# data[].attributes.body
Different perspectives of different times and biased views of who was fighting.

# data[].attributes.body
People see things differently based on their different biases/perspectives on what happened.

# data[].attributes.body
Kid A would rather get kid B in trouble for their own good and would rather face less punishment.

# data[].attributes.body
If stories coordinate with physical evidence, such as someone saying Kid A hit Kid B in the face first, and Kid B has a bruise, then that's more likely to be true. However, if someone states Kid B hit Kid A in the shoulder first, and there's no physical evidence to support that claim, then people are more likely to believe the first statement.

# data[].attributes.body
If the student has a bad rep they are less likely to be trusted due to his/her prior behavior. The story would be trust worthy if they had evidence and witnesses and reasons why they are telling the truth.

# data[].attributes.body
The friend of one of the children involved in the fight may have the intention of getting the other kid in trouble.

# data[].attributes.body
We believe that people will usually view things that benefit them

# data[].attributes.body
The best way to determine what happened is to collectively consider everyone's point of view; nobody is going to be completely trustworthy.

# data[].attributes.body
A week later you may not remember certain details or you might have a more open mind to different possibilities. Added time is going to make something less trustworthy.

# data[].attributes.body
Remembrance of the fight will clearly change if people are asked a week after the fight initially happened. While students may forget key details, it should also be brought up that students will have more time to fabricate a story or insert some lies in their story to either make them self or their friend appear innocent.

# data[].attributes.body
The friends of the students

# data[].attributes.body
Overtime you can remember less of something than in the heat of the moment or in a week from the event.

# data[].attributes.body
Bruises don't determine who was in the right or wrong, but it reveals that there was extreme violence. Missing objects or other physical pieces of evidence could be used to fact check.

# data[].attributes.body
The friends of each party have in interest in protecting their own party. I believe they will do a lot to protect eachother.

# data[].attributes.body
In order to get the most trustworthy account of the fight, teachers' accounts should most likely be taken first as they are figures of authority and can serve as a neutral party.

# data[].attributes.body
It could be seen as how they view the person.

# data[].attributes.body
Bruises can determine who was involved

# data[].attributes.body
from time to time you might not remember exactly how the fight started and you might remember more things as time goes on in a week from so

# data[].attributes.body
The friends or People related to the kid in the fight

# data[].attributes.body
Physical injures that look recent can help see the situation, other evidence can be found returning to the scene where it happened.

# data[].attributes.body
Different people view things/people in different ways.

# data[].attributes.body
if you see someone with a bruise you can figure out who was throwing the missing objects by asking the kid with the bruise who threw it.