# data[].attributes.body
Even though these reasons are here to support government having food restrictions, some are still skeptical. “ When faced with the facts about the dangers of consuming foods prepared with trans fats, shouldn’t it ultimately be each citizen’s right to choose whether or not to consume foods prepared with the controversial item?” (Source 2) Although it may be your choice, the majority of people in the U.S will benefit from the government regulating foods. Obesity is a major problem in our society, and the government regulating foods would help with this problem. Millions of tax dollars go towards fighting this, and with government regulations, we could put that money towards more important and beneficial things. We must put the needs of the majority before the wants of the minority.

# data[].attributes.body
Opposing viewers feel it is a bad idea to let the government have a say in what the citizens of America eat . If the government regulates the food our community eats ultimately puts our values, our rights and our freedom in a terrible position. But in 2008 New York City’s put a ban on hydrogenated oils containing trans fat means New Yorkers get less trans fat then other cities and it hasn't seem to affect anyone in the wrong way. In all, the government having a say in what the citizens eat does not look bad in certain point of views. The government regulating what the US as a whole eats will have many beneficial factors in the future to come.

# data[].attributes.body
There has been a lot of controversy with the talk of government regulation of food. Others claim that government regulation of food threatens our right to freedom as an american, but the benefits of food regulation far outweighs the risks.“New York City’s 2008 ban on use of hydrogenated oils containing trans fats means that New Yorkers get less trans fat with their fast food,... getting rid of trans fats certainly hasn’t hurt.” All food regulation is doing is improving the health of society which is something that is needed.

# data[].attributes.body
The government restricting food to create a healthier society has caused a lot of controversy. People believe that the government should not restrict food and ban specific food. although it's a good decision to restrict these types of foods due to the fact that half of our population is overweight and young children are getting diseases such as high cholesterol and diabetes. also people affecting are tax payers by costing more due to there medical bills and there therapys  over all banning and restricting foods is helping our population by saving money, tax payers not wasting as much money, and helping people lose weight

# data[].attributes.body
To people the government should not be able to regulate food. The people that agree with this would say  “government’s ability to regulate what we eat based on a number of unreliable health studies. Does this open the door to the government being able to regulate even the most minute details of our lives?” (source 3 by Bert Glass). People may say that because they feel like they don't have control of their live, however the government should regulate food because research shows “Economists say, obesity and its consequences cost our society $190 billion annually in health care and lost productivity, so health officials increasingly want to find equally effective strategies to discourage people from over-consuming sugary drinks and fast food.” ( source 2). This shows that not only people's health is at risk without the government looking out for people it shows that the government has to spend more money than expected. So the government should regulate food for the greater good.

# data[].attributes.body
There are many people who may wonder why the government would even want to regulate what people eat or drink since it’s their decision. Liz Berman, business owner and chairwoman of New Yorkers For Beverage Choices agrees with this and stated, “It’s sad that the board wants to limit our choices. We are smart enough to make our own decisions about what to eat and drink.” Although this may be true, there are still a lot of individuals, including children that are obese and that can cause a lot of harmful diseases.  “For the past several years, I’ve seen the number of children and adults struggling with obesity skyrocket, putting them at early risk of diabetes, heart disease, and cancer.” This clearly states that eating and drinking harmful products is never good for the human body. Children are supposed to be joyful at such a young age but this can prevent from their happiness, and even adults shouldn’t go through this suffering.

# data[].attributes.body
However, people think that the government should regulate many people suffer because of eating unhealthy food. “For the past several years, I’ve seen the number of children and adults struggling with obesity skyrocket, putting them at early risk of diabetes, heart disease, and cancer,” Dr. Steven Safyer, President and CEO of Montefiore Medical Center, said in an emailed statement to CBSNews.com.This may be true, but adults should guide their children to eat healthier, It is up to them to maintain their health. They should own up to their own decisions. “It’s sad that the board wants to limit our choices,” Liz Berman, business owner and chairwoman of New Yorkers for Beverage Choices, said in an emailed statement to CBSNews.com. “We are smart enough to make our own decisions about what to eat and drink.” People should be responsible enough to take care of themselves.They should be aware of what should be eaten and what shouldn't be eaten especially knowing what the consequences could be such as obesity and diabetes. Although many people suffer with these diseases, the government shouldn’t have to regulate what people eat and drink. People should know whats right for them and what isn’t.

