# data[].attributes.body
1. A method of film analysis and criticism that focuses on the recognition of the director's personal influence, emotions, and artistic perspective in their work.The story of this film revolves around a Chechen boy accused of murdering his adoptive father. The members of the jury initially had a cold attitude, but after in-depth discussion, there was a change in mindset and the boy was ultimately acquitted and released. The value of movies lies not only in their exciting storylines, but also in their profound insights into law and human behavior.

2. Sydney L ü mann used his magical artistic expression to showcase a thought-provoking and touching story in this less than 40 square meter house: a boy who grew up in a slum was accused of murdering his biological father, with onlookers and weapons presented as hard evidence. The 12 members serving as the jury in this case must discuss the case in the jury lounge before the case is closed, and the results of the discussion must be passed continuously before the case can be officially closed.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is authorship in films?

The topic of authorship in films, frequently discussed within the framework of auteur theory, pertains to the notion that the director of a film serves as its principal creative impetus and possesses a distinct artistic vision that shapes the final product. This concept posits that the director's individual style, thematic preoccupations, and distinctive approach establish them as the "author" of the film.

2. Do 12 Angry Men (1957) make the director, Sidney Lumet an auteur?

The film "12 Angry Men" (1957) is often regarded as a classic, and although skillfully directed by Sidney Lumet, the principles of auteur theory may not fully apply. The screenplay of the film, credited to Reginald Rose, plays a significant role, along with the contributions of the ensemble cast, cinematography, and other elements, in its achievement. While Lumet's direction is of utmost importance, the collaborative nature inherent in filmmaking may render it less straightforward to designate him as the sole auteur for this particular film.

# data[].attributes.body
The film 'Guang' (2018) has garnered significant acclaim for its touching story and deep emotional intensity, particularly in its depiction of the complex bond between the two siblings, Wen Guang and Wen Yong. This cinematic masterpiece delves into the formidable challenges confronted by families grappling with autism, presenting a sensitive and authentic depiction of this condition. The performances, especially those delivered by the esteemed actor Wu Guang, have been lauded for their remarkable authenticity and evocative resonance. The film's exploration of familial bonds, unwavering love, and the intricate complexities associated with living with autism undoubtedly contribute to its well-received status. Nevertheless, it is plausible that some viewers may find fault with the film's deliberate and contemplative pacing, which gradually unfolds the narrative. While this measured pacing affords a profound exploration of the characters and themes, it may not align with the preferences of audiences accustomed to more expeditious storytelling. Additionally, some critics posit that the narrative could be more meticulously interwoven to heighten its overall impact.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

The biases surrounding individuals with disabilities might produce damaging ramifications for both the individuals themselves and society as a whole. When individuals are subjected to stereotyping based on their disabilities, it perpetuates narrow and often unfounded presumptions regarding their capabilities, potential, and overall identity. This, in turn, can generate bias, exclusion, and the sidelining of the diverse skills and abilities that exist within the disabled community.

Challenging these stereotypes assumes immense significance in fostering an all-encompassing and empathetic society. This endeavor entails acknowledging the distinctiveness of each individual, appreciating their strengths, and comprehending that disability does not entirely define a person. By dismantling stereotypes, we actively promote a shift towards an accurate and respectful perception of individuals with disabilities, thereby advancing equal opportunities and dismantling barriers to social inclusion. Embracing diversity and understanding the myriad experiences of individuals with disabilities undoubtedly contributes to a more compassionate and informed perspective.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes this film good/bad?

"Sunset Boulevard" is widely regarded as a cinematic masterpiece due to a multitude of reasons. Primarily, its narrative structure is highly praised for its intricate nature and the incorporation of Joe Gillis' voiceover, which offers a distinct perspective on the unfolding events. The movie skillfully delves into the sinister aspects of Hollywood, delving into topics such as the obsession with fame, the fleeting nature of success, and the consequences of pursuing it at any cost. The screenplay, penned by Charles Brackett, Billy Wilder, and D.M. Marshman Jr., is acclaimed for its incisive dialogue and satirical portrayal of the entertainment industry.

Nevertheless, certain viewers may find fault in the deliberate pacing of the film, which could be perceived as sluggish when compared to contemporary standards. Moreover, the depiction of Hollywood in the movie may appear somewhat outdated, considering the evolution of the industry since its release in 1950. While the film's representation of gender roles and its treatment of the character Norma Desmond may be subject to critique from a modern standpoint, many argue that these elements are essential to the exploration of societal and industry norms during that era.

2. Compared to today's style, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

In terms of narrative and visual aspects, "Sunset Boulevard" distinctly differs from many present-day films. The film's narrative structure, employing voiceover to recount the protagonist's descent into despair, offers a retrospective and introspective lens. This technique was more commonly employed in classic cinema, representing a distinctive narrative style that is not as prevalent in modern storytelling.

Visually, the film welcomes the aesthetics of classic Hollywood, depending on black-and-white cinematography to intensify the film noir ambiance. The meticulously composed shots and iconic scenes significantly contribute to the timeless allure of the film. In contrast to the diverse visual techniques and color palettes prevalent today, "Sunset Boulevard" harkens back to an era when monochrome cinematography was the norm, accentuating the stark contrasts and shadows that are characteristic of film noir.

While contemporary audiences may be accustomed to faster-paced storytelling and a plethora of visual techniques, "Sunset Boulevard" stands as a testament to the enduring power of classic cinematic elements.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is authorship in films?

12 Angry Men is a black and white film produced by MGM and directed by Sidney Lumet, written by Reginald Rose and starring Henry Fonda, Lee Cobb, Martin Balsam, and others. The film was released in the United States on April 10, 1957.

12 Angry Men is a play written by American writer Reginald Rose about authorship in films. The work was originally a TV series and was later adapted into a film. The screenplay first appeared in 1954, and a film version was released in 1957. Rose also wrote the screenplay for 12 Angry Men and served as producer on the film version.

However, the entire production of the film also has the performance of the actors and the efforts of the director. The contribution of these people is also the reason for the success of the entire film.

2. Do 12 Angry Men (1957) make the director, Sidney Lumet, an auteur? Why? Please give reasons.

Yes, made Sidney Lumet an auteur.

First of all, the term auteur (French for "creator") in cinematography refers to a film director who is considered to be the main artist and decision-maker in the creation of a film. Auteur theory emphasizes that the director is the key figure in the creation of the film, and their personal style and visual expression are reflected in the film, and each film has its own unique personality and style.

Auteur's core concept is that the director of a film should have enough creative control over the creative process so that the final product reflects their unique artistic vision. This includes control over the story, photography, music, and performance of the actors.

Sidney Lumet, the director of 12 Angry Men, confined the story to a closed room with his unique direction and created a tense and engaging atmosphere through intense dramatic conflict, deep character representation and camera use. At the same time, the camera language used in the film is very unique, and some camera movements strengthen the tension and dramatic effect of the story. The director is good at using the camera to highlight the emotions and inner conflicts of the characters. Moreover, the court trial and jury discussion in the film are not only the trial of a case but also a profound discussion of society and justice. Through the presentation of the story, the director triggers the audience's reflection on justice, prejudice and fairness.

The director of this film won an Academy Award (1958) for Best Picture (nominated) and a Golden Globe Award (1958) for Best Director (Sidney Lumet, nominated). These are all proof that he is a qualified auteur.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is authorship in films ?

- The term "authorship" in the context of the film refers to the identification of the key creative individuals who played significant roles in shaping and bringing the film to life. In the case of "12 Angry Men," the primary authorship is often attributed to Reginald Rose, who wrote the original teleplay. Rose's script served as the foundation for the film's narrative and dialogue. Sidney Lumet, as the director, also played a crucial role in shaping the visual and directorial aspects of the film, contributing to the overall authorship. Additionally, the cast, including actors such as Henry Fonda, Lee J. Cobb, and others, contributed significantly to the film's success through their performances. The collaborative efforts of the entire filmmaking team, including the cinematographer, editor, and other crew members, also contribute to the overall authorship of the film.

2. Do 12 Angry Men (1957) make the director, Sidney Lumet, an auteur? Why? Please give reasons.

- Yes, Sidney Lumet is often considered an auteur for his work on "12 Angry Men" (1957) and many other films throughout his career. The term "auteur" is often used in film theory to describe a director who has a significant and personal influence on the creative aspects of a film, to the point where the director is considered the primary author of the work.

For the reasons why Sidney Lumet is considered an auteur in the context of "12 Angry Men":

- Distinctive Style and Vision: Sidney Lumet had a distinctive directorial style that was evident in his films. In "12 Angry Men," his use of confined spaces, intense close-ups, and careful framing helped create a sense of claustrophobia and tension in the jury room, contributing to the film's overall atmosphere.

- Emphasis on Character and Performance: Lumet was known for his ability to elicit powerful performances from his actors. In "12 Angry Men," the ensemble cast delivered compelling and nuanced performances, which added depth to the characters and contributed to the film's impact.

- Commitment to Social and Ethical Themes: Lumet frequently tackled social and ethical issues in his films. In "12 Angry Men," he explored themes of justice, prejudice, and the power of individual conviction. This thematic consistency is a hallmark of an auteur.

# data[].attributes.body
Authorship in film refers to the idea that a director, like an author in literature, leaves a distinctive and recognizable imprint on their work. It involves the unique style, thematic elements, visual choices, and storytelling techniques that characterize a director's films. For Example Think of Steven Spielberg his films stand out with captivating narratives, iconic music, and an enchanting atmosphere, making them easily recognizable. On the other hand, experiencing a Martin Scorsese film involves encountering intense characters, dynamic camera work, and a unique energy. It's like each director embeds a distinctive signature into their work, forming a recognizable imprint for those acquainted with their cinematic contributions.

"12 Angry Men" (1957) really shows how Sidney Lumet has his own special way of making movies. He does cool things with the camera, like those long shots and zoomed-in views that make the movie look interesting. Lumet is great at getting awesome performances from the actors, not just in this movie but in all his movies. What sets Lumet apart is how he tells exciting stories, even in a small space like one room. This makes him a one of akind director who knows how to make films in his own special style.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is authorship in films?

My personal opinion is that when a film has certain characteristics, it gives you a hint as to who directed it. If you are a lover of cinema and have watched many films, you start to pick up on when a film is directed by a certain director. For instance, Christopher Nolan's films are always directed with little use of green screen or CGI, and as an audience member, you can tell. It has his mark like a signature of its director. With Wes Anderson, his colour grading in the cinematography and the outfits his characters wear is another indicator that it's one of his films you're watching. I think that is what authorship is—when a director leaves their stamp on their films.

2. Do 12 Angry Men (1957) make the director, Sidney Lumet, an auteur? Why? Please give reasons.

When determining whether a director is an auteur, familiarity with their other films becomes crucial. In my experience watching this film, I would agree that Sidney Lumet qualifies as an auteur. His innovative cinematic techniques, such as long takes and close-ups, contribute to this belief. Additionally, Lumet's consistent ability to bring out exceptional performances from his actors, as evidenced in my research on his other films, is a hallmark of his directorial style. Making an audience deeply invested in a narrative with only 12 actors showcases the skill of a great director, and I believe this is precisely why Sidney Lumet can be considered an auteur.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is authorship in films?

An approach to film analysis and criticism that focuses on identifying a film director's personal influence, personal emotion, and artistic vision in his or her work

2. Do 12 Angry Men (1957) make the director, Sidney Lumet, an auteur? Why?

"12 Angry Men" (1957) is often considered a classic and milestone in film history. Sidney Lumet's filmography is diverse and covers a variety of genres and themes. While 12 Angry Men is an excellent film, Lumet also directed a series of films, including crime dramas.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is authorship in films?

The term "authorship" is commonly used in the fields of literature, art and media to describe the rights and attributions of creative works. In the field of cinema, "authorship" refers to the creator of a movie, i.e., the individual or group of individuals who have made a significant creative contribution to the movie.

In film, "authorship" emphasizes the fact that filmmaking is a creative endeavor that involves multiple roles, such as director, screenwriter, actor, cinematographer, etc. This concept is similar to the legal concept of "authorship". The concept is closely related to the legal term "copyright", which usually grants the creator exclusive rights to his or her work.

In some cases, the director is considered the primary author of the movie, as the director usually plays a decisive role in the overall creative direction of the movie. However, this also depends on different legal systems and cultural traditions.

2. Do 12 Angry Men (1957) make the director, Sidney Lumet, an auteur? Why? Please give reasons.

There is no doubt in my mind that he is. The movie depicts a young New Yorker accused of killing his father and sentenced to death for first-degree murder. Eleven jurors have already found the suspect guilty, but only one, feeling suspicious, insists on challenging the verdict, and with patience and perseverance convinces the other jurors to overturn the verdict, which is almost a wrongful conviction. Most of the film takes place in a cramped room, but with great dialog and performances, it still manages to create a drama that grips the audience. In the process of plot advancement, the director did not use a lot of large-scale scenes to switch, but only in the narrow room of the plot, but still can make the audience immersed in the feeling of tension and excitement.

# data[].attributes.body
12 angry men (1975)

1.What is authorship in films?

Regarding cinema, authorship is the notion that a particular person or group of people who had a major influence on the artistic vision of the work can be identified with the film as a creative work. Filmmaking is a collaborative process, therefore the question of authorship is complicated and hotly contested, even though it is frequently linked to literature and addressed in relation to directors of films.

A notable example of joint authorship in filmmaking is Sidney Lumet's "12 Angry Men," which was based on a teleplay by Reginald Rose. The film concentrates upon the rigorous discussions of a jury entrusted with establishing the guilt or innocence of a teenage defendant accused of patricide. The whole filmmaking team, including performers, cinematographers, and editors, contributed to the film's lasting influence, even if Lumet's directing vision and Rose's original writing serve as its cornerstones.

2. Do 12 Angry Men (1957) make the director, Sidney Lumet an auteur? Why? Please gives reasons.

With "12 Angry Men," Sidney Lumet establishes himself as a true auteur in the film industry with a striking demonstration of his directing talent. The picture is a tribute to Lumet's unique style and thematic coherence, since it centers on a jury deliberating over the fate of a juvenile defendant.

Throughout the entire movie, Lumet's eye for design is clear. Inside the jury room, the choice to shoot in black and white produces a stark and powerful mood. The emotional effect of the characters is heightened by his deliberate use of close-ups and deliberate camera angles, which create a distinctive visual style that characterizes his directing style.

The ensemble cast is a powerful example of Lumet's character-development technique. Emotional depth in the story is enhanced by the thorough portrayal of each jury. As someone who values character-driven storytelling, Lumet is known for his ability to bring out strong performances from his performers.

