# data[].attributes.body
After reading Jaye's opinion about Mary Maloney I agree with the way she has explained her evidence from the article. she shows good citation by telling you how she has make her own personal choice to kill her husband and that no one really did tell her that she had to and that she did because she was not pleased with the news that the husband had given her.

# data[].attributes.body
Zachary, I agree with you a little bit because it was her choice to kill her husband but she did it because of what her husband told her so I think she was effected mainly by her environment. In the article it also states that she was pregnant and that could have made her a little crazy. Another thing to consider is the fact that she might have been stressed after waiting so long for her husband and she might have chronic depression. This is why I think her environment effected her the most.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with you because when reading your text I felt that you restated what happened in the story more than actual cite evidence. Yes she cares about her husband, but though I said that she could've inherited a physcotic trait, she could've also inherited a caring trait. I believe she did not get it from her environmet because her husband cleary didn't care for her back.

# data[].attributes.body
Hagan, I agree that Mary Maloney is influenced more by the environment than by nature. I agree with your statement saying that she was told something upsetting or disappointing. One minute she was being nice and trying to do what he wanted to do but the next she was very angry with him.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Emma completely because in the article it sates that Mary Molany was 6 months pregnant and always had a cheery attitude. In paragraph two it states that " Her mouth and her eyes, with their new calm look".  I also enjoyed the evidence that supported her answer.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with you because in the text paragraph 22 it states "She did everything without thinking." Beyond this point in the text it tells me what kind of numbness she felt and she wasn't really aware to how she felt until after her husband fell to the ground. This evidence means to me that it wasn't so much of a personal opinion. If it was her decision in the text somewhere it would explain how Mary felt ready to kill him or at least show the reader. But it talks about how she didn't think . She simply killed him out of the shock of the news.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with you because she wouldn't have hit him if it was just her environment she chose to do that and the evidence that you put backs you up on your statement. I definitely think that she men't to do that because in the text it says that " her mouth and her eyes, with a new calm look she

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Vivian, because I said she is shaped by her individual agency as well. Vivian's evidence is also good proof because she said that in paragraph 19-21 her husband told her something that made her upset, which would trigger her emotions and she killed her husband. That is why I agree.

# data[].attributes.body
I Agree that you think Mary is shaped more by nurture, although I do not agree with your evidence that backs this statement up. I disagree with your evidence because you quote does not support your topic sentence that Mary Maloney is affected more by nurture which means her surroundings and environment. Your evidence is just supporting your statement " She acts very psychopathic."

# data[].attributes.body
I agree because Mary Maloney is trying to make her husband dinner and then he keeps telling her not to and on top of that she's already upset because of what her husband told her. The text states "this is going to be a big shock to you, I'm afraid."

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with you because it is true that Mary Maloney had the personal choice to either control her anger or take it out on her husband, and she chose to take it out on him. The story states that, "It didn't take long, four or five minutes at the most, and she sat through it all, watching him with puzzled horror." That explains that she is upset with the rather unfortunate news that she received.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with you because Mary Maloney did have a choice to either brush of the bad news her husband gave her, or to get revenge. In this case she took revenge. That means that she would be mostly shaped by her individual agency. In paragraph 28 it says, " All right, she told herself. So I've killed him." This blatantly states that she chose to kill her husband.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with your statement because in the text it says "...she sat through it all, watching him in horror." This means that because of what her husband told her she had a reaction that she might not have even meant to do it, but she was affected by what he said to her. What he said to her shocked her so much that she did something she regretted earlier. We know she regretted it because later in the text it talks about how all her old feelings for love came back to her and how she didn't have to fake the crying. Therefore, her environment affected her the most.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with Rachel because in paragraph 25 it states, "At that point, Mary Maloney simply walked up behind him without any pause, she swung the big frozen leg of lamb high in the air and brought it down as hard as she could on the back of his head." Mary Maloney choose to hit her husband with the frozen leg of lamb. The text doesn't mention someone being a murder in the family.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with you because, Mary's environment cannot persuade her to do anything. Mary Maloney chose by herself to swing the lamb leg. This is shown in paragraph 57 the author wrote that Mary says, "Why don't you eat up the lamb in the oven?" This tells the reader that she knew that they presumed her innocent so she chose to use that to her advantage and have the detectives eat it. This wasn't influenced whatsoever by her environment and was done entirely on her part, on her choosing.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with you because you claim that killing him was entirely her choice. I do not think so because I feel like it was not entirely her choice at all. I can back this statement up with "She couldn't feel anything except a slight sickness. She did everything without thinking."  This proves that she didn't intend to kill him in the first place. Her "Environment" also means her husband. Her husband caused her to kill him. He told her something that caused her to kill him. In some ways I can kind of agree with you saying that it was her choice but the author does not make it very clear

