# data[].attributes.body
2. How do ACOT, Wellievers instructional transformation model and learning adoptio

# data[].attributes.body
1. How does SAMR and TIM differ? Explain.

First, we have to take a deeper look at the design of these models. SAMR model is the abbreviation of Substitution, Augmentation, Modification and Redefinition. These are the four types of technology integration in instructional practices. These four levels can further categorized into two level which are enhancement and transformation. technological use to substitute and augment traditional or existing technologies in classroom falls in to enhancement level. whereas, use of technology to modify or redefine falls into transformation level. enhancement level can be considered as entry level and transformation level can be deemed as advanced level of technological integration in T&L.
Example
#Substitution = Technology is used to substitute the existing approach, for example typing the essay instead of writing it. Core task is same.
#Augmentation = Core task is still the same, but some features of technology will be used. Such as using different font styles to show the heading, paragraphing and so on.
#Modification = More advanced technological features are incorporated such as real time feedback such that other peers can collaborate and contribute.
#Redefining = as the name suggests, the core task is conveyed in a totally different way. such as producing a short clip based on the title instead if writing an essay.

Matrik Integrasi Teknologi (TIM) menyediakan rangka kerja untuk menerangkan dan mencari penggunaan teknologi untuk meningkatkan pembelajaran. TIM menggabungkan lima ciri saling bergantung pada persekitaran pembelajaran yang bermakna: positif, kolaboratif, konstruktif, nyata dan berorientasikan matlamat. Ciri-ciri ini berkaitan dengan lima tahap integrasi teknologi: kemasukan, penerimaan, penyesuaian, infusi, dan penukaran. Ringkasnya, persekitaran pembelajaran yang bermakna dan lima ciri lima tahap integrasi teknologi mencipta matriks 25 sel.

Differences
1. SAMR model emphasizes level of technological integration without giving much importance to pedagogical practices whereas TIM model relies heavily on pedagogical part of technological integration.
2. SAMR did not discuss about hierarchy of technological integration on each level. TIM attempted to explain that each attributes have 5 different level of integration which starts from entry and moves toward transformation.
3. SAMR discusses about how teachers attempt to use the technology in classroom setting whereas TIM talks extensively on how these technology integration will intrigue different aspect of students' learning in the form of collaboration, goal orientation and so on.

2. How do ACOT, Wellivers Instructional Transformation Theory, Learning Adoption/Trajectory differ from SAMR and TIM?

ACOT, Wellivers and Trajectory are concern about the importance of using technology into teaching and learning process in the classrooms. Technology is use as a teaching and learning tools into the current curriculum. Besides using technology, the teachers also have to ensure that learning outcomes and students performance achieve/improve. While SAMR focus on pedagogical approach and TIM provides a framework of using technology to enhance learning.

# data[].attributes.body
Vijayaseelan 821671
How do SAMR and TIM differ?

First, we have to take a deeper look at the design of these models. SAMR model is the abbreviation of Substitution, Augmentation, Modification and Redefinition. These are the four types of technology integration in instructional practices. These four levels can further categorized into two level which are enhancement and transformation. technological use to substitute and augment traditional or existing technologies in classroom falls in to enhancement level. whereas, use of technology to modify or redefine falls into transformation level. enhancement level can be considered as entry level and transformation level can be deemed as advanced level of technological integration in T&L.  
Example:
#Substitution = Technology is used to substitute the existing approach, for example typing the essay instead of writing it. Core task is same.
#Augmentation = Core task is still the same, but some features of technology will be used. Such as using different font styles to show the heading, paragraphing and so on.
#Modification = More advanced technological features are incorporated such as real time feedback such that other peers can collaborate and contribute. 
#Redefining = as the name suggests, the core task is conveyed in a totally different way. such as producing a short clip based on the title instead if writing an essay. 

