# data[].attributes.body
Shows minimal understanding of news interviewing concepts. Multiple significant errors in responses. Answers are largely incorrect or irrelevant to the questions asked.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates basic understanding of concepts. Several errors present in responses. Some answers lack proper support or contain misconceptions about news interviewing principles.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows good understanding of news interviewing concepts. Most answers are accurate with minor errors. Explanations are mostly well-supported with relevant information.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates comprehensive understanding of news interviewing concepts. All answers are accurate, well-supported, and show deep knowledge of the subject matter. Information provided is consistently correct and detailed.

# data[].attributes.body
Responses lack organization and clarity. Ideas are presented randomly with no logical flow. Writing is confusing and difficult to follow.

# data[].attributes.body
Responses show some organization but lack clear structure in places. Ideas may be jumbled or poorly connected. Writing needs more clarity.

# data[].attributes.body
Responses are generally well-organized and clear. Some minor issues with flow or transitions, but overall structure is logical and coherent.

# data[].attributes.body
Responses are exceptionally well-organized, clear, and logical. Ideas flow smoothly with clear transitions between concepts. Writing is concise and professional.

# data[].attributes.body
Many parts of questions are unanswered or severely lacking in detail. Responses are incomplete and fail to address key aspects of questions.

# data[].attributes.body
Several parts of questions are inadequately addressed or missing. Responses lack necessary detail and elaboration in multiple areas.

# data[].attributes.body
Most parts of questions are addressed with adequate detail. Some aspects might need more elaboration, but overall responses are complete.

# data[].attributes.body
All parts of questions are fully addressed with detailed, thorough responses. Answers go beyond basic requirements to demonstrate comprehensive understanding and application.

# data[].attributes.body
Unable to effectively apply concepts to practical scenarios. Shows little to no understanding of how to connect theoretical knowledge to real-world situations.

# data[].attributes.body
Limited ability to apply concepts to practical scenarios. Struggles to make connections between theory and practice. Analysis is superficial.

# data[].attributes.body
Shows good ability to apply concepts to practical contexts. Some room for improvement in critical analysis, but generally demonstrates sound application of knowledge.

# data[].attributes.body
Demonstrates superior ability to apply news interviewing concepts to practical scenarios. Shows excellent critical thinking and analysis in applying theoretical knowledge.