# data[].attributes.headline
ETHICS - link to guidance, process, forms

# data[].attributes.subject
ETHICS - link to guidance, process, forms

# data[].attributes.body
Pat

# data[].attributes.body
Use keywords / short sentences and language you are comfortable with to fill out this document

# data[].attributes.headline
Summary of group 1's discussion on 'originality' in the context of Illustration as a Research Practice. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Summary of group 1's discussion on 'originality' in the context of Illustration as a Research Practice. 

# data[].attributes.body
Originality can often be seen as something we strive for - something inward facing which we are precious about.
Thinking about 'originality' of the work in a research context is about sharing these insights/methods more outwardly in order to interrogate/rethink or reset the parameters of your field. It is in sharing these new insights, born out of the field which can infiltrate back in.

# data[].attributes.headline
Group 6 notes on originality:Everyone is original from the moment of selection of methods I mean its obvious everyone is influenced but because methods are selected deliberately and then together formulate methodology with a unique perspective that makes every illustrator original it is possible to copy an image, but not the method of doing images, what do you think? Perspective informs originalityYes and the selection of methods is a deliberate choice that also heavily relies on research. Whether it’s primary or secondary, it informs a unique piece of workEven we use the same method, we may select different arrangement or composition of elementsreferencing other material could potentially be used as a method and translated into something originalAgree, the arrangement of references is an interesting point, and for the illustration I actually find it very difficult to make a copy, because there is always some sort of filter or translation of information through the prism of a personal perspective. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Group 6 notes on originality:Everyone is original from the moment of selection of methods I mean its obvious everyone is influenced but because methods are selected deliberately and then together formulate methodology with a unique perspective that makes every illustrator original it is possible to copy an image, but not the method of doing images, what do you think? Perspective informs originalityYes and the selection of methods is a deliberate choice that also heavily relies on research. Whether it’s primary or secondary, it informs a unique piece of workEven we use the same method, we may select different arrangement or composition of elementsreferencing other material could potentially be used as a method and translated into something originalAgree, the arrangement of references is an interesting point, and for the illustration I actually find it very difficult to make a copy, because there is always some sort of filter or translation of information through the prism of a personal perspective. 

# data[].attributes.body
Room 2 - Part 2

# data[].attributes.body
Room 2

# data[].attributes.headline
21:43:42	 From  caitlinkiely : Methods :21:43:58	 From  Jiazhen Cai : Mindmap / walk / record / notes21:44:58	 From  Yiran Wang : Reading/writing/digital21:45:16	 From  caitlinkiely : 1. Walking 2. Looking/Photographing 3. Reflecting/Writing21:46:00	 From  Yijia Tang : Method: Movement, dancing, improvisation, draw, life-drawing, walking with camera on21:46:17	 From  Jiacun Li : walking/ mobile phone memo/photographing/sketchbook/diary21:54:50	 From  caitlinkiely : Themes /subjects21:55:23	 From  Yiran Wang : Feminism/animals21:55:30	 From  caitlinkiely : The landscape. Narratives contained within something.21:56:06	 From  Jiacun Li : Sorry guys, i went downstairs to get my lunch, it might take a few minutes21:57:10	 From  Jiazhen Cai : atmosphere21:57:59	 From  Yijia Tang : Themes: relationship , spacial traveling, nature, conversation

# data[].attributes.subject
21:43:42	 From  caitlinkiely : Methods :21:43:58	 From  Jiazhen Cai : Mindmap / walk / record / notes21:44:58	 From  Yiran Wang : Reading/writing/digital21:45:16	 From  caitlinkiely : 1. Walking 2. Looking/Photographing 3. Reflecting/Writing21:46:00	 From  Yijia Tang : Method: Movement, dancing, improvisation, draw, life-drawing, walking with camera on21:46:17	 From  Jiacun Li : walking/ mobile phone memo/photographing/sketchbook/diary21:54:50	 From  caitlinkiely : Themes /subjects21:55:23	 From  Yiran Wang : Feminism/animals21:55:30	 From  caitlinkiely : The landscape. Narratives contained within something.21:56:06	 From  Jiacun Li : Sorry guys, i went downstairs to get my lunch, it might take a few minutes21:57:10	 From  Jiazhen Cai : atmosphere21:57:59	 From  Yijia Tang : Themes: relationship , spacial traveling, nature, conversation

# data[].attributes.body
1.3 x methods that are more or less consistent and tend to form part of your methodology regardless of your project?

Drawing

photography

Projection (layering)

2.Any specific themes or subjects you find yourself returning to?

Like to reveal the layer socio-political layers

Especially for the minority group

3.Any common strategies or behaviours you tend to use?

Investigate

record

Critical respond

# data[].attributes.headline
mock up for a 'book' i'm making, using the word book loosely; the book situates itself as a tablecloth paired with a deck of cards

# data[].attributes.subject
mock up for a 'book' i'm making, using the word book loosely; the book situates itself as a tablecloth paired with a deck of cards

# data[].attributes.body
sian matthews

# data[].attributes.body
Yijia

# data[].attributes.body
Yijia

# data[].attributes.body
Pat, Narrowboat project
https://wingshanwong.com/work/chotto-motto-58wga

# data[].attributes.body
@JONO!

# data[].attributes.body
@JONO!

# data[].attributes.body
Peter: photography of 2.5D spreads for a book about C20th architectural ruins in rural sites.

Working from an archive of site photographs supplied by collaborating writer-architect.