# data[].attributes.headline
Various products have their disadvantages but they do come with several advantages. Bert Glass states that, “...trans fats are instrumental in creating a specific taste and texture in many foods that some consumers find desirable. Trans fats are also much easier to transport and ship than the other oils and fats due to their unique solid state”(Glass paragraph 38). Although this may be true, because of its desirable flavor, it brings in more buyers and those buyers end up consuming more and more. This can contribute to many health issues like bad cholesterol and heart disease just because people have become in a way addicted to specific products. By including regulations, many health issues wouldn’t be such a problem since there would be boundaries to keep people in good standards.

# data[].attributes.subject
Various products have their disadvantages but they do come with several advantages. Bert Glass states that, “...trans fats are instrumental in creating a specific taste and texture in many foods that some consumers find desirable. Trans fats are also much easier to transport and ship than the other oils and fats due to their unique solid state”(Glass paragraph 38). Although this may be true, because of its desirable flavor, it brings in more buyers and those buyers end up consuming more and more. This can contribute to many health issues like bad cholesterol and heart disease just because people have become in a way addicted to specific products. By including regulations, many health issues wouldn’t be such a problem since there would be boundaries to keep people in good standards.

# data[].attributes.body
Many will pose the question of what could happen when the government starts to have control over what you could eat or drink what else could they have control over. “Advocates that support the ban on trans fats are quick to point out the negative health effects of consuming food prepared with the banned item.” But these people don’t realize that the government looks after the people and their health. “Protecting our people and their health is a priority and gaining control of the food and drinks that the people eat can save many.”

# data[].attributes.body
There was a vote by New York City's Board of Health in December 2006, that they would be the first city to ban the use trans fats. The new law, which officially went into effect in July of 2008, aims to eliminate the artery-clogging fat used in the preparation of many popular food items around the city, including pizza, French fries, and various baked goods. Trans fats are much easier to transport and ship than other oils and fats due to their unique solid state. Although yet, trans fats can raise our level of “bad” cholesterol while also lowering our “good” cholesterol levels, both of which can contribute to heart disease. Advocates that support the ban on trans fats are quick to point out the negative health effects of consuming food prepared with the banned item. The more greasy and fatty foods we put in our body the health effects are numerous and costs more for the government and the people affected, especially in restaurants.

# data[].attributes.body
Sodas should be regulated by the government because they cause a variety of health problems and taxpayers billions of dollars every year. “While it is easy enough to view the ban on trans fats as an isolated incident, such a ban ultimately.” A ban of sodas puts americans freedom on the line.  “Poor health is much more than an individual, personal problem. If you are ill, your illness has consequences for others.”

