# data[].attributes.body
Standard of care - reasonably competent householder

# data[].attributes.body
Standard of care skilled reasonable carpenter (AC Billings)

# data[].attributes.body
1. Wells v Cooper [1958] 2 Q.B. 265, 268

2. AC Billings [1957] 3 All E.R. 1

3. Wells (n1) 268-269

4. ibid 270

# data[].attributes.body
The defendant should have foreseen that there was a risk of injury if the screws were not long enough.

# data[].attributes.body
1) Tort? negligence - Duty of care - Standard - foreseeability of harm.

2) Facts case - amateur carpenter, fixed the door handle with a short screw. A visitor opened the door and fell as the handle fell off causing him injury.

3) What was the judge at first instance's decision. The accident wasn't foreseeable. He did not owe a duty of care. Plaintiff appealed.

# data[].attributes.headline
3) What was the judgment of the Court of Appeal and explain the legal reasoning ofthat court in either allowing or dismissing the appeal? [65%]

# data[].attributes.subject
3) What was the judgment of the Court of Appeal and explain the legal reasoning ofthat court in either allowing or dismissing the appeal? [65%]

# data[].attributes.headline
2) Explain the arguments upon which the appeal was based. [25%]

# data[].attributes.subject
2) Explain the arguments upon which the appeal was based. [25%]

# data[].attributes.headline
Read the case of Wells v Cooper (available in the NOWTort Learning Room or via Westlaw) and answer the following questions:1) What tortious1 issues are raised by this case? [10%]

# data[].attributes.subject
Read the case of Wells v Cooper (available in the NOWTort Learning Room or via Westlaw) and answer the following questions:1) What tortious1 issues are raised by this case? [10%]

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
OSCOLA: a guide to referencing your sources for NLS students