# data[].attributes.body
1. "Public schools have no such problem," claims Sipher ("So That Nobody")

2. Rodger Sipher makes the bold statement: "... Abolish compulsory-attendance laws and allow only those who are committed to getting an education at attend" ("So That Nobody")

3. Sipher claims that students who don't want to learn will not interfere with those who want to learn ("So That Nobody")

# data[].attributes.body
1. According to Sipher, "Abolition of archaic attendance laws would produce enormous dividends" ("So That Nobody").
2. Sipher argues that "the solution to the problem is simple" ("So That Nobody").
3. Sipher believes that the students that are not motivated should "stay away" ("So That Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
1. Roger Sipher states, "American education is in trouble" ("So That Nobody").

2. "The solution to this problem is simple," Sipher writes, "Abolish compulsory-attendance laws" ("So That Nobody").

3. Sipher argues that "schools should be for education," but "they have failed miserably" ("So That Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
1. "Abolition of archaic attendance laws would produce enormous dividends", Sipher claims ("So That Nobody").
2. According to Sipher, "the solution to this problem is simple..." ("So That Nobody").
3. In the article "So That Nobody Has To Go To School If They Don't Want To", Roger Sipher suggests that "...American education is in trouble".

# data[].attributes.body
1) According to Sipher, "abolition of archaic attendance laws would produce enormous dividends" ("So That Nobody").

2) Sipher states that schools have attempted to please all people, and has failed at what they were originally formed for. ("So That Nobody").

3)

# data[].attributes.body
1.  Sipher implies that, "A decline in standardized test scores is but the most recent indicator that American education is in trouble" ("So That Nobody")
2. Sipher believes that one upside to eliminating attendance laws is that,"...students opposed to learning would not be able to pollute the educational atmosphere..." ("So That Nobody").
3.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Sipher argues, "This will not end public education" ("So that Nobody").
2. The article "So That Nobody Has To Go To School If They Don't Want To" argues that compulsory attendance prevents kids who want to learn from learning (Sipher).
3. Private schools simply will dismiss students knowing that they will be transferred to public school. ("So that Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
1. According to Sipher "Abolition of archaic attendance laws would produce enormous dividends" (So That Nobody).
2.  Sipher Argues

# data[].attributes.body
1. According to Sipher, we should, "...Abolish compulsory- attendance laws..."("So The Nobody").
2. In his article, "So That Nobody Has To Go To School If They Don't Want To", Sipher states, "Without compulsory- attendance, public schools would be freer to oust students whose academic or personal behavior undermines the educational mission of the institution."
3. Sipher believes that by removing attendance laws schools would have more freedom to remove students ("So That Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
1) Sipher makes known that schools are not a daycare nor a place to hangout; they are a serious place ("So That Nobody").

2) According to Roger Sipher, schools are not daycares or places for kids to hangout, they are a serious place for learning ("So That Nobody").

3) School is not a child's care service or a place to hangout, it is a place to learn ("So That Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
1. Sipher states, "Abolition of archaic attendance laws would produce enormous dividends" ("So That Nobody").
2. Growing up my mother would check my grades throughout the semester to see how well I was doing in school. Sipher claims that Grades would be a representation for how a student is doing in school ("So That Nobody").
3. American education is in trouble and the indicator is the fall of standardized test scores (Sipher "So That Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
1. Sipher states that "abolishing compulsory attendance laws" is the "solution to the problem" ("So That Nobody").

2. In "So That Nobody Has To Go To School If They Don't Want To," by Roger Sipher, he writes that, "Without compulsory attendance, public schools would be freer to oust students whose academic or personal behavior undermines the educational mission of the institution" ("So That Nobody").

3. Sipher claims that by doing away with compulsory attendance laws, education will be higher quality due to the fact that only dedicated and committed students will be attending schools ("So That Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
1. "Contrary to conventional belief," Sipher reveals, "legislators enacted compulsory-attendance laws to legalize what already existed" (So That Nobody).
2. Sipher believes, "[abolishing compulsory-attendance laws] will not end public education" and truly has no effect on school population (So That Nobody).
3. Sipher claims public education would not be abolished alongside compulsory-attendance laws (So That Nobody).

# data[].attributes.body
1. Sipher claims that "school is a serious place where once goes to learn" ("So That Nobody").
2. Sipher argues that it would be benificial for american schools to get rid of the manditory attendance laws:
This will not end public education. Contrary  to conventional belief, legislators enacted compulsory-attendance laws to legalize what already existed. William Landes and Lewis Solomon, economists, found little evidence that manditory- attendance laws increased the number of children in schools. ("So that Nobody")
3. According to Sipher, "private schools have no such problem" ("So That Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
Sipher states that the answer is "abolish compulsory attendance  laws" (So That Nobody).