# data[].attributes.body
Alex, I dont agree with your statement of saying that Mary is team Environment, I dont think your right because you dont have much evidence to support which is my main reason. Also Alex It was Mary's personal choice to kill her husband, no one told her to kill him. I agree with what you said when the husbands words made her kill him but still she didn't have to kill him, it was her own personal choice she made. Alex, this is why I feel like Mary was more effected by agency.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree because that scenario is what environmental is and how her surroundings make her react in  the way she did. She killed her husband because of something he said and that is her environment. But I also think it was because she was thinking about the baby and she didn't  know what to do. I know my response wasn't very good.

# data[].attributes.body
I personally disagree because I think that Mary Maloney was more shaped by her individual agency, and not by her environment. I think that it was her own personal choice to make a decision to kill her husband. Even if the conversation had an effect or not, I don't think that he told her to kill him or had an influence on it.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with you because I see your point about her hitting her husband because the enviroment changed. But I also disagree because it said in the text, she saw her husband standing at the window looking outside. Mary hitting her husband with a lamb leg was her personal choice to do that. She could of decided to talk it out with him but instead she decide to hit him.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with you because I also think it is team environment. I do not really understand your evidence but I can kind of see what it was coming from. She was talking about her husband and that was because he was at the house and was having a drink and she kept talking about how she liked that he didn't complain that he was tired so he was calm and in a better mood.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Sara because I also think that Mary is team Environment because in your response, in paragraph 2, it states that " she was about to have a baby". Also, I see the point that you are getting to about her talking about herself to her husband.

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree with you because even though you had good evidence, she had the choice to do everything how she did leading up to her murdering her husband. The text says, " She went to the freezer and took hold of the first object she found. She lifted it out, and looked at it." She could have easily put it the oven and cook it for herself, but instead she decided to carry it upstairs and hit her husband over the head with it.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with you because I see from your evidence that you pulled out saying "she swung the big frozen leg of lamb in the air and brought it down as hard as she could on the back of his head."  From that piece of evidence it is stating that it was her personal choice to do that to her husband which would mean that she was influenced by team agency.  I also disagree because her environment changed quickly around her and that could have made her a little uneasy and caused her to make the quick decision of killing him. I know this because in the text I read in paragraph 6 "... she was satisfied to sit quietly, enjoying his company..." This stating that she was previously calm before he got home.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with you because you give a valid answer. Even though I agree with your answer I do not agree with your explanations because you give no textual evidence supporting your claim. You also say what you think she is like based on the text yet you give no textual evidence. I do agree with your answer because in the text it states, "Her mouth and her eyes, with their new calm look, see larger and darker than before." This proves your point because it shows how she was originally calm until she was told the disturbing news that caused her to kill her husband.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Caleb because in the text Mary Maloney talks a lot about how much she loves her husband. This shows that what her husband said, which is her environment, affected her actions heavily. she was also willing to change what they were going to eat for dinner. This leads me to think she really loves him. This shows me that she doesn't care what she wants a the moment and that she will do what her husband wants to make him happy.

