# data[].attributes.body
A good literature review is characterized by several key elements:

Comprehensiveness,Critical Evaluation,Synthesis,Organizational Structure,Clarity and Coherence,Engagement with Literature,Citation and Referencing,Contribution to Knowledge

# data[].attributes.body
Good sample (A)

# data[].attributes.body
Sample C 25/100. Very general, lack of referencing. No backup for any statements.

# data[].attributes.body
No clear references

# data[].attributes.body
A good literature review is characterized by its comprehensive coverage of relevant sources, critical evaluation of existing research, coherent organization, and insightful synthesis of information.

# data[].attributes.body
not critically analyse

# data[].attributes.body
Only stating and doesnt give connection with other theories

# data[].attributes.body
sample B

sample B 40/100.

Clear understanding of the problem faced by the employee's, good demonstration by using different theories of job satisfaction along with a clear comparison among different researches but lack of appropriate citations.

# data[].attributes.body
Literature review should not be series of paragraphs.

Its not summarised

No clear APA referencing

# data[].attributes.body
Good referencing

# data[].attributes.body
Sample C - 0/100

# data[].attributes.body
Sample C

General knowledge (basic)

No introduction

No critical reflection

No recommendation

No citation

No references

No resources

No backup statement

# data[].attributes.body
A commendable introduction , proficient research and relevant theories must included in a good literature review. There must have justification of research design. Strong report presentation structure and style is important for a good literature review.

# data[].attributes.body
Sample B: 50/100 A thorough comprehension of the challenges encountered by employees is effectively showcased through the application of various job satisfaction theories, accompanied by a comprehensive comparison of diverse research findings; however, the absence of suitable citations detracts from its scholarly rigor.

# data[].attributes.body
Sample A- 70%

# data[].attributes.body
50 marks

# data[].attributes.body
Several factors contribute a good literature review:

Thoroughness, critical analysis, organization, synthesis of findings, clarity and coherence, identification of gaps, critical reflection, appropriate citations, consistency with research objectives.

# data[].attributes.body
Not too good

# data[].attributes.body
There is no introduction, lack of critical evaluation. It is informative and might give more references.

# data[].attributes.body
Sample B:

Introduction is unclear and full of quotations. Finding connection in the literature review was difficult. There's too many different types of reviews which are not in a flow.

# data[].attributes.body
Sample A 50/100