Lumet's ability of storytelling is emphasized by the film's real-time plot and pacing. Tense moments and audience participation are maintained as the deliberate process proceeds precisely. Throughout his body of work, Lumet consistently demonstrates his skill in creating and sustaining suspense.

Finally, "12 Angry Men" is a monument to Sidney Lumet's originality. He is recognized as a director with a distinctive and long-lasting influence on the film industry because of his visual style, thematic focus, narrative skill, and thematic coherence.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The concept of "authorship" in film refers to the idea that, like a book or painting, a film can be regarded as the creation of a single, creative mind, or auteur. The process of making a movie involves many different skills, including writers, directors, cinematographers, editors, and actors, but the idea of authorship implies that one person—typically the director—has a pronounced and unique creative influence on the finished work. This individual lends the movie a distinct aesthetic vision and style, earning them the title of "author" of the work.

2. Sidney Lumet can be considered as an auteur due to his works. In the movie 12 Angry Men, the character development and performance is very significant from the casts. The movie also bring out a social commentary theme that explores issues of prejudice and justice. Additionally, the spatial dynamics is also highlighted in the movie especially within the jury room where Lumet uses physical space to mirror the emotional states of the characters. This film has also reflected as an realistic filming approach with the use of minimalistic sets and naturalistic lighting to enhance the authenticity of the story.

# data[].attributes.body
1. A film is most valuable when it is the product of the director and his personal style. The script of this film is the director's unique style. Disputes, disputes, conflicts of interest, and contradictions are designed in complex relationships between characters. I think this is the director's unique style.

2. I think the success of this film has made the director recognized by the public in many aspects, although there are controversies. First of all, the director has strong control and innovation in script creation. The story setting of this film is a negotiation dialogue scenario. The director tries to help the audience enter the plot of the discussion by presenting new arguments one after another, which makes every audience member sit in the discussion room and everyone can find a convergent point of view in the film. In addition, the changes in the characters' views and positions in the film are also the driving force of the story line. The audience regards the narration of each character in the film as an interaction. The director is unique in the design of the story line.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The author in the film is often called "authorship theory", and the film is the external expression of the director's personal style. The director expresses his inner story through the story, light and shadow, pictures and other contents of the film, so that the film has its own personal characteristics.

2. I think so. This film shows Sidney Lumet's unique style as a director. The unique light and shadow of the film and the use of long shots all show the director's unique personal ideas. Some humorous soundtracks and lens contents not only express the director's own characteristics, but also conform to the characteristics of the times. So I think this film makes Sidney Lumet a director.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Authorship in films refers to the idea that a film can be considered the work of its director, who is often seen as the primary creative force shaping the overall vision of the movie. In the case of "12 Angry Men" (1957), Sidney Lumet's authorship is evident through his meticulous direction, skillful use of limited space, and adept handling of the ensemble cast. Lumet's influence is felt in the deliberate pacing, effective use of camera angles, and the nuanced performances he elicits from the actors.

2. Sidney Lumet can be considered an auteur for "12 Angry Men" due to the distinctive directorial choices he made that significantly shaped the film's narrative and impact. Lumet's signature style is evident in his decision to shoot almost the entire film in a single, claustrophobic jury room, heightening the tension and emphasizing the characters' emotional states. His use of dynamic camera angles, such as low-angle shots to depict power dynamics, and close-ups to capture the characters' emotions, showcases his directorial prowess. Lumet's ability to bring out stellar performances from the ensemble cast and his keen sense of pacing contribute to the film's status as a classic.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Authorship in films implies that a film reflects the director's personal vision and creative influence. This theory, originating from French film critics in the 1950s, considers the director as the primary creative force in a movie.

2. Regarding "12 Angry Men" and director Sidney Lumet, several points suggest that Lumet could be seen as an auteur. His unique directorial style is evident in the film. He uses a confined jury room as the main setting. This shows his ability to create tension and drama in a limited space. It intensifies character interactions and emotional arcs, a trademark of Lumet's direction. Lumet focuses on character development and interaction rather than elaborate sets or special effects. This approach demonstrates his commitment to storytelling and drawing out strong performances from actors. The film also explores deep moral questions and complexities of the justice system. Lumet revisits these themes in his later works. His ability to weave serious and contemplative themes into an engaging narrative shows his authorial influence.

In summary, Sidney Lumet's directorial choices in "12 Angry Men," from handling space and character to exploring profound themes, support the view of him as an auteur. His personal and creative vision is imprinted on the film.

# data[].attributes.body
1.What is authorship in films?

"Authorship means that the director is at the centre of the creation of the film, and that the director's vision of the world constitutes the overall framework of the film, and that such theories emerge from specific cultural contexts and have different principles and ways of evaluating a particular film.

For example, 12 Angry Men (1957) can be evaluated using one of the principles of consistency in "Authorship". Consistency in this case means that the director's style is strongly recognisable and specific. Sidney Lumet's works have a strong consistency both in terms of subject matter and film style. He is good at creating strong dramatic conflicts in small spaces, and he also expresses his criticism of social issues such as life, human nature, and social justice in his elder brother's works. And 12 Angry Men (1957) is a drama filmed in a courtroom, which has high intensity dramatic tension and explores social themes such as law, justice, life, and fairness, which is completely in line with the consistency of Sidney Lumet's directorial works.

2.Is Sidney Lumet an Auteur for 12 Angry Men (1957)

I think so, Sidney Lumet's cinematic sub-genre is fully embodied in this film, with its critical cinematic content and infectious lines that are his classic hallmarks. The pursuit of social justice and support for fairness in his works are his deeper thoughts and concepts about society as a whole. 12 Angry Men (1957) embodies Sidney Lumet's vision and worldview in a unique way, and this film has also become the work that laid the foundation of his style, so I think Sidney Lumet is the Auteur of 12 Angry Men (1957).

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is authorship in films?

"Authorship" in cinema refers to the fact that films, like other art forms, can be considered the work of an individual or author. This concept suggests that certain directors have a unique and recognizable style or vision in their work.

2.Yes, this movie makes the director, Sidney Lumet, an auteur for the following reasons

Unique style: His movies are always visually unique. We see in many of his works the use of long shots as well as a tense narrative style and a lot of attention and reflection on social issues.

Unique Narrative Structure: The movie is based on a discussion, no complicated plot, no flashy shots, just a conversation between 12 people. This structure gives the movie more depth and triggers the audience's thinking.

Vivid Characterization: Every character in the movie is vivid, with their distinctive personalities and their own characteristics. Their discussions are full of both intense conflict and deep care. Their debates reveal both the complexity and the light of human nature.

Thought-provoking Theme: The "anger" in the film's title "Twelve Angry Men" is a simple instinctive anger, but also a deeper anger filled with rationality and scrutiny, that is, the defense of truth and conscience. The "juvenile murder case" in the movie is just a symbolic reference, and it is precisely because the anger towards evil is so instinctive and overwhelming that the scrutiny of evil and the respect for the truth itself are so valuable.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad?

In my opinion, the film "GUANG" has a genuine storyline that leaves a lasting impression on the audience. The family dynamics portrayed in the film are relatable and well-executed, and the cinematography and direction enhance the emotional impact of the story. However, the pacing of the film may be an issue for some viewers, and some aspects of the film may be considered cliché. Ultimately, the quality of a film is subjective and depends on various factors such as the storyline, acting, cinematography, sound, and editing.

2. From your opinion, how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

Stereotypes of people with disabilities can lead to negative attitudes and discrimination towards them. Some stereotypes portray people with disabilities as pitiable, helpless, or incompetent, which can lead to them being spoken down to or treated unfairly. However, people with disabilities are like everyone else, with strengths and weaknesses. It is important to challenge and break down stereotypes to promote a more inclusive and accepting society. Personal stories and positive representations of people with disabilities can help to foster respect and preserve dignity, and encourage people to think about how they would feel facing inequality.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is authorship in films?

Authorship has a unique meaning in film. This theory was first developed in France in the 1940s and 1950s. Think of the director as the primary creator and author of the film. The director must first have the ability to make a good movie, and also need to show enough personality and style in the movie.

This allows the audience to identify the film's authorship through its unique style, technique, or details.

2. Do 12 Angry Men (1957) make the director, Sidney Lumet, an auteur? Why? Please give reasons.

Although this film is the director's debut, it can definitely be called a revelatory and influential film. Even in today's film industry, 12 Angry Men is a unique and novel movie. There is only one scene in the entire film. Only twelve people debated and spoke to each other. This requires very high rhythm and narrative.

This is different from any movie I've seen before. It doesn't have big scenes and special effects, and it doesn't switch between different scenes frequently, but it is attractive enough. The director seems to be quite good at creating strong dramatic conflicts in a small space. This is also his unique film style. The dramatic space of "12 Angry Men" is a small room. In "Murder on the Orient Express" the story takes place on a train.

To sum up, 12 Angry Men is enough to make Sidney Lumet a famous director. The film is well made but also has a unique technique and style.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is authorship in films?

Authorship in films refers to the creative vision and artistic control exercised by key individuals involved in the filmmaking process, such as the director, screenwriter, and cinematographer. These artists bring their unique perspectives, styles, and storytelling techniques to the film, shaping the final product and leaving their mark on the audience.

2. Do "12 Angry Men" (1957) make Sidney Lumet an auteur? Why? Please give reasons.

"12 Angry Men" (1957) directed by Sidney Lumet can be considered an example of an auteur's work, as Lumet's unique storytelling style, use of tension, and character development are evident throughout the film. Lumet's ability to create a claustrophobic atmosphere and draw deep emotional responses from the audience demonstrates his artistic vision and control over the filmmaking process. Furthermore, Lumet's collaboration with writer Reginald Rose on the script and his frequent collaborations with composer Kenyon Hopkins and editor Carl Lerner showcase his strong creative partnerships, which are also hallmarks of an auteur's work.

# data[].attributes.headline
NUR ABIRAH RIZQA BINTI MOHD SHAKIL (211686)

# data[].attributes.subject
NUR ABIRAH RIZQA BINTI MOHD SHAKIL (211686)

# data[].attributes.body
1.  The idea of "authorship" in film pertains to the notion that a film's director is the main creative force and is regarded as the "author" of the production. It implies that the film's final product is shaped by the director's vision, aesthetic preferences, and creative decisions, serving as a reflection of their individual artistic expression. The auteur theory, which first appeared in the middle of the 20th century and stresses the director's creative control and artistic signature, is frequently linked to the idea of authorship in films.

2.  Yes, I do think “12 Angry Men” (1957) did make Sidney Lumet an auteur. The reasons for this are as follows:

a) Directing Style: Lumet's decisions on long takes, simple sets, and intense acting enhance the overall suspense and mood of the movie. His focus on the characters and their interactions in the small jury room setting highlights his directing style.

b) Creative Control: Lumet had a great deal of influence over every aspect of the film's development, including the narrative and visual choices as well as casting. He collaborated closely with Boris Kaufman, the cinematographer, to develop a distinctive visual aesthetic that strengthens the narrative.

c) Signature Themes: Throughout his career, Lumet frequently addressed issues of morality, fairness, and the shortcomings of the legal system. "12 Angry Men" is consistent with these recurrent themes because it explores the intricacies of the legal system and the prejudices that might affect judgment.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is authorship in films?

Film authorship is referred to as focusing on primary creative force, personal influence, individual sensibility, and artistic vision behind the film. The auteur was a cinematic theory developed in France in the late 1940s by Andre Bazin and Alexandre Astruc and presented in the French film magazine Cahiers du Cinéma. Even though films are a team effort involving a variety of expertise, such as writers, directors, cinematographers, editors, and more, the idea of authorship frequently concentrates on people who have a big say in the artistic direction and aesthetic of the film, and the Auteur theory contends that the director is the main author of the film. Hence, the film’s artistic achievements depend on the director’s personal style and artistic vision according to the Auteur theory.

2. Do 12 Angry Men (1957) make the director, Sidney Lumet, an auteur? Why? Please give reasons.

For me, the answer is absolutely yes. When I was watching this movie, it made me think that even though this is an old movie, the director has a very unique set of ideas and techniques in conveying a story. Firstly, except for the beginning and the end, there was no location change at all, and the entire movie was concentrated at the same point in time. Before watching this film, I would have thought that such a film would lead to a very dull and boring viewing experience, but Sidney Lumet used the above points to successfully create a very fascinating sense of suspense. In addition, the narrative of the film is driven entirely by the performances and dialogues of the 12 actors, and there are a lot of clues and scenes mentioned in the film, but the audience knows them entirely through the dialogues of the 12 jurors, there are no scenes of flashbacks or anything like that, but the audience is able to feel as if they have seen or heard them through the performances of the 12 actors. And the director used several long shots to show the different personalities, emotions and positions of the 12 people in a very visual way. All in all, director Sidney Lumet's style of filming is very unique. The limitation of the scene allows the audience to focus more on the performance of the actors and the story itself, which tests the skill of the film team and creates its own unique style for "12 Angry Men".

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is authorship in films?

Authorship in film, often referred to as "authorship theory", is a concept that views the film director as the primary creative force. The theory holds that a film reflects the director's personal vision, style and thematic concerns. At the same time, the director's film has a distinct and recognisable voice, regardless of the various collaborations and influences involved in the filmmaking process. In addition, the director is seen as a key artistic figure who imprints his unique style and worldview on the film, making it distinctly personal.

2. Do 12 Angry Men (1957) make the director, Sidney Lumet, an auteur? Why? Please give reasons.

In my opinion, "12 ANGRY MEN" directed by Sidney Lumet can indeed be seen as an example of directorial style as he demonstrates his unique directorial style by keeping the narrative, pacing and character development aspects going throughout the film. The way he uses camera movement throughout the film and the close-ups, as well as the gradual increase in tension, reflect the control he has over the production of the film.

In addition, director Sidney Lumet's deft use of confined spaces (the jury room) in his film and his ability to maintain tension and interaction between his characters throughout the film, as he transforms a simple jury room into an arena for exploring wider societal issues, reflects his ability as a director.

In conclusion, I believe that the work of a good film director is one that is able to explore and reflect some of the problems and real human issues that exist in society, and "12 ANGRY MEN" fits these issues perfectly, delving into the complexities of the justice system and the psychology of its characters, while at the same time creating a lasting influence so much so that we're still talking about it now.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What is authorship in films?