Distilling, isolating, digitally drawing architectural and geological details which talk about the whole.

Sourcing/sorting found materials designing/making support structures to form an illustration 'kit'.

Conversations in meetings, emails, phone calls on underpinning themes such as deep time, 'archi-glyphs' and geo-glyphs.

Technical conversations, testing with collaborating graphic designer - on lighting, focus stacking, lens selection, colour correction for print.

# data[].attributes.body
El Wemyss (photo of sketch book type thing)

# data[].attributes.body
Krisztina Kapeljuh

# data[].attributes.body
Caitlin Kiely

# data[].attributes.body
Siddhi

# data[].attributes.body
Some notes from session 1 - Siddhi

# data[].attributes.headline
Click on the image for best clarity, it expands when you click it.

# data[].attributes.subject
Click on the image for best clarity, it expands when you click it.

# data[].attributes.headline
Chat Notes from IRM#1: A Discipline Specific Vocabulary

# data[].attributes.subject
Chat Notes from IRM#1: A Discipline Specific Vocabulary

# data[].attributes.body
13:53:27 From Peter Nencini : Slack - online workflow tool
14:03:41 From El Wemyss : London for me
14:03:50 From siddhi gupta : Delhi, India
14:03:50 From Jonathan Katz : London
14:03:57 From Pat : Hi all. London too :)
14:03:59 From Chenyue Yuan : London
14:04:03 From Yimin Qiao : London
14:04:04 From Jonathan Hadlow : ldn
14:04:04 From Jie Xu : I am still in London.
14:04:05 From Mireille Fauchon : South London
14:04:05 From Kristina Kapeljuh : Budapest! Hi everyone
14:04:06 From Jiali Wu : London
14:04:07 From Yiran Wang : Beijing
14:04:10 From Jiacun Li : London
14:04:11 From Jiazhen Cai : London
14:04:16 From Jingchuan Luo : London
14:10:24 From Peter Nencini : So, do please jot your questions in here…
14:11:57 From Peter Nencini : Vocabulary
14:12:09 From Peter Nencini : Defining a vocabulary for illustration
14:12:57 From Peter Nencini : Use the chat to archive our language, phrases that come to mind as the session goes.
14:13:11 From Peter Nencini : PADLET
14:13:13 From Mireille Fauchon : https://padlet.com/rachelgannon01/5lq27teac0ur3qs8
14:13:38 From Peter Nencini : It’s nicely editable
14:14:02 From Peter Nencini : Works for me
14:15:47 From Tracey Waller : Vocabulary : Invisible language
14:22:01 From Peter Nencini : Minimise
14:22:07 From Peter Nencini : Preview
14:22:16 From siddhi gupta : Full screen
14:24:30 From Peter Nencini : Friendship>Collaboration
14:25:18 From Peter Nencini : MF - documenting social history
14:25:56 From Peter Nencini : RG - balance of practice + teaching
14:26:13 From Peter Nencini : The DOING of illustration
14:26:44 From Peter Nencini : Ongoing, parallel awareness of each other’s developing ideas, methods, careers
14:27:50 From Peter Nencini : Åbäke
14:28:32 From Peter Nencini : Everything is your practice
14:28:44 From Peter Nencini : Life and Work
14:28:53 From Peter Nencini : Otherness
14:28:58 From Peter Nencini : Oddness
14:29:18 From Peter Nencini : Certeau - Practice of Everyday Life
14:29:45 From Peter Nencini : There might be other things to achieve with illustration
14:29:55 From Peter Nencini : Other subjects to unpick, to explore
14:30:21 From Peter Nencini : Defining new contents for illustration
14:30:28 From Peter Nencini : Sorry, contexts
14:31:03 From Peter Nencini : Balancing pragmatism with longer term ambition
14:31:55 From Peter Nencini : Notching up formative experiences - digesting what you can learn from different stages of your career, your practice
14:32:11 From Peter Nencini : COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE
14:32:36 From Peter Nencini : Within but also across institutions
14:32:50 From Peter Nencini : Reading lists
14:33:01 From Peter Nencini : Illustration’s missing canon
14:33:54 From Peter Nencini : Practice ahead of existing literature
14:34:52 From Peter Nencini : Finding the words to describe the action
14:35:10 From Peter Nencini : When the works, the vocabulary is not quite there
14:35:51 From Peter Nencini : Maybe a canon is a burden, like it is for painting?
14:36:36 From Peter Nencini : Illustrator For Hire - diminishing
14:37:09 From Peter Nencini : Predictable visual responses
14:37:34 From Peter Nencini : Volume of illustration graduates
14:38:00 From Peter Nencini : Moment to critique, define
14:38:27 From Peter Nencini : ILLUSTRATION + RESEARCH
14:38:58 From Peter Nencini : Investigate and interpretive practices
14:39:08 From Peter Nencini : Investigative, sorry
