# data[].attributes.body
The map of the parks’ locations in the city was great! It would be good to see photos of what the parks look like too so we have a sense of what people see that was accounted for in the studies

# data[].attributes.body
I think the slides could have less text. The methods and experimental design of the papers could go in the notes, and just put the main findings of the experiments on the slide

# data[].attributes.headline
Anything you like about this case study?

# data[].attributes.subject
Anything you like about this case study?

# data[].attributes.body
I think there is room to improve when presenting, for example projecting towards the audience

# data[].attributes.body
The role of perceived biodiversity is sort of disappointing in a way, with studies showing that the impact to us is not dependent on how species rich the forest actually is…it does not Help incentivise biodiversity measures :(

# data[].attributes.body
The bird call at the beginning was engaging!

# data[].attributes.body
You did a great job with a couple pieces of student engagement at the start

# data[].attributes.body
I love the birds on the slides. Great design!

# data[].attributes.headline
on the figure with the maps of specific parks it would be nice to line up the results of low disturbance with the mapped figure, and of high disturbance with that figure (instead they were reversed) - plus the place names were kind of distracting (picky point)

# data[].attributes.subject
on the figure with the maps of specific parks it would be nice to line up the results of low disturbance with the mapped figure, and of high disturbance with that figure (instead they were reversed) - plus the place names were kind of distracting (picky point)

# data[].attributes.body
Bringing it back to BC at the end with reference to the data about resident use or lack of use of parks would have been great! What are the practice implications of getting more BC residents to experience forests?

# data[].attributes.headline
Maybe could’ve reduced of the text on some of the slides, but overall they were well done! 

# data[].attributes.subject
Maybe could’ve reduced of the text on some of the slides, but overall they were well done! 

# data[].attributes.body
It was a bit fast to go over the graphs and data but overall i think they were great examples

# data[].attributes.body
I liked how you gave a general context for the topic in the first few slides and related it to our experience in BC, for example by using the quiz on the first slide

# data[].attributes.headline
It was interesting to have two different case studies but I think it also came at the risk of loosing some detail. Maybe focusing on only one would allow for more in depth analysis. Both examples were very interesting and well chosen! 

# data[].attributes.subject
It was interesting to have two different case studies but I think it also came at the risk of loosing some detail. Maybe focusing on only one would allow for more in depth analysis. Both examples were very interesting and well chosen! 

# data[].attributes.headline
in the second example it would be great to have some of the graphics, plus more detail on what is 'restorative perception"

# data[].attributes.subject
in the second example it would be great to have some of the graphics, plus more detail on what is 'restorative perception"

# data[].attributes.body
I liked your use of the bird stuffed animal as a prop and the poll at the beginning to catch our interest. A couple areas for improvement could be to reduce the amount of words on the slides and use a more conversational tone