# data[].attributes.body
Claim 1: Revenge is a wild justice.

Evidence: The first wrong is already against the law, and the wrong (by doing revenge) takes away the role of the law (authorities) to address that law. So by taking revenge, you're almost taking the law into your own hands, which is an uncivilized thing to do.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 1: public revenges are for the most part fortunate

evidence: Public revenges are mostly a good thing like the death of Cesar, Pertinax, Henry the Third, and more.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 1:That which the past is gone.

Evidence:In the text "Revenge" it states " that which is past is gone, and irrevocable." Which is saying that it is better to focus on the present and your future then to sit back and not reminisce on the past.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim: the most tolerable sort of revenge is for those wrongs

Evidence: which there is no right to a fault.  A man taking notice of the revenge such as there is no law for wrong-doings but a man’s enemy is still ahead of times and it’s two for one.

# data[].attributes.body
claim 1:The most tolerable sort of revenge is for those wrongs which there is no law to remedy.

Evidence: Let someone take notice that there is no law for wrongs.

# data[].attributes.body
CLAIM: The most tolerable sort of revenge is for those wrongs which there is no law to remedy.
Evidence: In paragraph 4 he states " let a man take heed the revenge  be such as there is no law to punish"  which meant let someone take notice that there is no law for wrongs

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 2:If a man studies revenge his wounds will be fresh and new and be able to heal and do well.

Evidence: Is that if you study revenge you would be able to keep those wounds new and they would heal and do well naturally without the hurt and pain of getting revenge and those wounds turn into scars.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 2:Public revenges are for the most part fortunate.

Evidence:In Paragraph eight he states "Public revenges are for the most part fortunate." This means Public revenges are mostly a good thing like the death of Cesar, Pertinax, Henry the Third, and more. Private revenges are not good.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 1: In taking revenge, a man is but even with his enemy; but in passing it over, he is superior.

Evidence: For it is a prince's part to pardon. It explains that the author thinks people of higher status should forgive and honor. Like Solomon, he was a person who was known for his wisdom. The prince was known to forgive and be wised of others.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 1: Some, when they take revenge, are desirous the party should know whence it cometh.

Evidence: They want the other person to feel sorry and hurt for got they done.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 1: Revenge is appropriate only when those wrongs have no law which can't be set right.

Evidence: " But another man's enemy is still within the grasp, and it is two for one."

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 2: Certainly,In taking revenge,a man is but even with his enemy;but in passing it over,he is superior.

Evidence: "For it is a prince's part to pardon."
Typically meaning ( a prince is supposed to be forgiving ).

# data[].attributes.body
claim - "Wise men have enough to do with thing present and to come "
Evidence - what's in the past is gone and can not be changed

# data[].attributes.body
Claim: Public revenges are for the most part fortunate.
Evidence: "But in private revenge is not so. Nay rather vindictive person lives the life of witches; who as they are mischievous, so end they unfortunate"  Meaning in private revenges it is not good, and actually someone who has a strong desire to take revenge live an evil life because they are mischievous and it ends unfortunately.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim- "there is no man doth a wrong for the wrong sake"
Evidence- they do wrong to make themselves profit, gain pleasure, honor, or the like

# data[].attributes.body
Claim 2:  For as for the first wrong, it doth but offend the law.

Evidence: If you take revenge on another person for something there will be consequences.

# data[].attributes.headline
Valerie ,Yoselin, Julia : Claim 1 : revenge can be good  Claim 2: revenge can be bad

# data[].attributes.subject
Valerie ,Yoselin, Julia : Claim 1 : revenge can be good  Claim 2: revenge can be bad

# data[].attributes.body
Evidence: According to the text, "Of Revenge," from paragraph 5, it states, " The most tolerable sort of revenge is for those wrongs which there is no low to remedy: but then let a man take heed the revenge be such as there is no law to punish: else a man's enemy is still beforehand, and it is two for one. "
The article also states, "public revenges are for the most part fortunate as that for the death of caesar for the death of pertinax for the death of henry the third of france and many more.

# data[].attributes.body
claim 2: There is no man doth a wrong for the wrongs sake.

Evidence: No man did wrong for no reason but to make him feel better about himself. If a man does something wrong out of anger or bad temper, it would be like a thorn that pricks you and scratches you because they dont know any better.