14:39:35 From Peter Nencini : Things we already do, which can be described as research
14:39:43 From Peter Nencini : Annotating
14:39:50 From Peter Nencini : Googling
14:39:57 From Peter Nencini : Fieldworking
14:40:00 From Peter Nencini : Testing
14:40:06 From Peter Nencini : Discussing
14:40:29 From Peter Nencini : METHODS WE USE TO GET CLOSER TO SUBJECT
14:40:44 From Peter Nencini : Breadth can make it elusive
14:41:17 From Peter Nencini : Focus on product rather than process can be an obstacle to finding the research methods
14:41:54 From Peter Nencini : Venerating research can get in the way
14:42:08 From Peter Nencini : Secretive cultures can get in the way
14:42:32 From Peter Nencini : Fetishing mark making can get in the way
14:43:17 From Peter Nencini : Relationship to academic culture, to be taken seriously
14:43:21 From Peter Nencini : RIGOUR
14:43:28 From Peter Nencini : ORIGINALITY
14:43:51 From Peter Nencini : Not so much to do with style
14:43:55 From Peter Nencini : ETHICS
14:44:28 From Peter Nencini : Illustration is so much about REPRESENTATION
14:44:53 From Peter Nencini : Responsibility as an imagemaker
14:45:05 From Peter Nencini : Responsibility of an image in circulation
14:45:41 From Peter Nencini : Responsibility of the publisher, distributor, user of that image
14:46:21 From Peter Nencini : PhD - synergy between research, writing the book and the processes of a PhD
14:46:56 From Peter Nencini : Academic terminology
14:47:24 From Peter Nencini : How do we do that, whilst retaining the accessibility of illustration?
14:48:02 From Peter Nencini : Rick Poynor - missing critical history of illustration
14:48:22 From Peter Nencini : Illustration Research Network
14:48:56 From El Wemyss : who was that?
14:49:13 From Peter Nencini : History of Illustration - Jaleen Grove
14:49:47 From Peter Nencini : https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/history-of-illustration-9781501342110/
14:49:59 From Peter Nencini : Illustrator as intellectual
14:50:03 From dacook : Jaleen Grove
14:50:04 From Jonathan Hadlow : Jaleen Grove
14:50:18 From El Wemyss : thanks guys
14:50:50 From Peter Nencini : Borrowing critical theory from other disciplines
14:51:10 From Peter Nencini : E.g. narrative theory
14:51:34 From Peter Nencini : Borrowing
14:51:38 From Peter Nencini : In-betweening
14:52:02 From Peter Nencini : Can be both a strength and a weakness?
14:52:21 From Peter Nencini : Not beholden to one particular medium
14:52:26 From Peter Nencini : Our own tools
14:52:32 From Peter Nencini : Illustrative strategies
14:53:06 From Peter Nencini : Borrow from us!
14:53:29 From Peter Nencini : DEFINITIONS
14:54:30 From Peter Nencini : Nuanced ways of naming different kinds of practices
14:54:42 From Peter Nencini : Methods
14:54:46 From Peter Nencini : Interactions
14:54:57 From Peter Nencini : Processes
14:55:23 From Peter Nencini : Critical writing about the practice
14:55:39 From Peter Nencini : Or practise
14:56:04 From Peter Nencini : Again, practice/practise rather than outcome
14:56:27 From Peter Nencini : Practical and intellectual processes
14:56:52 From Peter Nencini : Consultancy
14:57:17 From Peter Nencini : Alice Moloney works in this way - guest in a few weeks’ time
14:57:44 From Peter Nencini : WHO ARE WE WRITING FOR?
14:58:05 From Peter Nencini : A practical text.
14:58:11 From Peter Nencini : For students.
14:58:21 From Peter Nencini : Colleagues and peers.
14:58:42 From Peter Nencini : Those in other parallel fields?
14:58:58 From Peter Nencini : A sounding board
14:59:23 From Peter Nencini : Easy to miss nuances within our own practices
14:59:46 From Peter Nencini : Recognising, surfacing those methods
15:00:05 From Peter Nencini : Theory and Practice fused
15:00:39 From Peter Nencini : Navigating between making, thinking, locating, watching, visiting,…
15:01:01 From Peter Nencini : Practical-ethical-conceptual
15:01:22 From Peter Nencini : Equal weighting to theory and practice
15:01:45 From Peter Nencini : THE WRITING PROCESS
15:02:14 From Peter Nencini : Sorry, RESEARCHING & WRITING process
15:02:29 From Peter Nencini : Diverse examples and voices
15:03:21 From Peter Nencini : Overdue
15:04:08 From Peter Nencini : Focusing away from a hierarchy of the works’ published profile
15:04:27 From Peter Nencini : Two authors speaking with one voice
15:05:18 From Peter Nencini : Would be good to hear how this broke down - did one of you write something, then another edit; and vice-versa?
15:05:46 From Peter Nencini : Writing is making
