified something without permission.

# data[].attributes.subject
No.  The teacher modified something without permission.

# data[].attributes.headline
I vote yes because it was for educational purposes and was under 30 seconds

# data[].attributes.subject
I vote yes because it was for educational purposes and was under 30 seconds

# data[].attributes.body
I voted no because I am not sure that there is an educational purpose to the presentation that was created. I also voted no because there is no mention of the teacher citing the source of the images or where the images came from.

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted yes because the music was less than 30 seconds. The material sounded as if it would be educational in nature. 

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted yes because the music was less than 30 seconds. The material sounded as if it would be educational in nature. 

# data[].attributes.body
Yes as long as it's not longer than 30 seconds and it's for an educational purpose

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted yes because the music used was under 30 seconds and was educational in use.  

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted yes because the music used was under 30 seconds and was educational in use.  

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted no based on that if the video represents the whole school year, then it must have been an entire song. I believe you can't use an entire song on YouTube. I think the images she would have used were appropriately chosen from Public Domain.  

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted no based on that if the video represents the whole school year, then it must have been an entire song. I believe you can't use an entire song on YouTube. I think the images she would have used were appropriately chosen from Public Domain.  

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted yes because I believe if you are under 30 seconds that you should be good to go.  I do believe you should be careful what song you are choosing to use. Also give credit to the artist and that it is being use

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted yes because I believe if you are under 30 seconds that you should be good to go.  I do believe you should be careful what song you are choosing to use. Also give credit to the artist and that it is being use

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted yes because the clip used was less than 30 seconds and only a few images from google were used, the rest were from the teacher's classroom which was her original material.  She could cite the song used and its creator and then that would cover.  It doesn't have a purely educational application but is a great celebration on a year and is a lasting memory for the students.

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted yes because the clip used was less than 30 seconds and only a few images from google were used, the rest were from the teacher's classroom which was her original material.  She could cite the song used and its creator and then that would cover.  It doesn't have a purely educational application but is a great celebration on a year and is a lasting memory for the students.

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted no because they used more than 30 seconds of the song, in fact they used the entire song.

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted no because they used more than 30 seconds of the song, in fact they used the entire song.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this teacher would not be able to post this video on YouTube without permission.

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted no because they were using the whole song and you need to get copyright permission to use an entire song which would be longer than 30 seconds.

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted no because they were using the whole song and you need to get copyright permission to use an entire song which would be longer than 30 seconds.

# data[].attributes.body
Fair use would apply for a short clip of the song. As Weird Al would tell you, you have to get permission to parody a song. Also, posting on youtube would potentially be a violation. I don't see the educational purpose application here either.

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted no because  if they are using the entire song it would be longer than 30 seconds

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted no because  if they are using the entire song it would be longer than 30 seconds

# data[].attributes.body
I voted no because it was on youtube and the length of the song was unknown. This was intended for an end of the year activity, rather than instructional purposes.

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted no -- it was not used for educational purposes and it was put on youtube 

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted no -- it was not used for educational purposes and it was put on youtube 

# data[].attributes.body
If the music and images fall under the public domain. I would still cite the original music (based on Title by Band). If the parody lyrics were made up by the teacher, that part should be perfectly fine, as well.

# data[].attributes.headline
Yes as long as the  music clips are short and intended for educational purposes.

# data[].attributes.subject
Yes as long as the  music clips are short and intended for educational purposes.

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted no because we don't have enough information.  I am assuming that the length of the songs used would be longer than 30 sec, therefore it would be not be following the  guidelines.  Also, since it is used for an end of the year activity, it is not for educational purposes.

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted no because we don't have enough information.  I am assuming that the length of the songs used would be longer than 30 sec, therefore it would be not be following the  guidelines.  Also, since it is used for an end of the year activity, it is not for educational purposes.

# data[].attributes.body
- Compliance - possibly fewer than 5 images used?
- Noncompliance - The teacher most likely used more than 10% of the music, I don't believe the song was intended for teaching/a lesson/a multi-media project, and it didn't mention any citations
- Adjustments - the teacher could create his/her own music to create a song or the music could be shortened to fit within the guidelines. Also, citations should be given and the purpose needs to be for instruction.

