# data[].attributes.body
In the article "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN", Watts (2018) discusses the negative results of even slight temperature changes that is caused by global warming. Firstly, the author mentions the landmark report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), which advises to make urgent changes in order to keep temperatures between 1.5 C and 2 C (make sure you express ideas in your own words and why does the report suggest urgent changes?). Secondly, the author quotes a co-chair, Debra Roberts, as she encourages people to take action now, since the clock is ticking (focus on the actual idea why should we take urgent actions?). After that, Watts mentions some disasters such as hurricanes, droughts and forest fires and states that it is clear to see from these disasters that climate change is already happening and it would be even worse with higher temperatures. Later on, the author points out that  at 1.5 C, the ratio of the population exposed to water stress could be 50% lower compared to 2 C (state the ideas in your own words -even a slight change in temperature will cause serious water scarcity). He also adds that nature would encounter the most difference as at 2 C, plants are twice as likely to lose half of their habitat, and 99% of the corals would be gone. The author later suggests some pathaway solutions to achieve 1.5 C by The IPCC  which includes reforestation and shifting to electric transport system. To conclude, he is worried about how fast climate change and it's results are coming and hopes that his article (is it his article or IPCC's latest report) will make the readers take climate change more seriously.

Thank you for the task. Please go over my comments. Make sure you express some aspects of the supporting ideas in your own words.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In the article "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN", Watts (2018) focusses on climate change and its' effects. The author mentions that even 0.5 C temperature change can cause disasters. After that, he discusses a report by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC) which gives us information about the consequences of 1.5 C difference on the earth. The report highlights that climate change is occurring earlier than expected and It is and will be causing lots of problems like droughts, forest fires, hunger, sea-level rise. But IPCC suggests some pathways to prevent these disasters (what are these pathways? Be specific here!). In the end, the author hopes that his article or the report published by UN?raises awareness.

Thank you for the task. Make sure you refer to the writer i.e. the author claims / the author warns / he attacks ... Make sure you state the supporting ideas and main argument fully.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In the article ‘’Clean Energy Won’t Save Us’’ by Hickel (2016, July), the author contradicts with the general opinion on an ideal solution for global warming and he shares his idea on how to refrain from worsening the climate change. He starts by stating that today humans have become more and more aware of the existence of the climate change, as undeniably visible examples appeared in many parts of Earth. He then expresses the urgency to stop using fossil fuels, which are one of the main causes of global warming, and replace them with clean, renewable energy. But he adds that even though clean energy is a must, it won’t necessarily be our salvation. Because although we would then avoid any more CO2 emission from human activities, production of other greenhouse gases like methane and nitrous dioxide would still continue. He explains that along with carbon dioxide, these gases also cause warming considerably and they are enough to put the final nail in the coffin. He suggests that in order for us to survive, we first need to alter our economic system, which endorses continuous production and growth. He follows up by with addressing (with + noun / by + Ving) the negative effects the current economic system already has on people in both social and environmental aspects because it follows the logic of ever-increasing consumption and therefore obligates us to adopt rapidness in our lives, the author associates it with unhappiness and overwork. Finally he urges us readers to imagine a economic system which focuses on our well-being and on the other hand cares for the environment. He mentions the likelihood of such system and states that few countries already set an example of it.

Thank you for the task, good summary:)

# data[].attributes.body
"In the article entitled “We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN”  Watts (2018) discusses the implications of climate change and global warming. The author explains how even small changes in the temperature can be vital for the future of our planet. We only have 12 years left to ensure that the earth does not warm up beyond the threshold of 1,5°C. After that,  the author warns that it will simply be too late. If the earth warms up by only 0.5°C more, it will be a catastrophe for our species, with dire consequences such as floods, hurricanes, droughts, and poverty. The author seems pessimistic about the future because we are already experiencing the devastating effects of global warming, including the destruction of insects, crops, and coral reefs, among others. However, he states that  there is still a window of opportunity for us to minimize the effects of climate change if we aim for the less than half grade increase (make sure you state what are the possible pathways?). Referring to the Paris agreement on meeting that goal, the author believes that the report by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will inform everyone about the importance of climate change and what we can still do to avoid water shortages for millions of people around the world in the long run.

In "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN" Watts (2018) the author points out to climate change and its e affects (affect v. / effect n.) on people and animals. He mentions that there is a alarm bell from science community and we should take it seriously to save people (state the problems climate change has cuased so for and why are they alarming?). He also gives advice about what to do to prevent these negative affects (state the solution in a clear manner). He particularize what is the difference between 1.5 degree and 2 degree change (explain what is the difference?).