# data[].attributes.headline
Some might say that having a regulation on what we eat and drink would have a positive impact on our health. For example, “Economists say, obesity and its consequences cost our society $190 billion annually in health care and lost productivity, so health officials increasingly want to find equally effective strategies to discourage people from over-consuming sugary drinks and fast food.” 25- regulations do change eating behavior,” Although this is true, it is more important to have our right to choose what we eat. By informing people of the hazards of consuming too many unhealthy food portions, this could possibly lower the high annual health care bill due to overconsumption of sugary drinks and fast food. More specifically, “If you want more than 16 ounces, no government official is stopping you from ordering as many of those sizes as you like.” This reveals that no person of authority should be able to tell someone the portion size of what people choose to eat and drink. As long as the sugary and fast foods are being consumed in moderation, this will lesson the issue of obesity and other health issues, which is ultimately why enforcing a regulation on what we eat and drink should not be implemented. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Some might say that having a regulation on what we eat and drink would have a positive impact on our health. For example, “Economists say, obesity and its consequences cost our society $190 billion annually in health care and lost productivity, so health officials increasingly want to find equally effective strategies to discourage people from over-consuming sugary drinks and fast food.” 25- regulations do change eating behavior,” Although this is true, it is more important to have our right to choose what we eat. By informing people of the hazards of consuming too many unhealthy food portions, this could possibly lower the high annual health care bill due to overconsumption of sugary drinks and fast food. More specifically, “If you want more than 16 ounces, no government official is stopping you from ordering as many of those sizes as you like.” This reveals that no person of authority should be able to tell someone the portion size of what people choose to eat and drink. As long as the sugary and fast foods are being consumed in moderation, this will lesson the issue of obesity and other health issues, which is ultimately why enforcing a regulation on what we eat and drink should not be implemented. 

# data[].attributes.headline
The government should regulate what people eat. Some people don’t care about some foods being bad for you, but plenty of other people do. These include, among others, officials who must spend taxpayer dollars to care for the health of people with obesity-related chronic illnesses, employers dealing with a chronically ill workforce, the parents and teachers of overweight children, dentists who treat tooth decay, and a military desperate for recruits who can meet fitness standards.

# data[].attributes.subject
The government should regulate what people eat. Some people don’t care about some foods being bad for you, but plenty of other people do. These include, among others, officials who must spend taxpayer dollars to care for the health of people with obesity-related chronic illnesses, employers dealing with a chronically ill workforce, the parents and teachers of overweight children, dentists who treat tooth decay, and a military desperate for recruits who can meet fitness standards.

# data[].attributes.body
Government should think twice before inserting regulations on sugary foods and drinks. The government thinks that enforcing regulations to sugary foods and drinks is going to affect the population positively because when they visit the store, they won’t have any option, they just eat healthy or don’t eat at all. According to government, “Regulations make it easier for people to eat healthfully without having to think about it.”. Now, this is true, however, we are expected to make the right decision and choose to eat healthy. As Jaslow stated, “We are smart enough to make our own decisions about what to eat and drink.”. People must be trusted to make the right decision and they must have a right to choose what they want to eat.

# data[].attributes.body
Americans have the right to make their own decisions without having the government tell them what to eat. Americans have the right to choose what they want to eat and drink. They have values of freedom. The government can’t make a decision for the people. “American values of freedom and individualism in jeopardy. If we no longer have the right to have a plate of French fries and a hamburger prepared with the ingredients we are used to, our American right to make informed decisions on our own without the government’s intervention is in very big trouble.” Americans are smart enough to make our own decisions about what to eat and drink

# data[].attributes.body
The government is making it easier to find the healthier choice. Some might say that the government's intervention will make us a nanny-country. That is not the real issue at hand, Soda companies are just there for the money. That’s the only thing they care about. If everyone becomes obese than so be it, as long as they keep making their own money. If they really cared they would have a warning with big bold letters saying what the risks of ingesting their product is but they don’t they do the bare minimum and have the ingredients on the back. Why would they do that? It would hurt their sales, they don’t want that.

# data[].attributes.body
The argument of whether the government should regulate whether food and drinks should is debated.

According to opposing viewers, the government should not be able to regulate what people eat and drink. According to Glass “The real issue at hand, however, revolves around the government’s ability to regulate what we eat based on a number of unreliable health studies.” Even though there would be limitations given to the people from the government, the health of the people is important and is a risk to people’s lives and costs the government taxpayers dollars to cover it. According to Glass  “Advocates that support the ban on trans fats are quick to point out the negative health effects of consuming food prepared with the banned item” also “Also, the artery-clogging properties of trans fats can lead to a number of health problems requiring medical care, which can cost taxpayers billions of dollars each year". The opposition of the government on regulating foods and drinks would not benefit in the health of the people and only increase obesity numbers and government costs and the movement would influence others to consume healthier and not only be consumers who buy what is sold.

