# data[].attributes.body
This pie graph tells you what each color stands for . It also has a title that tells what the graph is. Lastly this pie graph adds up to 100% like pie graphs have to

# data[].attributes.body
This graph is not very good because it is overall very confusing. First the data is so clustered together its hard to read. Finally the data points aren't consistent

# data[].attributes.body
This is a good pie graph because it adds up to 100%. It is also good because each section has a title and includes the percentage. It also has appropriate sizes for each section in respect to their percentage.

# data[].attributes.body
This pie graph doesn't tell you what each of the groups are. It also doesn't have a title telling what this graph is showing.Lastly this graph doesn't add up to 100% it adds to 171% and pie graphs need to add up to 100%

# data[].attributes.body
This Graph does not include a title on the vertical axis. It also does not include a scale on the vertical axis, and this makes the data look like it is in a constant incline. This graph is also off on the horizontal axis because it is just random times when data is recorded.

# data[].attributes.headline
A Graph that is misleading (Amanda Huynh)

# data[].attributes.subject
A Graph that is misleading (Amanda Huynh)

# data[].attributes.body
This is an example of a bad graph because it does not have a title. The axis of this graph are not labeled as well. Finally, there is no source.

# data[].attributes.body
This is an example of a good graph because there is an informative title. A reliable source is also included with the graph. Lastly, there are equally spaced time intervals on the graph.

# data[].attributes.body
This graph is good due to the fact that it has a reputable source. It is also effective because it shows its numbers above each bar