In the context of films, authorship refers to the idea that a film can be considered the artistic creation of a singular creative mind, often attributed to the director. This concept, known as the "auteur theory," suggests that the director is the primary creative force behind a film and that their personal artistic vision is reflected in the overall work. Similar to how an author is the creative mind behind a book, authorship in films refers to the concept that the director is the primary creative force behind the film. The idea that a film represents the director's individual artistic vision and style.

2. Do 12 Angry Men (1957) make the director, Sidney Lumet, an auteur? Why? Please give reasons.

Sidney Lumet's 1957 film "12 Angry Men" is hailed as a masterpiece of cinematic storytelling and painstaking direction. Although there is no denying Lumet's influence, the movie could not fully fit the auteur theory, which emphasizes a director's unique vision throughout their body of work. Throughout his career, Lumet showed a wide range of directing skills in a variety of genres, demonstrating a diversity that isn't constantly related to the auteurs' signature style. However, Lumet's skillful directing in "12 Angry Men" is apparent in his capacity to generate suspense in the cramped environment.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

When watching GUANG, I feel that the storyline made was very genuine that left a lasting impression on me. The family dynamics resonated well throughout the movie, and the careful direction and cinematography enhanced the emotional effect. Although it is touching, I might still find an issue on its pacing and it is actually cliche. Film tastes are often based on personal preference, but in my opinion, the film's overall appeal was greatly enhanced by the combination of a gripping story and impressive technical work.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

Seeing how characters with disabilities are portrayed in "GUANG" made me think about how these portrayals affect our perceptions. Good and true representations encourage empathy and eliminate stereotypes, leading to a more complex understanding of people with disabilities. On the other hand, inaccurate or stereotypical representations can reinforce negative biases and lead to misunderstandings in the public. These cinematic stories have a special ability to shape our viewpoints by highlighting the value of responsible storytelling that accurately highlights the range of abilities and life experiences of people with disabilities, thereby creating a more accepting and understanding community.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Authorship is the film director's principle and style in organising the film based on auteur theory. It is a way for people like scholars, audiences or commentators to comment and criticise the films based on the director's style, personal influences, aesthetical style, vision of the subject matter and individual sensibility. The criticism based on the director's perspective in creating influence to the subject matter based on his vision which might influence society. The authorship is based on the director's technique in presenting his vision and mindset toward the subject matter. It also depends on the director's special and unique personality, personal background, the things which influenced the directors and personal experience. This film 12 Angry Men (1957) was directed by Sidney Lumet, an American film director. As the director is always known for featuring characters who are typically emotionally conflicted and have moral struggles, the authorship elicit by this film is the spark for the moral issue. This film narrates a story about 12 men as a jury in court discussing and arguing about a teenager who was charged with murder on a reasonable suspicion. The director's special and signature style and technique used established the authorship in the film.

2. I think 12 Angry Men (1957) makes the director, Sidney Lumet, an auteur because this movie is a very important legal film in the industry. It's not only related to the film and entertainment industry, but also making an impact on the aesthetic, cultural and history and influence the society as the issue mentioned in the movie was society related. In terms of filmmaking, the director created his own stylistic style in which most of the scenes in the movie were in the jury room, which was very rare in filmmaking even until now. Besides, the theme about law and legal which create an awareness within audiences even the authority in the country make the director's style which makes him an auteur. As a start of his first feature film, his films were consistent in law and legal perspective after this included The Verdict, Murder on the Orient Express, and Find Me Guilty. It was like the director's principle in expressing the director's vision on the same subject matter through different films. 12 Angry Men (1957) is the starting point and makes the director Sidney Lumet an auteur.

# data[].attributes.body
1. In "12 Angry Men" (1957), Sidney Lumet's authorship is prominently reflected through his masterful direction, shaping the film into a timeless classic. Lumet's visual acumen is evident as he transforms the confined jury room into a tense and psychologically charged space, employing effective camera work, shot compositions, and lighting choices. Under his guidance, the ensemble cast delivers nuanced performances, each juror meticulously characterized to convey the intricacies of the human psyche. Lumet's influence extends to the film's narrative pacing and structure, as the real-time exploration of the jury's deliberations unfolds with suspense and engagement. Emphasizing themes of justice and prejudice, Lumet's directorial choices contribute to the film's thematic depth and resonance. The emotional impact of "12 Angry Men" is heightened by Lumet's adept use of close-ups, camera angles, and the overall atmosphere he creates. While the film is a collaborative effort, Lumet's authorship shines through as he skillfully brings Reginald Rose's script to life, leaving an indelible mark on the cinematic landscape.

2. 12 Angry Men (1957) undeniably established Sidney Lumet as a director, with his unique directorial stamp evident throughout the film. Lumet's authorship is vividly reflected in his meticulous control of visual elements, transforming the limited jury room into a cinematic stage on which human dynamics and moral dilemmas are unfolded. His use of camera angles, lighting and composition not only creates a tense atmosphere but also reflects his unique visual style. Lumet's directorial influence extends to the entire cast, guiding them in nuanced performances that reflect his commitment to character depth and psychological realism. The film's narrative structure unfolds in real time, showcasing Lumet's thoughtful pacing and storytelling choices that enhance the overall impact. Thematically, Lumet's explorations of justice, prejudice, and group dynamics are consistent with his consistent focus on social issues in his work. At its core, 12 Angry Men is a testament to Lumet's credentials as an auteur, and his creative vision, thematic coherence, and directorial skill solidify his status as a unique and influential filmmaker.

# data[].attributes.headline
KOB3265 MEDIA APPRECIATION GROUP 5 FAREEZ, ABIRAH, HAFIZ, HARITZ, NASHA

# data[].attributes.subject
KOB3265 MEDIA APPRECIATION GROUP 5 FAREEZ, ABIRAH, HAFIZ, HARITZ, NASHA

# data[].attributes.body
MUHAMMAD DANIEL FAREEZ BIN ABU BAKAR (210719)

NUR ABIRAH RIZQA BINTI MOHD SHAKIL (211686)

HARITZ IKLIL BIN HESSLY HAFIZ (209083)

MUHAMMAD HAFIZ ZHAFRI BIN ABDUL HARIF (211085)

NASHA NURAINA BINTI MUHAMMAD AZNAL (213207)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
KOB3265 GROUP 5 PARASITE MEDIA APPRECIATION FAREEZ 210719

# data[].attributes.body
Group 7

1. Belmiro Al Daffa 213297

2. Nabila Tsabita Haura 213296

3. Amanda Intan Mahadewi 209708

4. Alfina Damayanti 209623

5. Dezar Tafarel Ramadhan 209632

# data[].attributes.body
HARITZ IKLIL BIN HESSLY HAFIZ (209083)

MUHAMMAD DANIEL FAREEZ BIN ABU BAKAR (210719)

MUHAMMAD HAFIZ ZHAFRI BIN ABDUL HARIF (211085)

NUR ABIRAH RIZQA BINTI MOHD SHAKIL (211686)

NASHA NURAINA BINTI MUHAMMAD AZNAL (213207)

# data[].attributes.body
ZHOU MENG 209788

ZHAO YU XUAN 209776

YANG YU JUAN 209773

LIU YI LIN 209696

WANG YU CHEN 209760

# data[].attributes.body
LU YI 213271

LIUZHAOHUI 209525

YANG YUE 209770

LI TIANTIAN 209686

SU FANGDA 208753

# data[].attributes.body
NORMAN ISKANDAR BIN ABDULLAH 212710

MUHAMMAD HAFIZUDDIN BIN MOHD HALIM 205369

AKMAL QAYYIM BIN MOHD ALI HANIFIAH210826

ALIFF DANIAL BIN EDDY RAZLAN 212738

YAO MENGTING 208874

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

Good:

This film has two story lines, and they have similar rhythms and experiences, which makes the film look substantial, compact in structure, and with obvious rhythm ups and downs. Such content shaping can reduce the boredom produced when watching the film.

In terms of the selection of actors, the actors selected for this film are very suitable for the roles. The actors' own experience and abilities allow them to better express the roles they play without creating a sense of separation. At the same time, the portrayal of each character in the film is real and full, making the plot more complete and fuller of suspense.

Bad:

The narrative technique of this film is relatively niche and not the narrative technique of mainstream movies. It may be difficult for some audiences to accept it. At the same time, from a current point of view, the content of this film is relatively outdated and does not conform to the mainstream of the current era, although it is still a classic.

2. Compared to today's styles, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

Compared with the current style, this film does not use editing methods to highlight the rhythm and ups and downs of the plot, but promotes it through the plot. The film uses the "irrationality" of the characters and plot to generate suspense, thereby intensifying the conflicts in the plot to reach the climax of the plot.

In terms of visual effects, black and white images lose the influence of color, allowing people to focus more on the picture and light and shadow, allowing them to be more immersed in the plot.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

I think the story line of this film is very attractive. Through the experience of an autistic man seeking a job, it leads people to think about the living conditions and abilities of this group, and makes people pay attention and sympathize with this group. At the same time, the film describes his talent in music, which tells the audience that everyone has his own unique talent.

In addition, the shots and images of the film have a sense of story. Through some close-ups, the audience's attention is focused on some things in the story that have an impact on the protagonist, highlighting the specialness of these things, reflecting the protagonist's current mood, and making it easier for the audience to immerse themselves in the protagonist's world.

bad:

Introducing this story through a third-person perspective is not immersive and resonant enough. Using a first-person perspective would make the story more empathetic.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

The stereotype of disabled people will make me have some bad guesses and presuppositions when I meet them for the first time, and will make me lose patience with them, even if most of the time they do not mean any harm.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

The film's technology and techniques are very mature and perfect. This is a movie with a rhythm and style that makes people feel comfortable and warm. I really like a close-up shot in the film: The brother's face looks a little distorted through the glass. I think this is a metaphor for the transparent barrier that exists between disabled people and normal people and society.

The shortcoming of this movie I think is the distortion of the plot. In fact, the probability of a genius emerging from a disabled person is very small. The real story is that most disabled people don't even have the ability to live on their own. From this perspective, I thought the plot lacked depth and realism.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

First of all, I instinctively thought that he was a person in need of help. They are a minority and different from normal people. I would like to express my sympathy for them. However, I learned from watching this film that perhaps what they want most is respect and equality. We should treat them like other normal people.

# data[].attributes.body
1. 1. What makes these films good/bad

What Worked Well in “Guang” (2018):

In Quek Shio Chuan's first movie, "Guang" (2018), the way he tells the story about autism is really good. He learned from his own life, especially from having a sibling with autism, which makes the movie feel real and easy to connect with. The way the characters talk in the movie is not forced it feels natural and shows the difficulties they face. Kyo Chen, who plays Guang, does a fantastic job showing the challenges of being social when you have autism. Most of the time, we see things from Guang's perspective, so we understand better what it's like to live with autism. The movie pays a lot of attention to details in how it looks and sounds, making it visually beautiful and putting us right into Guang's world.

Areas Needing Improvement in "Guang" (2018):

Even though "Guang" has a lot of good things, there are some parts that could be better. The movie ends a bit quickly, and it leaves us wanting to know more about the characters and their stories. It's like reading a short story that you wish was longer. Because it's a short film, we don't get to go very deep into the characters' feelings. It would be nice to spend more time understanding them better. However, these things don't take away from the fact that "Guang" did so well as a short film that the same people made a longer version, and it got a lot of praise from critics when it came out.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

In most situations, society tends to assume that individuals facing physical disabilities require special treatment, without grasping the essence of fairness they truly seek. A deeper understanding is needed to realize that every individual, including those with physical disabilities deserve recognition without falling into stereotypes. Inclusive perspectives are gained by seeing them as individuals bringing diversity and complexity into their own lives. The film highlights the reality that individuals with physical disabilities also possess potential and uniqueness deserving of appreciation.

Real challenges arise when there is a lack of understanding about autism. The presence of autism is often not as visibly apparent as other disabilitis. In this context, the film is considered an effective medium to increase awareness about autism, opening doors for reflection and a deeper understanding of the lives and experiences of individuals on the autism spectrum. With its contribution, the film becomes a valuable tool in overcoming misconceptions and encouraging a better perception of the diversity and uniqueness of each individual, without disregarding the presence of disabilities.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

This movie is adapted based on the director's own story. Through the movie, the director records the extraordinary stories of his brother's ordinary life. Besides the interdependence between brothers, the absence of the father and the early death of the mother have made this special family extremely difficult. But the movie is not as heavy as imagined, but rather has a quite lively temperament, bright and simple yet melodious. The two protagonists also have a good understanding and shaping of the characters. In the movie, there are multiple scenes where glass blocks the face of a person with autism. In the scene, the face of the person with autism is divided into many pieces by the glass. The director uses this kind of camera language to tell the audience about the contradictory inner world of the person with autism, or our prejudice against them.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

In the movie, there is a memorable line that Wenguang explained to Suen why he had to collect so many glasses, saying: Everyone emits a different frequency. Indeed, each of us is like a glassware collected by Wenguang, with 1700 expensive crystal bowls from boutiques and dirty small cups discarded as garbage. However, these vessels that distinguish between clouds and mud are equally useful in Wenguang's eyes, just as each of us has our own unique value and emits different frequencies.

# data[].attributes.body
Nasra Hassan Hussein 209714

Sarah Illiyana Baharein bt Mohd Ghazali 213609

LI JIAYIN 208861

LUO XINYU 209702

WANG JIEXIN 209747

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.authors[].name
SARAH ILLIYANA BAHAREIN BINTI MOHAMED GHAZALI / UPM

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
FILM REVIEW: EVERYTHING EVERYWHERE ALL AT ONCE (GROUP7)

# data[].attributes.body
1. ZHANG YAN 213289

2. BAI YANG 209610

3. ZHAO PEIXI 208969

4. ZHANG BOYA 209784

5. GUAN HENG 209522

# data[].attributes.body
1. Adam Faris Bin Mahayudin 213643

2. Ling Xin Yi 211735

3. Lim Xin Ying 210830

4. Tham Jo Yi 211853

5. Chen Luyang 209619

6. Peng Jieyu 209724

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Forrest Gump Review - KOB 3265 Media Appreciation

# data[].attributes.body
Group Members

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Forrest Gump Review - KOB 3265 Media Appreciation

# data[].attributes.body
Please attach here your Google Drive link (make sure it is open and can be accessed by me) to your video assignment. The written assignment MUST BE PUT on PutraBlast in PDF Format on/before WEEK 13, 8 JANUARY 2024, 11.59 PM.

Thank you.