15:06:13 From Peter Nencini : Writing collaboratively
15:06:49 From Peter Nencini : Sharing what is ostensibly a private process
15:06:59 From Peter Nencini : Same could be said of illustration
15:07:37 From Peter Nencini : Sharing at early, forming stages
15:07:53 From Peter Nencini : CONSTRUCTION OF THE BOOK
15:08:15 From Peter Nencini : Showing the works in context
15:08:51 From Peter Nencini : Context needed, in order to understand materiality, application, function, user
15:09:17 From Peter Nencini : Multiple images featured, in order again to give context
15:09:49 From Peter Nencini : Speculative writing
15:10:03 From Peter Nencini : Creative-Critical-Writing
15:10:15 From Peter Nencini : Poetry-Prose
15:11:09 From Peter Nencini : Control of the means of writing, critiquing, naming, modelling, sounding
15:11:48 From Peter Nencini : ORGANISING CONTENT
15:13:19 From Peter Nencini : Did you work closely with the graphic designer to typset the content in this way?
15:13:36 From Peter Nencini : Sorry, typeset
15:13:59 From Peter Nencini : Bridging education and industry
15:14:21 From Peter Nencini : Not about exemplars
15:14:52 From Peter Nencini : PRINCIPLES
15:15:58 From Peter Nencini : A set of principles to describe, categorise - rather than one sentence
15:17:03 From Peter Nencini : Showing the physical workings-out, not luxuriating in nice sketchbooks
15:17:14 From Peter Nencini : Illustrative thinking
15:17:24 From Peter Nencini : John O’Reilly
15:18:29 From Peter Nencini : Factoring in, from the start, the design of the book
15:20:06 From Peter Nencini : Cover important - away from stylistic inflection
15:21:02 From Peter Nencini : Angelo Stitz - designer - ex-Vis Com
15:22:06 From Peter Nencini : https://www.metatype.de/
15:22:18 From Peter Nencini : Hope that link is him!
15:23:53 From Peter Nencini : Someone needs to do a history of bubble writing
15:24:02 From El Wemyss : Super interesting
15:24:12 From Jonathan Hadlow : thanks
15:24:22 From Jiazhen Cai : many thanks!
15:26:15 From Peter Nencini : TW - new spaces for illustration?
15:26:35 From Peter Nencini : Imaginative commissioning
15:26:50 From Peter Nencini : Jono question next
15:27:22 From Peter Nencini : Educating those commissioning?
15:28:20 From Peter Nencini : The qualities of an illustration practice
15:28:58 From Peter Nencini : Illustrators as researchers
15:29:07 From Peter Nencini : Archival practices
15:29:44 From Peter Nencini : JH - selling a way of doing
15:29:53 From Peter Nencini : Systems design
15:30:16 From Peter Nencini : Visual systems design
15:30:39 From Peter Nencini : Commodified beyond the image made
15:31:52 From Peter Nencini : Illustration more encompassing in its defining of its processes, practices
15:34:36 From Peter Nencini : Do we do it by starting? Bit by bit?
15:35:37 From Peter Nencini : Four Corners Books
15:36:01 From Peter Nencini : https://www.fourcornersbooks.co.uk/books/the-prisoner-of-zenda/
15:40:23 From Peter Nencini : Tracey with a question…
15:44:22 From Tracey Waller : El has a question
15:44:38 From Peter Nencini : Storytelling has been co-opted by design disciplines more broadly
15:46:48 From Peter Nencini : Let us know in the chat if you have a question, anyone/everyone - I’m scrolling between two speaker views so might not see you putting your hand up
15:47:45 From Peter Nencini : The WORKSHOP as METHOD
15:47:56 From Peter Nencini : Facilitator
15:48:03 From Peter Nencini : Instigator
15:48:06 From Peter Nencini : Mediator?
15:48:43 From Peter Nencini : Mutability
15:49:34 From Peter Nencini : EW - a function across all mediums
15:50:14 From Peter Nencini : Empathy
15:50:20 From Peter Nencini : Storytelling
15:50:34 From Peter Nencini : Identifying the need
15:50:50 From Peter Nencini : Finding the partnerships
15:52:46 From Peter Nencini : Infrastructure
15:54:58 From Peter Nencini : Jen Franklin - Method Illustration - Camberwell
16:06:33 From Peter Nencini : Mimicking physical experience with online tools
16:07:06 From Peter Nencini : Completely different things
16:07:29 From Peter Nencini : Understanding the tools in themselves
16:10:00 From Pat : Thanks for sharing, and organising this :)))
16:10:05 From Jonathan Hadlow : Yes, thank you!
16:10:25 From Jonathan Katz : Thank you!! :)
16:10:38 From Mireille Fauchon : hello@mireillefauchon.com
16:10:43 From Jonathan Hadlow : Ye, no more google drives!
16:11:48 From Mireille Fauchon : Upload an image to padlet that describes your practice
16:13:45 From Mireille Fauchon : https://padlet.com/