# data[].attributes.body
I Disagree because I think something or someone made her want to do this. If there was 1 thing that would have been about Individual agency it would be when she knelt down and cried beside his dead body. I think somebody told her something that made her become a totally different person because she wouldn't just do it to do it.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with your response because your citing gives exceptional evidence as to why this is not normal for Mary. I understand your explanations, and you answered the question very clearly as well. Everything you stated supported your opinion as to why the outcome could've been avoided if her enviorment hadn't changed.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with you because from your textual evidence I can tell see that she was happy before her environment changed, just as you had stated. Your quotes supported your opinion, and you explained it well.

# data[].attributes.body
I agree with Gavin because he thinks that it was Mary's personal decision to kill her husband. This makes her more shaped by her individual agency than her environment. Gavin's evidence also shows that she was the one who made the decision to kill her husband and fake not knowing what happened. The text states in paragraph 46, "The violence of the crash,the noise, the small table overturning, helped bring her out of the shock." Some evidence that I have that also proves this point is in paragraphs 19 -21. The author says that Mary's husband told her something that made her very upset. Mary becomes so angry and upset that she kills her husband. Those are the reasons I agree with Gavin.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  For the title type your name and the name of the person you are responding to.
2.  Read the other person's response to the question.
3. Respond to their post by either agreeing or disagreeing. You must support your opinion with evidence from the text.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Mary Maloney is more shaped by her individual agency than her environment. I believe this because it was her personal decision to kill her husband. She could have just taken the news by crying and yelling instead of killing her husband. In paragraphs 19 -21, the author says that Mary's husband told her something that made her very upset. Mary becomes so angry and upset that she kills her husband. She might have inherited her sneakiness and twisted manner from her parents. That is why I believe that Mary Maloney is more shaped by her individual agency.

# data[].attributes.body
Mary Maloney is more shaped by her individual agency. I say this because in paragraph 25 is states, "At this point, Mary Maloney simply walked up behind him and without any pause , she swung the big frozen leg of lamb high in the air and brought it down as hard as she could on the back of his head. She might as well have hit him with a steel  bar."  This evidence supports my answer because Mary Maloney chose to hit her husband.  Because she chose to do that I say that she is more shaped by  individual agency.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Mary Maloney is more shaped by her environment more than individual agency. I believe this because in paragraph 6, the text states "For her, this was a wonderful time of day...she was satisfied to sit quietly, enjoying his company after the long hours alone in the house." This means that she was content and full of joy to see her husband. Suddenly, Mary's husband, Patrick, told her some very bad news. And Unfortunately, her husband ended up dead. The author states "She did everything without thinking" Therefore, this most likely means that this isn't normal for Mary, but after Patrick Maloney had told her this unforeseen news, she overreacted and killed him. These circumstances could have been stopped if Patrick had never told her the news. He could have lived if Mary's environment had not changed.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe Mary Maloney was effected by her environment. In the text it showed that Mary was very taken by this news. The news her husband gave her caused to react in such a way. Even though in the end it was her choice if her husband hadn't told  her such news she wouldn't of killed him. It also says that later on she kind of felt sorry when she really thought over what she did. This tells me this was kind of a moment thing. Where because of the news she decided to hit him with a lamb leg.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Mary Maloney is more shaped by her individual agency, because it is her personal choce to hit her husband upside the head with a lamb leg, and to fake and pretend that she never hit her husband and killed him, in paragraph 46 it says, "The violence of the crash, the noise, the small table overturning, helped bring her out of he shock."

# data[].attributes.body
I believe Mary Maloney is shaped more by her environment rather than her individual agency. I know this because in paragraph 19-21, the author writes that Mary's husband tells her something which causes here to become very upset. Mary becomes so upset and so mad that she kills her husband with a lamb leg. This shows that Mary was shaped by her environment because she was calm at first and nice to her husband until the environment around her changed, and she decided to kill her husband.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Mary Maloney was based more on Environment. Because she always had time to relax at home which made her all happy. But the text clearly states that when she kills her husband she become a totally different person

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Mary Maloney is more effected by her environment because her actions were affected by what her husband said to her. After he told her in paragraph 26 it says "...Mary Maloney simply walked up behind him and without any pause, she swung the big frozen leg of lamb as high in the air and brought it down as hard as she could on the back of his head."

