# data[].attributes.body
It’s necessary to teach non-cognitive skills to students--or allow students to learn them in an environment that facilitates that learning--because non-cognitive skills are what allow students to function effectively in environments that don’t judge them purely on what they know. Non-cognitive skills seem like a way of contextualizing what students know in social or non-academic settings. A student can be taught American history, but that knowledge is relatively useless in a vacuum, and standardized tests promote vacuum-packed knowledge. It is important for us to teach non-cognitive skills because students need to learn how to be functioning people while also learning cognitive skills: they can manage stress, understand the 1st amendment, learn how to learn, and do calculus. By learning  non-cognitive skills, students are given the contextual skills they’ll need to actually apply their cognitive skills.

# data[].attributes.body
Poor households are more stressful, and prevents kids from developing NCS; trauma is bad for kids because of stress (witnessing/receiving domestic violence, getting robbed, etc.). "adverse childhood experiences" are bad for kids and learning.

# data[].attributes.headline
It is important to teach non-cognitive skills because these skills promote self-improvement in areas like learning, awareness, and socializing. Shaping and developing these skills encourages scholarship, opposed to an education that enables a student to “get by,” or in other words, “meet requirements.” 

# data[].attributes.subject
It is important to teach non-cognitive skills because these skills promote self-improvement in areas like learning, awareness, and socializing. Shaping and developing these skills encourages scholarship, opposed to an education that enables a student to “get by,” or in other words, “meet requirements.” 

# data[].attributes.body
-jose

# data[].attributes.body
It's important to teach students non-cognitive skills because it gives them the tools and allows them  to realize that they have the autonomy, power, to adapt to academia/life

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Page 1 of 2

When you're trying to figure out whether to use who or whom, it helps to know the difference between subjects and objects because you use who when you're referring to the subject of a clause and whom when you're referring to the object of a clause. In other words, who is a subject pronoun and whom is an object pronoun.

Subject and Objects

The subject of a sentence is doing something, and the object of a sentence is having something done to it.

For example, if Squiggly calls Aardvark, then Squiggly is the subject because he is the one calling, and Aardvark is the object because he is the one being called.

Squiggly is the subject because he's taking action, and Aardvark is the object because he's the recipient of the action.

See Also: A Subject-Object Valentine

Just "Whom"

Remember, use whom when you are referring to the object of a sentence.My guess is that when people ask about who or whom, most of the time they are really just curious about whom because that's the less common word. You tend to look at sentences and think Is this where a need a whom? not Is this where I need a who?

For example, it is Whom did you squish? if you are trying to figure out that I squished Squiggly because whom is the one being squished-the object of the squishing.

Here's another example: It would be Whom do you love? because you are asking about the object-the target of the love. I know, it's shocking, but Bo Diddley was being grammatically incorrect when he wrote the song " Who Do You Love? "

Take the "Who" Versus "Whom" Quiz ⇒

Pages

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
what is the difference between who and whom

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
what is the difference between whom and who

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
what are the differences between whom and who

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.keywords[]
what are the differences between who and whom

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
When you’re trying to figure out whether to use who or whom, it helps to know the difference between subjects and objects because you use who when you’re referring to the subject of a clause and whom when you’re referring to the object of a clause.

# data[].attributes.body
Because while the paths we can take in life are innumerable and nearly unpredictable (in certain ways), what is assured is the importance of non-cognitive skills in the health of our relationships, the workplace, and our intra-personal landscape.

# data[].attributes.body
While listening to the podcast, please add comments about why you feel it is important to teach Non-Cognitive Skills to our students.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
Ira talks with Paul Tough, author of the book How Children Succeed, about the traditional ways we measure ability and intelligence in American schools. They talk about the focus on cognitive abilities and conventional "book smarts." They discuss the current emphasis on these kinds of skills in American education, and the emphasis on standardized testing, and then turn our attention to a growing body of research that suggests we may be on the verge of a new approach to some of the biggest challenges facing American schools today. Paul Tough discusses how "non-cognitive skills" - qualities like tenacity, resilience, impulse control - are being viewed as increasingly vital in education, and Ira speaks with economist James Heckman, who's been at the center of this research and this shift. (38 1/2 minutes)

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
Ira talks with Paul Tough, author of the book How Children Succeed , about the traditional ways we measure ability and intelligence in American schools. They talk about the focus on cognitive abilities and conventional "book smarts."