# data[].attributes.headline
Chat Notes from IRM#2: Methods, Themes, Originality, Ethics, Rigour

# data[].attributes.subject
Chat Notes from IRM#2: Methods, Themes, Originality, Ethics, Rigour

# data[].attributes.body
13:44:16 From Peter Nencini : ILLUSTRATION RESEARCH METHODS #2
13:57:31 From Peter Nencini : 1. Methods, Methodologies
13:57:42 From Peter Nencini : Breakouts
14:00:01 From Peter Nencini : Emerging themes shared, uploaded
14:00:19 From Peter Nencini : 2. Ethics, Originality, Rigour
14:00:32 From Peter Nencini : Three questions
14:01:32 From Peter Nencini : Emerging themes shared, uploaded
14:02:05 From Peter Nencini : Hi all - give us a couple of mins - nearly ready!
14:10:51 From Peter Nencini : Please also use the chat to jot down questions, ideas and links - we can translate that to the Padlet
14:11:22 From Rachel Gannon : https://padlet.com/rachelgannon01/5lq27teac0ur3qs8
14:11:45 From Peter Nencini : 1.
14:11:49 From Peter Nencini : METHODS
14:11:55 From Peter Nencini : METHODOLOGIES
14:12:11 From Peter Nencini : OUR
14:12:13 From Peter Nencini : US
14:13:24 From Peter Nencini : Often used in loose, vague ways
14:13:45 From Mireille Fauchon : METHOD = A tool, process or technique utilised to realise a specific aim.
Methods are referred to as interpretative practices = an practice performed in order to better interpret your subject matter.

Could be Intellectual consideration, practical making activity etc
14:14:04 From Mireille Fauchon : METHODOLOGY= A strategic system of methods selected to conduct an inquiry or to perform a task.
14:15:19 From Peter Nencini : Your work now and next
14:16:19 From Peter Nencini : Lots of different acts
14:16:44 From Peter Nencini : Recognising those acts - naming them
14:16:59 From Peter Nencini : Towards a goal
14:17:33 From Peter Nencini : Applied, e.g. to a community and phenomenon
14:17:43 From Peter Nencini : INTERPRETIVE
14:17:58 From Peter Nencini : Not at the end
14:18:08 From Peter Nencini : A whole process
14:18:41 From Peter Nencini : E.g. Illustrating a narrative text
14:18:47 From Peter Nencini : Reading the text
14:18:50 From Peter Nencini : Making notes
14:18:57 From Peter Nencini : Marginalia
14:19:00 From Peter Nencini : Onwards
14:19:09 From Peter Nencini : STRATEGIC
14:19:28 From Peter Nencini : Again, towards a goal
14:21:28 From Peter Nencini : Testing
14:21:45 From Peter Nencini : Intellectual considerations
14:21:53 From Peter Nencini : Practical considerations
14:23:50 From Peter Nencini : RECURRING METHODS
14:24:05 From Mireille Fauchon : We’d like you to identify:

• 3 x methods that are more or less consistent and tend to form part of your methodology regardless of your project?

• Any specific themes or subjects you find yourself returning to?

• Any common strategies or behaviours you tend to use?
14:29:32 From Mireille Fauchon : https://padlet.com/rachelgannon01/5lq27teac0ur3qs8
15:06:52 From Peter Nencini : Cait - what education background you came form
15:07:22 From Peter Nencini : Past experience changes the approach to illustration
15:07:34 From Peter Nencini : Filters through
15:07:53 From Peter Nencini : Methods -
15:07:56 From Peter Nencini : Walking
15:08:03 From Peter Nencini : Enacting movement
15:08:15 From Peter Nencini : Intentional walk
15:08:19 From Peter Nencini : Routine walk
15:09:34 From Peter Nencini : Vicky - hybridised research methods
15:10:07 From Peter Nencini : Yijia - non-disciplinary methods - e.g. walking
15:10:42 From Peter Nencini : Relationships
15:10:46 From Peter Nencini : Landscape
15:11:14 From Peter Nencini : Light and shadow and atmosphere
15:11:41 From Peter Nencini : Articulation of in-between - subject-object
15:13:11 From Peter Nencini : Practice in daily life
15:13:34 From Peter Nencini : Acting of doing things
15:14:10 From Peter Nencini : Using walking to understand an area
15:14:21 From Peter Nencini : Using walking as a cognitive process
15:15:37 From Peter Nencini : Sian - methods - methodology -
15:16:17 From Peter Nencini : Siddhi - books / photography / colour / sharing / selecting tools / audience
15:16:23 From Peter Nencini : Audience
15:16:34 From Peter Nencini : Making an audience
15:16:41 From Peter Nencini : Connecting to an audience
15:17:10 From Peter Nencini : Themes - food + education
15:17:54 From Peter Nencini : Gender + psychoanalysis
15:17:58 From Peter Nencini : Finding a market
15:18:08 From Peter Nencini : Education + culture + heritage
15:18:37 From Peter Nencini : Writing
15:18:43 From Peter Nencini : Building constraints
15:20:24 From Peter Nencini : Rachel - staging a meal - preparing food - determining the kind of conversation, exchange
15:20:30 From Peter Nencini : Working towards…
15:20:38 From Peter Nencini : Means to an end
15:22:34 From Peter Nencini : Light
15:22:40 From Peter Nencini : Relationships
15:22:49 From Peter Nencini : Designing something
15:23:06 From Peter Nencini : Strategy - humour - subtle? writing
15:23:22 From Peter Nencini : Re-checking - reflecting
15:23:36 From Peter Nencini : Books
15:23:38 From Peter Nencini : Test
15:23:40 From Peter Nencini : Text
15:23:43 From Peter Nencini : Sound
15:23:52 From Peter Nencini : Sketching
15:24:15 From Peter Nencini : Time - Human - Body
15:24:29 From Peter Nencini : Performance - motion
15:24:37 From Peter Nencini : Music
15:24:45 From Peter Nencini : Analogue drawing
15:24:48 From Peter Nencini : Seriality
15:25:09 From Peter Nencini : Ecology - Life v Theatre - Series
15:25:18 From Peter Nencini : Compartmentalising
15:25:22 From Peter Nencini : Logic
15:25:29 From Peter Nencini : Play
15:25:52 From Peter Nencini : 3D making - physical to digital
15:26:02 From Peter Nencini : Post-It-Noting
15:26:10 From Peter Nencini : Colour as impact
15:26:13 From Peter Nencini : Irony
15:26:18 From Peter Nencini : Sarcasm
15:27:23 From Peter Nencini : Ke - collected sound - from street - app -
15:28:03 From Peter Nencini : Sound determines the visual
15:28:54 From Peter Nencini : Transforming information
15:29:07 From Peter Nencini : A principle specific to illustration
15:29:14 From Peter Nencini : Folding in
15:30:22 From Peter Nencini : Pat - narrowboat project
15:30:48 From Peter Nencini : Drawing - photography - project
15:30:55 From Peter Nencini : Socio-political layer
15:31:10 From Peter Nencini : Overlaying meaning
15:31:26 From Peter Nencini : Billingsgate
15:31:57 From Peter Nencini : Rental / housing / crisis in London
15:32:22 From Peter Nencini : Identity as a HK citizen
15:33:00 From Peter Nencini : Primary research
15:33:42 From Peter Nencini : Use of archive
15:33:59 From Peter Nencini : Overall picture - understanding policy
15:35:00 From Peter Nencini : ETHICS
15:35:06 From Peter Nencini : ORIGINALITY
15:35:10 From Peter Nencini : RIGOUR
15:42:49 From Mireille Fauchon : Questions for discussion are:

