# data[].attributes.body
To compare and contrast source one and three, source one is representing the assimilation of a culture and how the world is in the process to become a monoculture. While source three is in the final stages of becoming a monoculture and showing how as a society everyone within the society is developing fixed mindsets, ultimately resulting in a monoculture of thought.

# data[].attributes.body
Source 2 is spreading the ideas of multiculturalism while source 3 claims they have diversity and many minority cultures in mainstream society. In a way, source 3 is mocking source 2 claiming that they also have “diversity” in their country, when in reality, diversity also includes peoples way of thinking and how they act.

# data[].attributes.body
A second comparison is the comparison between both source one and three and how they are both talking about how the government uses American citizens to silence and spread government propaganda all throughout the globe. As in the first source it is shown how these transnational corporations are used as solders to spread government propaganda and beliefs. Whereas in the third source the government brainwashed its citizens and makes them spew the same propaganda all throughout the globe.

# data[].attributes.headline
In addiction to this we can see how the ideas presented in source 2 come to fruition as an effect of source of the ideas presented in source 3. The fear caused by the idea of having a monoculture is prompted by seeing the impacts of a lack of diversity in media and thoughts being expressed. As an effect we are able to see how the usage of media in source 2 permits multiculturalism and cultural affirmation as the beliefs of Canada’s collective identities are expressed as one in order to combat the threat of Americanization.

# data[].attributes.subject
In addiction to this we can see how the ideas presented in source 2 come to fruition as an effect of source of the ideas presented in source 3. The fear caused by the idea of having a monoculture is prompted by seeing the impacts of a lack of diversity in media and thoughts being expressed. As an effect we are able to see how the usage of media in source 2 permits multiculturalism and cultural affirmation as the beliefs of Canada’s collective identities are expressed as one in order to combat the threat of Americanization.

# data[].attributes.body
Source 2 and 3 contrast one another being that source 3 is demonstrating a monoculture, whereas source 2 is preschinf a multicultural aesthetic.

All 3 sources are similar in the sense that there is a group that believes in their culture and their ways and is inflicting that in their individualistic approaches.

# data[].attributes.body
For example, source three is the result of what can occur when the events or perspectives of source one are realized and occur, whole at the same time, source two can also be the result of source one as it can also lead to having a positive impact of society such as a change in the view on a topic such as multiculturalism

# data[].attributes.body
Source 2 is the result of what happens when one dominant country tries to homogenize another country or region that are exemplified in Source 1.

# data[].attributes.body
source one and three have a connection where they both show the dominance of America and how they influence the world. the soldiers and symbols are the Americans that are standing with their shirts and signs and the person who is getting dragged out represents the residents of the small island they were invading

# data[].attributes.body
It develops a greater understanding of this through the illustrations of the negative effects it has on the individuals themselves as seen through the facial expressions of the natives on the island and the man bearing the Iraq protest sign being forcefully dragged out of the frame.

# data[].attributes.body
The people that witness the man being dragged away are all staring with anger. As a way of showing, they do not care or like any outlying ideas or thought other than what America promotes.

# data[].attributes.body
This often results in forced assimilation by the government to make sure that what they believe is right is what you believe is right, also brainwashing their citizens into only caring about what the government deems an important issue. Through this forced assimilation the government creates a monoculture and yet still making them believe that they have freedom of speech and that they came to these ideas on their own.

# data[].attributes.headline
The law enforcement personal can represent the control the government has over its citizens to maintain the monoculture. 

# data[].attributes.subject
The law enforcement personal can represent the control the government has over its citizens to maintain the monoculture. 

# data[].attributes.body
The rest of group was shown to have a forced smile, stating how they were get forced to have the same opinion and same signs.

# data[].attributes.body
Furthermore, this image could be an example of assimilation as the officials are trying to create America as they want it - in the removal of the man advertising change

# data[].attributes.headline
The black and white image represents how everyone is the same

# data[].attributes.subject
The black and white image represents how everyone is the same

# data[].attributes.body
1. This source is critical of globalization because this blind "diversity" is taking over the world, making everyone have the same opinions and views on topics while thinking they are unique in their beliefs.

2. The people with different political opinions and ideas are being marginalized and silenced in favor of a monoculture of people that think the same way.

# data[].attributes.body
Source 3 depicts a scene where Americans are seen to be pro-diversity but in the presence of difference look onward in discuss

# data[].attributes.body
The image also depicts some individuals with slightly smaller eyes with a more grey tone, possibly representing how they are blind to other ways of thinking and only see their own, essentially ignoring the views of other s.

