# data[].attributes.body
1. Teachers initialy thought the lenght of the project is just right for 88% which changed at the end of the project for 70% and 30% feeling it was too long
Interestingly  90% of students felt project's lenght was just right at the end + 7% stating it could be longer and only 3% stating it was too long
2. Judging involvment in the project 40% ofteacher were creative and helpful meeting deadlines. 10% did what they were asked and 50% struggling with deadlines
And again 88% were creative ,cooperative and helpful meeting deadlines 10% struggling and 3 % passive
3. 60% of teacher would reduce the number of task per month and thinking some of them were useless  40% felt project was well planned and everything went according to the plan
Students judged 23% task started too late and were too many 77% though the project were well planned ,went according to plan with 3 % eager to have more tasks per month
4. Initialy 60 % of teachers and 84% student were new to eTwinning project at the end  40% of teachers are ready and with pleasure will participate again with 50 % teachers open and 10% not eager to repeat the experience  50% of studets are ready and with pleasure
+ 43% why not and 6 % unwilling So it means students are a bit more enthusiasticc than teachers about further participation but new studets had otherally a good experience
5. 84% of students they want to learn about diets 24% food 8% awarness of influence of food on health  20% wanted to find out about diffrent countries and cultures
Techers expectations were more varied and not directly related with main aim of the project bur more with its management. So teachers 70% declared project based learning, 50% coordinating students work 40% international school collaboration 22% ICT tools and 27% team work only 25% balanced diet 33% new ways of thinking on nutrition . Aksed about ICT tools teachers admitted 60% want to learn 11% want others to teach them . Only 29 are confident or able to teach others and very interestingly students had no need to learn or be helped with ICT. 70 % declared to know it very well and be confident 4 able to teach others and 26% not perfect but able. It seems the same number of students can theach the same number of teachers. Students can be our resource to learn ICT
6. Teachers declared 60% learnt to use ICT tools and 10% skype. we learnt technology 10% knowledge on countries 10% team work and 10% new ways of thinking about nutrition. Students reacherd their initial aims as 22% diets, 47% nutricion, 17% food related diseases,
44% language, 40% knowledge about other countries, 22% ICT tools, 26% videoconferencing
15 film making 24% online surveys  so it shows students learnt what the aim of project targeted at + creative skills with use of technology and language
7. We all communicated mostly on facebook, then Skype and by e-mail as least favourable....We often used messenger on facebook
8. Teachers decided 70% ferequency of contact was just right with 20% confident to contact and 20% waiting to be contacted On studetns side 60% felt the frequency was just right with 25% wanting to contact more often.
It put our attention for vital need of students for face to face frequent interactions.
9.Students described that 46% an communicate in english 24 very goog, good or fluent in writing posts 20% so so and only 12% needin help. At the same time
80% of teachers felt confident or so so and 18% needing encouragement and more practise.
10. Teachers evaluated their work with students 60% cooperating well, 40% helping with deadlines, 20% duing more than students, 20% delegating work to students and 10% not cooperating well.  Students were active in 50%, cooperative 45%,  15 % doing more work than peers only 3% passive and 12% struggling to meet deadlines.
Students liked 43% videoconferencing 20% students interactions and work on projects tasks 35% working on recipes and tutorials, 21% digital posters and 20% cartoons only 3% surveys
11. Asked about what can enrich the project in future students said travels to partners' countries.
Teachers noticed need for a better task distribution, and more focus on planned students interactions

# data[].attributes.body
TEACHERS                                                                    STUDENTS

# data[].attributes.body
TEACHERS                                                    STUDENTS