# data[].attributes.headline
TUTORIAL ASSIGNMENT WEEK 13: 12 ANGRY MEN (1957)

# data[].attributes.subject
TUTORIAL ASSIGNMENT WEEK 13: 12 ANGRY MEN (1957)

# data[].attributes.body
Please watch 12 ANGRY MEN (2957) attached on Putrablast, and explain these issues;

1. What is authorship in films?

2. Do 12 Angry Men (1957) make the director, Sidney Lumet, an auteur? Why? Please give reasons.

You are given until Sunday (14 January 2024, 12 noon) to submit your opinion. Please put your comment in the comment section and not send words/PDF files (it is hard to read when all of you send files instead of commenting directly in the section given).

Thank you.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these film good/bad?

GODD: I think the biggest advantage of this film is that it is realistic, a real film, that is, there is no exaggerated plot, just a simple story told in detail. The Wenguang in the movie is the autistic child we encounter in our daily life. It's not that they don't want to talk, it's that they don't know who to talk to. It's not that they're going out of their way to do some weird reaction, it's just that their sense of the outside world is different from ours. It's not that they don't want to give you what you ask for, it's that their focus only gives them what they care about. This story is a record of the world that autistic children face and their growth process.

BAD: The plot of the movie is a little flat and the audience may feel bored when watching it.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

From my point of view, when stereotypes are negative or misrepresentative, they can contribute to misconceptions and discrimination. Stereotypes might lead to the formation of biased judgments, hinder opportunities for inclusion, and perpetuate stigma.

It's crucial to recognize that individuals with disabilities are diverse and have unique abilities, talents, and experiences. Stereotypes can oversimplify and limit our understanding of the rich diversity within the disabled community.

Promoting awareness, education, and fostering a more inclusive mindset can help challenge and break down stereotypes. By focusing on individuals' capabilities rather than their disabilities, society can work towards creating a more inclusive and equitable environment for everyone.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

I think the strength of this film is that it has a good director - Quek Shio Chuan, whose first short film <GUANG> won the Grand Prize at the 2011 BMW Short Film Competition and has won several awards internationally. The film tells the story of a young autistic man with hidden musical talent who struggles to find work and his relationship with his brother.

With an intact and authentic storyline, GUANG focuses on the protagonist's perception of the world through his autism, inspired by the director's own brother, Richard Kuo, who suffers from the same condition. The plot revolves around the protagonist's attempts to find a regular job and receive guidance from his brother. The background music and the lighting of the filming are also used very cleverly, and the feeling of the characters is incorporated very well through the changes in music and lighting, which can bring in the emotions to the audience.

Disadvantage：

The plot of the film isn't exactly appealing to a lot of the general public, and the film's plot in general, is slow, which could lead to viewers being impatient.

2. In your opinion, how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

I think that stereotypes of people with disabilities are oversimplified challenges and abilities that lead to a misunderstanding of their experiences and needs. However, after watching this film, I think we all need to change the stereotypes of people with disabilities because everyone is an individual, and society should be an environment of mutual respect and tolerance.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Good: The movie is well acted and has a very moving storyline as it is based on the director's personal experience of living with his autistic brother. At the same time, the movie's use of lighting is excellent. There is very little use of bright light throughout the movie, and the overall dark color palette makes the depressing mood well represented. At the same time, the lines in this movie can bring the audience into the atmosphere. The short introductions at the beginning reflect the character's traits and allow the audience to better sink into the atmosphere of the movie.

Bad: The plot of this movie is bland with no ups and downs, which can easily make the audience feel bored.

2. From my point of view, when people with disabilities are mentioned, I would think that they do not have the ability to live on their own, but this movie breaks my prejudice. At the end of the movie, the protagonist becomes a piano tuner based on his own talent, and his talent in music is no longer covered up. This movie also made me realize that people with disabilities also have their own strengths and can take care of their own lives.

# data[].attributes.body
The film 'GUANG' focuses on a story that revolves around two brothers, where due to the untimely death of their loved ones, the younger brother has to take up the task of taking care of his autistic brother. The brother's autistic flaws lead him to have trouble finding a job and getting into trouble in life, which makes the brother bitter and helpless until he suddenly discovers his brother's musical talent, and they move on to a better future.

（1）What makes these films good/bad?

Firstly, the film resonates with the warmth between family members, that gives the audience good emotional swings as well as not being clichéd, and doesn't give the audience a definitive answer, but instead portrays an open-ended ending with the musical talent displayed by the brother. Secondly, the film's actor’s interpretation is very superb, playing the autistic brother of the actor, but also the autistic person's state of life, the inner feelings of the portrayal is very accurate, so that not only can make the brother's role in the image of a more full, but also make the plot between the brothers full and complete. Moreover, the film is excellent in terms of cinematography. The use of light, the choice of colors and the composition of the images all show different degrees of excellent design. For example, the film is softly lit, and the psychological state of the characters in the climax is shot in a fast-paced manner, so that the audience can experience the struggle of the characters. Through this kind of shooting, it creates a warm atmosphere and touching emotions for the film, so that the audience can go deeper into the plot and be deeply moved by the feelings between brothers.

But for me, the film also had some flaws. I don't think there is a lot of believability in some of the plot points, resulting in some viewers not being able to empathies with it. For example, the most important thing in the film is the younger brother's sudden discovery of his brother's musical talent, which builds up over time, while the younger brother, who lives together, suddenly discovers it only after a long period of time. Such a plot leads to a somewhat unnatural direction for the film.

(2) From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

As we all know, stereotyping leads to social prejudice against a certain group and affects people's evaluation of and attitude towards that group. Such prejudice may lead to discrimination and exclusion, hindering the equal rights and interests and social participation of that group. Stereotyping of persons with disabilities exists in our society. People often regard persons with disabilities as useless to society and overlook their talents and potentials in certain areas. Stereotypes place individual deficiencies in the image of the group, but ignore the impact of individual strengths on the impression of the group. Therefore, as a member of society, each of us should see the flashpoints of others as individuals, not the deficiencies that social stereotypes give them. Especially for the disadvantaged groups, we should keep a fair attitude and tolerant heart to make our own contribution to the society together with them.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

The greatest strength of this film is its realism. This film is based on the director. The director's brother is autistic. So most of the movie comes from his life. The movie story seems to be happening around us. Moreover, the film's narrative does not dwell heavily on the hardships of the Wen guang and Ernest Chong's lives. Rather, it didn't deliberately show the hardships of the younger brother raising the elder brother. We feel that the two brothers accompany each other and grow together. In addition, the use of lenses is unique. The use of light many times in the movie uses the different lights in the lens to set off different plots. For example, Wen Guang finally assembled a piano at home. The light that shines on the Wen Guang not only illuminates the future world of the WenGuang, but also gives him and Ernest Chong a new direction in their lives. The plot director of the movie handled it very delicately. But some people think that the film uses too much soft light filters and sensational soundtracks.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

Before watching the film, my perception of autistic people was limited to their fear of communicating with others and their communication difficulties. Watching the whole film refreshed my perception. Autistic people have a very rich spiritual world. And they need to be cared for and understood by the outside world. We just look at people with disabilities through normal eyes. In their world, they see the world in their own way.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

I personally felt the movie had a heartfelt story to tell but was quite boring to me. I found myself checking my phone often throughout the film. I did, however, really enjoy the performance of the actor who played Wen Guang. Sometimes when actors are portraying autistic characters, they can overdo it to drive home the point that this person is different, but the acting felt really well done. The film also does a great job of showing you the brothers’ relationship.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

I personally think something I have never considered that this movie helped me see is the fact that just as these stereotypes are harmful to autistic people, they can be harmful to us too. In that way, they can stop us from ever becoming friends with autistic people and forming friendships and bonds with them. Not only does it harm them by not being understood, but they are also shunned for being different.

# data[].attributes.body
Tutorial Assignment Week 12

1.     What makes these films good/bad

The quality of a film often depends on how closely it captures the essence of everyday life.  In the Malaysian film "GUANG (2018)," the narrative mostly revolves around the amusing daily lives of two brothers.  Although presented with a light touch, the portrayal remains realistic. The film's cinematography and color tones receive commendation, making it a worthwhile one-and-a-half-hour watch. The actors' genuine performances, particularly the main character "Wen Guang," authentically convey the challenges of portraying a character with high-functioning autism, showcasing meticulous preparation. The film's production team demonstrates meticulous attention to detail, evident in scenes like the reflection on a glass window capturing the two brothers and the alternating red-green lights during the younger brother's fishkeeping. Instances such as Wen Guang leaving home under a yellow bridge after breaking a cup portray ordinary yet uniquely melancholic moments.

2.     From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

In the film, Wen Guang, as a person with disabilities, might appear to outsiders as someone prone to causing trouble. However, the reality is that people don't understand him well enough or delve into his inner world. He never feels inferior because of his uniqueness. Despite the controversial nature of some of his actions, Wen Guang always has a clear understanding of what he wants to pursue. In contrast, how many 'normal' individuals in the real world truly know their goals? Most people lead aimless lives, just getting by. Therefore, witnessing Wen Guang's willingness to search through a garbage heap for a specific cup frequency gives me a realization,if one can dedicate themselves completely to a task, you can ultimately become the light in your dream.

# data[].attributes.body
1) What makes it good/bad?

I generally enjoyed the visuals in the film, its colours that determined the mood and aesthetic in portraying his KL life in the city to the street lifr and coffee shops, it had personality and was pleasing to the eye. It was also a heartfelt story that touched hearts and raised awareness on autism. However, it couldve been better in terms of plot and character which felt like it was a bit underdeveloped. It might be boring and cliche to some as it is lacklustre of intrigue and drama

2) From your opinion, how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

In my opinion, it has made me aware of the struggles that people with autism face and the stigma around it where people think they are crazy when theyre not. I also have the utmost respect towards people who has relations with people with autism as they too, have their own strengths. It has also made me aware how unique and smart they are regardless of their disabilities as they are actually able to do a lot of things that we cant too. We shouldnt restrict their capabilities and unleash their full potential instead and understand

# data[].attributes.body
1) what makes it good/bad?

Sunset Boulevard was acclaimed for its innovation in its film noir style and its compelling narrative. Gloria Swanson's impactful performance was also the key in the movie and the dialogues were memorable. It was a movie ahead of its time with its exploration of themes on the dark side of hollywood hence the impact in the cinematic industry. However, some might find the melodramatic aspects of it in a negative way where the pacing of story might be lacking.

2) Comparison to today's style, what makes it different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

Sunset Boulevard has that classic, theatrical effect as time back then was different especially in how they try to focus more on the way they speak in their dialogues as well as enriching their characters with personality to liven up the film. Unlike today, they didnt have advanced technology to make visual effects as advanced as now hence they implemented a noir style which offers a different experience.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

Good

The cinematography and lighting are beautifully spot-on, capturing the lives of secular peons in all their splendour. The film is a very warm story without being purposely melodramatic, shot poetically with imaginative camera work. A few distorted images through glass and windows show us a twisted hero, but in his world, everything is normal. The opening Wes Anderson-like neat composition can quickly let people substituting into the brother's life state and character distinctive features, the movement of the camera with the high soundtrack and the brother of the whole person in the rubbish to find a cup of that gesture also managed to make the audience feel proud and intoxicated, on the whole process by the brother's emotional drive down, this is not only a sincere so simple as to do it, what kind of a story to be told in the way is enough to let the The way a story is told is enough to get people into it.

Bad

The film's use of background music is too pervasive and lacks restraint, seriously undermining the shocking feeling that should have been brought about by the final hero playing music with a cup, and the emotions are let out too soon. The leading man's performance is one of the film's few highlights, very natural and endearing, of course to accentuate this endearment, there are a lot of details that don't resemble a real autistic person, but this is a matter of dramaturgy, intentional for the sake of romanticising autism, and has nothing to do with the actor. All of the characters wandered away from the setting and lacked realism. Shooting the past with partial bokeh would have been a good idea, but the reminiscence passages are all "explanatory notes" from God's point of view, which are so nakedly functional that they take away all the mysterious ambiguity.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

Changing perceptions. Many people think that people with physical disabilities need special care and attention, but what they actually need is equality and respect. We should recognise that people with physical disabilities have their own personalities, interests and needs, just like anyone else. Instead of treating them as a single "disabled person", they should be treated as unique individuals. In addition, it is important not to underestimate the ability of persons with physical disabilities to learn, work and live like everyone else. There is also a lack of knowledge about autistic people, who are less visible than other disabilities such as blindness or mute people. This film is a good way to help people to know more about autistic people.

# data[].attributes.headline
NUR ABIRAH RIZQA BINTI MOHD SHAKIL (211686)

# data[].attributes.subject
NUR ABIRAH RIZQA BINTI MOHD SHAKIL (211686)

# data[].attributes.headline
NUR ABIRAH RIZQA BINTI MOHD SHAKIL (211686)

# data[].attributes.subject
NUR ABIRAH RIZQA BINTI MOHD SHAKIL (211686)

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

A well-crafted and engaging narrative is often crucial to a film's success. A strong plot, character development, and satisfying resolution all make this movie great. An actor's performance has a huge impact on the quality of a movie. Engaging and emotional performances enhance the audience's connection to the characters and story. The performances from the cast of The Light of Cinema are outstanding. It brought the audience into the story very well and moved everyone very much.

Putting perspective into cinematography, lighting, and overall aesthetics helps create the mood and emotional tone of the film. A skilled director can provide the right guidance during the creative process, ensuring that the film's visuals translate effectively to the screen. The visuals and lighting effects of the film are outstanding. It brings a perfect viewing experience to the audience. The film is also original and innovative.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

Stereotypes can shape society’s views and attitudes toward people with disabilities. When movies perpetuate negative stereotypes, they reinforce the stigmatization and marginalization of people with disabilities. Movies have always portrayed people with disabilities through a diverse lens. This is an opportunity to showcase the diversity and capabilities of this community.

Inclusive and realistic depictions in movies can help change society's attitudes towards people with disabilities. When audiences see disabled characters playing a variety of roles and situations, it helps challenge preconceived notions.

# data[].attributes.body
1.What make these films good/bad?

Good

-The movie may receive recognition for promoting understanding and increasing awareness if it delicately and truthfully captures the experiences of people with autism .Next, good character development could be advantageous, particularly for the protagonist who is autistic. Characters with depth frequently increase the audience's emotional connection to the narrative. Through cinematography and direction, positive comments regarding the film's technical aspects might be given if it is a well-directed and shot movie with visually appealing scenes and strong storytelling. Utilizing melodic components, the music and sound design may have a major positive impact because the movie features a character who has a hidden musical talent.

