# data[].attributes.body
pendulum is another system that is driven by gravitiy.

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that clocks was built before the inventive of electery

# data[].attributes.body
A grandfather clock is  only  powered by gravity

# data[].attributes.body
I did not know that grandfarther clocks did not have to have battiers in them and the just run by gravity by it's self.

# data[].attributes.body
you push and pull something to get it moving

# data[].attributes.headline
i learned that it takes streath to push and pull

# data[].attributes.subject
i learned that it takes streath to push and pull

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that a Grandfather Clock is runned by gravity

# data[].attributes.body
i learned that it does not mater hou heavy it is.

# data[].attributes.body
i learned that the grandfather clock moves on gravity

# data[].attributes.body
swings use force and gravity to move up and down.

# data[].attributes.headline
 i learned that a grandfather clock moves with gravity 

# data[].attributes.subject
 i learned that a grandfather clock moves with gravity 

# data[].attributes.body
and not batteries

# data[].attributes.body
the grandfather clock was ran with no electricity

# data[].attributes.body
a thing can't be push with out a thing

# data[].attributes.headline
I learned that many people who study the history of science agree that Galileo was the first modern scientist.

# data[].attributes.subject
I learned that many people who study the history of science agree that Galileo was the first modern scientist.

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that Galileo used his pulse to time how long it took the lamp to complete one cycle

# data[].attributes.body
i learned that the clock was   built before the invention of electricity

# data[].attributes.body
i learned that he stared at a lamp in church

# data[].attributes.body
Galileo  used his pulse to time how long it took  the lamp to complete one cycle

# data[].attributes.body
i learned that the gran

# data[].attributes.body
I learn that the edrcfd

# data[].attributes.body
it matters how long the string is

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that Galileo was the first modern scientist

# data[].attributes.body
i learned that when you affect the length of the string it changes the time to complete a cycle

# data[].attributes.body
a grandfather clock is a pengalum

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that galio counted the number of swings from a lamp in pisa-italy.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
The first post in this blog series reviewed whether there was adequate evidence in support of learning styles. " Is Appealing to Learning Styles Malpractice? " explored many voices, such as Tania Lombrozo and Jeremy Teitelbaum, who question not only the validity of learning styles, but also examine other neuroscience trends like the effectiveness of multitasking and left brain versus right brain tendencies. Even Howard Gardner has weighed in, warning that multiple intelligences should not be construed as fodder to argue the validity of learning styles.

The overriding conclusion was that L&D professionals should listen to the current consensus, which calls for a move away from learning styles as an instructional design tool. No doubt, this will be hard for many practitioners.

Learning styles have been on the table for many years. And although research shows that they may not be effective (or even real), research also shows that people have a natural tendency to adopt fads that appeal to our natural biases. As Thomas Gilovich states in How We Know What Isn't So, humans are "fairly adept at finding a frame that is comforting."

Learning styles clearly fall into that camp, and many practitioners will find discarding them difficult. As far as ISD trends goes, learning styles are really not alone. In fact, practitioners often box themselves into one design acronym camp or another. Think: ADDIE, SAM, or LLAMA. Similarly, when a trend takes center stage-blended learning, flipped classroom, microlearning-a keen and ardent following quickly takes shape.

So if running off photocopies of a learning style inventory is not sound practice, what is? And what about that alphabet soup of advice? DiSC, MMPI, VARK, ACT, and SAT instruments must tell us something, right? Maybe. Maybe not.

Here's the good news: Over decades of educational research, the pendulum of instruction always seems to swing toward some central tendency. All "knowns" known, L&D practitioners are well-served by revisiting the foundation of our field. For instance, consider Robert Gagne, whose nine events of instructional design model continue to provide a common thread for modern day developers. Other time-tested theories and practices that remain valuable and consistent with the newest research include:

Vygotsky's "Zone of Proximal Development," which focuses on creating challenges, not frustration.

Ogle's KWL reading technique, which scaffolds learning based on prior knowledge.