# data[].attributes.body
The government should be allowed to place bans on our food because it still gives people a choice. Some people, like Bert Glass, believe that these bans will put our values of freedom at risk. But the ban ultimately just limits our beginning portion sizes. “People who buy sugary drinks at such establishments will still have an option to purchase an additional 16-ounce beverage.”(Sugary Drinks over 16-Ounces Banned in New York City, Board of Health Votes Ryan Jaslow paragraph #3) People still have a choice to either make a healthy meal choice or unhealthy, but in this circumstance it makes the healthy choice, a default choice. Most people who choose the default choice no matter what it is they are still given the freedom to choose as they want. These bans can both make people much healthier while still honoring their values.

# data[].attributes.headline
 However reducing the levels of fat and sugar in products have reduced the amount of consumption in people’s everyday lives in New York. Ryan states “The American Beverage Association has previously criticized that soda is being targeted as a culprit in the obesity epidemic over other factors.”(Jaslow,1). The sugars in products have been proven unhealthy in some cases such as sodas and packaged desserts. While fats and sugars are unhealthy in some levels this still does not limit the amount consumption because the food and drink items can still be available somewhere else.  “...the ban may not be as effective as officials hope, given people will still be able to buy sugary drinks such as Big Gulps at 7-11 convenience stores” (Congro,1).  Even with the ban of unhealthy food choices, people will still be able to buy sugary, fatty foods in New York. The new regulation is simply unreasonable.

# data[].attributes.subject
 However reducing the levels of fat and sugar in products have reduced the amount of consumption in people’s everyday lives in New York. Ryan states “The American Beverage Association has previously criticized that soda is being targeted as a culprit in the obesity epidemic over other factors.”(Jaslow,1). The sugars in products have been proven unhealthy in some cases such as sodas and packaged desserts. While fats and sugars are unhealthy in some levels this still does not limit the amount consumption because the food and drink items can still be available somewhere else.  “...the ban may not be as effective as officials hope, given people will still be able to buy sugary drinks such as Big Gulps at 7-11 convenience stores” (Congro,1).  Even with the ban of unhealthy food choices, people will still be able to buy sugary, fatty foods in New York. The new regulation is simply unreasonable.

# data[].attributes.body
Regulating junk food will cause people to become healthy without a choice. Kids are more likely to choose healthy meals if they have a toy or prise in them or the unhealthy meal without the toy. In the second article, the writer says, “Canadian researchers report that kids are three times more likely to choose healthier meals if those meals come with a toy and the regular ones do not. When it comes to kids’ food choices, the meal with the toy is invariably the default.” Yes, kids my chose the meal with the toy but most kids will still chose the meal that taste better. It should be the citizens right to choose what to eat and when to eat it. In another article the writer says, “When faced with the facts about the dangers of consuming foods prepared with trans fats, shouldn’t it ultimately be each citizen’s right to choose whether or not to consume foods prepared with the controversial item?” The consumer should be able to choose what to eat. A healthy person that does everything right should be able to choose when they want to slack off a eat some ice cream. But the government wants to control what foods are eaten.

# data[].attributes.body
Many will post the question of what could happen when the government starts to have control over what you could eat or drink what else could they have control over. But these people don’t realize that the government looks after the people and their health. Protecting our people and their health is a priority and gaining control of the food and drinks that the people eat can save many .  “Advocates that support the ban on trans fats are quick to point out the negative health effects of consuming food prepared with the banned item.”

# data[].attributes.headline
By limiting our beverage choices you are limiting our choices and treating us like young children. Adults should be able to make their own decisions. If they choose to eat and drink unhealthy, that is their choice. 

# data[].attributes.subject
By limiting our beverage choices you are limiting our choices and treating us like young children. Adults should be able to make their own decisions. If they choose to eat and drink unhealthy, that is their choice. 