Bad

-The movie may come under fire for spreading false beliefs if it presents autism in a stereotypical or inaccurate way. Next, talk about the tempo. Pacing issues can make for a less enjoyable overall viewing experience, such as a slow or jumbled story. Following, the plot could be perceived as weak if it is extremely cliched or predictable, especially if viewers don't think it is very unique. Lastly, criticism may stem from problems with editing, photography, or other technical elements.

2.From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way of you look at these people?

- In my opinion, Initially, preconceived notions frequently result in restricted opportunities for people with disabilities. Preconceived beliefs about their abilities could prevent them from obtaining an education or a job, which would limit their ability to fully engage in society. Furthermore, these preconceptions may lead to social exclusion. People may be reluctant to interact with people who have disabilities out of concern that they may say or do something offensive, which will ultimately lead to this community's isolation.Subseeding, a few stereotypes depict people with disabilities as helpless objects or as always in need of assistance. Their autonomy and agency are undermined by such portrayals, which promote dependence rather than empowerment. Media can be very important in this regard. One example of this is the movie "Guang," which shows characters with disabilities in a complex and real way. Through providing a more truthful and optimistic portrayal, these stories aid in dispelling stereotypes and promoting a more accepting and compassionate community. In the end, dispelling myths is a crucial first step toward building a society that accepts and maximizes the potential of people with disabilities.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

Good：

The photography and lighting in this film are very beautiful and spot on, capturing the lives of ordinary people in a palatable way. The film is a very warm story, but it is not deliberately sensational. It is shot with imaginative shots and is poetic. Several distorted scenes through glass and windows allow us to see a distorted male protagonist, but in his world, everything is normal. Perhaps it is our sight that is distorted.

Bad：

This film could have been more effective in depicting individual stories and failing to show autism in its entirety, giving the audience such a simplistic and one-sided understanding of autistic people.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

Stereotypes are preconceived notions people have about a specific group of people. When it comes to people with disabilities, stereotypes can influence how individuals are viewed and treated, with some stereotypes portraying people with disabilities as pitiful or in need of constant help. This can lead to a condescending attitude where individuals are not treated as equals, but rather as recipients of sympathy.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad?

Good:

I was inspired by the film "GUANG". It is a profound exploration of the condition of people with disabilities through the lens of the lives of people with autism, and the story line of the film presents a narrative that both educates and moves the audience. In my opinion, the highlight of the film is the portrayal of the main character, which provides a window into the world of people with autism. This portrayal is neither overly dramatic nor oversimplified. It is raw and real, allowing the audience to deeply feel the main character's struggle for life. In addition, from a cinematic perspective, the director's clever use of visual and auditory elements to convey the main character's inner world makes this a story that resonates with a wide audience. In the end, the wonderful thing about "GUANG" is that it transcends the ability to simply tell a story and becomes a powerful tool to advocate for the understanding and acceptance of human diversity.

Bad:

I think the weakness of "GUANG" is that this film slows down the pace of the film in order to focus on detailed character development and storytelling, making the film stagnate in some parts of the plot, giving me the impression that the director shoots for a long time in some scenes but does not make any advancement to the character development or the story arc. In terms of cinematography, the director chose more static shots to focus on the inner world of the main character, but I think this didn't do a better job of showing the inner strength of the disabled and lacked some of the vitality of the main character who still has hope for the world. In addition, the film focuses too much on the development of the main character, which leads to a less comprehensive development and narration of the surrounding environment and secondary characters.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

In my opinion, the film "GUANG" changed the stereotypes of how people perceive people with disabilities. In a world where people with disabilities are often stereotyped as narrow and limited, this film breaks down these misconceptions by presenting the main character as a fully realised individual with his own dreams, challenges and talents. This portrayal is important in changing the public's perception of people with disabilities, who are no longer viewed with pity or fear, but as individuals worthy of respect.

More than anything, "GUANG" is a film that presents itself as powerful in its ability to change hearts and minds. By presenting an autistic person in a realistic and empathetic way, the film invites the audience to reconsider their initial perceptions and stereotypes. It encourages a more inclusive and understanding society, where people are seen for who they are, rather than the labels they carry. In this way, while "GUANG" tells the stories of people with disabilities, it also promotes dialogue about diversity, acceptance and human richness.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

Good:

In GUANG, the film's charm lies in the fact that it does not intentionally create a dramatic fuss, but focuses on the most trivial daily lives of small people. These warm and delicate moments of life are extremely easy to trigger the audience's empathy. In addition to the sincere and pure portrayal of brotherly emotions, the director's clever use of light and shadow is also a highlight. For example, the flash of a glass under a street lamp in heavy rain and the elevated shot of pigeons flying in the sunlight are romantic and unique images that vividly show the rich inner world of an autistic person. This attention to detail and deeper dive into emotions are the film's notable strengths.

From a personal point of view, such a way of expressing the film helps to change the public's perception of stereotypes of people with disabilities. Often, these stereotypes are rooted in ignorance or misunderstanding, leading to our limited understanding of the abilities and potential of people with disabilities. Through its unique narrative and camera language, GUANG breaks down the common stereotypes about autistic people and shows their complex and rich inner world. This kind of video expression not only enhances the depth of film art but also promotes a more comprehensive and in-depth understanding of the disabled community in society.

Bad:

Although the GUANG film aims to portray autism realistically, it may inevitably reinforce certain stereotypes about autism, such as portraying individuals with autism as having genius-like abilities. In addition, the film focuses primarily on one individual's experience, and this limited perspective may not provide a full picture of the broad spectrum of autism. Such a narrative may result in the audience having a limited and one-sided understanding of autism.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

Films like "GUANG" can both challenge and reinforce stereotypes. When a film portrays persons with disabilities realistically and sympathetically, it can help break down misconceptions and foster deeper understanding. However, if a film inadvertently reinforces stereotypes (e.g., portraying people with autism as having extraordinary talents or being socially awkward), this can distort public perception and lead to the generalization of these traits to all individuals with autism. As a viewer, it is important to critically analyze these portrayals and recognize that they represent a single narrative within a diverse experience. Personal interactions and education play a key role in shaping a more nuanced understanding of disability that goes beyond what is portrayed in the film.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

First of all, the social issues discussed in this film are commendable. The difficulty of people with special illnesses such as autism to be employed and understood in society is deeply represented. The director is discussing the issues through the story of this film. By interspersing the drama of Literature and Light with his brother and several job interviews reflects the reality of social issues. In addition, the film excels in its set design, with many of the characters' emotions being able to be expressed through the setting of the scenes. The stories related to the characters are also shown through the alternation of scenes. However, the film is rather bland in its story line and even a bit boring at some points, as most of the plot is predictable by the audience, missing a part of the plot that allows one to get into surprises.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

Disability is actually a relatively uniform term, it is a label, and when we refer to people with disabilities we always assume that they have certain prejudicial characteristics. In particular, certain directors who have not carried out any research have portrayed people with disabilities simply as stereotypes. This can lead to the audience projecting prejudice onto those who live with disabilities and ignoring their individual differences.

# data[].attributes.body
Please watch GUANG (2018) as attached on Putrablast and explain these issues;

1. What makes these films good/bad

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

1. What makes these films good/bad

Good:

Good director: Malaysian director Kuo Xiu Zhuan, who won the BMW SHORTIES 2011 Short film competition for his first feature-length film. Awarded the most promising Director at the 30th Malaysian Film Festival 2019.

Fascinating script: Because this film is the director's creative inspiration from the process of getting along with his own autistic brother Guo Xiukai. So the script is very real.

Real performance: Zhuang Zhongwei's brother Wen Guang shows the daily life of autistic people, while Zhang Shunyuan's brother also shows the helplessness and pressure of autistic people's families.

Excellent background music: The theme song of the film is "Abstract Picture", sung by director Guo Xiuyu's sister Guo Xiuyu (Shio). The song is based on a song Guo wrote for her autistic brother Guo Xiukai. The song won the Gold Award for Best Newcomer and the Best TV Movie Theme Song at the 2020 Malaysian AIM Chinese Music Awards.

Bad:

The plot is too flat: Because the plot is too boring, the plot development is too formatted. At the same time, some of the film's illusions and visual presentation are too deliberate. Lack of details.

Reinforces the stereotype of autism: Because of the actors' performances, it is easy for people to associate autistic people with the characters in the film. At the same time, some people with mild autism do not behave in the same way as actors in movies.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

Because in the stereotype people see all people with disabilities as a single group, in fact the disability community is very diverse, including different types and levels of disability. There may be too much emphasis on people with disabilities being different from everyone else, while ignoring that they have emotions just like everyone else.

If there are negative stereotypes about people with disabilities, it may lower their expectations of them. This may lead to more conservative attitudes towards persons with disabilities in their interactions, work or study, and may result in more negative treatment. Because of stereotypes, some people may avoid deep social relationships with people with disabilities. This can make it more difficult for people with disabilities to socialize and form meaningful relationships.

Influenced by stereotypes, I can be overly helpful or overly protective of disabled people. This, while well-intentioned, can have a negative impact on the autonomy and self-reliance of persons with disabilities, making them feel undervalued. And too much kindness can come across as a burden.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

Good：There are many good things about this movie, such as some interesting scenes, the brother goes to a thrift store to "try out the cups" giving the characters a lot of sensory experiences, "it turns out that the cups need to be touched, knocked, listened to, and experienced on the tip of the tongue" It's just like how some artists need to use multiple senses to select material for their creations. This is just like some artists who need to use multiple senses to select materials for their creations. It also explains the aesthetic needs in Maslow's theory of needs, i.e. the need for physical, psychological, spiritual and desire.

Regarding the aesthetics of the film: the colors are high in saturation and low in brightness, and the texture of the images is good, whether it is the flower lady with a headscarf, the greenish blue fish in the container, or the images of the two brothers conversing across the wall. The cold background of the older brother and the warmer background of the younger brother form a great contrast and visual impact, and at the same time, it also signifies the differences in the personalities of the characters.

On the screen, the camera gives more close-ups in the brother's story, and the proportion of face-to-face dialogues in the film is high, which also shows that the relationship between the characters is not complicated and simple life images.

Bad：The movie is suspected of over-glorifying disabled people because most disabled people in life are ordinary and rarely do they have a brother who turns out to be a filler in other ways like the brother in the movie.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

Through watching this movie, we can appreciate the difficulties and psychological sadness of the disabled, but in life, many stereotypes will make us think that they can't do a lot of things and need to be helped all the time, but in fact, the disabled people need to be looked at in a normal way, because they actually need equality and respect.

# data[].attributes.body
1. "GUANG" stands out as a Malaysian film that not only captures the essence of Southeast Asian culture through vibrant color saturation and a diverse linguistic palette but also draws its strength from the director's personal connection to the narrative—an inspiration taken from the director's brother. Rooted in a true story, the film's authenticity resonates with audiences, offering a genuine portrayal of experiences. Noteworthy is the director's conscious effort to avoid discriminatory portrayals, opting instead to highlight themes of friendship and family, fostering a positive and consoling image of special groups within society. The cinematographic choices, particularly the use of close-up shots on the brother's character, showcase a nuanced approach to character development. By capturing facial expressions and subtle body movements, the film invites audiences to empathize with the challenges faced by individuals with autism, creating a powerful and intimate connection. Overall, "GUANG" emerges as a cinematic endeavor that goes beyond entertainment, weaving together cultural richness, personal inspiration, and thoughtful storytelling to deliver a meaningful and inclusive representation of individuals with disabilities.

2. In my view, individuals with autism aren't fundamentally different from what society deems as "normal" people. The key distinction lies in the necessity for more tolerance and understanding from those around them. Embracing their imperfections with open hands, an open heart, and sincerity reveals that, like anyone else, they possess their own unique strengths and qualities. Delving into their world, I've discovered a simplicity, cleanliness, and ordinariness that coexists with the complexities of our shared existence.

Contrary to common assumptions that people with autism may not enjoy socializing or forming connections, I believe that it's not a lack of interest but rather a challenge in expressing themselves verbally. They often convey kindness through actions, harboring a deep desire for acceptance and the opportunity to build friendly relationships with others.

Observing the behaviors and thought processes of individuals with autism, I've come to realize that their uniqueness may be conspicuous to the average person, leading to misunderstandings and a reluctance to approach them. Yet, with a bit more patience, understanding, and time, I've uncovered the truth that they aren't so different from the rest of us. It's a matter of peeling away the layers, appreciating their individuality, and recognizing the shared humanity that binds us all together.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes Guang (2018) films good/bad films ?

Like any cinematic production, the quality of Guangzhou's 2018 films may be assessed using a number of important criteria. A strong film is built on a captivating plot and a well-written screenplay, but great director brings the tale to life with imaginative camera angles and well-timed editing. The entire viewing experience is enhanced by the cast's outstanding performances, deft editing, and powerful sound design. A film's perceived quality may also be inferred from its reception, as judged by awards, box office performance, and reviews from both critics and viewers. At the end of the day, a lot depends on personal taste and subjectivity when judging a movie as "good" or "bad."

2. From opinion, how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals ?

- The way people with disabilities are portrayed in films has the power to either dispel or reinforce preconceptions. Movies that depict characters with disabilities in a nuanced and genuine manner have the power to dispel preconceptions and present a more accurate picture of their lives. On the other side, a movie may lead to prejudices and misunderstandings if it uses cliches or supports negative stereotypes.

Films that feature multifaceted, well-developed people with impairments have the potential to favourably impact society perceptions. Realistic portrayals help dispel stereotypes about what people with disabilities are capable of, promoting empathy, compassion, and a more inclusive viewpoint.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes sunset boulevard films good/bad

Billy Wilder's picture Sunset Boulevard has been the focus of several debates and studies. The movie, which has been adapted for Spanish-language productions and is renowned for breaking traditional cinematic frames, Kaul (2023), has had a significant influence on the development of musical production (Mateo, 2022). Hollywood is evolving, and Sunset Boulevard is known for showing the casualties that come with it (Wilner, 2023). Through its central protagonists, the movie offers a metaphor of Hollywood filmmaking that ends in madness and death (Brown, 2004). It also makes fun of planned obsolescence, which was influenced by the auto industry (Fotsch, 2005).

The movie incorporates from well-known themes and character types from American theatre and film, as well as from aspects of film noir (Dean, 1984). It depicts the Hollywood film business during the period of its creation, with the glamorous actress Norma Desmond at the centre of attention in her Sunset Boulevard house in Los Angeles, California (Santos et al., 2022). Its depiction of delusions and dementia has also been examined (Dean, 1984).

In summary, Sunset Boulevard is regarded as a major motion picture that contributed to the development of musical theatre, offered an allegory of Hollywood film, and included aspects of film noir.

