# data[].attributes.body
claim: they both were wealthy men and made donations.

support: Carnicky donated nearly 90% of his money, that is way more than what Rockerfeller did.

question: What reasons did Rockerfeller have that made him donate less

# data[].attributes.body
Claim: Carnicky and Rockefeller they had enough money to donate different places.
Support: Rockefeller and Carnicky both donate their money places like universities and foundations.
Question : What were there truly desires when they were donating to these places.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim: They both gave away a large amount of their fortune, Carnicky even more than Rockefeller. They wanted to be remembered for more than having a lot of money.
They both did not know what to do with their money, so they donated it to build schools, libraries, buildings...
Question: Do we still value them?
In our world, where we already discovered so much, do you think it is still possible to make this much money?

# data[].attributes.body
Claim: Fortune is made by contributing to the society.
Support: There are so many people in the world that are extremely wealthy, but only Carnegie and Rockefeller are being remembered.
Question: The video seems to only discussed about the right side of these two men, didn't they do any negative stuff in their life?

# data[].attributes.body
Claim: They both donated their money in different places with using their names.
Support: Rockefeller donated money for to open universities and foundations.
Carnegie donated money to open libraries, universities and foundations.
Question: Why did they wanted to donate their money with using their names?

# data[].attributes.body
The very strong feeling induced by watching the video is that both Carnegie and Rockefeller acquainted a bunch of decent people with ground . This feeling only appears because instead of analyzing the Big People the proper way by examining both their assets and liabilities, the woman went on and idolized them both. Since  it conceives a ton of suspicion, I'm not playing the Devil's advocate: both Carnegie and Rockefeller are a bit psychos, because they lack empathy necessary to care about their workers and keeping the rivals alive.

Here is the question: Who are the Rockefellers and Carnegies of nowadays?

# data[].attributes.body
Claim: People who have a large amount of wealth want to be remembered heroically.
Support: Carnegie was always encouraging others to work harder, though he was guilty of cutting workers wages. Even though he did this, he started numerous foundations, donated to charities and built multiple libraries, which are good deeds.
Question: Are any of the libraries, besides the NY one, still in use?

# data[].attributes.body
Carnicky was liked more than Rockefeller.
He donated 90% of his wealth, way more than Rockefeller.
Why would Rockefeller not do the same thing, and what consequences did "not donating" have?

# data[].attributes.body
Robber Barons didn't honor his country because he was selfish and didn't contribute to the good of america.

I support Carnegie to Give almost all his money to make America a better place

Why did just Carnegie contributed to the america society?

# data[].attributes.body
Claim: Men that have an overwhelming wealth are prone to giving it away.
Support: Both Rockefeller and Carnegie did not know what to do with their money and ended up in a contest for giving it away. Carnegie alone gave away 90% of his fortune.
Question: Why does this happen? Why do some go further than others?

# data[].attributes.body
Claim: Robber Barons were ruthless in there work but did contribute enormously to American society.

support: I support the mens decisions in supporting American society.

question: what drove them to giving so much? Most men would be selfish and keep it all for them selfs.

# data[].attributes.body
Claim: Their wealth is being examined
Support: They often talk about their wealth and the many businesses have supported and still have their name apart of the company.
Question: Who owns the Rockefeller centre now?