# data[].attributes.headline
Correct Line of Reasoning! Check Your Answers!

# data[].attributes.subject
Correct Line of Reasoning! Check Your Answers!

# data[].attributes.body
Chavez argues that the practicing of nonviolence over violence is in everyone's best interest, that no matter the size of a problem, it would not outweigh the value of someone's life.

# data[].attributes.body
In Chavez's article he successfully argues that nonviolence is the key to success and with violence it leads to despair which can be seen with the migrant workers  rights.

# data[].attributes.body
In his article to the religious organization, Cesar Chavez effectively argues that nonviolence is more productive than violence through the use of allusion, rhetorical fragments, and repetition.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is effective and purposeful about Chavez’s line of reasoning and argument structure?
He continuously builds on his claim that everyone should follow nonviolence. By building on the idea he is able to extend his claim through the entire piece.
2. What strategic pieces of evidence does Chavez use to appeal to his audience’s values?
He frequently uses repetition and allusion to Civil Rights leaders, including Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr. He does this to show that these famous figures fought successfully with nonviolence, it further strengthens his argument.
3. What strategy did you use to help identify his line of reasoning and his order of ideas?
Most pieces like this one are structured the same, I was able to identify how he built on each previous claim, and the counter argument is usually presented before the conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
In the article Chavez is able to argue that non-violence is more powerful than violence because of the moral sustainability through the use of repetition, sentence structure and appeals to famous figures.

# data[].attributes.body
What is effective and purposeful about Chavez’s line of reasoning and argument structure?

-He is able to build on his earlier claims about non-violence throughout the entire writing.

What strategic pieces of evidence does Chavez use to appeal to his audience’s values?

-Chavez uses the repetitive use of the word non-violence to try and convey that message. He also uses appeals to big figures in the past such as MLK and Gandhi.

What strategy did you use to help identify his line of reasoning and his order of ideas?

-I tried to make each previous sentence build off of the last one.

# data[].attributes.body
In his article to the religious organization, Chavez effectively argues the validity of nonviolent protests and the moral imperative of fighting for migrant workers rights.

# data[].attributes.body
1. His argument structure is effective, because it shows logical thinking. He builds on to the idea that nonviolence is more effective than violence.
2.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The structure of Chavez's argument is very effective because throughout his writing he goes back to reference to the line of reasoning.
2. He uses references to Gandhi and MLK to show credibility to his knowledge of nonviolent movements and their effectiveness. He also uses repetition when discusses the if then situations of violent and nonviolent movements.
3. I just tried to identify which side of the argument of violence or nonviolence he was leaning on and then went on to search for his reasoning in later paragraphs.

# data[].attributes.body
Chavez, in his letter to the religious organization, argues that nonviolent protest is superior to violent protest by appealing to the audience’s religious values, using clever allusions to civil rights leaders/foundational documents, and setting up dichotomy between nonviolent and violent protest.

# data[].attributes.body
| 1. What is effective and purposeful about Chavez’s line of reasoning and argument structure?  Chavez sets up a really good method of contrasting nonviolent and violent protest, and moves through his argument that it builds off itself logically. For his last point to be true all prior points have to be true    2.What strategic pieces of evidence does Chavez use to appeal to his audience’s values?  Due to the audiences religious nature Chavez draws parallels between nonviolent protest as a whole and the venerated Martin Luther King Jr. along with traditional appeals to religious morality    3.What strategy did you use to help identify his line of reasoning and his order of ideas?  His order of ideas lines up pretty well with the paragraphs, so when I summarized the main claim of each paragraph it all came together

# data[].attributes.body
| Violence will only beget two things: either more violence and death or workers will lose all rights.
|1.We will gain support if we appeal to nonviolent practices--we know people want justice for those who suffer and we want to act on that.
| 2.We have to be committed to nonviolence as more than a strategy--it is a principle that governs our actions and beliefs. Most people who care for others are nonviolent.
| 3.Although we do know there are some who are so frustrated by the injustice, they will choose violence if we fail.
| 4.To counter these frustrations, we have sought to involve many to participate.
| 5.This is why our nonviolent protests work--because we are able to avoid senseless violence even with masses of people.
| I6.f we won through violent means, we would be negatively impacted and we would lose our sense of humanity.
| 7.Violent success does not hold long term power--violence begets more violence and our people would suffer.
| 8.Just look at history--who would lose? Who dies? The poor and impoverished lose. They would die by violent means but ultimately for what? They would die in vain?
| 9.We are committed to nonviolent means because what poor people have is time.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Chavez uses multiple rhetorical devices throughout his article that help him build a really great claim and follow through with supporting evidence. He uses repetition in the word violence to show the importance of it in his article, he makes multiple references to MLK and even Gandhi which shows a sense of parallelism to bring the rights activists together in persona. He makes effective claims and follows them with supporting claims to keep his line of reasoning in tact and effective throughout the article.

2. He uses ethos and logos to show a sense of emotional appeal to the audience he even throws in places where the audience can connect and relate to him as a writer but mainly as a person. He also uses multiple rhetorical devices to help support his claims and draw his audience in more.

3. After reading and annotating I just went back through and looked and what claims he held throughout his article and just built off of the keep his line of reasoning. After finding the main topic throughout his article I was able to go back and find all of the supporting evidence and claims to support his main idea.