# data[].attributes.body
i guess its bye y'all

# data[].attributes.body
Our goal is prepare students for the world they will live in, and they will live in a world of technology so we need to adapt and help them use technology in a way it will help them be successful.

# data[].attributes.body
Technology, works to a point, students tend to rely on techonoligy instead of their instinct and can't critical think without a computer.

# data[].attributes.body
I let my students use their phones when their netbooks are not working as well.

# data[].attributes.body
students can google all they want but when test come up then theyll need to demonstrate that they know the stuff

# data[].attributes.body
Maybe we do not need to teach them the how of technology but the Why/when of technology.

# data[].attributes.body
Being a 1 to 1 school does not fix appropriate cell phone usage.

# data[].attributes.body
Do we NEED to know? Are you sure?

# data[].attributes.body
check your work with google not do it on google!

# data[].attributes.body
As a 1 to 1 district it is expected to use the technology. it is even a metric in our evaluation process. We need to learn to use this not take a step back.

# data[].attributes.body
I understand students lack basic skills but I feel teachers also need to learn tech in order to bridge the gap.  Adapt or Die!!!!!

# data[].attributes.body
evolving?

# data[].attributes.body
what type of research shows that argument

# data[].attributes.body
universities. Dr Jones said:

"Our research shows that the argument that there is a generational break between today's generation of young people who are immersed in new technologies and older generations who are less familiar with technology is flawed.

# data[].attributes.body
IQ indicators have changed for this very reason!!!

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.mheducation.com/ideas/thought-leadership/how-social-media-can-help-students-study.html

# data[].attributes.body
as the article says. Socal apps are not the same as tech in teh classroom. Sound bites and tweets are not designed for comprehension, analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. They appeal to raw emotion. We need critical thinking to really understand an issue, how movements grow, and how legislation is passed.

# data[].attributes.body
From the Article:  We can post something on Facebook about an idea that pops into our heads, but are we able to say much more? We lament a do-nothing Congress, but do we understand the complexities of passing meaningful legislation?

# data[].attributes.body
Are our students at a disadvantage in the art of communication because of modern technology?

# data[].attributes.body
Are students getting meaningful learning from articles that they find on social media apps? Is google a blessing or a curse?

# data[].attributes.body
How would the internet look like in 10 years from now?

# data[].attributes.body
are the students truly learning more with technology, when they can google and copy paste the answer?

# data[].attributes.body
How can help our students to discriminate between useful and useless information?

# data[].attributes.body
IIf we know this as educators then why do we use what is being used and learning needs to change.

# data[].attributes.body
Can infinite information make us less informed?

# data[].attributes.body
Are the questions we are asking students to easy, can we make the questions we ask less googlable?

# data[].attributes.body
Is the information presented backed up by reputable research or is this just an opinion of someone who is born before cell phones or internet?

# data[].attributes.body
How do we implement technology in the classroom that promotes critical thinking?

# data[].attributes.body
Are students truly technology savvy, or do they just know how to navigate and use social media apps?

# data[].attributes.body
Is the problem of less depth of knowledge/thinking new and due to technology or merely more obvious?