# data[].attributes.body
I believe it would be beneficial to do more research on this subject.

# data[].attributes.body
Therefore, any generalization if made can only include at most the state which the campuses fall in.

# data[].attributes.body
In addition, several additional factors that were not factored in by the researchers could have also influenced students' homesickness: cuisine differences and students' religious beliefs.

# data[].attributes.body
This suggests that perceived discrimination and homesickness may not have a well-defined correlation, or that it may be, after all, not truly a significant factor in predicting homesickness.

# data[].attributes.body
We think that the article would have been more reliable with more arguments.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe this experiment on cats could help people better understand this pet in the future.

# data[].attributes.body
We think that the author of this article could have been better if he gives us more information and explanation behind the article and have points to understand the article more.

# data[].attributes.body
I wanted to learn more about cats, I would have liked if the author added more information on the subject.

# data[].attributes.body
If scientists could refine their experimental process, the results would be more accurate.

# data[].attributes.body
The author may have had more reliable information.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe the article would be more relevant if it had more scientific information to back up their hypothesis.

# data[].attributes.body
The author could have Shown more proofs if cats are good .

# data[].attributes.body
The author could have more completed and academic appearance if essay's conclusion included more information about research.

# data[].attributes.body
If the author had included more numeric data the article would have been more reliable.

# data[].attributes.body
I think the article would be better if the authors provide more details of the study.

# data[].attributes.body
The author should have done more of an academic reading on the article and have strong points on the article.

# data[].attributes.body
If the author had searched more information on cats they would have reached to a great conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
In addition, a consensus opinion study could have been between the two scientists Sensitivity analyses were not considered

# data[].attributes.body
If the experimental results on whether cats are good are really feasible, why aren't there more people supporting these experiments?

# data[].attributes.body
In addition, a consensus opinion study could have been between the two scientists Sensitivity analyses were not considered

# data[].attributes.body
Since cats are not humans they can't really express themselves and we have to conduct the research on them.  Moreover, I don't know where the author would have leading this article into ?

# data[].attributes.body
we think that further studies of this experimental may benefit from asking for their opinions.

# data[].attributes.body
The personal opinion of two scientists without any scientific background may not be enough to be considered a research paper.

# data[].attributes.body
We believe that this article weakness is because is not showing why the cats are good and what is the reason for them to be good. Even so the article doesn't have a lot of an argument to explain and show to us. This article could have been better and helpful if the author had more academic work, or information about it.

# data[].attributes.body
The author could have elaborate more on the result.

# data[].attributes.body
If the author could find and use more reliable researches like peer-reviewed articles to conclude cats as beneficial, it would have been more reliable article to consider.

# data[].attributes.body
If the author had included more numeric information, in the collective step,  it would have benefited the readers' learning.

# data[].attributes.body
If the authors wanted to prove that cats are good they could have done more research.

# data[].attributes.body
If cats could communicate with people, we can get more accurate results.

# data[].attributes.body
If one of the scientists thought cats are good and the other that cats are bad the results could have been 50-50 which will make not relevant point for the investigation.

# data[].attributes.body
A limited sample size may lead us to believe that are bad.

# data[].attributes.body
In article author may have discussed about more realistic things about cats.

# data[].attributes.body
This article basically deals with the psychology of cats and determining whether the cats are good or not but haven't got to an analysis on such claims.

# data[].attributes.body
If the authors wanted to increase the accuracy of the results they could have talked to more people who own a cat as a pet.

# data[].attributes.body
If the authors were can only be able to conclude that cats were 'not good'.

# data[].attributes.body
The author did not provide any evidence to support his claim meaning that it might have a lot of weak points that can be targeted by criticism.

# data[].attributes.body
If the author doesn't like their cat, there may not be this experiment either.

# data[].attributes.body
I hope this paper is a sarcastic joke. If considered serious it can negatively affect the university's reputation.

# data[].attributes.body
The author should have read more information before coming to a conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
If there were more arguments in the reading it would have been more accurate.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors claim to have scientific opinions, but the opinions shown in the article are not scientific.

# data[].attributes.body
I would recommend the author check other papers regarding studies conducted on cats to understand different methodologies.

# data[].attributes.body
The conclusion part of article should have been providing something more than a opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors claim to base their research on studies, but in the article, there is no reliable information based on this.

# data[].attributes.body
The author doesn't has a point to make with this article as the behind it is unclear. Moreover it's not scientific and research based. Cats cannot express their opinions so condemning whether  their actions are ethical or not doesn't make any sense.

# data[].attributes.body
I think this experiment may not affect everyone's perception of cats.

# data[].attributes.body
The authors may need to be more cautious with their personal ideas and scientific backgrounds. They do not have clear specific objectives regarding the investigation.

# data[].attributes.body
It would be better if the author did not use anecdotal opinion as a base of this research.

# data[].attributes.body
The author could have provide more specific examples of studies to make a conclusion.

# data[].attributes.body
It would be better if the author took some information from pet parents.

# data[].attributes.body
The cats considered for this study could have been slept, drug, or tired instead of other states, which would definitely change the research results(of the two scientists).

# data[].attributes.body
The experiment could have been more realistic had more cats had been used and not just two.