# data[].attributes.headline
it's a choice i prefer xbox to Wii as i could use easily. no reference to support it.

# data[].attributes.subject
it's a choice i prefer xbox to Wii as i could use easily. no reference to support it.

# data[].attributes.body
referenced and evidence based

# data[].attributes.body
Weakness: this is a statement that has not been evideced
Strength: it informs you of the other ways to use these gadgets

# data[].attributes.body
Makes a strong point. Has a reference. Saying that something is a good choice for rehabilitation may not be accurate because it is better than something else does not still make it a good choice for rehabilitation as it may not have monitored the effectiveness of the tools used.

# data[].attributes.body
Weakness could be opinion based but on the other hand it's a signal that the person or situation needs help.

# data[].attributes.body
strength, referenced andthe sentence is well structured and straight to the point

# data[].attributes.body
evidence based

# data[].attributes.headline
its a strength because with use it. no evidence base

# data[].attributes.subject
its a strength because with use it. no evidence base

# data[].attributes.body
strength- with evidence

# data[].attributes.headline
Evidence based information with references

# data[].attributes.subject
Evidence based information with references

# data[].attributes.body
weakness- individual's opinion

# data[].attributes.body
I disagree, the Wii and xbox are not used for educational or healthcare setting. Also there are no evidence to support this statement.

# data[].attributes.headline
Weakness, lack of evidence and no reference

# data[].attributes.subject
Weakness, lack of evidence and no reference

# data[].attributes.body
it is opinionated, further explanation may be needed

# data[].attributes.body
It has been referenced which is positive

# data[].attributes.body
No referencing so there is not a strong evidence base for the statement. Informative so this may be a strength.

# data[].attributes.body
strength: jackpot reference and beneficial purpose
weakness: screen time

# data[].attributes.body
weakness, no reference, the sentence could be expanded further.

# data[].attributes.body
no facts included

# data[].attributes.headline
how do we know this is true? no reference 

# data[].attributes.subject
how do we know this is true? no reference 

# data[].attributes.body
Underpinned with evidence

# data[].attributes.headline
Strength is paraphrased but no evidence and reseach have been provided.

# data[].attributes.subject
Strength is paraphrased but no evidence and reseach have been provided.

# data[].attributes.body
Highly academic statement, including reference, as well as it's usefulness.

# data[].attributes.body
strength; but no evidence

# data[].attributes.body
it is subjective

# data[].attributes.headline
well written , good referencing, more details

# data[].attributes.subject
well written , good referencing, more details

# data[].attributes.headline
good: this is a  much more fine tune academic approach with clear information and referencing to support.

# data[].attributes.subject
good: this is a  much more fine tune academic approach with clear information and referencing to support.

# data[].attributes.headline
No reason why it's been used in Education and healthcare

# data[].attributes.subject
No reason why it's been used in Education and healthcare

# data[].attributes.headline
strengthen: There is evidence to supply this statement.

# data[].attributes.subject
strengthen: There is evidence to supply this statement.

# data[].attributes.body
This provides a statement, however no research has been cited within the text to back this statement up.

# data[].attributes.body
The writing style creates a point and backs it up with a reference. It also includes an explanation and rationale

# data[].attributes.headline
Strength, as it supported with a reference

# data[].attributes.subject
Strength, as it supported with a reference

# data[].attributes.body
very well written with a reference , could explain what kind of rehabilitation as the term is very broad

# data[].attributes.body
Educational but not fact

# data[].attributes.headline
A strength. It helps in educating people 

# data[].attributes.subject
A strength. It helps in educating people 

# data[].attributes.body
Good point but no evidence

# data[].attributes.body
opinion

# data[].attributes.headline
This between strength and weakness, it does not have reference.

# data[].attributes.subject
This between strength and weakness, it does not have reference.

# data[].attributes.body
inclusive and more general. It may for a good choice for some people and not for some people. Writings need to be specific and clear and not generalised as what is good for one person may not be good for the other.