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Mary Maloney has been shaped more by her environment because she perceived some information from her husband that she wasn't too thrilled about. She probably wasn't thinking clearly, seeing as she seemed upset about that news. Her personality may have looked to be shrewd and unfair, but she was pregnant with a baby and if her husband was leaving her in some sort of way, that news made her cheery personality vanish.

# data[].attributes.body
In my opinion I think that Mary Maloney is mostly made/shaped by her environmental traits.The reasons I think that Mary Maloney is an environmental character are that in paragraphs 1-6 she is sitting in the chair waiting on her husband to arrive home to work which shows you that she clearly cares for him. Also, in paragraph the husband states, " This is going to be a big shock to you, I'm afraid," and he goes on to tell her something that she doesn't want to hear. Her actions due to the concept of this is that she goes to get dinner and as the man is walking away she hits him in the back of the head and their he is lying their dead.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Mary Maloney was shaped more by environment. I think this because in paragraph 6, she is talking about her husband the whole time.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Mary Maloney was shaped more by her environment than her inherited traits. This is because in paragraph 6, she talks about how much she loves him and everything about him. She kills him after he tells her something which means that her environment influenced her heavily. She was generally a nice person until she was acted upon by an outside force. "She couldn't feel anything except a slight sickness. She did everything without thinking." This shows that she usually does not act like that.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Mary Maloney was shaped more by her environment. This is because the things that happened around her affected how she acted. Her husband told her something she didn't like which made her upset. Mary was shocked by whatever her husband said and she got very angry. In the text she talks about how much she loves him. This shows me that her surroundings/environment influenced her actions a ton.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Mary Maloney has  been shaped more by her individual agency becasue first of all I have no proof of her being surrounded by other killers. She made her own "personal choice" kill her husband. Nobody told her to go and kill her husband. She might've have inherited the physcotic trait that I believe she has, and grew up around parents that did twisted things.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Mary Maloney is shaped more by her environment because she reacted because of something her husband said. Mary Maloney also was willing to adjust what they were going to eat for dinner.

# data[].attributes.body
I think she is shaped more to her individual agency because in paragraph 25, it says "she swung the big frozen leg of lamb high in the air and brought it down as hard as she could on the back of his head".This is her personal choice to hit her husband with the lamb leg.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Mary Maloney is more shaped by her individual agency (nature) side, because she made a personal choice to kill her husband. Her sneaky and wicked personality, also might have been inherited from her parents. In the article, on paragraph 25, it stated, "Mary Maloney simply walked up behind him and without any pause, she swung the big frozen leg of lamb high in the air and brought it back down as hard as she could on the back of his head." Also as Mary Maloney stated in paragraph 28, "All right she told herself. So I've killed him." This shows that Mary made her own personal choice to slaughter him, even though he had no influence on telling her to do so. For these reasons, I think that Mary Maloney is more shaped by her individual agency.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that it was more nature side or the agency side because Mary Malony had a chose to hit her husband and she chose to take her anger out on him instead of controlling. I know this because the nurture side is all about your environment. So, I think that this decision was not influenced by her environment even though she was pregnant.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Mary Maloney is shaped more by her individual agency because she made the decision to hit her husband in the head with a leg of lamb. The text says, " At that point, Mary Maloney simply walked up behind him and without any pause, she swung the big frozen leg of lamb in the air and brought it down as hard as she could on the back of his head". It also says that when he told her the news she sat in horror, this indicates that she was shocked and upset. She choose to overreact, she could have easily done something less drastic.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Mary Maloney is shaped more by environment because in the text she receives some news she doesn't wanna hear by her husband which effects her environment. Since she has heard this sad news it leaves her in shock and it causes her to react in a way she probably didn't expect to. I believe this because in the text it says "...she sat through it all, watching him with horror." This shows how fast things changed for Mary and how her environment affected her so much.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Mary Maloney had been shaped more by her environment more than her individual agency.  I think this because in the text it states that she was told some news and since she is pregnant that might have made her overreact. Also, it states that at first she was very confused after she had been told the news and didn't know what to think.  In the text I read that "She knew he didn't want to speak much until the first drink was finished, and she was satisfied to sit quietly, enjoying his company..." This is stating that she is excited for the moment when her husband gets home but when the environment changed around her she quickly made the decision.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Mary Maloney has been more shaped by her environment. I believe this because in the text it explains how she was happy to have her husband arrive home at first. After he told her the distressing news she seemed very panicked and made a irrational decision to kill her husband. This shows that the stressful environment she was in had shaped her to do something she would not have done if she was elsewhere. In paragraph five it states, "...and she was satisfied to sit quietly, enjoying his company after the long hours alone in the house." This proves that she was originally calm and happy with him. The environmental changes quickly caused her mood to change.

