# data[].attributes.body
The original ruling on this case said that the conviction order was valid and put in place to secure the U.S. from invasion. However, the view on the 5th amendment was changed after this case since it was the first time the court created a new standard of review. It led to the agreement that any law discriminating against race is automatically required to be thoroughly inspected. This case connects to the founding ideal rights because the case came to be because Korematsu believed that the U.S. was resricting japanese american rights. Japanese americans were being forced to leave their homes and go to relocation camps which they thought was a violation of their 5th amendment rights.

# data[].attributes.body
The court ruled that evidence obtained while violating 4th amendment search and seizure can't be used in state court. This case troubled the court in deciding when unlawfully seized evidence is allowed to be used in a criminal trial. The interpretation off the 4th amendments protection was strengthened by the decision that illegally found evidence is not acceptable for use in state court. I believe this case connects to the founding ideal rights and liberty because Mapp's rights in the amendments were not followed and she did not receive the protection in her house to be free from search.

# data[].attributes.body
The court's decision declared that in all criminal prosecutions, the defendant has the right to counsel that the court is required to provide. This case further supported that everyone has the right to a lawyer and added that anyone who can't afford a lawyer should be appointed one by the state. The founding ideals that this case connects to are equal rights and opportunity. All defendants have the right to counsel which provides them with equal opportunity in court but Gideon's rights were violated meaning that he was not given the same opportunity as everyone should get.

# data[].attributes.body
The court ruled that law enforcement are required to inform suspects of their right to stay silent and have an attorney present during interrogation. This enhanced the interpretation of the amendment because it proved the importance of being informed of your rights. Court also announced that procedural safeguards should be required. This case is related to the ideals opportunity and rights because since all people should be informed of their rights, then Miranda should have been told that he could stay silent but instead his rights were violated which impacted his opportunity to defend himself in court.

# data[].attributes.body
The court decided that students do not lose their 1st amendment rights when they enter school property and that students don't lose their freedom. This impacted and changed the interpretation of the 1st amendment because it required that schools give a reasonable reason to why a certain act interferes with the schools system. This connects with the founding ideals rights and opportunity. Students should all have equal opportunity to express and silent protest since it does not interfere with the school district however in the case, the amendment was violated.

# data[].attributes.body
The court ruling on this case changed the interpretation of the 8th amendment because it cleared up what people were allowed to be given the death penalty and when it was constitutional. This case questioned whether the death penalty was constitutional and led to many states banning it altogether. This case connects with the founding ideal rights because the 8th amendment rights were violated since Furman's punishment was not in full accordance with his crime and may have had racial bias making it a cruel and unusual punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
The court said that the death penalty was constitutional in this situation but changed the interpretation by agreeing that it must be used carefully and accordingly to fit with the amendment. This is important because the case proved that the death penalty could still not be considered a cruel and unusual punishment but it enforced limits to it. The founding ideal that this case is connected to is rights. In the 8th amendment, it says that people have the right to reasonable punishments that match their crimes, and Gregg's punishment, according to the court, was not cruel and unusual meaning it could be used.

# data[].attributes.body
This case was important to change the interpretation of the 8th amendment in schools since it said that students were allowed to be free from corporal punishment in schools. The case also acknowledged that excessive punishments in schools were not in accordance with the disturbance and teachers would be held accountable for them. This case is related to the founding ideal of liberty and rights. Students do not lose the rights that are given in the 8th amendment when they are at school. This means they have the right to be free from harsh punishments.

# data[].attributes.body
The court's reargument on the case recognized that the search and seizure protection of the 4th amendment does apply to students in schools. Along with that the court also added that schools can reasonably search students' belongings under their authority which added a new interpretation to the amendment and school limits. The founding ideal that this case connects to is liberty and rights. Since in the 4rth amendment guarantees the natural right to be free from search and seizure, the case questioned whether students in schools had that freedom and concluded that in most situations they still have that liberty.

# data[].attributes.body
The court concluded that schools do not have to tolerate lewd or obscene speech and can censer or even prohibit it. This changes how we view the 1st amendment because even though students have freedom and the right to speech and expression, the school still has the power to stop the presentation of offensive or inappropriate behavior and speech. This connects with the founding ideals liberty and rights because it shows how students can be limited on their freedom of speech depending on the effects it has on the rest of the school or their audience.

# data[].attributes.body
This case changes the amendment's interpretation because it decided that schools do not have to promote student speech and have the right to censor or prohibit speech that is not appropriate or in accordance with the system but with reason. Along with this the case also stated that schools should be promoting and teaching social order and censoring students is editorial control. This case is related to the founding ideals of liberty and opportunity since students have free speech which gives them the chance and opportunity to express themselves. Students were arguing whether their freedom of speech in the school was violated when the newspaper was censored.

# data[].attributes.body
The interpretation of the 4th amendment changed in this case because of the courts decision that drug testing on school athletes is not a violation to the amendment. This is important because even though students are free from search and seizure at school, student athletes can still get drug tested at school during school hours since it was decided that the concerns of the schools are more important then minimal privacy concerns. The founding ideal connected to this case are liberty. This is because the 4th amendment provides student with freedom and security. However when schools need to then they can break dome of that freedom if necessary like when doing a drug test of athletes.

# data[].attributes.body
This case changed the interpretation of the 1st amendment because it said that students can be limited if they promote illegal drug use in schools. Although students have their 1st amendment rights of freedom of speech and expression, they do not extend to illegal drug promotion especially when it opposes the schools mission. This connects to the founding ideals liberty and rights because the 1st amendment does give students the full freedom to express anything they want in schools without limitations and consequences which was learned in this case. Students rights to speech can be restricted by schools if it is a disturbance to the schools system.

# data[].attributes.body
The court said that school officials can limit students but not prohibit them on their actions. In other words, the new view on the amendment showed that schools can't control students freedom of expression especially if the expression doesn't substantial disturbance. This connects with the founding ideas rights and liberty. B.L. has the right to post freely online and when outside of school, her parents should be the disciplinarians instead of the school. They school can't stop her freedom to post what she wishes since it's her expression.

# data[].attributes.body
The interpretation of the 4th amendment was changed due to this case because it concluded that physical force used on suspects is considered a seizure in the amendment. Even if police successfully detain the suspect, if they shoot or injure them then it is considered a seizure. The founding ideal connected to this amendment is rights. The officers in the case used guns to try and restrain Torres which made it a seizure and broke the rights people have in the 4th amendment. Even if they didn't use guns they would still be breaking the amendment since they would be using physical force.