2. Compared to today styles, what makes this films make different in terms of storytelling and visuals in movie sunset boulevard.

- Sunset Boulevard" is notably superior than contemporary techniques in several aspects of storytelling and imagery. The movie combines noir film themes with a Hollywood film metaphor that culminates in the main characters' psychosis and death (Dean, 1984). Unlike more modern storytelling approaches that could depend more heavily on conversation and overt storytelling tactics, this method of storytelling combines visual and narrative to express deeper ideas (Weedon, 2018). Furthermore, the film's usage of dementia and delusion has drawn attention, which complicates the narrative further (Wilner, 2023). Sunset Boulevard' is different from many other contemporary films in that it prioritises subtle storytelling above clear-cut plots.

Sunset Boulevard" offers a distinct visual experience by defying the conventions of film frames (Kaul, 2023). The film's depiction of a Hollywood that is changing and the casualties that follow from it offers a unique visual image of the period, encapsulating the spirit of a Hollywood that has passed away (Wilner, 2023). Unlike modern approaches, which could make use of cutting-edge technology and special effects to produce aesthetically spectacular sceneries, this visual depiction is different. In addition, the film's realistic approach and integration of film noir elements add to its distinct visual appeal (Dean, 1984).

In conclusion, "Sunset Boulevard" sets itself apart from contemporary narrative techniques and visual aesthetics with its subtle storytelling style, use of allegorical aspects, and distinctive visual portrayal of a shifting Hollywood period.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

Good

The film Guang has some strengths that make it a good film. The story setting is unique and it displays autism in a vivid way. Since the story is based on the true experience of the director’s brother, he is able to deliver the real emotions and gripping plot which make the audience resonate with it. This film shows a complete look at Wen Guang's journey to persevere in his love, seeing from his perspective his passion for collecting glassware, his struggles when his brother didn't understand, and his difficulties with social interactions. The excellent performance of the actor also no doubt makes the character succeed. In terms of cinematography, it professionally utilized various techniques to meet the film’s needs. The film applies light and shadow masterfully to create mood and visual styles. For instance, Wen Guang often bathes in soft and hazy light to indicate his simple inner world, and darkness and stark contrasts used to emphasize emotional tension and anxiety. In this film, there are a lot of slow and deliberate camera movements and most of them are used to indicate Wen Guang’s methodical way of experiencing and immersing in his world. This brings the audience steps into his world too.

Bad

Although the length of this film is not too long (only about 1 hour 30 minutes), audiences will still find its pace to be too slow and sometimes boring. It will be better if the film focuses more on the important storyline and exclude some unnecessary slow-paced scenes to improve the watching experience. Also, although the character of Wen Guang is very well designed, there is a lack of character development for other supporting characters. This makes only Wen Guang well developed and the other characters do not seem to be solid enough. It is suggested that the story can explore the supporting characters’ perspectives on Guang's challenges, for example, their own internal struggles, and how they handle their interactions with him may have given the story more depth and emotional impact.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

These stereotypes have somehow changed my perspective on people with disabilities. I remember there is one scene in the film where Sue Ann unconsciously says that she is different from Wen Guang because she is “normal”. This impresses me because it lets me think about if they can be considered “abnormal” ? They are just having their own speciality like every of us will have our own strengths and weaknesses, so, how can we define the term “normal”? The stereotype often makes me feel like they are very different from us but actually this thought should not exist. Also, we often think that they cannot do things as perfect as “normal person” does, but actually, often they may have more potential than we do in one way or another, hence it is only a preconceived stereotype.

# data[].attributes.body
1. what are the pros/cons of these movies

Pros: Since the director's brother is autistic, the content of this movie allows the audience to have a strong sense of immersion without the content seeming abrupt.

Because it is the director's personal experience, it makes the details of the story very believable. Although it is still free from the cliché of autism being discovered as a special talent, it does not affect the sincerity of the whole story.

The content of the story is narrated in a soothing manner, with several accidents occurring in the process, further emphasizing the helplessness of the younger brother in the face of such an older brother. At the moment of his mother's death, the younger brother becomes the older brother, and the younger brother no longer needs to face only the life of "firewood, rice, oil, salt, soy, vinegar, and tea", but also needs to shoulder his mother's trust for him.

Meanwhile, the metaphor of "glass" in the movie is also quite subtle.

Through the glass, everything visible to the naked eye is twisted and distorted because of the scattering and reflection of "light" - there are two times in the movie when the brother's face is distorted in the glass door/bowl. Thus, the transparent glass symbolizes the "invisible gap" between normal people/society and the autistic person, as the brother says, "I didn't even try to understand what he was thinking."

"There are cracks in everything, that's where the sun shines through."

As Cohen says in this poem, the best way to reach mutual understanding is only to break down the walls (glass) and leave the cracks. After the brother ruthlessly shatters the glass collected by Literature and Light, the relationship between the two men finally comes to a point of transformation.

The bond between family members cannot be described in words, and everyone cannot choose their own family members when they are born. However, the moment of birth, the bond with the relatives also begins. Regardless of the family's situation, regardless of whether the relatives are healthy or not, family members are bound to each other and accompany each other until the moment of life disappears.

In the movie, I can see how the younger brother takes care of his older brother, how helpless he is, how he blames him, how sorry he is. At the same time, there is also the brother's eternal dependence on his brother, who runs away from home alone and eventually returns to his brother, carefully apologizing.

This reminds me of the ancient Chinese poets Su Shi and Su Zhe. Su Shi was a great talent and a brilliant writer, but his political career was very unsuccessful. Repeated relegations took him farther and farther away from the capital. But his brother Su Zhe's attachment to him did not disappear with the distance. Every choice Su Zhe made in his political career was to be able to pick up his brother, so that he could be free of any further trials and tribulations.

In the middle of this movie, even though the younger brother is often angry with his brother, he doesn't really think about giving up on him. The older brother also thinks of his younger brother when he receives his first paycheck, and the feeling of running to each other is always the hottest. This movie can be said to be very successful in its portrayal of the relationship between the older and younger brother.

Weaknesses: Perhaps it is because the feelings of the older brother and his younger brother, or the brother's friendship with his friends are played very colorful. In contrast, the female lead's acting was too idolatrous and did not seem natural in this particular drama.

2. In your opinion, how do stereotypes of disabled people change your view of these people?

In my opinion, everyone's existence is unique. Autistic people, they are just children from the stars who have not learned how to communicate with us. But we can't deny that their existence is also valuable, they can also be the shining star in the sky.

Normal people or disabled people. It's just the outside world's judgment, when your heart is strong enough and brave enough, the external defects do not count for anything. As the old Chinese saying goes, "Where there's a will, there's a way". This saying does not differentiate between normal people and people with disabilities.

Nowadays, the Paralympics have proved to us once and for all that bravery is the greatest weapon, which can help us solve our sufferings again and again. Perseverance is the best backing, which can help us resist all external sufferings.

Although my brother is autistic, his musical talent is far beyond normal, as the so-called "normal people" how many of us can be like him?

So when it comes down to it, the stereotype of disabled people is just our empathy and compassion. Normal people contain empathy, so that we face the disabled with "colored glasses". However, some so-called normal people are not as hardworking as people with disabilities.

Everything in this world has a purpose, and we are all normal people.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad?

This is a Malaysian film. Its strong color saturation throughout the film gives it a Southeast Asian vibe. The actors in this movie also used Malaysian accents in the movie, but also interspersed with other languages, including Cantonese, Malay, and so on. As a local, I feel a sense of kinship when I watch the film.

The film “GUANG” was inspired by the director's brother and is an adaptation of a true event. Films based on true events resonate better with the audience. The film's content and plot are excellent. The director avoided overtly discriminatory portrayals of characters and other issues in the plot; instead, the film emphasizes friendship and family to depict the conditions of the special groups in society while also painting a positive and consoling image.

Furthermore, this director employs more close-up shots on the character of the brother, which includes his facial expressions and some small detailed body movements. The close-up shots of facial expressions are more likely to allow the audience to enter his world and empathize with him while watching the movie. Also, these close-ups do a great job of capturing some of the small gestures of an autistic person and bring the character to life.

2. From your opinion, how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

In my opinion, I don't think they are really that different from our so-called normal people, the only difference may be that they need some more tolerance and understanding from people. As long as we accept their imperfections with open hands, heart and sincerity, we will find that they also have their own shining points. At the same time, with their world, we will find that there is actually a simple, clean and ordinary side of this world.

It is common that people may think that people with autism don't like to socialize or don't like to make friends. But in my opinion, it's not that they don't like to socialize, but they are not good at expressing themselves, and they are more likely to release their kindness to others through their actions. They also desire to be accepted by everyone and build friendly relationships with people.

In short, the behaviors and ways of thinking of people with autism are so obvious and unique to the average person. They may not be understood and few people may be willing to approach them. However, with a little more patience, a little more understanding and a little more time, we will realize that they are not so different from us.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad?

Good:

Sunset Boulevard (1950) is a classic film noir that continues to be praised for its dark humor, scathing social commentary, and brilliant performances. Sunset Boulevard's gripping narrative, narrated by a corpse caught in Hollywood's twisted underbelly, keeps you hanging on every word. Richly drawn characters like Norma Desmond, a faded star clinging to delusion, and Joe Gillis, a struggling writer trapped in her web, blur the lines of morality and vulnerability.

In the context of visual, dramatic chiaroscuro lighting sculpts characters from darkness, amplifying every flicker of unease and paranoia. The gothic mansion, Norma Desmond's crumbling testament to lost stardom, looms with its own oppressive grandeur, reflecting the decay of her dreams. Then, when reality blurs with delusion, surreal expressionistic elements emerge. Dream sequences twist and distort, mirroring Norma's fractured mental state, pulling you deeper into the film's hypnotic allure, where shadows conceal as much as they reveal. This visual interplay isn't mere decoration; it's a language that speaks volumes about the characters' hidden desires and the dark underbelly of Hollywood's glittering facade.

Bad:

Sunset Boulevard's deliberate pace, while contributing to its atmospheric richness, could sometimes feel sluggish. Also, the film's portrayal of Hollywood and gender roles reflects the values of its time, which may not resonate with all modern audiences.

2. Compared to today’s styles, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

As compared to today's film style, Sunset Boulevard embraces a slower, deliberate pace, giving weight to nuanced dialogue and character development. Its film noir style, with sharp shadows and dramatic angles, creates a stark atmosphere. Expressionistic dream sequences and the Gothic mansion setting further enhance the film's unique visual language, contrasting the glamorous facade of Hollywood with its darker realities.

Instead of Computer-generated imagery (CGI) spectacle, Sunset Boulevard utilizes chiaroscuro lighting and dramatic shadows to create a sense of unease and psychological darkness. The decaying mansion becomes a character, reflecting Norma's descent into madness.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad?

The most precious thing about this movie is that it tells the truth and cruelty of the film and television industry. The director led the audience to recall the glory and end of a film era. In this movie, the suspense theme is just its appearance. The real core is to express the memory of silent movies and the lamentation of the changing times. Much of the film focuses on the portrayal of the heroine. The heroine is a famous actress in the silent film era. All frontal or side depictions of her show that she is a person from the old era and a person abandoned by the times. She drives an old luxury car that has been discontinued, her room is filled with photos of her past, and she plays Chaplin to entertain the leading actor while comforting him. All this shows that she is still immersed in the glory of the past, but the reality is that she has been forgotten and no one wants to find her to star in movies. The movie depicts a person in an old era in detail. Our era is developing rapidly, but this development is based on the overthrow of the old. The film profoundly expresses nostalgia and regret for the silent film era and the actors of that time. This is the film's greatest strength. Although this film is a classic, it still has shortcomings. As a suspense film, it does not give the audience much suspense, tension, and fear. Although I thought that the plot of the male protagonist entering the villa by mistake at the beginning of the movie was the beginning of a standard villa suspense film, the subsequent development of the movie was beyond my expectation, with neither horror nor suspense.

2. Compared to today's styles, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

The film unfolds the narrative from the perspective of the victim, which is different from many suspense films today. Because the biggest suspense in most suspense films is the victim's life experience. However, this film directly takes the victim as the protagonist and tells his story directly to the audience.

Compared with today's various color and special effects movies, the black and white visual effect of this movie is definitely very dull. This seems to be more consistent with the theme of the film. The emergence of talkies eliminated silent film actors represented by heroines. Nowadays, color movies and special effects movies have replaced black and white movies. The emergence of new things means the end and forgetfulness of old things.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad?

The film uses a non-traditional narrative. The film narrates the entire story with the dead protagonist. At the same time, the film is told in flashback, which draws the audience's attention and makes them curious about what will happen next. In addition, the film is in black and white, but the director uses dark and gloomy contrasts to render the atmosphere. This highlights the dark side of Hollywood. Although the film was well received by the audience, there were still some shortcomings. In my opinion, this film adopts a black-and-white style, which might be slightly uncomfortable for viewers who are accustomed to watching color films. Also, the whole film emphasises the dark side of Hollywood and ignores its creativity.

2. Compared to today's styles, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

The film employs a non-linear narrative structure through flashbacks, which was groundbreaking at the time and added a layer of suspense. This innovative storytelling technique has persisted to this day. Visually, the film is presented in black and white, a departure from the prevalent use of color in contemporary cinema where most films are produced in vibrant hues.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The film “Guang”, good in some ways, included the performances by the stars. The performances of the main character Wen Guang make audiences believe that the character, the disabilities situation exists in our real life. The actor built up the character, made it believable, and moved the audience.

Besides that, the producer and directors used lighting to create the mood for the audiences to immerse in the plot of the story. There are different uses of lighting in the movie including both natural and artificial lighting like the light from candles, the sunlight, reflection lighting, and many more. It creates a sense of cinematic feeling which will easily bring audiences to the story.

Furthermore, the framing of the film is varied and attracts audiences. It creates different kinds of boundaries and dimensions from different camera angles and shots. For example, there are uses of extreme long shots at the end of the movie. There is also the usage of eye level shots and dutch angle shots to differentiate the depth of the background to the audience and the audience won't feel bored.

The composition of the movie also creates the aesthetic style of this film. The organisation of different props, lights lines, actors, and many more creates a sense of unity and helps audiences to understand the character's mindset. For example, in the scene when the character Wen Guang and his brother are at their house, the composition within the scene creates a sense of balance, and the composition makes the audience feel comfortable with the visual.

At the end of the movie in which the main character makes the "piano" through the glasses, the background music associated with it also creates a sense of touching among the audience. The background music "Home, Sweet Home" also makes the audience relate to the character's bonding and relationships with his brother.