Thank you for the task. Make sure you state some of the supporting ideas fully.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN" Watts (2018) the author points out to climate change and its e affects (affect v. / effect n.) on people and animals. He mentions that there is a alarm bell from science community and we should take it seriously to save people (state the problems climate change has cuased so for and why are they alarming?). He also gives advice about what to do to prevent these negative affects (state the solution in a clear manner). He particularize what is the difference between 1.5 degree and 2 degree change (explain what is the difference?).

Thank you for the task. Make sure you state the supporting ideas and main argument fully.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In the article “We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN” Watts (2018) discusses the importance of time in dealing with climate change crisis and reasons for climate change ing. The author stresses that according to the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change(IPCC), the rise in temperatures which is 1.5C yet, has happened earlier than predicted. Even though it does not seem much of a difference, the consequences of this change are too many such as deaths, droughts, wild fires. He also wants from his readers to consider (warns the readers about) the  probability and the consequences of what would happen if it would be a 2C degrees rise which he thinks it will happen unless people take precautions. Furthermore he shares some pathways ,mentioned by the IPCC, to avoid from the more global warming temperature risings. While he concludes his sentences he also implies his hopes towards people so that they can think for further and avoid the painful consequences by taking the latest report into consideration.

Thank you for the task. Pleas go over my corrections.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN" (2018) written by Watts, the author

# data[].attributes.body
In "We have years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN",Watts(2018) objects to the consequences of global warming and climate change. Watts starts with by stating even half a degree change is causes vital effects on us / the ecosystem.Thereafter the author mentions that he is sure about climate is already changing and he  criticizes /he warns that   additional warming could make the situation worse. Also he mentions /stresses that climate change will a effect (affect v. / effect n.) plant's habitat, insects and  pollination of crops awfully.Consequently  he focuses on lower levels of oxygen in the oceans and how it a effects on fisheries. Watts claims  if the temperature increases by 2°C fisheries loss would be double.Even so the author believes if we aim at  for avoiding global warming and if we apply Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change(IPCC)'s suggestions like using lands more environmentally, developing electric transportation and using more renewable energy and reforestation. We could change our destiny. At the end Watts  concludes by hoping that report will change people's attitude.

Thank you for the task. Please go over my comments and make sure you use stronger reporting verbs to express the author's attitude better.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
The article " We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe,warns UN" Watts(2018) points out the possible disastrous effects of worlds' increasing temperature . The author criticizes peoples' lack of awareness and attitude towards the subject. He supports his decisions with the report of IPCC (be specific what is in the report and why does he support that?)

# data[].attributes.headline
In the article  "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN" Watts (2018) stated catastrophic events that came with the global warming .The author mentions about reports writen by UN . Author belives that ,people are not aware of up coming crisises.He urges people to take action .

# data[].attributes.subject
In the article  "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN" Watts (2018) stated catastrophic events that came with the global warming .The author mentions about reports writen by UN . Author belives that ,people are not aware of up coming crisises.He urges people to take action .

# data[].attributes.body
In the article  "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN" Watts (2018) stated / states that catastrophic events that came with the global warming .The author mentions about reports writen by UN (be specific what is in the report and why is it important?). The Author believes that ,people are not aware of up coming crisises. He urges people to take action .

# data[].attributes.body
In the article ''We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN'', Watts(2018) warns people about the catastrophic consequences of climate change and want people to be more aware of it.  He first draws the readers' attention to disasters that are happening around the world due to the climate change and it shows that even a slightly rise in temperature could have worsen make the consequences of climate change worse (state here what are the consequences we already experience?). He then mentions IPCC's pathways about achieving 1.5 C, which happened earlier then predicted, with reforestation and reduction in carbon pollution (state the other solutions too). Later he points out that climate change is occuring faster than expected. He states that even 1 C of warming is painfull enough, 2 C - 3 C of warming will be dangerous and disast e rous (be careful with the order of the ideas, you need to follow the author's order). At the end Watts hopes that report will raise people's awareness about the climate change.