TIM is the abbreviation of Technology Integration Matrix which discusses about how technology is integrated based on 5 attributes which spans over 5 levels. 5 attributes are active, collaborative, constructive, authentic and goal oriented and 5 levels are entry, adoption, adaptation, infusion and transformation. TIM talks mainly about pedagogical aspect of a lesson and how technology is used in a way that can change the ownership of learning from teachers to students. TIM model also explains on how the technology is utilized for conventional use at the entry stage to a complex use when moving towards transformation level. At the entry level, a lesson tend to lean towards the technology i.e: explaining about the ways to use the devices and so on and moves towards content in transformation level. At this stage technology will become a transparent component of a lesson. 

Differences
1. SAMR model emphasizes level of technological integration without giving much importance to pedagogical practices whereas TIM model relies heavily on pedagogical part of technological integration.
2. SAMR did not discuss about hierarchy of technological integration on each level. TIM attempted to explain that each attributes have 5 different level of integration which starts from entry and moves toward transformation. 
3. SAMR discusses about how teachers attempt to use the technology in classroom setting whereas TIM talks extensively on how these technology integration will intrigue different aspect of students' learning in the form of collaboration, goal orientation and so on.  

2. How do ACOT, Wellievers instructional transformation model and learning adoption/trajectory differ from SAMR and TIM?

ACOT, Wellievers' instructional transformation model and learning adoption/trajectroy models are three closely related models. These model are based upon how a new technology that have been introduced are being adopted and utilized by the educators. All three models talks about the levels of familiarization of the technology among teachers. 

SAMR and TIM models revolves about how the technology can be incorporated in teaching and learning practices. We as teachers attempt to incorporate technology in our instructional practices. The outcome of incorporation of technology tend to vary. Why this happens? This is what TIM and SAMR attempted to answer. This is because there are different level of technological utilization. We can use the technology to enhance our T&L but the outcome will not be outstanding but when we utilize it to transform the instruction, we can expect an outstanding and impactful outcome among students. 

# data[].attributes.body
Terms
Kaedah vs model
ACOT, Trajectory,Wellivers
Tahap/level integrasi menaik 5
SAMR
2 tahap dgn 2 dlman
Kurikulum
TIM
Tahap dgn 2 dimensi

# data[].attributes.body
1.      How do SAMR and TIM differ? Explain.

Matrik Integrasi Teknologi (TIM) menyediakan rangka kerja untuk menerangkan dan mencari penggunaan teknologi untuk meningkatkan pembelajaran. TIM menggabungkan lima ciri saling bergantung pada persekitaran pembelajaran yang bermakna: positif, kolaboratif, konstruktif, nyata dan berorientasikan matlamat. Ciri-ciri ini berkaitan dengan lima tahap integrasi teknologi: kemasukan, penerimaan, penyesuaian, infusi, dan penukaran. Ringkasnya, persekitaran pembelajaran yang bermakna dan lima ciri lima tahap integrasi teknologi mencipta matriks 25 sel.
SAMR model menyediakan cara untuk memahami bagaimana teknologi komputer mempengaruhi pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Ia juga menunjukkan kemajuan yang diaplikasikan oleh para pendidik teknologi pendidikan ketika mereka maju melalui pengajaran dan pembelajaran teknologi. Walaupun seseorang mungkin berhujah sama ada sesuatu aktiviti boleh ditakrifkan sebagai satu peringkat atau yang lain, konsep penting untuk difahami di sini adalah tahap penglibatan pelajar. Tahap kemajuan ini dapat diukur dengan baik dengan melihat siapa yang bertanya soalan penting. Apabila orang bergerak, teknologi komputer menjadi lebih penting di dalam kelas, tetapi ia juga menjadi tidak ketara dalam keperluan pengajaran dan pembelajaran yang baik.

1.      How do ACOT, Wellivers Instructional Transformation Theory, Learning Adoption/Trajectory differ from SAMR and TIM? Explain.