According to Sipher "private schools have no such problem" (So That Nobody).

# data[].attributes.body
Sipher argues that students who are not interested in retaining knowledge can be extracted from the learning environment to help teachers maintain educating their students.

# data[].attributes.body
Private schools do not struggle with this. They can remove a student, knowing they have public school as an option. Without compulsory attendance, public schools would be able to drop students who did not meet academic or behavioral expectations.

# data[].attributes.body
Private schools are not affected by this, they can fail or send students elsewhere knowing that they will be able to attend another school. Compulsory attendance forces the schools to keep and deal with the students rather than give them up.

# data[].attributes.body
1. According to Montagu, "A decline in standardized test scores is but the most recent indicator that American education is in trouble" ("So That Nobody")
2. Montagu believes there is a very specific reason for declines in education:
A decline in standardized test scores is but the most recent indicator that American education is in trouble ("So That Nobody").

3. "A decline in standardized test scores," writes Montagu, " is but the most recent indicator that American education is in trouble ("So That Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
Cipher makes the argument that "Compulsory attendance not only forces those who wish to have no part in school into the fray, but it jeopardizes the education of those who wish to be there by surrounding them by others who are simply not motivated ("So That Nobody")."

# data[].attributes.body
1. American education is seeing a decrease in standardized test scores Sipher states the reason for this is:
present mandatory-attendance laws force many to attend school who have no wish to be there. (So That Nobody)
2. The removal of forced attendance laws would "produce enormous dividends" (Sipher So That Nobody).
3. Sipher argues that if forced attendance laws were removed it would create great benefits (So That Nobody).

# data[].attributes.body
1. According to Sipher, "Abolition of achaic attendance laws would produce enormous dividends" ("So That Nobody").
2. Sipher argues that private schools have more freedom then public schools:
Private schools have no such problem. They can fail or dismiss students, knowing such students can attend public school, Without compulsory attendance, public schools would be freer to oust students whose academic or personal behavior undermines the educational mission of the institution. ("So That Nobody")
3. Sipher finds school to be a serious place to learn, not 'day care centers' or 'indoor street corners' (So That Nobody).

# data[].attributes.body
According to Sipher, the recent drop of students attending school is due to the fact that the students do not have an overall choice ("So That Nobody")

# data[].attributes.body
Sipher explains that even the teachers know that some students know they will pass regardless of their effort in elementary and middle school ("So that Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
Author Rodger Sipher argues that the compulsory attendance laws will not cause public education to end. That the laws redundantly reinforce what is already in place. Two economists, Lewis Solomon and William Landes, claim that the mandatory attendance laws do not increase the number of students who attend such public schools and that the schools have never successfully enforced the laws.

# data[].attributes.body
In Roger Sipher's article he explains how private schools do not have the problem public schools face of students that hinder their educational objectives. They can "fail or dismiss students", since they have the ability to go to public schools. If attendance was not forced they would be able expel students with poor personal or academic behaviors that are a detriment to the school's educational goals.

# data[].attributes.body
In Sipher's article, "So That Nobody Has To Go To School If They Don't Want To," he implies that the reason that reason for decreased standardized test scores is because of students who have "little desire to learn" and "have no wish to be there". Cipher believes this can be fixed by removing attendance laws for schools so that the students who are willing and want to learn can get their education.

# data[].attributes.body
Private schools do not have this problem. Private schools have the safety of knowing if they fail or kick a student out they still have other options of schooling. If public schools weren't bound by compulsory attendance they would have more freedom to dismiss a student whose behavior, whether personally or academically, threatens the school's ultimate mission.

# data[].attributes.body
In the article by Roger Sipher, he states that repealing the compulsory attendance laws in public schools would be a step in the right direction fro improving education. Most parents want their children to receive a high school diploma. But, the compulsory attendance inhibits the ability of public schools to effectively discipline the students and make their education good.

# data[].attributes.body
Roger Sipher states in the article (So Thant Nobody). that Recent drops in standardized test scores are alarm bells warning that American education is falling behind. A driving force behind the dilemma are the mandatory-attendance laws that make people attend school even if no desire to learn. These kids cause problems with in the school that make it an impossible learning atmosphere.

# data[].attributes.body
If high school teachers were asked if troublesome students learned anything worthwhile or if they do homework, they would say no. Students are aware that they can slack off and still manage to get by. Therefore, they stay at school, even if they could quit legally, because they know they are able to do less than quality work and are still graduate.