• When have you had to be mindful of ethical concerns?
• Where do you recognise originality in your practice?
• An example of rigorous practice in your work.
15:45:17 From sianym : I’m gonna have to go I’m afraid! Thank you all for this afternoon!!!
15:45:27 From Peter Nencini : Thanks Sian
15:56:36 From Peter Nencini : Conviviality
15:56:57 From Mireille Fauchon : https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/The_SAGE_Handbook_of_Qualitative_Researc.html?id=AmPgDQAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
15:59:42 From Mireille Fauchon : https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=cKfiJYCN6BYC&printsec=copyright&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
15:59:47 From Peter Nencini : https://www.deveron-projects.com/site_media/uploads/leguin.pdf
16:02:57 From Pat : Sorry my group, I accidentally click quit :P
16:04:21 From Peter Nencini : El -
16:04:42 From Peter Nencini : Social history
16:04:48 From Peter Nencini : Working with people
16:04:55 From Peter Nencini : Working with land
16:05:05 From Peter Nencini : Taking footprints
16:05:25 From Peter Nencini : Rewilded places - minimising time and imprint
16:05:45 From Peter Nencini : Voyeurism - recording friends living alone
16:06:18 From Peter Nencini : Intentions laid out from the start
16:07:01 From Peter Nencini : Environmental data collection
16:08:10 From Peter Nencini : Fruits of rigour
16:08:30 From Peter Nencini : Testing within a tutor group
16:09:08 From Peter Nencini : Capturing readers’ interpretation via testing
16:09:37 From Peter Nencini : Method’s originality depends on discipline, conext
16:10:30 From Peter Nencini : Ethics support/advice from RCA Research
16:12:47 From Peter Nencini : Whistleblowing scenario
16:12:51 From Pat : its for Ethical further discussion :https://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/sierra-160-cm-line-tattooed-on-4-people-el-gallo-arte-contemporaneo-salamanca-spain-t11852
16:13:44 From Yiran Wang : Sorry guys I have to go. Thank you so much today& see u next week! ;)
16:13:51 From Peter Nencini : Thanks Yiran
16:15:11 From Peter Nencini : Defamation - libel - responsibility - representation
16:16:15 From Peter Nencini : Where does the responsibility lie within a commission?
16:16:57 From Peter Nencini : Using conversations in one’s research
16:17:19 From Peter Nencini : Case by case - ongoing considerations
16:18:35 From Siddhi : I think one may also be considering if they fear being offensive or unethical
16:20:21 From Peter Nencini : NEXT WEEK -
16:20:54 From Peter Nencini : DEVELOPING AN ABSRACT
16:21:05 From Peter Nencini : Toward the conference, or other
16:22:44 From Pat : Jone, also a question for you, thinking an alternatively,
Will u think you will take the commission if Tom ask you to make a promotion to advertising RCA, will u accept, haha?

