# data[].attributes.headline
GUIDING QUESTION: Comment on how the choices the writer has made (such as their perspective on the issue, or their use of anecdote) can both inform and convince a reader of this article

# data[].attributes.subject
GUIDING QUESTION: Comment on how the choices the writer has made (such as their perspective on the issue, or their use of anecdote) can both inform and convince a reader of this article

# data[].attributes.body
Opinion Column, published in the New York Times in 2018, written by Gioncarlo Valentine, a writer, photographer, and transgender rights advocate.

# data[].attributes.body
Perspective: A writer’s choice of perspective shapes how readers understand and engage with the issue. For instance, if the perspective is first-person, it provides a personal viewpoint, making the account seem intimate and credible. This directness can foster empathy, encouraging readers to trust the writer’s insights. Conversely, a third-person perspective can make the argument seem objective, as though presenting "facts" rather than a personal opinion, which can also build trust by appearing impartial.

Anecdotes: Incorporating anecdotes can serve as a powerful persuasive tool. By telling a relatable story, the writer allows readers to see the issue through a personal lens, making complex or abstract topics more accessible and grounded. This can also help the writer build a bridge to the reader’s emotions, reinforcing arguments by appealing to shared experiences. A well-placed anecdote can illustrate the impact of an issue more vividly than data alone, creating a memorable connection.

Language Choices: By choosing emotive language or rhetorical questions, the writer can guide the reader’s emotional response and provoke reflection. This strategy is key in persuasive writing, as it actively engages readers by involving them in the topic emotionally and intellectually, which enhances conviction.

Structural Elements: The way arguments are arranged can also play a role. For example, starting with a strong anecdote followed by evidence can hook the reader's attention initially and then convince them with logical support.

# data[].attributes.body
The GQ is expects us to write about how does Gioncarlo Valentine use personal choices in this article to present his perspectives by sharing personal experiences of challenges with gender identity and language to offer readers a deeper understanding of the complex emotional and social issues individuals face in relation to inclusive language.

# data[].attributes.body
Anecdote as a Persuasive Tool:
Valentine begins with a personal story of navigating gender identity without supportive language, illustrating his struggles in an underfunded Baltimore high school. This anecdote provides both emotional and informative appeal, showing the profound impact of language on identity and mental health.

Contrast to Highlight Social Division:
Valentine contrasts his experience of lacking language with today’s diverse terms like "non-binary" and "they/them." This juxtaposition shows the progress in language inclusivity, highlighting how today’s language provides self-expression tools he didn’t have access to in his youth.

Addressing Opposing Views:
Acknowledging the critique that “political correctness” has gone too far, Valentine contextualizes inclusive language as essential, not optional. He counters the view of critics by framing inclusive language as a “lifeline” for those on society's margins.

Language as a Lifeline:
Valentine frames inclusive language as vital for survival and dignity, urging readers to see it as crucial for identity validation. Without such language, marginalized individuals lack a means to assert their identities.

Expansive Language for Growth:
Valentine describes terms like “gender neutral” and “they/them” as “glorious,” showing how language has grown to celebrate and empower diverse identities. This positioning encourages readers to see language as adaptable and inclusive.

Critique of Power Structures:
Valentine critiques the privilege inherent in opposition to inclusive language, highlighting how those in power often dominate this debate. This underscores language reform as essential for marginalized groups to challenge oppression and gain visibility.

# data[].attributes.body
1. People with strong political opinions

2. Readers of The New York Times

3. Queer children looking for a community and support

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.diversityintech.co.uk/the-importance-of-inclusive-language-in-the-workplace/

# data[].attributes.body
argument: Valentine's decision to present their perspective on the lack of knowledge regarding gender identity informs and convinces the queer children looking for a community and support

# data[].attributes.body
Parenthesis:
Valentine uses parentheses to add personal insights, such as the way pronouns were “weaponized” against him, giving readers a closer, intimate view into his experience without disrupting the flow.

Lexical Field:
Words like “gender,” “neutral,” “non-conforming,” and “inclusion” form a lexical field around identity and marginalization, highlighting the impact of inclusive language on self-identity and reinforcing its importance for marginalized groups.

Anaphora:
The repeated phrase “I wish” underscores Valentine’s regret and longing for affirming language, emphasizing the emotional toll of not having the right words for self-expression.

Hyphens:
Hyphens link terms like “gender-nonconforming” to create complex identities in a single term, showing how language evolves to capture more nuanced experiences.

First Person:
Using “I” statements personalizes Valentine’s journey, helping readers connect with his experiences and understand the broader impact of inclusive language.

Synthetic Personalization:
Directly addressing the reader with phrases like “what those who complain don’t understand” creates a conversational tone, making the topic feel relevant to each individual.

Low Modality:
Valentine’s use of “might” and “could” reflects the uncertainty and newness of the topic, allowing for a nuanced and non-absolute tone that invites readers to empathize.

Anecdotes:
Personal stories about his high school years and identity struggles make his arguments concrete and relatable, showing the real-life impact of language on mental health.

Semi-colon:
The semi-colons link related ideas, like identity and societal resistance, allowing Valentine to present complex thoughts cohesively and inviting readers to pause for reflection.

Analogy:
Comparing language to a “lifeline” stresses its essential role in personal validation, making the concept of inclusive language more accessible and highlighting its emotional and psychological support.

Alliteration:
Alliterative phrases like “politically correct” and “criminally underfunded” draw attention to societal issues, emphasizing the impact of privilege and adding a memorable rhythm to key concepts.