As the story is set in Malaysia, the setting, the design, the environment, and the style make it very "Malaysian" and close to Malaysian audiences. Hence, audiences will feel it is believable, real enough, and related when watching the movie.

However, the bad part of the movie is also due to the style. The dialog in Malaysian style might make audiences besides Malaysians difficult to understand and hard to promote it.

2. In my opinion, the stereotype of the disabled makes me change the way of look at these individuals. I might think they are not able to live their life properly and they are "different" in some way. For example, when the character Sue Ann first met Wen Guang at a bus stop she said she is a normal person like others. Although she did not discriminate against Wen Guang during that time, her subconscious reaction said that she is a normal person is a kind of stereotype by many people. This movie proves that disabled people can live their lives well as long as they find the right talent and put them in the right position. They can also like other people to live their lives properly.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad?

Sunset Boulevard (1950) is a classic film noir that was nominated for an Academy Award for Best Picture and a Golden Globe for Best Drama. As a result, it continues to be enjoyed today as well.

First of all, the biggest advantage of this film is that it abandons the traditional suspense film's way of telling the story in the third person, and instead chooses to use a dead character to tell the whole story, and it is a very bold and interesting practice to enter the storyline from the perspective of the victim, and this non-traditional narrative also makes this film more mysterious and suspenseful. This unconventional narrative also makes the film more mysterious and suspenseful, thus enabling the audience to delve deeper into the plot and arouse curiosity. In addition, the film's leading lady was Gloria Swanson, a silent film superstar. Swanson, one of the top stars of silent films, and the excellent interpretation was one of the success factors of the film.

Secondly, even classics have their flaws and regrets. The film's storyline is rather bland, and as a suspense drama there are no impressive reversals or climaxes, making the viewing experience less than perfect, and thus creating a less than intense atmosphere of suspense.

2.Compared to today's styles, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

First of all, the narrative of this film is not the narrative perspective of ordinary films, it is a non-objective narrative with subjective colours, and the film implies the narrative technique of male perspective, the female characters can only be in the position of being judged or gazed at, which is different from today's situation, due to the great improvement of the status of women in the international arena as well as the promotion of gender equality in the international arena, feminism has been presented from time to time in films, and the female characters are no longer being judged by the male perspective in the film, but are more attractive characters with their own independent personalities and self-judgment.

Secondly, in terms of the visual effect of the film, there is a great difference between this film and today's films. As the film was made in the 1950s, the relevant inventions and filming machines of the film industry were not fully developed, and the film was also in the period of alternating renewal of sound films and silent films. Due to the limitation of the era, the film was made in black and white as the colour tone of the film, but the method of lighting and filming was very elaborate in it. Unlike today's films, today's films often use special effects, using different camera equipment or post-production to meet the needs of different films, more colourful in the film, and more outstanding in the visual effects.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good?

Sunset Boulevard is undoubtedly

a great masterpiece of the classic

Hollywood era, which mercilessly

exposes the cruelty of the celebrity

system, twisted and struggling humanity,

and helpless self destruction,declearing

the end of the old era of cinema, and

endowing this film with a distinct social

and ironic flavor, making it an outstanding

milestone in Hollywood's black films.

The use of symbols in the film is very

in line with the declining reality of the

old film era reflected in the story.

For example, the fallen leaves in the

courtyard of Norma Villa convey a

sense of dilapidation and depression.

2. Compared to today's styles, what makes

this film different in terms of storytelling

and visuals?

At the end of Sunset Boulevard, a highly

subjective shot was used, with close-up

shots of Norma's gritted teeth and claws,

exaggerated and ferocious body movements

reflecting the tragic fate of a mentally deranged

person. At the peak of the gloomy atmosphere,

it also made the most sharp satire on the essence

of Hollywood's fame and fortune market.Further

linking the images of Joe and Betty highlights

the sharp contradiction between the commercial

system and artistic pursuit under Hollywood's

strict factory monopoly.

# data[].attributes.body
1.The storyline of this movie is complete and has ups and downs, and in terms of visual style, it's film noir, an embodiment of classic Hollywood aesthetics, making for a great viewer experience. The story revolves around a struggling screenwriter named Joe Gillis, played by William Holden, who stumbles upon the decaying mansion of former silent film star Norma Desmond, played by Gloria Swanson. Desmond, living in the past glories of her career, hires Gillis to help her write a screenplay for her comeback. As Gillis becomes more entangled in Desmond's delusions, the film explores themes of faded fame, obsession, and the harsh realities of the Hollywood industry.The beginning of this movie and the storyline are impressive. It has memorable lines and plot. The opening floating shot became a classic.

2.This movie is different from today's movies in its soundtrack. Today's movies prefer to use electronic music whereas this movie used orchestral music. This movie is digital, this movie is film noir, and this movie uses character dialog to move the plot forward, whereas most movies today use a combination of bits and pieces of flashbacks to move the plot forward!

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes "Sunset Boulevard" good/bad:

Good:

Compelling Storytelling: "Sunset Boulevard" excels in its storytelling department. Because Joe Gillis, a deceased character, is largely narrated via his perspective, the film employs a unique narrative structure that adds a fascinating element to the storyline.

Strong Characters: Gloria Swanson's portrayal of Norma Desmond is one of the most enduring and fully realised of the cast. The movie looks at subjects including the dark side of Hollywood, the delusion of celebrity, and the effects of obsession.

Cinematic Technique: John F. Seitz's photography and Billy Wilder's direction both add to the noir feel of the movie. The narrative's tone and intensity are improved through the use of lighting, shadows, and camera angles.

Compelling Performances: Gloria Swanson's interpretation of Norma Desmond, in particular, has received a lot of recognition for its subtlety and complexity.

Bad:

Pacing: By today's standards, "Sunset Boulevard" may seem leisurely to some viewers. In contrast to modern fast-paced blockbusters, the film's plot may seem more purposeful as it takes its time to reveal the story.

Dated Production: Although the movie had outstanding production qualities for the day, some elements, including the visual effects, might seem archaic to viewers of today.

2. Comparison to Today's Styles:

Storytelling:

Narrative Structure:

The voice acting in "Sunset Boulevard" is unique because the story is told in a non-linear fashion. This is not like a lot of modern movies, which frequently take a more direct and linear approach to storytelling.

Examining Dark Themes: One notable aspect of the movie is its examination of Hollywood's darker side, which includes themes of ageing and obsessions. These subjects may still be included in today's films, but the style and degree of nuance may change.

Visuals:

Cinematic Techniques:The movie employs traditional Hollywood filmmaking methods, such as noir style, which features dramatic camera angles, deep shadows, and expressive lighting. Modern movies frequently make use of cutting-edge technology and various visual aesthetics, like computer-generated imagery and creative camera work.

Black and White:The noir mood of "Sunset Boulevard" is enhanced by the film's black and white photography. This feature stands out because black and white films are less common and colour films are the standard these days.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad?

The black and white films such as Sunset Boulevard have their unique features and shortcomings, here is some analysis.

Black-and-white films are usually supported by strong storytelling and narrative techniques, and Sunset Boulevard is an example of this. The core of the story is very obvious, highlighting the transition from silent to talkies at the time. The design of the character of Norma Desmond represents a person who has been eliminated by the changes of the times, and the whole movie reveals her helplessness underneath the glamorous and proud exterior. The camera language of this movie is very outstanding, like at the end of the film, when Norma's close-up is gradually out of focus, representing the gradual decline of the glory of the silent film era, this film intuitively tells us that the times are changing so rapidly that no matter how ordinary or extraordinary we were, we will eventually dissipate with the passage of time, just as sound replaces silent, 3D replaces 2D, and color replaces black-and-white. Black-and-white movies are very direct in the delivery of information, so that no matter how much or how little the audience knows about the movie, they can read and understand the message. This film, for example, makes extensive use of the male protagonist's narration to drive the plot, and the lines in it are straightforward, without too much finesse to decorate the lines or beat around the bush. This is one of the charms of black-and-white movies in my opinion.

On the other hand, in the aspect of the bad of the black and white film, even if these films utilize dramatic lighting to displace the shortage of colour, and these lightings has their uses, however, depend too much on shadows and dark imagery can become visually boring and hide crucial elements. Also, overexposed scenes might lose emotional depth and wash out textures. Besides, the music of these films is often loud and exaggerated. The right music should enhance the movie, not dominate it. Excessively loud or obtrusive music might obstruct important details, distort conversation, and eventually irritate audiences.

2. Compared to today's styles, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

Storytelling

Joe Gillis, the protagonist, narrates the majority of the film via voiceover narration. Voiceover narration has been less common and more sparingly employed in modern films. Rather than relying exclusively on voiceovers, modern filmmakers could seek to tell stories through their characters' actions, speech, and visuals. But, voiceover can still be a powerful storytelling technique when employed skillfully. In addition, the film depends mainly on dialogue to communicate its story, with little physical action. This emphasis on conversation-driven storytelling is a characteristic of classic Hollywood films, in which dialogue and character interactions are fundamental to the story's progression. Modern films, on the other hand, frequently incorporate more dynamic action sequences and rely on a combination of visual and verbal narrative.

Visual

One of the most obvious differences between this film and modern film is the cinematography and editing techniques. Sunset Boulevard's remarkable lack of colour draws attention to light and shadow, resulting in a dramatic and expressionistic aesthetic. However, various colour palettes are used in modern films to enhance realism and elicit particular moods. Besides, the visual composition, including the types of shots, camera movements and angles and the style of editing in the black and white film are comparatively simple and repetitive. With the development of the film industry and the maturity of technology, modern films will pursue more innovations and advancements in various visual compositions, so we will see more ways of presentation in modern films compared to the films back then. Besides, the dramatic and exaggerated acting in Sunset Boulevard matches the amplified emotions of the black and white genre. Modern performances frequently aim for a more nuanced, realistic style that mimics real-life behavior.

# data[].attributes.body
Sunset Boulevard (1950)

1.What makes these film good/bad?

In my opinion, From the good aspect, with a story that examines the effects of living in the past, "Sunset Boulevard" exposes the seedy edges of Hollywood and excels in inventive storytelling. Plot complexity is added by the painstaking character development, especially that of Norma Desmond. One of the reasons the movie has endured as a cinematic classic is its capacity to offer a distinct viewpoint within the Hollywood industry. When it comes to the bad aspect, one possible disadvantage of "Sunset Boulevard" could be its scant examination of various viewpoints inside the Hollywood setting. Although the film purposely concentrates on a single aspect of the business, some viewers could find themselves yearning for a more thorough depiction of the range of experiences available in the entertainment industry. The movie might have had more depth if it had included a wider range of individuals and viewpoints.

2.Compared to today's styles, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

Based on storytelling,"Sunset Boulevard" places an emphasis on a complex and deep story, in contrast to several contemporary movies that mainly depend on visual effects and quick cutting. The movie offers a depth that may be different from the faster pacing of some modern films because it takes its time to build characters and examine the psychological complexity of Hollywood.Character development is given a lot of weight in the movie, which also delves deeply into the minds of its main characters, especially Norma Desmond. "Sunset Boulevard" stands out for its character-driven approach because modern movies occasionally put action or plot twists ahead of in-depth character analysis. In conclusion, the story of "Sunset Boulevard" is recounted from the perspective of a deceased character and follows a non-linear narrative pattern. This narrative technique, while not exclusive to the movie, stands in stark contrast to the more linear storytelling found in many modern motion pictures.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What make these films good/bad?

Good:

- The biggest advantage of this film is its originality, the unique and innovative aspects in storytelling set the film apart, the film narrated by a true story of the director. The director Quek Shio Chuan has an older brother with autism, and due to his personal experience, the details of the story are very credible and engaging that contribute to the film's success.

- The amazing cinematography elevate the overall quality of the film and the use of light is very beautiful and in place, making the life of the common folks very enjoyable. The framing of every shot looks meticulously planned and carried out. There is a scene that several distorted images through glass and windows let us see a distorted male protagonist, but in his world, everything is normal, and it is our sight that is distorted.

- And the compelling characters and strong performances by Kyo Chen, enhance the audience's emotional connection to the story. Most times actors playing these roles tend to draw all the attention, but Chen never consumes the frames, letting his honest performance inform his struggles. His glassy stares and his flustered states of exigencies readily draw empathy. Likewise with Ernest Chong who plays the younger brother. Their portrayals are natural and the humour unforced. The characters conversed in a mixture of Mandarin, Cantonese and Malay, giving the movie a great sense of place and time.

Bad:

-The pace of the film is too slow, and viewers who are accustomed to fast-paced movies may want to make a two times playback speed.

- Although this movie is based on music as the starting point, some viewers may feel that the music in the movie is too full.

- This film is predicable, some viewers may find the plot too plain and they can predict the ending.

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

- The way I see it, stereotypes of people with disabilities can have a profound impact on how individuals are perceived and treated. These stereotypes often stem from societal misconceptions, lack of understanding, or cultural biases. It's important to recognize that these stereotypes are generalizations and do not accurately represent the diversity and individuality of people with disabilities. For my own experience, my uncle and aunt are deaf-mute, there was a time that I took a walk with my uncle, we were going to cross the road, there was a person honking the horn in the car, and my uncle couldn't hear it, so he didn't respond. Then that person started to spout insults. So for those of us who have lived with them, we may understand their hardships and difficulties, but for those who do not know them, they may feel that when others talk to them, they do not response because of their personality and do not think they are disabled. Challenging stereotypes and promoting accurate, diverse representations of people with disabilities is essential for fostering inclusivity, understanding, and equal opportunities. It's important to recognize the individuality of each person, acknowledging their strengths, capabilities, and contributions to society. Building awareness and promoting positive attitudes can help create a more inclusive and supportive environment for individuals with disabilities.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

Good:

- The film's acclaim stems from various elements that contribute to its excellence, such as its compelling storytelling and the exceptional scriptwriting, sharp, witty, and filled with memorable lines that has become iconic in the history of cinema, offering a unique perspective on the Hollywood industry and the consequences of fame. It effectively explores the psychological complexity of the characters.

- A good movie definitely cannot do without masterful direction and outstanding performances. "Sunset Boulevard" (1950) is widely regarded as a classic film, directed by Billy Wilder. Billy Wilder's direction is often praised for its skillful use of camera angles, lighting, and pacing. The film's atmosphere and mood contribute significantly to its impact. And the characters in the film, particularly Norma Desmond, are memorable and well-developed. Gloria Swanson's performance as Norma is often praised for its depth and complexity.

