# data[].attributes.body
 The author's article is clear and well supported as the

# data[].attributes.body
 The author's article is clear and well supported as the

# data[].attributes.body
 The author's article is clear and well supported as the

# data[].attributes.body
 The author's article is clear and well supported as the

# data[].attributes.body
 The author's article is clear and well supported as the

# data[].attributes.body
 The author's article is clear and well supported as the

# data[].attributes.body
 The author's article is clear and well supported as the

# data[].attributes.body
 The author's article is clear and well supported as the

# data[].attributes.body
With the development of technology, the author stated that robots should replace human workforce as it is more modern , specific and able to minimize error.Robots nowadays are creative and capable of assesting a situation through cognitive process. For instance, computers are designed with high technology to engage normal interaction with human.After that , designated robots can perform more specific tasks flawlessly.For example , they can browse and sort through millions of emails faster than human lawyers in order to detect illegal activities precisely.Besides, robot replacement issue should be taken into consideration as human tends to make mistakes such as in surgery.

 The author's article is clear and well supported as the author provided strong evidence and counter argument.The supporting details are included with factual evidence retrieved from two researches and one article by Manjoo, Loftus and Murray.For example, the author referred to Manjoo's article about octopus-arm machines used in surgery.He refute the idea that it is unethical to replace human for the sake of efficiency. This evidence was given to strengthen his claim that robot replacement should be taken into consideration as human tends to make mistakes.

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, the article provide a different perspective regarding the workforce in certain fields that can be replaced by robots. All the arguments written by the author are quite interesting as the readers can gain knowledge about when and how to replace human with computers. Besides, the readers also gain knowledge about all the technology advancement nowdays. Unlike the euthor, I partially agree that robot should replace all the human workforce because there will be some consequences that may burden the humans. I hope this matter will look into the quality and quantitaty of robots which perform certain task in the future. This is needed to control unnecessary output in whatever the robots are producing in the workplace.

-azahanim, munirah, sabrina, husna-

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, the article titled Replaced By A Robot provide a lot of useful information about robot's efficiency in performing human task. One of the examples is robots technology has progressed in the areas of decision making and creativity. I agree with the author as he looked into the overall view on the use of robots in the present day. In the future, it is recommended that the author will look into the moral aspect of using robots at the workplace because this will capture reader's attention as the issue will expose a brighter side of human beings in the future.
by: Afiq, Zul, dayat, ajw

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, the article entitled 'Replace by a Robot' provided different perspective about robot being used in workplace. The article was well-supported as the author provided strong evidence together with arguments. I firmly agree with the author's argument because robotic workforce can increase efficiency in many profession. I feel that the author should emphasize that the purpose of robot invention is to help human rather than comparing human's ability with robot. Only then, readers will feel more intrigued with this article.

Saidah
Zarifah
Syafieza
Ann
Inas

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, the article titled “Replaced By A Robot” provides an understanding on how robots are useful in workplace. Like the author has stated, we also agree that we should maximize robotic workforce in workplace in order to reduce human errors. Overall, it is crystal clear that robotic workforce is the most efficient choice to increase the productivity of one’s company.

By 💕🌸
1. Intan
2. Hani
3. Tasya
4.Artika

# data[].attributes.body
In conclusion, the article that had been written by the author which is “Replaced by A Robot” gives people informations about contributions of robots in workforce. However, in my opinion there are both advantages and disadvantages if we fully depend on robots. There are issues to be considered as robots can increase unemployment rate and require high maintainance cost but they can help human with their workloads. I hope that more researches will be conducted redarding the issues of using robots as a replacement of humans in the workforce to ensure that this effort would benefit human to the maximum level.

by: syakirah, haziqah, syafiqah, aida 🌸🍄

# data[].attributes.body
Now days, almost all the human workforce

# data[].attributes.body
Now days, almost all the human workforce

# data[].attributes.body
Now days, almost all the human workforce

# data[].attributes.body
The article is written by an unknown author who is trying to inform readers about the advantages of robots. The author is being biased towards his claim that employer should increase the usage of robots as workforce and keep human errors at minimal rate as technology advances.

With the development of technology, the author stated that robots should replace human workforce as it is more modern , specific and able to minimize error.Robots nowadays are creative and capable of assesting a situation through cognitive process. For instance, computers are designed with high technology to engage normal interaction with human.After that , designated robots can perform more specific tasks flawlessly.For example , they can browse and sort through millions of emails faster than human lawyers in order to detect illegal activities precisely.Besides, robot replacement issue should be taken into consideration as human tends to make mistakes such as in surgery.

The author's article is clear and well supported as the author provided strong evidence and counter argument.The supporting details are included with factual evidence retrieved from two researches and one article by Manjoo, Loftus and Murray.For example, the author referred to Manjoo's article about octopus-arm machines used in surgery.He refute the idea that it is unethical to replace human for the sake of efficiency. This evidence was given to strengthen his claim that robot replacement should be taken into consideration as human tends to make mistakes.

BY:
1. Zarifah
2. Saidah
3. An Nashroh
4. Syafieza
5. Inas Shahira

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the article, the author intends to dispute people that thinks robot supersede the human capability in some tasks . In facts, regarding the technology advance, employee in all fields should find a way to increase their robotic workforce and decrease human errors.

According to the author, robots are capable of doing more than simple task by replacing humans in certain high-skilled jobs. Certain employee may not be aware that technology has improved in the area of resolution and innovation when some robots can make and perform a precise decision because these interactive computers are so well-designed. The author also said that robot can perform their work more efficiently and minimize human error. Human fault in the workplace result in the causes of certain incident. Robot such as surgical robots can do their jobs efficiently better than doctors.

