# data[].attributes.body
"Makt är en term för något som händer mellan människor, även om den inte alltid handlar om direkt påverkan ansikte mot ansikte" (Börjesson & Rehn 2009, s. 19)

# data[].attributes.body
"The linguistic turn opened up new ways of interpreting
texts, which may contain different rhetorical strategies
and voices as opposed to being written as supposedly
objective, and especially the relationship between them
– ‘intertextuality’." (CMM, s. 323)

# data[].attributes.body
"There are always alternative possible analyses for discourse samples, and the question arises of how analysts can justify the analyses they propose" (Fairclough, 1992, s. 238)

# data[].attributes.body
"Power is immanent in discourse; it is one of its defining features, and power relations are intrinsically discursive" (Cohen, Manion & Morrison 2018 s.687) .

# data[].attributes.body
Power is not necessarily about one group dominating another. Can also be domination with people`s consent in a passive or active way (Kilderry; 2013)

# data[].attributes.body
Discourses correspond roughly to dimensions of texts which have traditionally been discussed in terms of 'content', 'ideational meanings', 'topic', 'subject matter', and so forth. There is a good reason for using 'discourse' rather than these traditional terms: discourse is a particular way of constructing a subject-matter, and the concept differs from its predecessors in emphasizing that contents or subject-matters - areas of knowledge - only enter texts in the mediated form of particular constructions of them (Fairclough, 1992, s. 127-128).

# data[].attributes.body
Fairclough beskriver diskurs som ”language use” (Fairclough, 1992, s. 62), vilket visar att diskurs är både en handling och en representation (Fairclough, 1992, s. 63).

# data[].attributes.body
Användning av andras texter – kan analyseras, och kan ses som att texten ”transforming the past […] into the present” (Fairclough, 1992, s. 85)

# data[].attributes.body
"Power is immanent in discourse; it is one of its defining features, and power relations are intrinsically discursive." ( Cohen, Manion & Morrison, 2018, s. 687-688)

# data[].attributes.body
Användning av andras texter – kan analyseras, och kan ses som att texten ”transforming the past […] into the present” (Fairclough, 1992, s. 85)

# data[].attributes.body
Critical discourse analysis looks at a social problem. not just a research question (Fairclough, 2003), and uses linguistic analysis to identify and expose ideology and power at work in society.  (Cohen, Manion & Morrison, 2018, s. 688)

# data[].attributes.body
Fairclough beskriver diskurs som ”language use” (Fairclough, 1992, s. 62), vilket visar att diskurs är både en handling och en representation (Fairclough, 1992, s. 63).

# data[].attributes.body
"The purpose of CDA is to gain insights into how ideologies and political/social/economic processes are dialogically constitutive of each other and contribute to representations of ‘truth’ "(Fairclough, 1995 se Richardsson & Langford 2015).

# data[].attributes.body
"'Critical' implies showing connections and causes
which are hidden; it also implies intervention, for example providing resources for those who may be disadvantaged through change" (Fairclough, 1992, s. 9).

# data[].attributes.body
"Critical discourse analysis reveals how power operates and is constituted, shaped, legitimated, maintained, regulated and
challenged in and through language and discourses" (Cohen, Manion & Morrison, 2018, s. 687)

# data[].attributes.body
"‘Discourse’ is a slippery term" ( Cohen, Manion & Morrison, 2018, s. 686)