# data[].attributes.headline
Group 6 Article & Questions (just in case)

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 6 Article & Questions (just in case)

# data[].attributes.body
2. The school curriculum has been affected by books being banned because this censorship stops people from having new types of opinions and ideas. It will limit the learning students have because if they aren’t being exposed to new topics and forming their own opinions and discussing these opinions, then it’s harder for them to form their own thoughts without the bias of anybody else.
4. No, it isn’t possible because for somebody to ever propose the banning of a book it means they disapprove of some kind of material in the book.

# data[].attributes.body
#2 Response:
I think the banning of books does lead to negative effects in terms of how course material is taught and how certain things can be applied to life out of school. I think it can diminish curiosity/diversity among students learning different views and making connections as well as creating a lack of interest about course work since there would be nothing to relate it to.

Rhetorical Question Response:
The credibility of the writers (one of which who seems to be a historian and an expert on the First Amendment concerning free speech) furthers the central claim by creating a respectable and trustworthy author who the audience can look to to provide correct information to form their stance on the topic of Banning Books. It also helps in this case because it also makes the authors seem unbiased on the subject at hand.

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the article, it focuses heavily on the  banning on books through the government, however does your group agree with the banning of books or will it be harmful to society?

By banning books does this violate the first amendment put in place to protect the rights of citizens? Should they have a say in what books they are allowed to read?

# data[].attributes.body
2. It limits the learning capabilities of students because even if the book is non-fiction, reading is a way of learning, relieving stress, and getting familiar with the grammar of the language. Also some books may entice the readers to look deeper into the subject, which is something that the school’s should be encouraging.
4. Through dishonest and manipulative methods. To ban a book without someone’s opinion getting in the way, it would have to be done in discretion, or making sure that the only people aware of the ban share the same justification of the reason.

# data[].attributes.body
Do you think censorship is useful because at that point are we not just taking maybe the most crucial part of the information away?

How does the correlation between banning and learning affect  students do you think we will lose out on information that was once available is certain books get banned?

# data[].attributes.body
1. Yes their are many people who are probably right now trying to ban a book because it does not line up with their religious beliefs or ideas in general. Personal belief for sure has something to do with the banning of certain books.
3. I don't think certain topics prevent an audience to read the book because everyone will read the content that peaks their curiosity. Their is content out their that is not for everyone, only certain people would like that content so to say that the content prevents and audience I don't believe that. Everything no matter how boring or how gruesome, has an audience.

# data[].attributes.body
Q1 Since your article mentions that banning books infringes on the first amendment rights of readers, does the same apply for the authors of banned books?
Q2 Do you guys feel like recent instances of book banning are more or less justified those of the past? Does it matter the motivation for banning?

# data[].attributes.body
2) Book banning affected school curriculum because it sets limitations on to what topics students or anyone can discover. Most book bans contain controversial topics but these topics can lead to diversity and keep people open minded.
3) I don't believe that content can prevent an audience from reading certain books or books to get made if the content itself doesn't attract attention or it it's something questionable but at the same time it just depends on the person. What might appeal to one might not appeal to someone else as everyone has a different mindset and different things that catch their curiosity. Everyone has a different liking to a certain genre so it just depends on who the content draws in.

# data[].attributes.body
​Is it possible to ban books without someone's opinion getting in the way of the reason?

Will banning books discourage future writers in that topic?

# data[].attributes.body
Q1. How does the relationship between book prohibition and education influence students? Do you believe we will lose access to previously available knowledge if particular books are forbidden?

Q2. Book prohibition has an impact on school curricula since it limits what topics pupils or anybody else may learn about. Most book bans include contentious issues, yet these issues may foster variety and keep the people open to things

# data[].attributes.body
1. Does the same apply to authors of banned books, because your essay states that banning books violates readers' first amendment rights?

2. How will school curriculum be effected with the access of book banning due to the protesting of protective parents?

# data[].attributes.body
Q2. Banning books has affected the school curriculum because censorship prevents people from having various kinds of opinions and ideas. By not exposing students to new topics and subject matter, and not forming their own opinions and discussing these opinions, it becomes hard for them to develop their own opinions without being influenced by anyone else's perspective.

Q3. If content does not attract attention or it is something questionable, then it should not prevent an audience from reading or create certain books, but at the same time that depends on the individual. As everyone has a different mindset and different things that interest them, what appeals to one might not appeal to another. Each individual will have a different preference for a genre, so it all depends on who the content appeals to.