# data[].attributes.headline
Chat Notes from IRM#3: Proposals, Community

# data[].attributes.subject
Chat Notes from IRM#3: Proposals, Community

# data[].attributes.body
14:06:56 From Peter Nencini : Hi all - please use the chat. We’ll save and post it on the Padlet afterwards.
14:07:13 From Peter Nencini : Hi all - please use the chat. We’ll save and post it on the Padlet afterwards.
14:08:02 From Peter Nencini : Today is focused on the symposium ‘Education & Illustration: Methods & Paradigms’
14:08:50 From Peter Nencini : 1. Forming questions
14:09:10 From Peter Nencini : 2. Framing your practice, towards an abstract
14:09:30 From Peter Nencini : Student forum within the symposium
14:09:45 From Mireille Fauchon : https://www.illustrationresearch.org/
14:10:05 From Peter Nencini : Looking at illustration practice academically
14:10:11 From Peter Nencini : An international community
14:10:29 From Peter Nencini : Themed conference each year
14:10:45 From Peter Nencini : Gather, listen, discuss
14:11:03 From Peter Nencini : IMPACT
14:11:32 From Peter Nencini : Presenting to a community, in order to share and further knowledge
14:12:11 From Peter Nencini : Broader, more experimental approach to presentation
14:12:18 From Peter Nencini : Process -
14:12:26 From Peter Nencini : 1. Submit an abstract
14:12:39 From Peter Nencini : 2. Peer reviewed by a panel / group
14:12:54 From Peter Nencini : 3. Asked to turn this into a presentation
14:13:19 From Peter Nencini : 4. Invited to write up the presentation more formally for the Journal of Illustration
14:14:05 From Peter Nencini : 5. This writing / article is also peer reviewed for rigour, originality, methodology, ethics
14:15:03 From Peter Nencini : Theme this year is Education & Illustration
14:15:51 From Peter Nencini : Alongside papers presented, there’ll be a student forum and an exhibition of research works - visual or written
14:17:59 From Mireille Fauchon : Experimental writing
14:18:07 From Mireille Fauchon : creative writing
14:19:08 From Peter Nencini : El - applying as collaborators
14:20:12 From Peter Nencini : Languages used from different disciplines can be really productive
14:21:36 From Peter Nencini : How we as illustration educators can work, going forward
14:21:43 From Peter Nencini : What is relevant?
14:21:53 From Peter Nencini : Call for papers -
14:24:14 From Mireille Fauchon : • What questions would you have about the future the of illustration?
• What question would you most like to know the answer to?
14:24:56 From Mireille Fauchon : • What are the tools that educators and students of illustration need to understand the subject with both criticality and professionalism?

• What are the key questions those teaching the subject need to ask to facilitate illustrators to better understand their cultural agency and have the means to work ethically and effectively?

