# data[].attributes.body
Interest Area: Interviewing is an art with seamless appealing ways to get almost anyone talking. Considering the education sector is more dynamic now than ever leaning towards remote learning and the intended audience is digital savvy, this course fully embraces technology erasing physical barriers of the traditional classroom (Newhouse, 2002) in order to divulge into the practical aspect of conducting successful interviews
Learner profile: Incorporates both domestic and international learners with diverse background.
Gender: Assorted gender.
Age: 19 - 32yrs.
Delivery mode: Online / Self-paced.
Learning outcomes: To comprehend the  interview elements and etiquettes to be upheld  by both interviewer and interviewee for the purpose of leading effective, standard interviews.
Challenges: Budget constraints – Learner can lack essential equipment.
Facilities – No equipped physical location for hands on learning.
Time – Technical course hence takes time to actualise course.
Stakeholders: Students, Media practitioners (Journalists, News reporters, Content creators)

# data[].attributes.body
Multimodal: Videos, Graphics, Audio files, Captions and transcript therefore addressing diversity in learning styles (Edwards, 1996)

# data[].attributes.body
The virtual reality technology will personalize learning, creating an immersive experience for an individual learner.

# data[].attributes.body
LMS Google drive
Kahoot for Quizzes
Power point documents

# data[].attributes.body
These technology conscious modes of learning are more relatable to online learners (Sutherland., 2020)
Communication: Zoom online classes
Discussion Forums
Emails
News section.
Collaboration:   Padlet
Chat box
Google docs
Comment section
Zoom Breakout rooms

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
INTERVIEWER HOLDING MICROPHONE FOR INTERVIEW

# data[].attributes.body
1. (Bhasin,2012)Integration of Information and Communication Technology in Enhancing Teaching and Learning. Contemporary Educational Technology, 3(2), pp. 130-140. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/6073

2. (Edwardys, 1996) (Day)
Assistive technology for postsecondary students with learning disabilities
Journal of Learning Disability, 29 (5) (1996), pp. 486-492
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896315026853

3. (New house) (Trinidad) (Clarkson, 2002)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/252917081_Quality_Pedagogy_and_Effective_Learning_with_Information_and_Communications_Technologies_ICT_a_review_of_the_literature

4. (Beebe) & ((Masterson, 2003) Communicating in small groups. Pearson
Education Inc. Boston: Massachusetts
https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q=Beebe,+S.+A.,+%26+Masterson,+J.+T.+(2003).+Communicating+in+small+groups.+Pearson++Education+Inc.+Boston:+Massachusetts&hl=en&as_sdt=0&as_vis=1&oi=scholart

5. (Barkley), (Cross)& (Major, 2005). Collaborative learning techniques: A
handbook for college faculty. San Francisco; Jossey-Bass Publishers
https://www.scirp.org/(S(351jmbntvnsjt1aadkposzje))/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx?ReferenceID=1055696

6. (Black) and (Wiliam, 1998)Assessment and classroom learning. Assess. Educ. 5, 7–74. doi: 10.1080/0969595980050102
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0969595980050102
https://explorance.com/blog/7-reasons-students-need-technology-classroom/

# data[].attributes.body
ASSESSMENT: Quizlet - Offers instant feedback
Kahoot - Self assessment and evaluation
EVALUATION: Tick Icon -  Exhibit learning analysis and commitment to course enabling objective to be achieved.