# data[].attributes.body
Roger Sipher states the modern-day school environment is much different than its original purpose. A school nowadays will try to impact all types of people, resulting in failure. (Sipher "So That Nobody ")

# data[].attributes.body
If you ask teachers, they will tell you delinquent students won't do anything or learn anything of value. These students know that they'll be passed regardless of the work they do. It's likely that they'll either drop out or allow themselves to be passed into a diploma.

# data[].attributes.body
In the private school system they don't have to worry about passing or failing students. They know that if they fail or dismiss a student, they will be able to attend a public school. Without compulsory

# data[].attributes.body
Cipher states, to begin with, this would prove to everyone that school is a place to go and learn, not a place to take lightly. Schools, although often mistaken, are not for child care services. Any young kids or teens who are not willing to learn should steer clear of school, and this in turn will help to end compulsory schooling ("So That Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
Public education would not be consequently abolished alongside mandatory-attendances laws. These laws only came about to legitimize the constant and steady schooling of grade level children. Economists proved the little influence these laws actually had on school population and the effectiveness of them.

# data[].attributes.body
1 - Roger Sipher claims that mandatory-attendance laws are a reason for lowered test scores ("So That Nobody").
2 - According to Sipher, "there is no contradiction between the assertion that compulsory attendance has had little effect on the number of children attending school and the argument that repeal would be a positive step toward improving education" ("So That Nobody").
3 - "Schools are neither day-care centers nor indoor street corners," explains Sipher, "young people who resist learning should stay away" ("So That Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
1. Sipher offers a solution for the extra money saved by using "these savings to support institutions to to deal with young people not in school" ("So That Nobody").
2. Sipher believes that removing compulsory attendance would allow motivated students and teachers a better education environment ("So That Nobody").
3. One person that is against compulsory attendance claims removing the law "would alert everyone that school is a serious place where on goes to learn" (Sipher).

# data[].attributes.body
According to Sipher, "A decline in standardized test scores is but the most recent indicator that American education is in trouble" ("So That Nobody").

"If,  in the long run, these institutions prove more costly," writes Sipher, "at least we would not confuse their mission with that of schools" ("So That Nobody").

One writer says the solution to the problem is to "Abolish compulsory-attendance laws and allow only those who are committed to getting an education to attend" ("So That Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
Roger sipher expounds, " Schools should be for education" ("So That Nobody").

the writer claims that school is strictly a place to gain knowledge and not for playing around (Sipher, "So That Nobody")

In the passage, So That Nobody Has To Go To School If They
Don't Want To, Sipher states, "Teachers could stop policing recalcitrant students and start educating."

# data[].attributes.body
According to Sipher, "A decline in standardized test scores is but the most recent indicator that American education is in trouble." ("So That Nobody")

# data[].attributes.body
According to Sipher, "Abolition of archaic laws would produce enormous dividends" (So That Nobody).

Sipher argues that compulsory-attendence laws are the reason for students being less motivated  to attend and learn at school (So That Nobody).

"The solution to this problem is simple," says Sipher, " Abolish compulsory-attendence laws and allow only those who are committed to getting an education to attend" (So That Nobody).

# data[].attributes.body
1. Sipher claims that getting rid of laws concerning attendance would better the learning environment for those interested in increasing their education ("So That Nobody").
2. Sipher describes that "contrary to conventional belief, legislators enacted compulsory-attendance laws to legalize what already existed" ("So That Nobody").
3.  Sipher feels that "private schools have no such problem," because they know "students can attend public schools" ('So That Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
Sipher discusses how the removing of compulsory attendance from public school systems would reshape the atmosphere that students are put in. It would go from a day-care to a place where serious young people go to learn. ("So That Nobody")

# data[].attributes.body
Second, students who want nothing to doing with learning in a school setting would not disrupt others who value their education. In return this would allow for teachers to stop worrying about the insubordinate students and focus their time on student who care.

# data[].attributes.body
Roger Sipher explains that numerous students who have no desire to be in school are forced to attend due to the laws put in place. The students who are reaching for a higher education would obtain the one they deserve if students that did not want to be in school were not attending. By getting rid of these attendance regulations this problem could be solved because only those who have a desire to attend school would do so.

# data[].attributes.body
Research has shown that students who are forced to go to school are not as successful as those who want a proper education. There is a law that is keeping them in school, this is the reason that test scores and attendance is so low. If students were not forced to go to school, then there would be a decrease in the amount of people who don't graduate.

# data[].attributes.body
Private schools don’t have the same problem as public schools because of their independence to disregard students who don’t care to take their education seriously.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Sipher states that on the other hand,  private schools don't have this problem because they can discipline students harshly, even expulsion, because they know that these students will now be required to go to a public school; they know that they are not the only place where students can get their education. They are not required to enforce compulsory attendance which means that they have more power over harsh disciplinary acts when it comes to students ("So That Nobody").