The article was well supported as the author included evidence and also counter-argument. Firstly, a surgical robot will always make the right cut during surgery as stated by Monjoo. This particular evidence is well supported based on the main idea that robot can perform their work more efficient and minimize human error. The counter argument based on this main idea is when some said that it is morally wrong to replace human beings with robots because replacing human from their jobs for the sake of efficwrong. NEED TO BE RESTRUCTURED

iency is
- AZAHANIM
- SABRINA
- HUSNA
- MUNIRAH

# data[].attributes.body
The article delivered by the author is declining more to the side of robots rather than human in the field of workforce. The author pinned that, as the technology evolves, employers in all fields should concern in uplifting their robotic workforce and reduce human error.
Since the technology has progressed in the field of decision making and creativity, robot seems to be able to perform specific task better in a highly specialized  manner. Robots can replace human being for efficiency despite opposing moral values.
The article is strong plus being aided with evidences and counter-arguments collected by the author. One from the examples, Manjoo stated that there are surgical robot that always make an accurate cut in surgeries thus replacing the error that may be brought by human despite people argue and viewed it as morally wrong. This clearly explained that robots can possibly replace human.

afiq
dayat
ajwad
zuls

# data[].attributes.body
The objective of the article is to persuade readers to be biased to robots than human in the workforce. The author claimed, that the employer in all areas should look to increase their robotic workforce and decrease human error as technology evolve.

According to the author, highly specific machines can reduce human’s failures in the workplace. This was proven by the author who stated that highly specific machines can often do specialized tasks better than human beings. Specifically when it comes to human lawyers, because they may miss important evidence while robots can sort through this information quickly an accurately.

The article is clear and well-supported by strong evidence which was researched by the author that mentioned a quote from Loftus, which said, " some interactive computers are so well-designed that it would soon be possible to talk with them almost endlessly before realizing that they are not human." The author also provided counter-arguments in each paragraph. One of the counter-arguments was that robots can only replace humans in certain less-skilled jobs. The author refuted this idea by saying " these opponents of a mechanized workforce may not be aware that technology has progressed in the areas of decision-making and creativity."

Prepared by,
- Artika
- Tasya
- Hani
- Intan

# data[].attributes.body
Today, many robotic technologies had been used to replace the human workforce in order to increase its efficiency. Some may see it as a good sign and other may think otherwise as in the article entitled 'Replaced by a Robot' written by an unknown author. The purpose of the article was to inform the readers on the benefits of increasing robotic workforce in every field. In this article, the author seems to using a judgemental tone as the author is always to prove its statement. Reading the article, the author claim that, as the technology improves, employers in all fields should fire a way to increased their robotic workforce and minimize human error.

According to the author the use of robotic technology have increased as it give benefits in term of technology decision making, performing specific task and also reducing human error. From the author's point of view, technology has improved and robotic technology are able to make decission and also using its creativity in same areas can work the level as humans. Thus, can be seen as robots in same areas can work almost same level as humans. The author also stated that the well-designed of machines usually can do specific tasks better than a well-trained human. Thus, any type of information can be sort by robot quickly and accurately. Lastly, the author also think that replacing a human by robot is not only based on its efficiency but in other aspect are also taking into account. For example, the surgical robot can make the right cut (Manjoo) better than a doctor.

The article was clear and well supported as the author includes some of the evidences and counter arguments. The types of the evidence provided in the article are facts based on an investigation. The evidence are included in every paragraph for each the counter arguments. One of the evidence are the investigation came out by Murray stating that the use of the software programme can identify any suspicious activity which can alert investigators. This particular evidence, supported the main idea that the well-designed of machines usually can do specific task better than a well-trained human. Counter arguments are provided in each of the paragraph. For example, it had been argued that humans only can be replaced by the robots in certain low-skilled jobs. From this counter argument, the author’s stated that technology has improved and robotic technology are able to make decission and also using its creativity in same areas can work the level as humans.

In conclusion, the article titled 'Replaced by a Robot' provides a different perspective about the uses of robotic technology in humans life. There is no doubt that the author had argue in the article about the benefits of replacing human by robot are true but they may also have its disadvantages . We personally think that humans were to be replaced by robot in the future, they are may be consequences as jobs opportunities will decrease and number of unemployed people will incease. Lastly we hope that more research will be done on this matter, so that we can make a right decision in the future to avoid any complications.

By: Fira, Aimi, Fazhilah, Balqis

# data[].attributes.body
Based on the author’s statement, robot is a human creation that was designed to assist their workloads in a specific sector.  Thus, it can help in minimizing error in tasks.

According to the author, nowadays technology in robots has surpasses the creativity of human and even can make decision precisely. This is proven when the author state that the robots can communicate with each other and even won a game. In fact, regarding completing specific tasks, robots can do better than well-trained human. Not only that, the robots can also arrange information faster and accurately. Furthermore, the robots are rarely failed to complete the tasks in their workplace. Robots are fearless when it comes to surgical procedure hence it reduces the risk of failure.

The article is well-supported by strong evidence and counterarguments. Most of the evidence was provided by the author are facts that can be found in every paragraph. For example, taken by the author from research done by Manjoo, a minimally invasive surgical robot could make the right cut which supported the idea that robots are rarely fail to complete their tasks. Counterarguments are also provided in each of the paragraphs. For instance, human can only be substitute by the robots in the area of low-skilled jobs that opposed the author’s point that robots nowadays had been designed to be more creative and good in decision making.

Prepared by:

-          Syafiqah

-          Syakirah

-          Haziqah

-          Aida

# data[].attributes.body
Please insert your introduction, Point 1 and Point 2 here