# data[].attributes.body
Thesis: In the passages , both poets develop point of view by talking about war, although the intended effect of “Dulce et Decorum Est; Who's for the Game?” is negative, while “Who's for the Game?” intends to get people to join the war.
Evidence (Similarity):

From ,Dulce et Decorum Est; Who's for the Game?.“In all my dreams before my helpless sight”

“He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning”

“If in some smothering dreams, you too could pace”

From ,Who’s for the Game?.

“Who’s for the game, the biggest that’s played”,

“The red crashing game of a fight?”

“Who’ll grip and tackle the job unafraid?”

“And who thinks he’d rather sit tight?”

Evidence (Difference):

“His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin,”

“If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood”

“Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs”

Bitter as the cud”

“Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues, -”

Evidence (Similarity OR Difference):

“For there’s only one course to pursue”,

“ Your country is up to her neck in a fight”,

“And she’s looking and calling for you”.

# data[].attributes.body
Thesis: In the passages, both poets develop the point of view by telling reasons on why people shouldn’t joun the army . Although,the intended effect of Dulce et Decorum Est is to reframe people to join the army, While Who’s for the game is about why it is or it's not worth fighting for your country.

# data[].attributes.body
in the passages, both poets develop the point of view by explaining the reason why u shouldn't join the army, although the intended effect of dulce et decorum est;is to keep people from joining the army, while who's for the game? is to g

# data[].attributes.body
In the passages ,both poets develop point of view by, explaining why and why not to go to war ; although, the intended effect of  “Dulce et Decorum Est” is more about stopping people from going to war , while “Whos for the game” intends to help and support the idea of going to war. Who’ll grip and tackle the job unafraid? And who thinks he’d rather sit tight?”( from Whos for the game) Evidence (Difference): Whos for the game

“Your country is up to her neck in a fight, And she’s looking and calling for you”

Evidence (Similarity OR Difference):  Dulce et decorum est

“His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin, 20 If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs Bitter as the cud “

# data[].attributes.body
in these passages both poets  develop point of view by war . although the intended effect of  dulce et decorous est . While who’s for the game talk about how you should be at war.

# data[].attributes.body
In the passages, both poets develop the point of view by saying why people should or should not join the army. Although, the intended effect of Dulce  et Decorum talks about why people should not join the army, "Who's for the game" talks about why people should join the army.
1.

# data[].attributes.body
In the passages,both poets develop point of view by   using multiple reasons  to persuade the reader of their opinion although the intended effect of dulce et decorum is to persuade other to not join.while “who’s for the game inspired people to join

# data[].attributes.body
In the passaeges they both have diffrent perspectives

# data[].attributes.body
thesis;in the passages,they both have different perspectives and explain in a different way.They show why and why not they should join the army.They also give multiple reasons.

# data[].attributes.body
in these passages,both stories talk about 2 different points of view of war “dulce et decorum est;whos for the game?”in cons and “whos for the game” is the pros of war.

“Many lost their boots,limped on,blood-shod. All went lame all blind;”

“He plunges at me guttering,choking and drowning”

‘Who wants to turn himself into the show”

# data[].attributes.body
In the passages, both poets develop point of view by a person in the war; although, the intended effect of “decorum est" is dark, while “who’s for the game” courage you into war.

# data[].attributes.body
In the passages, both of the stories, they was two different stories of the wars,

# data[].attributes.body
In the passage , both poets develop point of views by giving multiple statements and reasoning on why people should and should not go to war. Although the intended effect of dulce et decorum est is negative, who's for the game? is getting people to join.

# data[].attributes.body
Nijah Williams
Avatar of anonymous
Anonymous
19h
Nijah Williams
 In the passages , both poets develop point of view by talking about war, although the intended effect of “Dulce et Decorum Est; Who's for the Game?” is negative, while “Who's for the Game?” intends to get people to join the war. 


favorite
2
1 comment
Avatar of Charles Levin
Charles Levin 24h
Nice!
Your avatar
Add comment
jeremiah Myers
Avatar of anonymous
Anonymous
24h
jeremiah Myers
Thesis: In the passages, both poets develop the point of view by telling reasons on why people shouldn’t joun the army . Although,the intended effect of Dulce et Decorum Est is to reframe people to join the army, While Who’s for the game is about why it is or it's not worth fighting for your country.

