# data[].attributes.body
I thought that it was surprising that some teachers are unwilling to integrate technology into their classroom, being a society that heavily relies on technology everyday.

# data[].attributes.body
I learned you can use technology to stimulate situations. Students can engage, visualize, and create solutions with access to technology.

# data[].attributes.body
I always though that technology in the classroom was not good for the children, but I have learned that using technology gives kids a way to learn in a new way while also keeping them updated in the world. We are moving into a technical world, so the children should be able to learn with what we are using outside of the classroom. They are more engaged and willing to learn and able to work with each other more

# data[].attributes.headline
I like the idea of how they say constructivism is a "model of learning that asserts knowledge is not passively received, but it is actively created in the mind of every learner."  Now in this day in age, technology has become an important integration in the classroom.  I personally think that if it is used correctly, a classroom can benefit from the use of technology alongside of the lesson plan.

# data[].attributes.subject
I like the idea of how they say constructivism is a "model of learning that asserts knowledge is not passively received, but it is actively created in the mind of every learner."  Now in this day in age, technology has become an important integration in the classroom.  I personally think that if it is used correctly, a classroom can benefit from the use of technology alongside of the lesson plan.

# data[].attributes.headline
Seeing a change to learning was nice. Although some have disagreed such as parents, I think we are really enhancing learning through technology.  I really enjoyed reading this.

# data[].attributes.subject
Seeing a change to learning was nice. Although some have disagreed such as parents, I think we are really enhancing learning through technology.  I really enjoyed reading this.

# data[].attributes.body
It's interesting that in 2017 there are still classrooms that don't have "smart boards." I think this is an essential tool to have and use in our classroom.

# data[].attributes.body
When comparing old and new paradigm, I didn't realize the extent of the major differences. And some of the new paradigms things, to me, are not completely throughout all classrooms. I have been in classrooms where it seems more teacher-driven than student-centered. But, I do remember a lot less critical thinking when i was in school compared to now

# data[].attributes.body
Interactive classroom and a collaborative approach...It is encouraging that a multiple facet approach can present a myriad of information.  A concern is the unsecured amount of intellectual property.

# data[].attributes.body
What stood out most to me was the fact that some teachers and parents think that teaching technology will led to students only being users and not innovators of technology

# data[].attributes.body
The Student Response system was really interesting to me and also seemed like it would be beneficial to my future classroom

# data[].attributes.headline
i was struck by how much classroom techniques and procedures have changed over time. the thought that paper books could leave the classroom, or world in general, makes me really sad to be honest. however, it is a more sustainable form of learning if you're thinking about the environment. there is also more possibility for interaction with technology and all of its applications, leading to a shift in a more student-centered learning style that could be really beneficial. 

# data[].attributes.subject
i was struck by how much classroom techniques and procedures have changed over time. the thought that paper books could leave the classroom, or world in general, makes me really sad to be honest. however, it is a more sustainable form of learning if you're thinking about the environment. there is also more possibility for interaction with technology and all of its applications, leading to a shift in a more student-centered learning style that could be really beneficial. 

# data[].attributes.body
That some people think technology based teaching only teaches procedural thinking and can take away from exploring deep concepts. In some aspects this may be true, but I think incorporating technology in the classroom peaks student interest and keeps them engaged.

# data[].attributes.body
How much instruction has changed over time (i.e. the old vs. new paradigm), and how technology has helped shape the new paradigm to a more student-centered discovery/inquiry approach and to learning.

# data[].attributes.body
I thought is was interesting that although some instructors and parents argue that technology can take away from face to face time, classroom implementation is actually adding to face time and discussion.

I actually saw this in real time today. I saw students working on Chrome Books with partners. They were collaborating, discussing ideas, and researching information relevant to the real world.

# data[].attributes.body
The Thomas Edison quote that books will soon be obsolete in schools. I mean, it is crazy to think that it might be happening a little already. I remember being in high school and most my classmates used their computers in class while I still wanted to use my notebook. I'm here at grad school and some course have online textbooks. I will admit. I don't know how eager I am about this transition and advances of our technological world. On one hand I like like. On the other hand I'm very much old fashion and would be happy going back to basic technology or before that. Reading the article kinda reminded me of that episode from "Spongebob" where Squidward travels to the future and learns everything is Chrome in the future. (Play on joke, not the same type of Chrome--but still. Think of how far we've come).

# data[].attributes.headline
What stood out to you the most about the Chung article?

# data[].attributes.subject
What stood out to you the most about the Chung article?