2. In "So That Nobody Has To Go To School If They Don't Want To", Roger Sipher explains, "Private schools have no such problem. They can fail or dismiss students, knowing such students can attend public school".

5. If required attendance is ended in publics then "public schools would be freer to oust students whose academic or personal behavior undermines the educational mission of the institution" (Sipher "So That Nobody").

# data[].attributes.body
Private schools do not have compulsory attendance, so they have the power to fail or dismiss students at will. These institutions know the kids they expel can attend a public school, so they are able to do what is necessary to rid the school of students whose behavior, academic or personal, reflects poorly on the school. This therefore keeps attendance from being an issue.

# data[].attributes.body
The laws that require students to attend school seems to be the reason for lower rates in test score. Students are less motivated to do the work when they know that they will eventually reach the point where they can quit school or receive their diploma. Education scores and qualities will go up if this compulsory-attendance laws were diminished. Therefore school shouldn't be made a requirement for the ones who have no motivation or want to attend.

# data[].attributes.body
Taking away the compulsory-attendance law is simple solution to the issues regarding the children who have no desire to receive an education. If the law was abolished it would then allow for the motivated and driven students to attend school without the distraction of the other students who resist earning an education.

# data[].attributes.body
Forcing students by law to attend school has seems to have a very small effect on actual attendance, and people counter that these laws should be repealed. Parents tend to want an education for their students and this fact only appeals to the fact that mandated attendance by law can really inhibit students and teachers from learning and educating.

# data[].attributes.body
Students that do not want to be in school are forced to attend because of the mandatory-attendance law, contributing to the problem American education is facing.  As a result, these unmotivated students and the ones who do want to learn do not get the level of education that they deserve.

# data[].attributes.body
Public education will not vanish. Legislators will achieve a happy medium with compulsory-attendance laws. Roger Sipher explained that two economists, Landes and Solomon discovered that forced attendance is not what kept up the numbers of kids in school most likely because the attendance laws where never faithfully enforced.

# data[].attributes.body
In order to maximize learning in schools, attendance should not be required. This would allow the students who really want to learn the opportunity to get a quality education. Although it may cause problems such as expenses and more kids without an education, the level and standards of learning that goes in in schools would increase drastically.

# data[].attributes.body
The laws requiring students to attend school seems

# data[].attributes.body
Instead of making school a requirement just let the kids who want to attend come-- this way you do not receive kids who do not respect school and its purpose.

# data[].attributes.body
In Roger Siphen's "So That Nobody Has To Go To School If They Don't Want To", to avoid lowering test scores, laws should be enforced to allow education to be a privilege, not a right. This will allow opportunities for students that actually want to learn and get an education. This method will overall allow funds to go more to education to the people that want it. As for people that don't want an education, they can have an opportunity to learn other skills outside of the fundamental learning environment. ("Nobody Has To")

# data[].attributes.body
The quality of education will improve if students that are willing to educate themselves come to school. This would not only help save the school institutions money but also help teachers focus on giving a quality education to students. The money that is saved could be invested toward those who are not wanting a formal education.

# data[].attributes.headline
So That Nobody Has to Go To School If They Don't Want To

# data[].attributes.subject
So That Nobody Has to Go To School If They Don't Want To

# data[].attributes.body
Resources previously exhausted to keep kids in school could be reallocated to form institutions for kids not willing to go to school. This would allow schools to focus on educating those seeking education, and separate institutions to focus on helping children in need of other attention.

# data[].attributes.body
The quality of education will go up and more motivated students will receive better educations if compulsory-attendance laws were abolished.

# data[].attributes.headline
So that nobody has to go to school if they don't want to paraphrase

# data[].attributes.subject
So that nobody has to go to school if they don't want to paraphrase

# data[].attributes.body
American education seems to be doomed due to lower test score rates than before.

There are laws that require students to be at school and this seems like the reason for this. Many kids don't want to learn and seemingly refuse to go to school. This limits the education of students who actually want to be there.

# data[].attributes.body
Because private schools have the ability to discharge students from their facilities, attendance and completing work is not much of a problem

# data[].attributes.body
In Roger Sipher's "So That Nobody Has To Go To School If They Don't Want To", Sipher emphasizes the explanation for a significant decrease in standardized test scores. He claims that forced attendance to schools causes these scores to plummet due to the children not having the drive to work hard in school. This also negatively affects the students that want to learn in school.

# data[].attributes.body
Private schools do not have to deal with nearly as much misconduct as public schools. Each student they dismiss while have the opportunity to attend public school and will not be turned away. If public school was to eliminate their strict attendance policy, they would have an easier time dismissing students.