Model Transformasi Pengajaran ACOT dan model adopsi / trajektori adalah tiga model berkaitan rapat. Model ini berdasarkan pada bagaimana teknologi baru diperkenalkan dan digunakan oleh pendidik. Tiga model ini membincangkan tahap pengenalan teknologi di kalangan guru.

Model SAMR dan TIM berputar bagaimana teknologi boleh dimasukkan ke dalam amalan pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Kami sebagai guru cuba menggabungkan teknologi ke dalam amalan pengajaran kami. Keputusan penggabungan teknologi cenderung bervariasi. Ini kerana terdapat tahap penggunaan teknologi yang berlainan. Kita boleh menggunakan teknologi ini untuk meningkatkan Latihan dan Pembelajaran kita tetapi hasilnya tidak akan menjadi sangat baik tetapi apabila kita menggunakannya untuk mengubah arahan, kita boleh mengharapkan hasil yang luar biasa dan mempengaruhi pelajar.

# data[].attributes.body
How do SAMR and TIM differ?

First, we have to take a deeper look at the design of these models. SAMR model is the abbreviation of Substitution, Augmentation, Modification and Redefinition. These are the four types of technology integration in instructional practices. These four levels can further categorized into two level which are enhancement and transformation. technological use to substitute and augment traditional or existing technologies in classroom falls in to enhancement level. whereas, use of technology to modify or redefine falls into transformation level. enhancement level can be considered as entry level and transformation level can be deemed as advanced level of technological integration in T&L.
Example:
#Substitution = Technology is used to substitute the existing approach, for example typing the essay instead of writing it. Core task is same.
#Augmentation = Core task is still the same, but some features of technology will be used. Such as using different font styles to show the heading, paragraphing and so on.
#Modification = More advanced technological features are incorporated such as real time feedback such that other peers can collaborate and contribute.
#Redefining = as the name suggests, the core task is conveyed in a totally different way. such as producing a short clip based on the title instead if writing an essay.

TIM is the abbreviation of Technology Integration Matrix which discusses about how technology is integrated based on 5 attributes which spans over 5 levels. 5 attributes are active, collaborative, constructive, authentic and goal oriented and 5 levels are entry, adoption, adaptation, infusion and transformation. TIM talks mainly about pedagogical aspect of a lesson and how technology is used in a way that can change the ownership of learning from teachers to students. TIM model also explains on how the technology is utilized for conventional use at the entry stage to a complex use when moving towards transformation level. At the entry level, a lesson tend to lean towards the technology i.e: explaining about the ways to use the devices and so on and moves towards content in transformation level. At this stage technology will become a transparent component of a lesson.

Differences
1. SAMR model emphasizes level of technological integration without giving much importance to pedagogical practices whereas TIM model relies heavily on pedagogical part of technological integration.
2. SAMR did not discuss about hierarchy of technological integration on each level. TIM attempted to explain that each attributes have 5 different level of integration which starts from entry and moves toward transformation.
3. SAMR discusses about how teachers attempt to use the technology in classroom setting whereas TIM talks extensively on how these technology integration will intrigue different aspect of students' learning in the form of collaboration, goal orientation and so on.

2. How do ACOT, Wellievers instructional transformation model and learning adoption/trajectory differ from SAMR and TIM?

ACOT, Wellievers' instructional transformation model and learning adoption/trajectroy models are three closely related models. These model are based upon how a new technology that have been introduced are being adopted and utilized by the educators. All three models talks about the levels of familiarization of the technology among teachers.

SAMR and TIM models revolves about how the technology can be incorporated in teaching and learning practices. We as teachers attempt to incorporate technology in our instructional practices. The outcome of incorporation of technology tend to vary. Why this happens? This is what TIM and SAMR attempted to answer. This is because there are different level of technological utilization. We can use the technology to enhance our T&L but the outcome will not be outstanding but when we utilize it to transform the instruction, we can expect an outstanding and impactful outcome among students.

# data[].attributes.body
How do SAMR and TIM differ? Explain.

Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition Model (SAMR) framework, the focus is on levels of use of educational technology whereby Technology Integration Matrix (TIM) framework focuses on planning, describing and evaluating technology integration.

