# data[].attributes.body
Maybe on the second day it is possible to divide the group into smaller groups. This way, several conversations can take place around the topic and the focus is no longer on the two participants who have different opinions.  The facilitators can go back and forth between the groups and accompany the individual processes, continue thoughts, ask questions. In this way, reflection processes can be initiated.

(Karla Stoltzmann)

# data[].attributes.body
Perhaps the group can be divided into several small groups. In these, different conversations can arise and be "distracted" from the two participants. At the same time, participants who may not want to speak in front of the large group have a chance to share their thoughts.
The facilitators can go back and forth between the groups and accompany the individual processes, continue thoughts, ask questions. In this way, reflection processes can be initiated. - Karla Stoltzmann

# data[].attributes.body
Perhaps the group can be divided into several small groups. In these, different conversations can arise and be "distracted" from the two participants. At the same time, participants who may not want to speak in front of the large group have a chance to share their thoughts.
The facilitators can go back and forth between the groups and accompany the individual processes, continue thoughts, ask questions. In this way, reflection processes can be initiated.

- Karla Stoltzmann

# data[].attributes.body
As said in the T-Kit, the conflict can only be solved by the people involved, but it also can be helpful to have a third neutral party in a mediator role. Therefore I as a trainer would adress the conflict and try to make contact between Larissa and the group. Just talking about the problem again could already solve it, if it´s not too big. If it doesn´t, then the conflict mapping could help to clarify everyones needs and thoughts. After that hopefully works, I would start with simple warm up and come together exercises to diffuse the tension and let them have a fresh restart with something fun and positive.

# data[].attributes.body
As said in the T-Kit, the conflict can only be solved by the people involved, but it also can be helpful to have a third neutral party in a mediator role. Therefore I as a trainer would adress the conflict and try to make contact between Larissa and the group. Just talking about the problem again could already solve it, if it´s not too big. If it doesn´t, then the conflict mapping could help to clarify everyones needs and thoughts. After that hopefully works, I would start with simple warm up and come together exercises to diffuse the tension and let them have a fresh restart with something fun and positive.

# data[].attributes.body
I believe that you need to talk about any problem in the group and work on solving the problem. So in this case, as a coach, at the end of the training, I would arrange a conversation and summing up the results of the day between all the participants and raised this problem, but without naming names. I would suggest that the whole group develop "rules of communication and behavior." If necessary, I would also talk separately with Larisa and Mila. And as mentioned above, I would have held games to rally and unite the group.

# data[].attributes.body
At the beginning, I would observe whether the conflict is discussed in the group and whether the group resolves it itself. If I notice that the topic is being avoided, I would address the issue as a neutral person. Each person could consider how they feel about the current situation and what they would like to change about communication, for example. These two topics can be discussed either in small groups or as a whole group. In doing so, I would make sure that people treat each other with respect and that Larissa and Mila do not feel attacked. Another option is to write anonymous notes.
- Mareike Remmel

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe the trainer should work out the rules of communication together with the participants and look at the common goals and wishes. I don't think it is advisable for the person in question to explicitly disagree, as he or she could feel segregated from the group, discriminated against and bullied by the trainer. Tanja Raab

# data[].attributes.body
as someone who has experienced such situations myself, i can say that it is not a simple situation for which there can only be one solution. i think that i would first observe the situation and see how the participants concerned and the rest of the group behave. Perhaps it might be helpful to take brief notes. If the situation relaxes on its own, I don't think it would make sense to intervene. However, if I notice that one person is becoming more and more excluded, I would try to talk to the affected persons and facilitate a discussion situation in which the affected persons still feel comfortable and don't get into their panic zone, perhaps by first asking how the affected persons are doing. I think I would give the affected people the opportunity to speak out without interfering too much myself. I would intervene as soon as verbal or nonverbal aggression occurs, or if I am explicitly asked about it. I would then give the persons involved an opportunity to reflect on their situations, so that both have the chance to talk about their perceptions and feelings. Perhaps there are also playful means to relax such situations. In any case, I would try my best to make the persons feel comfortable and find their way back to each other through this possibility of conversation. If this should not succeed, I would have to perhaps again clear rules for the group, or make it clear that it may not come to an exclusion of individuals and that we are a group and also find common solutions as a group. Here, for example, you could encourage the group to write down their wishes and perhaps also try to solve the tensions through playful offers.

# data[].attributes.body
spoke out sharply about it. No one else in the group commented on the situation, but you assume that the group took Mila's side because you notice that there is less
ou conduct a three-day training session, and on the second day there was a conflict between two of the participants. One of the participants (Larisa) was actively demonstrating her awareness of the topic and giving everyone advice throughout the training. The other participant (Mila) spoke out sharply about it. No one else in the group commented on the situation, but you assume that the group took Mila's side because you notice that there is less communication with Larissa.