Thank you for the task. Please go over my comments, Make sure you state the supporting ideas fully and follow the order of the ideas in the original text.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In “We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN” Watts (2018) criticized /criticizes that the  climate change is a  has problem and has negative consequences and way of keep temperautes 1.5C to 2C from IPCC (language hinders understanding). The author warns that according to the report by IPCC , only water stress could be rise up to of %50 when temperatutes rises 1.5C to 2C. The author stresses that the result of the degree increase has are already begun beginning to be seen in parts of the world like  droughts in Cape Town, wild fires. Following this the author claims that on other hand, in this case, not only water scarcity but other problems will arise.the biggest problem will be nature and many nature problems will arise. He also suggests that some measures should be taken to prevent such problems from occurring like afforestation (state the other suggestions?).the author is not very hopeful about this and stresses that people should take precautions as soon as possible (make sure you read the last paragraph, doesn't he have any hope?.)

Thank you for the task. Make sure you refer to the writer i.e. the author claims / the author warns / he attacks ... Make sure you state the supporting ideas and main argument fully.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In “We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN”, Watts J.(2018, October 8), states that the 0.5 degree Celcius change in the global temperature affects our life immensely. The author starts with the report by IPCC and it states that keeping the temperature between 1.5 and 2.0 is of upmost importance. Watts also mentions / warns that the quote of Debra Roberts which claims that this is sciences’ biggest danger and everyone should be aware of it. The temperature increase has negative impacts around the world already and it will be worse if it continues to increase.  The author stresses that although a difference of 0.5 doesn’t seem much, this same difference can be helping nature and its resources, and by their extension
humanity (the ideas is not clear here, is it an advantage or disadvantage? and you need to explain what are its consequences?). Moreover there are different solutions by IPCC (state fully what are these solutions?).  The author finalizes his article by telling the devastation of 3.0 degree celcius incease of global temperature and hoping that the climate change will be taken more seriously with the help of the latest report.

Thank you for the task. Make sure you refer to the writer i.e. the author claims / the author warns / he attacks ... Make sure you state the supporting ideas and main argument fully.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.headline
Watts(2018), in his article, "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN" discusses the vital risks of World's leading problem, which is climate change. Watt depicts that even half a degree will trigger the impacts of the consequences like global warming. He tried to attract the reader to the importance of keeping temperatures between 1.50 C and 20C. So, due to the records that Watts shared in his article, the people should understand the importance of largest alarm bell from the science community and take the actions against the threat. Therefore, the record droughts in Cape Town and forest fires in the arctic shows that the danger is started to show up. Moreover, according to current commitments, the earth will warm up to 3 degrees. The world is under dangerous disaster and people have to be aware of it. 

# data[].attributes.subject
Watts(2018), in his article, "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN" discusses the vital risks of World's leading problem, which is climate change. Watt depicts that even half a degree will trigger the impacts of the consequences like global warming. He tried to attract the reader to the importance of keeping temperatures between 1.50 C and 20C. So, due to the records that Watts shared in his article, the people should understand the importance of largest alarm bell from the science community and take the actions against the threat. Therefore, the record droughts in Cape Town and forest fires in the arctic shows that the danger is started to show up. Moreover, according to current commitments, the earth will warm up to 3 degrees. The world is under dangerous disaster and people have to be aware of it. 

# data[].attributes.body
Batuhan

Watts(2018), in his article, "We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN" discusses the vital risks of World's leading problem, which is climate change. Watt depicts that even half a degree will trigger the impacts of the consequences (language hinders understanding) like global warming. He tried /tries to attract the readers' attention to the importance of keeping temperatures between 1.50 C and 2.0 C. So, due to the records that Watts shared in his article, the people should understand the importance of largest alarm bell from the science community and take the actions against the threat. Therefore, the author stresses that the record droughts in Cape Town and forest fires in the arctic shows that the danger is starts ed to show up. Moreover, the author warns that according to current commitments, the earth will warm up to 3 degrees. The world is under dangerous disaster and people have to be aware of it. So what does the author suggest as solutions? and make sure you state his main argument fully.)

Thank you for the task. Make sure you state the supporting ideas and main argument fully.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In the article “We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN”, Watts (2018) discusses the consequences of 1.5C increase in Earth due to climate change and global warming. He mentions a warning from climate scientists that 1.5C increase shouldn’t be exceeded; otherwise, it will significantly worsen the risks of natural and man-made disasters (state in a clear manner what are these disasters?). Moreover, he provides a landmark report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) which suggests some affordable and feasible changes to prevent the damage that global warming cause. He supports his idea by mentioning a co-chair’s  words about the importance of acting against climate change (be specific here what are those words?). Following that, he believes that time and timely action are so vital because the greatest difference would be to the in favor of nature since there are insects, which are vital for pollination of crops. In addition, food scarcity would be a less of a problem and millions fewer people would be at risk of climate-related poverty. He also suggests using different combinations of land use and technological change to achieve 1.5C (make sure you state the other suggestions). He concludes by expressing his hopeful stance for the issue as he believes that the report will change the perspective towards climate change.

