# data[].attributes.body
She admire volunteers to took a survey to understand that what are thoughts of different people about wildlife conservation, and try to focus on this terrible situation. So for this purpose she traveled almost 10,000 villages around from Rajasthan to Karla and realized to focus on another 25 species, by which only 4% are well protected, while on the other hand only 1% of species are effectively protected India by government management.

But she wants to raise the quantity of these species from 4% to 10% so by increasing this percentage their value will also be reached to 10,000. At the same time she tried to make partnership with farmers and urge most of them to buy lands to conserve wildlife.

She also put some historic values that about 30,000 wildlife including (Bears, Tigers, Bears, Leopards) shouted by British and Indians. Because she declares that in 1960 tigers were the most iconic species, and now we have shrunk their numbers.

# data[].attributes.body
Krithi Kranath has mentioned many stratergies to protect wild animals. Firstly they have arranged a stratergy of  Protecting Parks. In India about 4% is protecting and 1%is effectively protecting and everything is managed by the Government .In my point of view protecting Parks is a Must and this percentage is comparatively low.So Government must pay more attention on this because Parks are the paradise for animals.It is tbeir homes.So Protecting parks is a must.
Moreover,she has found that many people lives nearby to animals and lots of conflicts have occured.As a result of that they have taken an action for that by introducing the web portal.People can call and report the conflict. It is for people who have lost their live stock or crops.They can directly contact and can tell their problem. After recieving the complaing they are taking actions for this and they contact the government for the claim.They believe that,after recieving the claim those people will fostering tolerance towards wild life.According to my point of view,sometimes many people, farmers donot work on it as they are not well educated to use this method.Some may have no access to internet and many problems as they are poor.So this metod is very challenging and can't get a 100% result from it.
Another stratergy that she is taking is that bulding partnerships

# data[].attributes.body
Krithi Karnath's first perspective on true wildlife conservation is by creating a web portal for the people who loose their crops or livestock. In this web portal people can actually write down a compliant email or call directly and explain about the losses. Soon after the complaint is received by her organization, they would talk to the government for the claim. After getting the proper claim the farmers would be happy and create a self tolerance for the wildlife. But this task is challenging because farmers are generally poor and maybe could not access the internet and telephone. Or the farmers may be illiterate and do not know what to do.

In another part she created partnership with the farmers and gathered volunteers who would work with her for the conservation. She surveyed over 10000 villages along with the volunteers and made people realise that the problem they are facing is not only theirs but for the whole India. This strategy may be the best because every people will be aware about the do's and dont's of the wild life. They will find a way on their own to reduce the conflicts.

Krithi also says that only 4% of Indian land is protected and among which only 1% is protected effectively. She wants that 4% to rise up to 10%. She recommends that it can be done by buying land and converting it into conservation areas, parks and corridors. However in my perspective the value of land is so high and India is a big country and 6 % is lots of land. Generally investors would not lend money on this kind of work because there is no  payback. Even though  national and international tourism will increase the trade and commerce but also for investors that is not real money. And it may take more than couple of  decades too get the money back.

So creating a local awareness by involving the farmers and educating them about the affects of wildlife losses may be best strategy to conserve the wildlife. Furthermore creating a tolerance and leaving the wildlife wild may create the increase in population of wildlife.

# data[].attributes.body
There are three unique perspectives that Karanth mentioned to  conservate true wildlide in India.
Firstly,  she and conservation scientists, farmers create a partnership to set up a web portal. It means that Indian farmers can call in and report conflict in regarding to any problems that they are forcing and being influented to their life. A field team will collect them , report to government and aid them to get compensation.
Secondly, she traveled through 500 urban area and 200 parks in India to do thousand of survey with volunteers in 18 to 45 years old. The purspose is to understant how people understand and perceive about wild life conservation and serious awareness of this matter. Finnally, She also mentioned the stragegy to promote the Indian land from 4% to 10%. She stated that this stragetry would be possible if Indian land could be bought  and build corridors for conservation  by  not only government but also each individuals or organisation. The enormous results for the growth of wild animals population could be brought like getting 10000 tigers, thousand of elephants and other extraordinary species. Consequently, in my opinion, the building the partnership between farmers is the   most effective strategics because It help them aware , adquire and share the knowledge  about wildlife conservation.

# data[].attributes.body
She manage to volunteer people and took a survey to understand what people think about wild life conservation and try to make them aware of this serious situation.
Also by creating a web portal to get compensation if any wild animal cause damage to their property.
another strategy is to encourage NGOs, governments and other corporations to buy land so that it can be converted into wild life reservoir.
Among these strategies making people aware of the importance of wildlife is the most effective and easier as people in rural area are not much literate and they don't know the importance of the wildlife. how animals are helping humans indirectly

According to me creation of web portal for compensation is not an effective manner because most of the people who hunt down the animals are farmers of rural areas and they are not literate enough to use internet and request for compensation.

Building partnership with NGOs, Governments and corporations and convince them to buy land to expand wild life reservoir is time consuming but effective way as there are many philanthropists who can understand the situation and can invest their fortune to make it possible.

# data[].attributes.body
Krithi Karanth has explained a number of unique perspectives on true wildlife conservation in India.

One of the perspectives included a survey that Karanth conducted in 10000 villages around rural parts of India alongside 500 volunteers aged 18 to 45 who deeply understand the issue within wildlife conservation and its affect on people. This survey has provided information on the problems that wildlife causes to the villagers such as decrease in amount of crops produced.

Another perspective that Karanth has discussed is creating a web portal for people to record the malicious actions of wildlife on their lives and villages which would be reported to the government by email or phone call. People affected would get compensations according to the damage dealt.

The last perspective argued by Krithi Karanth was that only 4% of land in India is protected by the government. However, she suggests that the number should be risen up to 10%. This could be achieved by buying land and using it as conservation area for the wildlife.

To conclude, these strategies are could be highly effective due to its simplicity