2. How do ACOT, Wellivers Instructional Transformation Theory, Learning Adoption/ Trajectory differ from SAMR and TIM?

Actually, Technology is being used as teaching and learning tool according to current curriculum, whereby ACOT, Wellivers and Trajectory are concerned on the importanceof using the technology.

Teachers ensure that learning outcomes and students performance improve while using the technology while SAMR focuses on pedagogical approach and TIM provides an guideline to use techology to improve learning

# data[].attributes.headline
Maren (821682)                                                                           1- How do SAMR and TIM differ?SAMR is a method that enables differentiate among the pedagogy with the current technological tools. It reveals the different levels that can be achieved in using technology based learning. Main separated into two groups Enhancement level and Transforming level. Different from this TIM has a total of 4 stages and 5 level of entries. As the stages gets to toughest the more complex learning occurs( more to conceptual)

# data[].attributes.subject
Maren (821682)                                                                           1- How do SAMR and TIM differ?SAMR is a method that enables differentiate among the pedagogy with the current technological tools. It reveals the different levels that can be achieved in using technology based learning. Main separated into two groups Enhancement level and Transforming level. Different from this TIM has a total of 4 stages and 5 level of entries. As the stages gets to toughest the more complex learning occurs( more to conceptual)

# data[].attributes.body
2- How do ACOT, Wellivers Instructional Transformation Theory, Learning Adoption/Trajectory differ from SAMR and TIM?
Explain.

These models are more focusses the use of technology integration rather than just as a new pedagogy skill. ACOT explain the variety of implementation of technology as in some scenario it might not even be a HOT's orientated learning instead its just a normal classic teaching method with technology as a visual tool only. Transformation through new Technology occurs if the the new utility are well planned and created according to the goal or objective to be acieved.

# data[].attributes.body
1. How do SAMR and TIM differ?
SAMR - Satu kaedah yang mementingkan teknologi sebagai alat untuk untuk pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam abad ke-21 bagi menggantikan kaedah pengajaran secara tradisional. Terdiri daripada 4 aspek iaitu Substitution, Augmentation, Modification dan Redifination.
TIM - Satu kaedah yang mementingkan pendekatan pedagogi dan menggunakan teknologi untuk membantu pengajaran. Terdiri daripada 5 aspek utama iaitu active, collaborative, constructive, authentic dan goal-directed.

2. How do ACOT, Wellivers Instructional Transformation Theory, Learning Adoption/Trajectory differ from SAMR and TIM?
ACOT, Wellivers and Trajectory are concern about the importance of using technology into teaching and learning process in the classrooms. Technology is use as a teaching and learning tools into the current curriculum. Besides using technology, the teachers also have to ensure that learning outcomes and students performance achieve/improve. While SAMR focus on pedagogical approach and TIM provides a framework of using technology to enhance learning.

# data[].attributes.body
1. How do SAMR and TIM differ? Explain.

SAMR membahagikan kepada 2 pendekatan: garis atas dan garis bawah. Untuk garis bawah dikenali sebagai Penambahbaikan (Enhancement) terdiri daripada ‘Subsititution’ dan ‘Augmentation’, manakala garis atas dikenali sebagai transformasi (transformation) terdiri daripada ‘modification’ dan ‘redefinition’. Dalam pendekatan garis atas, boleh dirumuskan bahawa guru menilai pelajar dengan cara menganalisis, menilai dan mencipta dan secara tidak langsung dalam garis atas telah bergabung kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi. SAMR ini boleh dikatakan bahawa dapat membantu guru dalam merancang bila, bagaimana dan cara menyatupadukan teknologi dalam integrasi kelas untuk PdPc seharian