Thank you for the task. Please go over my comments.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In “We have years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN”, Watts (2018) warns about the consequences of global warming and climate change.

The author reports some information and data bases from the report by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(IPCC) to prove his claims (state briefly what does this report include? you do not need generic expressions like this in your summaries). First the author states that according to the report by IPCC expected climate change has already come and a single change in the global temperature would make  have worse the results worse. Because of 1 °C change there has been natural disasters such as wild fires, flood and articl ice melting around the world and if this increase continues, poverty will rise up and the balance of the nature will be disturbed. Following this, the author states some ideas from=refers (a more academic way of expressing it) IPCC to immobilize the increase of global temperature only 1.5 degrees Celsius. They recommend changing their style to use technology and in land use to achieve their goals . He also mentions /stresses the  use electrical vehicles to and replanting areas with trees=reforestation. With these electrical vehicles carbon pollution will also decrease. At last the Last but not the least the author highlights that the increase of global temperature is more than targeted level. According to Watts still many people don't take seriously the urgency and importance of this topic and precautions are not enough. He hopes that this report will increase awareness about climate change before it is too late.

Thank you for the task. Please go over my comments and make sure you use stronger reporting verbs to express the author's attitude better.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In “We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN” Watts (2018) discusses the future of the climate change by pointing out how a small amount of increase in temperature of the world can generate disastrous effects  if people do not limit this calamity. Throughout the text the author provides information from one of the landmark reports of the UN entitled “Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)” to persuade people that world is in danger. The author believes in that people are unaware of the awaiting disaster which is ahead of them and he underlines the importance of  taking an action. He supports his opinion by quoting, co-chair of the working group,Debra Roberts who believes these disasters are severe warning for us to take an immediate action. Following this, the author warns that that the world is 1 degrees celcius warmer than pre-industrial levels which is the major reason why the natural disasters occur around the world such as in US, South Africa and the Arctic. He stresses that additional increase of temperature would worsen the current consequences. Therefore, he believes that the warming of the world should be restricted to 1.5 degrees celcius. The author suggests following the IPCC’s possible solution pathways such as reforestation, different combination of land use and changing the technology to maintain the desired temperature.Considering the current level of commitments, the author criticizes the people and claims that the world is heading towards to outrageous 3 degrees celcius of warming. To sum up, Watts underlines the importance of the report as it highlights the dangerous temperature increase. For that reason, he is hopeful that the report will persuade people to consider climate change more profoundly.

Thank you for the task. Please go over my comments.

Best,
MET

# data[].attributes.body
In the article entitled ‘’We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN’’ by Watts (2018, October 8), published on The Guardian, the author tackles the climate change problem and its negative effects, sharing a significantly reliable report on the critical situation of our world’s temperature levels (rather than this detail you can express it as Watts claims that UN's report will push relevant parties to take this problem seriously). As we can understand from the self-explanatory title of the article, the author starts by with highlighting the warning from UN IPCC of the emergency of taking action against the rising temperatures.

He addresses to some of the extreme weather conditions being experienced all around the globe, stating that even the current warming level of 1 degree celcius causes so many problems and indicates that any further increase would be catastrophic.

He follows up by citing the above-mentioned report on what would happen if should our hopes to set the warming at maximum of 1.5 degrees fail. According to given examples of consequences (it is better to leave this out as it hinders with meaning), the author warns that water levels would rise higher than today, stressing %50 more people around the world. Insects and plantation would lose half of their habitats and %99 of coral reefs would be destroyed. Moreover, Watts carries on with the rising acidity and decreasing oxygen concentration of seas and oceans, caused by overvaporization, aquatic life would fall into serious danger. Next, Watts mentions the course of action that IPCC strongly suggests to adopt before it is too late, which includes policies such as reforestation and implementing electric transportation system. In conclusion, he shares his opinion on how the commitment levels of people fall short of sufficing to make a difference and states that he hopes the IPCC report will raise awareness on the matter, which should highly concern all humans.

Thank you, good job:)

MET