Bloom's Taxonomy, which divides learning objectives into three primary domains: Cognitive Domain, Affective Domain, and Psychomotor Domain.

Bruner's constructivist theory, which contends that learning is all about building meaning-not to be interpreted as an invitation to break out the Legos.

Instructional design pros can find solace in-and capitalize on-another foundation of learning: context. In other words, good design connects instructional content to the learners' prior experiences and readiness (emotional and cognitive) for new material and behaviors. No matter what design "model" you use, your instruction must carefully and creatively deliberate facets of a specific pattern:

Access Existing Personal Cognitive Structuring >> Learner Activates Current Framework to Stimulate Connections >> Receive New Information >> Rehearse New Information >> Discard Inaccurate Understanding by Accommodating Valid Information >> Adjust Schema/Build New Structure >> Apply, Practice Accordingly to Gain Mastery >> Refresh to Imprint Over Time >> Access Existing Structure....

It's likely that some proponents will continue to argue that "learning styles" essentially boils down to a learner-centered versus instructor-centered philosophy-something that few can deny is important. But being learner-centered is not dependent on appealing to learning styles. Indeed, all instructional strategies from lectures, to collaborative and cooperative face-to-face experiences, to webinars with polls and surveys, to serious games and simulations, have the potential to be learner-centered, as well as effective and produce results.

The key to success isn't an adherence to learning styles but whether the instruction was skillfully designed. What's more, there a myriad other variables that can impact knowledge transfer and application on the job-not the least of which is willingness to learn and change. Case in point: for some tasks, research may show that collaboration will aid knowledge retention. However, an expertly executed individual exercise will always trump a poorly design group activity. You get the idea.

So, in the end, what do we actually know about learning, thinking, and instructional design? A growing body of research shows quite definitively how students learn and how instruction is created. Those dedicated to L&D need merely study the now and peer into the past for guidance, because the stoic pendulum, fortunately, nearly always comes to rest in the middle.

Part 3 in this series will examine the need to focus on what can be "designed" into instruction to promote deep thinking and imprinting to aid significant learning and change over time.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
The Pendulum of Instructional Design Theory and Tools

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
The first post in this blog series reviewed whether there was adequate evidence in support of learning styles. " Is Appealing to Learning Styles Malpractice? " explored many voices, such as Tania Lombrozo and Jeremy Teitelbaum, who question not only the validity of learning styles, but also examine other neuroscience trends like the effectiveness of multitasking and left brain versus right brain tendencies.

# data[].attributes.body
i learned that a grandfather clock was built before the invention of electricity

# data[].attributes.body
It dose not mater how fast it is it always took the same length of time to complete  a cycle

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that energy of its motion makes the pendulum swing past the release position

# data[].attributes.body
~The structure of the pendulum arm pulls on the pendulum bob,and keeps it from falling.~

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that a grandfather clock was built before the invention of electricity

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that a granfother clock dosen't use electricity.

# data[].attributes.body
gal

# data[].attributes.body
that a pedelums rod or arm is called a pendelm arm.

# data[].attributes.body
pill

# data[].attributes.body
a grandfather clock is a pendulums

# data[].attributes.body
I leared that that it depenc on height,weight,length

# data[].attributes.headline
a swing is a pendulum it uses fors and motion to

# data[].attributes.subject
a swing is a pendulum it uses fors and motion to

# data[].attributes.body
i learned that the drum pulls the drive mass that triggers the pendulum

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that Galileo Lorome created the pengulum

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that grandfather clocks do not use electricity .

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that he got his idea from a lamp

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.readable_text
ROME (Reuters) - An art collector has found a tooth, thumb and finger of the renowned Italian scientist Galileo Galilei who died in the 17th century, Florence's History of Science museum announced on Friday.

The body parts, along with another finger and a vertebrae, were cut from Galileo's corpse by scientists and historians during a burial ceremony held 95 years after his death in 1642.