• How can we best consecrate links between innovative or exploratory educational practices and professional applications?
14:25:21 From siddhi gupta : More than question, validate the impact illustration can have in education. Especially in ‘art education’ which needs some democratising.
14:25:39 From Inès Iragui : How can we broaden the scope of “Illustration” to clients beyond a certain look/style?
14:26:06 From El Wemyss : How as an illustrator can we ensure we are recognised as equals in the world of environmental research rather than an aid?
14:26:18 From dansiyu.zhu to Peter Nencini (Privately) : hi peter, I diconneted. did you receive my question?
14:27:00 From El Wemyss : How can we access a level of education to understand the significance of new research?
14:27:03 From Peter Nencini : Consecrating links - does it make sense to have an illustration ‘base’ - or should we reside and study where the collaborations exist? That is, other centres of knowledge or production?
14:27:30 From siddhi gupta : How folk art and illustration can exchange labels
14:27:46 From Peter Nencini to dansiyu.zhu (Privately) : Hi Dansiyu - I can’t see it - try again! Thanks
14:27:50 From Andrea Popyordanova : What is the value of non-fictional illustration? how can illustrators connect more with people doing research outside the world of art and design and collaborate?
14:28:14 From dansiyu.zhu : I`m worried about institutions teach the illustrations as a visual seduction
14:28:27 From Jiazhen Cai : How to relate advanced or experimental illustration practice to our community development?
14:28:53 From El Wemyss : How can illustrators ensure they are recognised as key contributors when they are collaborating with more science based industries
14:29:32 From Jingchuan Luo : Is it important to evolve the understanding of  literature in illustration education or practice
14:29:50 From Chenyue : The imitation and plagiarism of illustration style under the efficiency of information dissemination?
14:29:55 From Yijia Tang : How illustrator method communicate with people digitally without losing the perception and plasticity?
14:30:03 From Peter Nencini : How can illustration embrace its popular, accessible and shared DNA - whilst being esoteric or innovative?
14:30:46 From Pat : To what extend illustration can benefit the society.
14:30:55 From Jiazhen Cai : How can we change the stereotype of illustration to the audience we already have?
14:31:27 From dansiyu.zhu : what is the role of linguistic context (high/low/mixed) in creation of international illustrating platform?
14:37:00 From Yijia Tang : Can you identify illustrator using conversation as the mean method, develop  research practice need to objectively accurate and scientifically acceptable. How subjective story telling and imaginative fiction works regard to different culture?
14:38:07 From dansiyu.zhu : I think it`s not only a problem in this paper. it`s also a universal problem of the common value between technology/science and art.
14:42:29 From Mireille Fauchon : Illustration as a tool
14:42:41 From Mireille Fauchon : narrative to translate
14:44:02 From Mireille Fauchon : illustration and it’s relationship with literature
14:45:52 From Mireille Fauchon : How can we apply innovative  / experimental practices professionally?
14:49:10 From Mireille Fauchon : http://www.illustratorsillustrated.com/interview-olivia-ahmad-curator-of-the-house-of-illustration/
14:49:50 From Mireille Fauchon : Infrastructure for illustration
14:50:00 From Mireille Fauchon : Paradigm shift needed
14:50:19 From Caitlin Kiely : How can Illustration Education mirror the kinds of expanded territories that an illustrator may situate themselves. Could this be done by building links between different research institutions/courses e.g geographers, ethnographers, writers to promote an exchange of methods between.
14:51:29 From Peter Nencini : Infrastructure-wise, it’s interesting to look at the Netherlands - re: product and graphic design - look at Droog
14:53:11 From Peter Nencini : TAG conference
14:53:24 From Peter Nencini : Theoretical architecture
14:53:41 From Peter Nencini : Sorry, archaeology
14:54:12 From Peter Nencini : Leah Fusco
14:54:18 From Mireille Fauchon : TAG
14:54:44 From Peter Nencini : https://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/news-events/conferences/tag-2019
14:56:09 From Peter Nencini : Sarah Langford - project - https://ir7shapingtheviewspeakers.wordpress.com/2016/09/05/sarah-langford/
14:56:44 From Peter Nencini : Porosity
14:59:27 From Peter Nencini : ABSTRACT
14:59:34 From Peter Nencini : A summary; a proposal
14:59:38 From Peter Nencini : 300 words
14:59:49 From Peter Nencini : Tuned to 20 minutes
15:00:33 From Peter Nencini : Accompanied by (e.g.) 6 images
15:00:45 From Mireille Fauchon : https://padlet.com/rachelgannon01/5lq27teac0ur3qs8
15:11:25 From Mireille Fauchon : Come back 3:40
15:24:46 From Mireille Fauchon : https://esthermcmanus.co.uk/
15:27:57 From Mireille Fauchon : http://turf-projects.com/moss/
15:46:54 From Mireille Fauchon : Nomadic Illustration - Catrin Morgan
15:46:58 From Peter Nencini : Dansiyu - Catrin Morgan - Nomadic images
15:48:00 From Mireille Fauchon : Impacts of digital / internet platforms
15:48:04 From Mireille Fauchon : ethics
15:48:10 From Mireille Fauchon : Reuse of imagery
15:48:20 From Peter Nencini : Boris Groys - In the Flow
15:48:44 From dansiyu.zhu to Peter Nencini (Privately) : thank you
15:52:09 From Jiazhen Cai : Sorry there is a wood fracturing car outside my window so I cannot turn on my radio
15:54:00 From Mireille Fauchon : empathy and technology
15:54:40 From Mireille Fauchon : connection
15:55:32 From Mireille Fauchon : Talking to people
15:56:39 From Mireille Fauchon : https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m000dqfl
15:56:40 From Peter Nencini to dansiyu.zhu (Privately) : Alice Moloney - non-verbal communication - grief
15:56:51 From Mireille Fauchon : Alice Moloney discusses how best to express negative emotions in the digital realm.
15:57:22 From Peter Nencini to dansiyu.zhu (Privately) : Lawrence Lek
15:59:15 From Peter Nencini to dansiyu.zhu (Privately) : Writing as process - linguistics - illustration as process
15:59:54 From Peter Nencini to dansiyu.zhu (Privately) : Underestimation of comics
15:59:56 From anne.howeson@rca.ac.uk : how about heiroglyphics
16:00:14 From anne.howeson@rca.ac.uk : (spelling)?
16:00:22 From Mireille Fauchon : Literary criticism?
16:00:38 From Mireille Fauchon : illustrative narratives
16:00:47 From Peter Nencini : Lawrence LekWriting as process - linguistics - illustration as processUnderestimation of comics
16:03:53 From Mireille Fauchon : discipline specific vocabulary
16:04:03 From Mireille Fauchon : Appropriate language
16:05:53 From Peter Nencini : The event. The tools. For other creatives. Interactive.
16:06:45 From Peter Nencini : Workshops within the conference
16:06:56 From Mireille Fauchon : Workshop culture, DIY art schools, skill sharing and radical pedagogies.
16:08:01 From Mireille Fauchon : Learning through illustration - using illustrative approaches to educate.
16:08:21 From Mireille Fauchon : Educational environments - spaces of learning both physical and virtual.
16:09:18 From Mireille Fauchon : Propose a panel / sessiom
16:09:29 From Mireille Fauchon : illustration as ‘event’
16:09:53 From Peter Nencini : Rebecca Davies
16:09:58 From Peter Nencini : Luise Vormittag
16:10:03 From Mireille Fauchon : Rebecca Davies - portland inn project
16:10:42 From Mireille Fauchon : hello@mireillefauchon.com
16:10:43 From Mireille Fauchon : illustrationresearchmethods@gmail.com
16:10:52 From Yijia Tang : Thank you!!!
16:11:16 From El Wemyss : Thank you so much
16:11:25 From Jingchuan Luo : Thank you for holding these sessions!
16:11:33 From Jiazhen Cai : Thxxxx!!
16:12:01 From Kristina Kapeljuh : Thank you!
16:12:09 From Pat : Thanks!!! :)))
16:12:11 From dansiyu.zhu : Thank you all. And may I ask for the record of our text? because I disconnected several times and all the notes are gone :`<
16:12:39 From dansiyu.zhu : Thank you so much!