# data[].attributes.body
They receive minimum support prices so the farmer knows what price he will get for the crop
Farmer receives input subsidies from gov

# data[].attributes.body
The farmer is using limited and sustainable technology, there is no real machinery as it is not sustainable in this area

# data[].attributes.body
There’s very little technology

# data[].attributes.body
cow looks undernourished so we can infer there is not enough money for technology let alone feeding livestock

# data[].attributes.body
primitive farming not high tech at all

# data[].attributes.body
small scale subsistence farm. limited low technology.

# data[].attributes.body
A stable increase in the production of wheat and rice between 1993 and 2010

# data[].attributes.body
There are two categories 1: entitled to 5kg of rice per person per month
2: entitled to 35 kg grain per household per month - expected to cover 75% rural pop and 50% urban

# data[].attributes.body
taste becomes more modern, in rural areas less lentils and home grown stuff are being consumed maybe due to cost of importing but also because taste has become more modern

# data[].attributes.body
Cereals are the most consumed for both areas

# data[].attributes.body
farming with basic tools and no machinery just horses. Small scale on small pieces of land, farmers don't make much money so can't buy more land or better equipment

# data[].attributes.body
The photograph suggests that the technology for farming is not that advanced and that the areas for farming are quite vast - Using animals for farming = lack of technology and tools

# data[].attributes.body
In 1993 Indias diet consisted of 71% cereals however that percentage has decreased over the years as the small percentages of milk, vanaspati oil, pulses and others have fluctuated and overall increased. this is due to the changing diets of the modern population

# data[].attributes.body
Possibly not because climate change could become a pressing issue and make it so farmers crops do not grow and they do not have sufficient money to spend on irrigation sun stems big enough to support them.

# data[].attributes.body
people can afford a more diverse diet when they move to urban areas due to higher paying jobs

# data[].attributes.body
Both rural and urban rely highly on cereals in their diet only decreasing by 4 and 7% between 1993 and 2010

# data[].attributes.body
Income support for farmers

# data[].attributes.body
very little support from governing bodies for farmers as they decide most of the prices which means that the farmers aren’t being paid a fair wage

# data[].attributes.body
The farmer receives several input subsidies from the government and receive fertilisers cheaply

# data[].attributes.body
In general for both urban and rural inhabitants cereal makes up the majority of their diets, only dropping 7% from 1993-2010 for rural dwellers and 4% for urban

# data[].attributes.body
helping the farmer but mainly helping the consumer

# data[].attributes.body
Make sure prices are low enough for all consumers

# data[].attributes.body
The farmer is using appropriate technology. He is probably a subsistence farmer.

# data[].attributes.body
probably not, costs are too high and the rapidly population means higher deman for food

# data[].attributes.body
The farmers get input subsidies from the government and are able to get cheaper fertilisers but other than that nothing really helps them

# data[].attributes.body
Machinery looks inexpensive, possibly handmade, indicates farms aren’t large and the farmers don’t have a lot of money

# data[].attributes.body
probably not without imports due to poor climate, rapid growing populations without a rapidly growing farming industry

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe but farmers will need a lot more technology to speed up processes

# data[].attributes.body
Yes, but the government need to work to reduce corruption and allow more food to be imported if they need prices to go down. Invest in helping farmers to use their land better with irrigation and other stuff.

# data[].attributes.body
The prices are lowered but this doesnt end up helping the farmer as the farmer will therefore loose money

# data[].attributes.body
Famers are paid a minimum by the gov to ensure they are paid. It is stored in a big place by the gov, although a lot of it rots.

# data[].attributes.body
No because they arent actually doing enough tosave the farmers and cheapening their foods therefore minimising their income they are stopping the production of more food for the growing population

# data[].attributes.body
they are subsidising products to keep prices low for consumers.

# data[].attributes.body
Not at this rate. India is throwing away more food, and that will only increase with population growth. They need to get their act together and start trying to keep the food they already have edible and not just make more.

# data[].attributes.body
Rural and Urban diets have followed similar patterns. The percentage of cereals goes down by a few%, and milk stays at around 7% and 9% respectively. The only anomaly is other, which is growing much faster in urban diets than rural diets.