Giovanni Targioni Tozzetti, a science historian who cut away the parts and wrote about the ceremony, "confessed he had found it hard to resist the temptation to take away the skull which had housed such extraordinary genius," the museum said.

The newly-found relics had passed from one collector to another until they went missing in 1905. The remaining finger and the vertebrae have been conserved since 1737 in a mummified state in museums in Florence and Padua.

"All the organic material extracted from the corpse has therefore now been identified and is conserved in responsible hands," the museum said in a statement.

"On the basis of considerable historical documentation, there are no doubts about the authenticity of the items," it added.

They will be exhibited from early 2010, when the museum will re-open after current renovation work and will change its name to the Galileo museum.

Galileo, born in Pisa in 1564, is considered one of the fathers of modern science due to his studies in physics, mathematics and particularly astronomy, where he led great advances in developing the telescope.

His lost fingers and tooth were bought by an unnamed collector at a recent auction, where they were being sold as unidentified artifacts contained in an 17th century wooden case, the museum said.

For 95 years after his death, ecclesiastical authorities refused to allow Galileo to be buried in consecrated ground because his findings were considered contrary to the teachings of the Catholic church.

His body now lies in Florence's Santa Croce church, opposite the tomb of Michelangelo.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Italy collector finds Galileo's lost tooth, fingers

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
ROME (Reuters) - An art collector has found a tooth, thumb and finger of the renowned Italian scientist Galileo Galilei who died in the 17th century, Florence's History of Science museum announced on Friday. The body parts, along with another finger and a vertebrae, were cut from Galileo's corpse by scientists and historians during a burial ceremony held 95 years after his death in 1642.

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that Galileo used a church clock to sta

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that pendelums are effercted by the shorter or longer the string

# data[].attributes.body
galileo started thinking about penguiloms

# data[].attributes.body
A pendulum is another system that is driven  by gravity

# data[].attributes.body
i learned that the guy that invented the pendulum is a ghost

# data[].attributes.body
I learned most clocks run with pendulums

click link below

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_AiV12XBbI

# data[].attributes.body
A pendulum is another system that is driven by gravity.

# data[].attributes.body
Galilon's pendulum showing diffent release potisions for the ball

# data[].attributes.body
Pendulums use gravity to move

# data[].attributes.body
Galileo invented pendulums

# data[].attributes.body
Grandfather clocks have never ran on electricity.

# data[].attributes.body
i learned that swing is a type of pendulums

# data[].attributes.body
swing is a pendalum

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that gravity keeps a pendulum going

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that Gallelio was what many people bielved the worlds first modern scientist

# data[].attributes.body
swings are like pendulums

# data[].attributes.headline
I learned that he got the idea from a swinging church lamo

# data[].attributes.subject
I learned that he got the idea from a swinging church lamo

# data[].attributes.headline
i learned that the pendulums make a clock work.

# data[].attributes.subject
i learned that the pendulums make a clock work.

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that galio used his pulse to count the number of swings and he used a lamp in the pisa.

# data[].attributes.body
A pendulum is another system that is driven by gravity

# data[].attributes.headline
Grandfather clocks have drums to make them swing and galileo galilei invented the bob

# data[].attributes.subject
Grandfather clocks have drums to make them swing and galileo galilei invented the bob

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that gravity is the main thing that makes a grandfather clock work.H

# data[].attributes.body
grandfather clocks use gravity to function

# data[].attributes.body
A gravitational pull that turns the drum.

# data[].attributes.body
Grandfather clocks use gravity to function

# data[].attributes.body
i learn that galileo galilei invented bob

# data[].attributes.body
Grandfather clocks  have drums that makes the drive mass swing and that makes the pendulum swing

# data[].attributes.body
The grandfather clock has a drum that makes the mass swing and the gears move.

# data[].attributes.body
grandfather clocks use gravity to function

# data[].attributes.body
I learned that one of the very first clocks was made with a pendulum, and used no electricity. (grandfather clock