# data[].attributes.body
I think she is shaped by her environment. I think this because in the article it states in paragraph 2 "This was her 6 month expecting a child." In thins case she was probably a little tempered. Also in paragraph 19 it says "This is going to be a big shock to you, I'm afraid, but I've thought about it a good deal and I've decided that he only thing to do is to tell you to immediately. And he told her. It didn't take long, four or five minutes at most, and she sat still through it all, watching him with puzzled horror." When that happened she might have gotten a little tempered and decided to hit him over the head. And when the police were there she acted like a nice and innocent lady to hide what she had done.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Mary Maloney is shaped more by her enviroment because  she seems like a nice lady when she constanly tries to make patrick food and get him drinks but she gos a little crazy when her husband tells her something she doesn't like. The author states "she sat through it all , watching him in puzzled horror.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Mary Maloney is more individual agency because she chose to hit/kill her husband she had a choice to either take it easy or react harshly.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Mary Maloney is shaped from her individual agency more because killing her husband was entirely her choice and I believe this because in paragraph 25the author wrote that, "...Mary Maloney simply walked up behind him and without any pause, she swung the big frozen leg of lamb high in the air and brought it down as hard as she could on the back of his head." This is influenced by her own decisions because she was the one who chose to do it. As far as we know, no one in her environment had ever killed someone.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Mary Maloney had been more shaped by her environment then agency. Her husband had recently told her some distressing news, which catches her very off guard. The text states "...she sat through it all, watching him with puzzled horror." This proves that she was shaken by the news, which caused her to do things she wouldn't normally do. It also says "She did everything without thinking." Clearly, these actions are not typical for Mary, and they would not have happened if her husband hadn't said what he did, or if her environment hadn't changed.

# data[].attributes.body
I think that Mary Malone y is more shaped by agency then environment which is nature. I think this because in paragraph 25 is says she banged the frozen lamb leg on the husbands head, I think it was environment because  it was her personal choice to kill her husband. Also It was her choice to not own up to the fact that she killed her husband. All these choices are personal choices which basically means environment. This is why I think she is on environment.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that Mary Maloney is  shaped more by individual agency because she made a choice to murder her husband.  In paragraph 25 she swung the frozen lamb leg on her husbands head. I believe it as agency because it was her choice and she did it. The text sounds like she had no violence like killing someone in the family.

# data[].attributes.body
I think Mary Maloney is shaped by Nurture because she acted very psychopathic and we know that because in the last 2 paragraphs it says  ¨the weapon is probably right under our noses. What do you think, Jack and in the other room, Mary Maloney began to laugh.

# data[].attributes.body
Directions:
1.  Make the title of your post your first and last name.
2. Type your constructed response in the box.