# data[].attributes.body
Weekness - No reference

# data[].attributes.headline
strength, in depth with evidence based research, including sources and references. 

# data[].attributes.subject
strength, in depth with evidence based research, including sources and references. 

# data[].attributes.headline
Strength as it is backed up with reference

# data[].attributes.subject
Strength as it is backed up with reference

# data[].attributes.headline
This statement is opinion based with no evidance. It is not a acedemic style of writing.

# data[].attributes.subject
This statement is opinion based with no evidance. It is not a acedemic style of writing.

# data[].attributes.body
Weakness- no supporting statements. The use of "sometimes", makes the statement weak

# data[].attributes.body
clear and concise, also factual however needs the evidence to back it up

# data[].attributes.body
positive- backed up with evidence and referenced

# data[].attributes.headline
potentially presumptuous statement - needs evidencing

# data[].attributes.subject
potentially presumptuous statement - needs evidencing

# data[].attributes.body
is a suggesstion

# data[].attributes.body
I could help to improve our style of Academic writing.

# data[].attributes.body
Opinionated due to the use of words like "I think". language used such as "loads better" is not academic. A strength is that it provides information about a product however it does not justify the reason why having no controller is better.

# data[].attributes.body
weakness : no reference
strength: if it is true then it is a fun way and will motivate children to learn more while having fun

# data[].attributes.body
Have no ideas about using educational gamming. for me it is a weakness

# data[].attributes.body
Strength, because it brings families together somethings, as some games demand teamwork.

# data[].attributes.body
An informal point being made. no references or evidence provided

# data[].attributes.body
good academic vocabulary, referencing used effectively and good evidence, also explains why this is good

# data[].attributes.body
strength
it is researched and supported by a reference

# data[].attributes.headline
critical thinking- different literature, comparing and contrasting and drawing personal conclusions

# data[].attributes.subject
critical thinking- different literature, comparing and contrasting and drawing personal conclusions

# data[].attributes.headline
refencing used to back up evidence and gives a reason why and uses a PEEL layout

# data[].attributes.subject
refencing used to back up evidence and gives a reason why and uses a PEEL layout

# data[].attributes.headline
weakness because that is some ones opinion.

# data[].attributes.subject
weakness because that is some ones opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
Includes a research study and has been cited within the text.

# data[].attributes.body
This for reference

# data[].attributes.body
Weakness: Personal opinion-no evidence based.

# data[].attributes.headline
good : clear explanation of what the xbox and we are 

# data[].attributes.subject
good : clear explanation of what the xbox and we are 

# data[].attributes.body
bad: would have been more supported if some examples were given

# data[].attributes.headline
written in first person with the phrase 'I think' isn't very professional

# data[].attributes.subject
written in first person with the phrase 'I think' isn't very professional

# data[].attributes.headline
reference is included so this means research is been done, academic writing.

# data[].attributes.subject
reference is included so this means research is been done, academic writing.

# data[].attributes.headline
again this is not strong because is optional

# data[].attributes.subject
again this is not strong because is optional

# data[].attributes.body
this is opinion based and there is no research/ supporting evidence to back up the oponion

# data[].attributes.headline
This statement is strong as it contains references 

# data[].attributes.subject
This statement is strong as it contains references 

# data[].attributes.headline
strength- has evidence/ reference to back the statement

# data[].attributes.subject
strength- has evidence/ reference to back the statement

# data[].attributes.body
this style of writing show research has been put into it as there is a reference to backup what is being said

# data[].attributes.body
Strength. Includes an evidence based fact, with a citation to support.

# data[].attributes.headline
where is your information from? The 'IS "can be removed from the sentence

# data[].attributes.subject
where is your information from? The 'IS "can be removed from the sentence

# data[].attributes.headline
This statement tells the reader where the Wii and Xbox are for and which sector use them. It gives reason 

# data[].attributes.subject
This statement tells the reader where the Wii and Xbox are for and which sector use them. It gives reason 

# data[].attributes.body
strength with supported evidence

# data[].attributes.body
researched - evidence based