# data[].attributes.body
The source shows diversity by having people that are different races and ages but is ironic because having the same perspective and all supporting one person that is written on their shirts in not diverse but instead very monocultural.

# data[].attributes.body
Source 3 and Source 1 are related because in Source 1, the individuals seem unhappy being forced out of their island and to take in different American companies and their cultures and product.  Similarly, the man on the floor is talking about keeping Iraq out of America. He might feel the same way about Americanization. Both these people relate on the negative impact of globalization.

# data[].attributes.body
The author also believes how countries like Canada uses the fear of cultural homogenization to develop a stronger bond of multiculturalism.

# data[].attributes.body
This is hinting towards America, since Hollywood only wants people in movies that will bring them more sales, and not bring fourth the message that the original movie producer was trying to send people.

# data[].attributes.body
Instead of creating a monoculture and having all the citizens share the same beliefs and values, we live in a pluralistic society which embraces our diverse cultures and values.

# data[].attributes.body
Source II is linked to the term universalization of popular culture as the spread of this show, which can represent popular culture around the world changes the ideologies of societies, and individuals

# data[].attributes.body
as well, when a show about minority groups is aired to countries like these, it can shift perspectives of the individuals into something more positive.

# data[].attributes.body
when the source mentions that France, Switzerland, and Israel have aired this show, it clearly promotes the positive influence that globalization can have on individuals, as all the aforementioned countries have had history with Islamophobia and hate crimes with Muslims in the past.

# data[].attributes.body
This source supports globalization and its affects on the world, because it presents it in a way that shows how globalization can change the way we view other cultures for the better, after being exposed to them through multiculturalism

# data[].attributes.body
In some regard we are able to feel a sense of betrayal as childish cartoon characters created by Americans and being broadcast around the world spreading American ideologies are partaking in the invasion. This not only contributes to universalization of pop culture as kids growing up watching those programs adopt similar beliefs, but homegenization as these individuals are passively loosing their own cultures creating a monoculture.

# data[].attributes.body
Bombs dropped from planes are one of, if not the most effective war tactics in history, but the bombs in this political cartoon are TVs. This is amazing symbolism for how Media plays an atomic role in spreading American products, specifically advertising.

# data[].attributes.body
This could be a hint towards the numerous wars that America has been in to make other places into another section of their own country, killing their citizens to get what they want and to make it so that everyone has the exact same mindset as their own.

# data[].attributes.body
this affects economic globalization because brands that are made in different countries and are not known will lose profit, and we would only support the brands that are known and are relevant in our daily lives

# data[].attributes.body
The invaders’ weapons are none other than items seen commonly in American households - coke bottles, televisions - symbolizing the takeover of American culture through the means of trade and media.

# data[].attributes.body
In the process, they have even killed an individual which could represent how Americanization may force unique cultures into fading away into irrelevancy.

# data[].attributes.body
This source mostly correlates to a left wing perspective as the author is trying to highlight the negatives of economic globalization via media and trade as seen with technology falling from the sky.

# data[].attributes.body
This image conveys the juxtaposition between the well liked innocent Disney characters and their actions of colonizing this native land

# data[].attributes.body
The overall cartoon demonstrates that America does not need weapons or tanks to fight war anymore, as this is how modern colonialism is and modern wars are fought

# data[].attributes.body
Presenting Americanization of other countries like a war that is hostile to local companies and producers, crushes opportunity for innovation, and builds monopolies around the world.

# data[].attributes.body
An example of this that can be seen in the real world is when Canada was first discovered by the Europeans. The First Nations were wary at first, but soon became accepting of them and their culture, as they brought many resources such as pots and guns with them in exchange for a variety of resources, most notably beaver pelts. This led to a spread of the European cultures, alongside their resources and diseases. As a result, they became dependent on them to supply those resources, only to be removed once they lost their usefulness. Both the people native to the island in the cartoon and the First Nations were not looking for new trade and communication technologies, they still become assimilated into the invading people's culture.

# data[].attributes.body
This action mirrors what was done during word war two on Iwo Jima, American soldiers invaded the island that once belonged to the Japanese as a way of ‘marking their territory’.

# data[].attributes.headline
The image shows a group of soldiers stabbing a flag into the ground , this symbolizes how America invaded Japan attempting to take it over

# data[].attributes.subject
The image shows a group of soldiers stabbing a flag into the ground , this symbolizes how America invaded Japan attempting to take it over