- And the noir elements and cultural commentary of the film also is a important point to make this film good. "Sunset Boulevard" incorporates elements of film noir, including a morally ambiguous protagonist, the moody cinematography and a sense of doom, adds to the film's atmosphere. Moreover, the film provides insightful cultural commentary on the Hollywood system, the obsession with celebrity, and the challenges faced by individuals in the film industry.

Bad:

- The film's style and pacing to be dated compared to contemporary filmmaking. The slower pace may not resonate with those accustomed to faster, contemporary storytelling.

- The film is kind of lacking diversity in its cast and focuses primarily on a white, privileged perspective, which may be a drawback for audiences seeking more inclusivity.

-The film has been criticized for its portrayal of women, particularly in its depiction of the character Norma Desmond, as it can be seen as reinforcing certain gender stereotypes.

2. Compared to today's styles, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

Storytelling

- "Sunset Boulevard" reflects the filmmaking conventions of the 1950s, often have a slower narrative pace compared to many contemporary films. The storytelling is patient, allowing for more extended scenes and deeper character development.

- And the film uses a non-linear narrative structure, with the protagonist narrating the story from a point in the future. This type of storytelling, while not uncommon in classic cinema, is less prevalent in many contemporary films, which often favor more straightforward and linear storytelling.

Visuals

- "Sunset Boulevard" is shot in black and white, a common practice in the 1950s. This contributes to a distinct visual aesthetic, relying on shades of gray and contrasts to create mood and atmosphere. Today, color is the norm, and black-and-white films are considered more of an artistic choice than a standard.

- Special effects in the 1950s were limited compared to today's advanced CGI capabilities. "Sunset Boulevard" relies on elaborate set designs, practical effects and in-camera techniques, which can appear less sophisticated but carry a certain charm for fans of classic cinema.

- The film showcases classic Hollywood cinematography with carefully composed shots, deep focus, and attention to lighting. While modern films may use more dynamic camera movements and editing techniques, "Sunset Boulevard" relies on static shots and long takes, characteristic of classic filmmaking. And the film was shot in the 1.37:1 aspect ratio, a standard format during that time while modern films often use wider aspect ratios, providing a different visual experience and allowing for more expansive compositions.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

Good：Widely acclaimed for its unique narrative style and in-depth characterizations, Sunset Boulevard creates a somber and tense atmosphere through black-and-white cinematography and finely rendered images. The film also employs the contrast between silent and real movies within the film to emphasize the generation gap and reality of the conflict between Norma and Joe. The movie not only reveals the dark side of Hollywood and the loneliness of its stars, but also reflects the complexity of human nature and the nature of self-deception.

Bad：What make it bad is Pacing: Some viewers might find the film's pacing slow or deliberate, especially when compared to more contemporary films with faster editing styles.

2. Compared to today's styles, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

storytelling: The film employs a non-linear narrative, using flashbacks and deceased narrators, distinguishing it from contemporary cinema.

visuals: Black-and-white cinematography was a common feature of films of the era, providing a unique visual aesthetic. Lighting techniques created a darkly humorous atmosphere for the film.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

Widely regarded as one of the best dramas about the film industry, the film was praised for its biting criticism of Hollywood and the illusions it creates. In particular, characters such as Norma Desmond have been praised for their depth of development. Norma is compared to Charles Dickens's Miss Havisham, highlighting her disconnect from reality and delusions of grandeur. The story is uniquely narrated in the form of an undead narrator, which was an innovation at the time and a departure from the less common narrative structure of modern cinema.

Although Sunset Boulevard is widely regarded as a classic, there has not been much specific discussion about its possible shortcomings. Some viewers may find the film's pacing and narrative style at odds with the preferences of contemporary audiences, especially those accustomed to modern cinematic technology and narrative techniques. In addition, some viewers may find some of the film's themes and presentation too dramatic or dated, affecting its appeal to modern audiences.

2. Compared to today's styles, what makes this film different regarding storytelling and visuals?

Sunset Boulevard is a quintessential film noir, a style no longer common in contemporary cinema. Film noir is often known for its pessimistic, somber tone and complex moral issues. The film delves into the inner workings of Hollywood, focusing specifically on the lives of film writers and their role in the filmmaking process, a rarity in contemporary cinema. The film employs the device of a deceased narrator, which is less common in modern cinema. This narrative style adds a unique, surreal atmosphere to the film.

Contemporary films commonly use color cinematography, whereas Sunset Boulevard uses black and white images, adding a period and artistic atmosphere to the film. Film noir often uses more dramatic and conscious camera work and lighting techniques than contemporary films, and these techniques are well represented in Sunset Boulevard. Shadows and lighting are contrasted throughout the film to enhance the story's emotional depth and visual impact.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

Sunset Boulevard (1950)?

The strengths of this film are that it has the perfect beginning, ending, and narration, and Billy used it to send off a generation of the silent film era; it's about obsession, and it's a thriller-filled love story, and it keeps enough outer suspense and inner tension going all the way through the story that's equal parts outlandish and true. Secondly, Edgar Allan Poe-esque darkness, and Fitzgerald-type flamboyance blend into one. About the lost and phantasmagorical dreams of the Queen of Silent Film. Billy Wilder's direction and the cinematography by John F. Seitz are key strengths of the film. The use of shadow and light, as well as the overall visual composition, create suspense for the audience. The use of shadow and light, as well as the overall visual composition, adds to the film's noir atmosphere and enhances its storytelling.

The downside of this film is that some viewers may find the pace of this film slower compared to more modern films. Also, the picture quality of the film is in black and white, so it can be difficult for viewers who are used to modern picture qualities to get accustomed to it.

2. Compared to today's styles, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

Firstly, for the storyline of the film, the article unfolds mainly in flashbacks, but modern films basically unfold in a linear fashion. The flashbacks can attract the public's curiosity and keep them following the film's storyline.

Visually, the film is a prime example of film black. The very clever use of shadowy visual effects gives the public a psychological state of mystery and curiosity.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

I personally quite liked the way the story was told, with one of our main characters being dead. It really pulled you in and made you curious about how this happened. Gloria Swanson's portrayal of Norma Desmond and William Holden's performance as Joe Gillis are really another bonus in this film. Usually, if a film has bad acting, it really pulls you out of it. These actors, on the other hand, did the opposite—they pulled you in.

2. Compared to today's styles, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

Unlike some modern films that rely heavily on action or visual effects, this film prioritises storytelling, allowing the audience to delve deep into the characters' emotions and motivations. Some might say it's boring or drags out, but if you have the patience, you can really enjoy a great film. While modern storytelling films might be fast-paced and constantly have things happening to keep the audience's attention, When it comes to visuals, it's shot in black and white. The film uses shadows and contrasts to create a striking atmosphere. Modern films, on the other hand, use colour, and if they do shoot in black and white, it's more of a stylistic choice.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes the film good/bad?

Good:

Storytelling: "Sunset Boulevard" is praised for its unconventional narrative structure, with a dead character (Joe Gillis) narrating the story from beyond the grave.

Characters: The film explores the psychological depth of its characters, particularly the aging silent film star, Norma Desmond, and her relationship with the struggling screenwriter, Joe Gillis.

Cinematic Influence: The film is considered a classic of film noir, utilizing moody cinematography, shadows, and a sense of moral ambiguity.

Bad:

Cinematograph Technology: the black-and-white cinematography and visual effects dated compared to contemporary films.

Pacing: a little slow by those accustomed to the faster pace of modern cinema.

2. Compared to today's styles, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

Narrative Structure: The film employs a non-linear narrative with a flashback structure, which was less common in 1950 but has since become a more widely used technique.

Voiceover Technique: The use of a voiceover by a deceased character to tell the story is a distinctive narrative choice not as commonly found in modern cinema.

Visuals:Black and White: The film is in black and white, a standard format in the 1950s but now less common. Modern films predominantly use color.

# data[].attributes.headline
TUTORIAL ASSIGNMENT WEEK 12: GUANG (2018)

# data[].attributes.subject
TUTORIAL ASSIGNMENT WEEK 12: GUANG (2018)

# data[].attributes.body
Please watch GUANG (2018) as attached on Putrablast and explain these issues;

1. What makes these films good/bad

2. From your opinion how do stereotypes of people with disabilities change the way you look at these individuals?

You are given until Sunday (7 January 2024, 12 noon) to submit your opinion here. Please directly put your comment in the comment section (on Padlet) and not send words/PDF files (it is hard to read when all of you sending files instead of commenting directly in the section given).

Thank you.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad

good: This film is famous for its innovative storytelling methods, with its dead protagonist telling the story of the afterlife. This unconventional approach adds depth and intrigue to the storytelling. And the film's cinematography is also excellent, with the use of light and dark lighting and creative camera angles enhancing the film's noir atmosphere. Engrossing soundtrack: perfectly complements the narrative and creates a haunting, evocative atmosphere.

bad：The film has a slow pace, and while well received by many, the film's style and moody cinematography may not be to everyone's taste. Some viewers may find its style too dark or heavy.

2. Compared to today's styles, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

The film uses a non-linear narrative structure, which was a unique and innovative approach in 1950, providing viewers with an unconventional and suspenseful storytelling experience. While non-linear narratives are still used today, this film was a pioneer in the use of this technique. Visually, the film was shot in black and white, a common practice in the 1950s. Today, color cinematography is the norm, with filmmakers using color palettes to convey mood, tone, and atmosphere.

# data[].attributes.body
1. What makes these films good/bad?

Good

Innovative Storytelling: "Sunset Boulevard" is known for its innovative narrative structure, opening with the protagonist's death and then using flashbacks to tell the story. This approach was groundbreaking for its time.

Exploration of Hollywood's Dark Side: The film provides a critical and cynical look at the Hollywood film industry, addressing issues such as celebrity, obsession, and the price of fame. It is often praised for its commentary on the ruthless nature of the industry.

Noir Aesthetics: "Sunset Boulevard" is celebrated for its noir cinematography, including the use of shadowy visuals, high contrast lighting, and a moody atmosphere that contributes to the film's overall sense of doom.

Iconic Scenes and Lines: The film has produced several iconic scenes and memorable lines, such as Norma Desmond's declaration, "I am big. It's the pictures that got small." These moments have become ingrained in popular culture.

Bad

Dated Elements: Some viewers may find certain aspects of the film dated, including the portrayal of Hollywood in the 1950s and the stylistic conventions of the time. This can impact the accessibility for contemporary audiences.

Limited Diversity: Like many classic films from the era, "Sunset Boulevard" has been criticized for its lack of diversity in casting and its focus on a predominantly white, male perspective.

Depiction of Mental Illness: The portrayal of Norma Desmond's mental health has been a subject of discussion, with some critics suggesting that it perpetuates stigmas surrounding mental illness.

2. Compared to today's styles, what makes this film different in terms of storytelling and visuals?

"Sunset Boulevard" (1950) differs from today's films in terms of storytelling and visuals. One notable aspect is the classic Hollywood narrative style employed by director Billy Wilder. The film follows a more linear and structured storytelling approach, typical of the filmmaking conventions of its time. Unlike many modern films that experiment with non-linear narratives or unconventional plot structures, "Sunset Boulevard" adheres to a more traditional storytelling format.

Visually, the film showcases the black-and-white cinematography characteristic of the Golden Age of Hollywood. The use of monochrome film creates a distinctive aesthetic, emphasizing contrasts and shadows. This visual style contributes to the film's noir atmosphere, a common feature of many films from the 1940s and 1950s.

Moreover, the set designs and practical effects used in "Sunset Boulevard" reflect the filmmaking techniques of the era. Unlike contemporary films that often rely heavily on advanced CGI and digital effects, "Sunset Boulevard" captures the essence of practical filmmaking, with carefully crafted sets and in-camera effects.

In summary, the classic narrative structure and black-and-white cinematography set "Sunset Boulevard" apart from today's films, offering a glimpse into the storytelling and visual styles of Hollywood's Golden Age.

# data[].attributes.body
1.     What makes "Sunset Boulevard" (1950) good or bad?

This classic movie offers a powerful critique of the Hollywood industry and the price of fame. The performances of the actors are also highly praised. However, This was not very popular when it was first released, but critics recognized its qualities and it has since become a classic. I think some people may find the movie's dark themes and characters disturbing.

2. What makes it different from today's films?

- Storytelling: "Sunset Boulevard" is different from modern films because it portrays the dark side of fame and the Hollywood industry in an unflinching way. It focuses on the cost of needing to be seen and the loss of self in living as a spectacle. The movie's themes of fiction and reality, the darkness of celebrity and fame, and gender constructs are still relevant today. The film explores dichotomies characteristic of the film noir genre, such as illusion/truth, present/past, and freedom/imprisonment.

- Visuals: The film's use of metaphor and its portrayal of the faded glamour of Hollywood make it stand out from modern movies. The movie's focus on the differences between silent films and talkies, using faces to convey emotions and thoughts, making dialogue secondary in many places, is also unique to the film.

- Acting: The acting style is different from modern films, as it was made during the classic period of Hollywood cinema. The actors performances are more theatrical and expressive, with a focus on conveying emotions through facial expressions and body language.

# data[].attributes.body
1.     What makes "Sunset Boulevard" (1950) good or bad?

The classic movie offers a powerful critique of the Hollywood industry and the price of fame. The performances of the actors are also highly praised. However, This was not very popular when it was first released, but critics recognized its qualities and it has since become a classic. I think some people may find the movie's dark themes and characters disturbing.

2. What makes it different from today's films?

- Storytelling: "Sunset Boulevard" is different from modern films because it portrays the dark side of fame and the Hollywood industry in an unflinching way. It focuses on the cost of needing to be seen and the loss of self in living as a spectacle. The movie's themes of fiction and reality, the darkness of celebrity and fame, and gender constructs are still relevant today. The film explores dichotomies characteristic of the film noir genre, such as illusion/truth, present/past, and freedom/imprisonment.

- Visuals: The film's use of metaphor and its portrayal of the faded glamour of Hollywood make it stand out from modern movies. The movie's focus on the differences between silent films and talkies, using faces to convey emotions and thoughts, making dialogue secondary in many places, is also unique to the film.

- Acting: The acting style is different from modern films, as it was made during the classic period of Hollywood cinema. The actors performances are more theatrical and expressive, with a focus on conveying emotions through facial expressions and body language.

- Realism: The film's depiction of Hollywood is more realistic than modern films, as it was made during a time when the industry was more insular and self-contained. The film's portrayal of the way studios treat actors, the obsession with youth and beauty, and the fading of silent film stars is more authentic than modern films.