TIM pula merupakan kesinambungan penggunaan teknologi berdasarkan 5 atribut: active, collaborative, constructive, authentic dan goal-directed yang merentasi 5 tahap : entry, adoption, adaptation, infusion dan transformation. Terdapat 25 sel matrik yang menyatakan ciri-ciri dalam pengukuran terhadap integrasi teknologi. Berdasarkan kepada 5 tahap dan 5 atribut yang digunakan, dapati di tahap ‘Entry’ lebih fokus kepada guru dan dorongan daripada guru, manakala di bahagian transformasi lebih berpusatkan pelajar.  TIM juga  berubah dari ‘instructional’ ke kandungan yang mana model ini membimbing guru dalam merancang supaya pemilihan teknologi yang sesuai dengan PdPc. Secara rumusnya, TIM ini lebih fokus kepada pedagogi dan pendekatan pedagogi dalam mengintegrasikan tenologi.

2- How do ACOT, Wellivers Instructional Transformation Theory, Learning Adoption/Trajectory differ from SAMR and TIM?
Explain.

Kesemua model ini menggunakan atau mengintegrasikan teknologi dalam PdPc harian. Terdapat 5 fasa bagi setiap model yang dikaji, manakala SAMR hanya mempunyai 4 fasa. Setiap fasa bagi model mempunyai peranan masing-masing.

-        Selain itu, bagi model ACOT, Wellivers Instructional Transformation Theory, Learning Adoption/Trajectory lebih memberi penekanan kepada kesedaran dalam menggunakan teknologi untuk melihat hasil pembelajaran dan pencapaian pelajar, manakala SAMR lebih kepada penggunaan dan TIM pula lebih fokus kepada pedagogi dan pendekatan pedagogi dalan mengintegrasikan teknologi atau boleh rumuskan bahawa TIM menyediakan rangka kerja untuk menerangkan dan mensasarkan penggunaan teknologi untuk meningkatkan pembelajaran.

# data[].attributes.body
1- How do SAMR and TIM differ?
Explain

# data[].attributes.body
1. How do SAMR and TIM differ? Explain.
SAMR adalah sebuah model yang dicipta untuk pengintegrasian teknologi bagi mengukur tahap penggunaan teknologi dalam pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan (PdPc).  SAMR adalah merujuk kepada Sabstitutes, Augmentation, Modification, Redefinition.
Manakala Technology Integration Matrix (TIM) pula merujuk kepada rangka kerja yang menggabungkan lima elemen penting sebagai asas untuk meningkatkan pembelajaran melalui penggunaan teknologi. Antara elemen tersebut ialah active,  collaborative, constructive,authentic dan juga goal-directed.

2. How do ACOT, Wellivers Instructional Transformation Theory, Learning Adoption/ Trajectory differ from SAMR and TIM

Model Apple Classroom Of Tomorrow (ACOT) ,Wellivers Instructional Transformation Theory, Learning Adoption/ Trajectory  adalah model yan diciptakan untuk melihat kesan penggunaan teknologi dalam PdPc. Sehubungan itu, pelajar diberi peluang untuk meneroka sendiri teknologi berdasarkan panduan yang dissediakan dan guru adalah  bertindak sebagai pembimbing.

Manakala SAMR dan TIM lebih kepada pengintegrasian teknologi dalam PdPc.

# data[].attributes.body
1- How do SAMR and TIM differ?
Explain

The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition Model offers a method of seeing how computer technology might impact teaching and learning.  It also shows a progression that adopters of educational technology often follow as they progress through teaching and learning with technology.  While TIM is resfer to Technology Integration Matrix. The Technology Integration Matrix (TIM) provides a framework for describing and targeting the use of technology to enhance learning. The TIM incorporates five interdependent characteristics of meaningful learning environments: active, collaborative, constructive, authentic, and goal-directed.

2- How do ACOT, Wellivers Instructional Transformation Theory, Learning Adoption/Trajectory differ from SAMR and TIM?
Explain.

# data[].attributes.body
2- How do ACOT, Wellivers Instructional Transformation Theory, Learning Adoption/Trajectory differ from SAMR and TIM?
Explain.