# data[].attributes.body
We don't know the length of the song. Did she purchase the song from iTunes? Would that make a difference? Is the song less than 30 seconds? Used for educational purchases? And why youtube? Does that make it worse it its on youtube compared to filmed & air dropped? And what if the parody was on educational purchases? People make song parodies all the time, I think this is a fine line!

# data[].attributes.body
I voted no, because the video was posted to YouTube, and was not necessarily being used for educational purposes.

# data[].attributes.headline
If the music clip was longer than 30 seconds (which is unknown?), then proper credit and citation seems to be needed. 

# data[].attributes.subject
If the music clip was longer than 30 seconds (which is unknown?), then proper credit and citation seems to be needed. 

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted no because I didn't know how long the song was.

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted no because I didn't know how long the song was.

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted yes as long   as she only uses 30 seconds of music and is it for personal use.

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted yes as long   as she only uses 30 seconds of music and is it for personal use.

# data[].attributes.headline
I agree with the "better safe than sorry" post. Once things are out on the web, especially youtube, everyone can view this. It doesn't take much for someone to want to make a big deal out of copyright and the video is longer than 30 seconds. I think if you really want to make a song parody for a class, share it via various apps rather than posting it on youtube. However, I am torn because if credit is being given to the original writer of the song, it might be okay. People make song parodies all the time.

# data[].attributes.subject
I agree with the "better safe than sorry" post. Once things are out on the web, especially youtube, everyone can view this. It doesn't take much for someone to want to make a big deal out of copyright and the video is longer than 30 seconds. I think if you really want to make a song parody for a class, share it via various apps rather than posting it on youtube. However, I am torn because if credit is being given to the original writer of the song, it might be okay. People make song parodies all the time.

# data[].attributes.headline
The clip is longer than the allowed 30 seconds, as well as it is not for an educational purpose.

# data[].attributes.subject
The clip is longer than the allowed 30 seconds, as well as it is not for an educational purpose.

# data[].attributes.headline
I believe as long as the whole tune is not used (30 second rule) and credit is given to the Artist - it would be okay.

# data[].attributes.subject
I believe as long as the whole tune is not used (30 second rule) and credit is given to the Artist - it would be okay.

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted no because it did not specify how much material(songs and images) was used to make video and it did not indicate if this teacher cited the material used.  Better to be safe than sorry and cite material used.  The use of her own images of students and their activities would be safer perhaps? But I would not post it on youtube.  

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted no because it did not specify how much material(songs and images) was used to make video and it did not indicate if this teacher cited the material used.  Better to be safe than sorry and cite material used.  The use of her own images of students and their activities would be safer perhaps? But I would not post it on youtube.  

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted no. As long as the song is longer than 30 seconds. If I were doing this I would give credit to the owner but also use a variety of songs to make sure I was following the guidlines

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted no. As long as the song is longer than 30 seconds. If I were doing this I would give credit to the owner but also use a variety of songs to make sure I was following the guidlines

# data[].attributes.body
It depends on how much of the song is being used (10%) and if it is being used for educational purposes and proper credit is given to the owner.

# data[].attributes.headline
I find this to be confusing, but I voted no.  Most of the time people use the whole song.  I think if you have bought the song in I-tunes or Amazon Music people think you can use the whole song, because you purchased the song.

# data[].attributes.subject
I find this to be confusing, but I voted no.  Most of the time people use the whole song.  I think if you have bought the song in I-tunes or Amazon Music people think you can use the whole song, because you purchased the song.

# data[].attributes.headline
As long as the music clips are 30 seconds or shorter, this would fall under the guidelines for Fair Use. 

# data[].attributes.subject
As long as the music clips are 30 seconds or shorter, this would fall under the guidelines for Fair Use. 

# data[].attributes.headline
I voted "yes" on this, assuming that the teacher used short clips of music (not an entire composition), and that the images were all cited. Also, that this had an educational use and wasn't just for fun. The intent always matters!  

# data[].attributes.subject
I voted "yes" on this, assuming that the teacher used short clips of music (not an entire composition), and that the images were all cited. Also, that this had an educational use and wasn't just for fun. The intent always matters!  

# data[].attributes.headline
It is kind of tricky, fair use applies.  But the song or material is owned by the creator.

# data[].attributes.subject
It is kind of tricky, fair use applies.  But the song or material is owned by the creator.