favorite
1
1 comment
Avatar of Charles Levin
Charles Levin 24h
Good Jeremiah – although do both passages tell people why they shouldn't join the war?
Your avatar
Add comment
jordan jones
Avatar of anonymous
Anonymous
24h
jordan jones
in the passages, both poets develop the point of view by explaining the reason why u shouldn't join the army, although the intended effect of dulce et decorum est;is to keep people from joining the army, while who's for the game? is to g
favorite
1
Your avatar
Add comment
Tianna Matthews
Avatar of anonymous
Anonymous
24h
Tianna Matthews
In the passages ,both poets develop point of view by, explaining why and why not to go to war ; although, the intended effect of  “Dulce et Decorum Est” is more about stopping people from going to war , while “Whos for the game” intends to help and support the idea of going to war. 


favorite
2
1 comment
Avatar of Charles Levin
Charles Levin 24h
Awesome, Tianna!
Your avatar
Add comment
kayla gannaway
Avatar of anonymous
Anonymous
24h
kayla gannaway
in these passages both poets  develop point of view by war . although the intended effect of  dulce et decorous est . While who’s for the game talk about how you should be at war.

favorite
1
1 comment
Avatar of Charles Levin
Charles Levin 24h
Nice, Kayla. I'm a little confused by the second sentence. What is the intended effect of Dulce et Decorum Est?
Your avatar
Add comment
Saniya Lakey
Avatar of anonymous
Anonymous
24h
Saniya Lakey
In the passages, both poets develop the point of view by saying why people should or should not join the army. Although, the intended effect of Dulce  et Decorum talks about why people should not join the army, "Who's for the game" talks about why people should join the army.
favorite
1
Your avatar
Add comment
Lauryn
Avatar of anonymous
Anonymous
24h
Lauryn 
In the passages,both poets develop point of view by   using multiple reasons  to persuade the reader of their opinion although the intended effect of dulce et decorum is to persuade other to not join.while “who’s for the game inspired people to join 


favorite_border
0
Your avatar
Add comment
Jordyn Butler
Avatar of anonymous
Anonymous
24h
Jordyn Butler
In the passaeges they both have diffrent perspectives  
favorite_border
0
Your avatar
Add comment
kendarius rice
Avatar of Ken'Darius Rice
Ken'Darius Rice
24h
kendarius rice
thesis;in the passages,they both have different perspectives and explain in a different way.They show why and why not they should join the army.They also give multiple reasons.
favorite
1
Your avatar
Add comment
Kaleb Johnson
Avatar of anonymous
Anonymous
24h
Kaleb Johnson 
 in these passages,both stories talk about 2 different points of view of war “dulce et decorum est;whos for the game?”in cons and “whos for the game” is the pros of war.


favorite_border
0
Your avatar
Add comment
Roman Smith
Avatar of anonymous
Anonymous
24h
Roman Smith 
In the passages, both poets develop point of view by a person in the war; although, the intended effect of “decorum est" is dark, while “who’s for the game” courage you into war. 

favorite_border
0
Your avatar
Add comment
Aaron Mckline
Avatar of anonymous
Anonymous
24h
Aaron Mckline 
In the passages, both of the stories, they was two different stories of the wars, 
favorite_border
0
Your avatar
Add comment
Avatar of anonymous
Anonymous
1m

# data[].attributes.body
In the passages, both poets develop point of view by explaining why and why you shouldn't go to war; although, the intended effect of "Who's For The Game" is to persuade people to go to war, while "Dulce et Decorum Est" is to persuade people to not go to war.

Evidence(similarities):From "Who's From The Game" It states "And who thinks he’d rather sit tight?"
"Who’ll grip and tackle the job unafraid?"

Evidence from: "Dulce et Decorum Est" It sates "Drunk with fatigue; deaf even to the hoots of gas-shells dropping softly behind."
"He plunges at me, guttering, choking, drowning."

Evidence (differences):From "Who's From The Game" It states "But you’ll come on all right – For there’s only one course to pursue,"

Evidence From: "Dulce et Decorum Est" It sates "Many had lost their boots, 5
But limped on, blood-shod. All went lame, all blind;"

Evidence (similar or different):From "Who's From The Game" It states "Your country is up to her neck in a fight, and she’s looking and calling for you."

Evidence (similar or different):"Dulce et Decorum Est" It sates "If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs Bitter as the cud"

# data[].attributes.body
in the passage , both poets develop point of views by someone in war ,they talk about the differences if u should or should not and they give you the pros and cons

# data[].attributes.body
Im the passage

# data[].attributes.body
In this passage both poets are explaining why you should go to war and why you shouldn't the first passage us giving details on why you should and the second passage is giving details on why you shouldn't