# data[].attributes.body
With the ever evolving world, there has been a massive increase of dependability on computer based technology. More electronics are being invented day in day out and the existing ones being improved and with time, every activity we pertake in, involves used of technology.

In my opinion, the dependance rate on technology will grow to a point where by everything will be computerized. For example most jobs will be performed by robots this will replace human beings in workspaces. Although this will increase productivity, most people will loose their jobs. Also through people depending so much on their phones, human interaction will be minimal which is a very high risk to people acquiring mental health issues.

Depsite it's positive impacts, relying so much on computers is not good for us. We should find a way to minimize our dependance and try to perform other tasks by ourselves.

# data[].attributes.body
Crop-growing skyscrapers

By the year 2050, nearly 80% of the Earth's population will live in urban centres. Applying the most conservative estimates to current demographic trends, the human population will increase by about three billion people by then. An estimated 10 hectares of new land (about 20% larger than Brazil) will be needed to grow enough food to feed them, if traditional farming methods continue as they are practised today. At present, throughout the world, over 80% of the land that is suitable for raising crops is in use. Historically, some 15% of that has been laid waste by poor management practices. What can be done to ensure enough food for the world's population to live on?

The concept of indoor farming is not new, since hothouse production of tomatoes and other produce has been in vogue for some time. What is new is the urgent need to scale up this technology to accommodate another three billion people. Many believe an entirely new approach to indoor farming is required, employing cutting-edge technologies. One such proposal is for the 'Vertical Farm'. The concept is of multi-storey buildings in which food crops are grown in environmentally controlled conditions. Situated in the heart of urban centres, they would drastically reduce the amount of transportation required to bring food to consumers. Vertical farms would need to be efficient, cheap to construct and safe to operate. If successfully implemented, proponents claim, vertical farms offer the promise of urban renewal, sustainable production of a safe and varied food supply (through year-round production of all crops), and the eventual repair of ecosystems that have been sacrificed for horizontal farming.

It took humans 10,000 years to learn how to grow most of the crops we now take for granted. Along the way, we despoiled most of the land we worked, often turning verdant, natural ecozones into semi-arid deserts. Within that same time frame, we evolved into an urban species, in which 60% of the human population now lives vertically in cities. This means that, for the majority, we humans have shelter from the elements, yet we subject our food-bearing plants to the rigours of the great outdoors and can do no more than hope for a good weather year. However, more often than not now, due to a rapidly changing climate, that is not what happens. Massive floods, long droughts, hurricanes and severe monsoons take their toll each year, destroying millions of tons of valuable crops.

The supporters of vertical farming claim many potential advantages for the system. For instance, crops would be produced all year round, as they would be kept in artificially controlled, optimum growing conditions. There would be no weather-related crop failures due to droughts, floods or pests. All the food could be grown organically, eliminating the need for herbicides, pesticides and fertilisers. The system would greatly reduce the incidence of many infectious diseases that are acquired at the agricultural interface. Although the system would consume energy, it would return energy to the grid via methane generation from composting non-edible parts of plants. It would also dramatically reduce fossil fuel use, by cutting out the need for tractors, ploughs and shipping.

A major drawback of vertical farming, however, is that the plants would require artificial light. Without it, those plants nearest the windows would be exposed to more sunlight and grow more quickly, reducing the efficiency of the system. Single-storey greenhouses have the benefit of natural overhead light: even so, many still need artificial lighting. A multi-storey facility with no natural overhead light would require far more. Generating enough light could be prohibitively expensive, unless cheap, renewable energy is available, and this appears to be rather a future aspiration than a likelihood for the near future.

One variation on vertical farming that has been developed is to grow plants in stacked trays that move on rails. Moving the trays allows the plants to get enough sunlight. This system is already in operation, and works well within a single-storey greenhouse with light reaching it from above: it is not certain, however, that it can be made to work without that overhead natural light.

Vertical farming is an attempt to address the undoubted problems that we face in producing enough food for a growing population. At the moment, though, more needs to be done to reduce the detrimental impact it would have on the environment, particularly as regards the use of energy. While it is possible that much of our food will be grown in skyscrapers in future, most experts currently believe it is far more likely that we will simply use the space available on urban rooftops.

# data[].attributes.body
By clicking on this task, you are able to access the tracks to your "New Insights into IELTS."

# data[].attributes.headline
Tutorials on how the computer based IELTS works: 

# data[].attributes.subject
Tutorials on how the computer based IELTS works: 

# data[].attributes.body
https://takeielts.britishcouncil.org/take-ielts/prepare/computer-delivered-ielts/how-it-works

# data[].attributes.headline
Useful link towards understanding punctuation marks.  

# data[].attributes.subject
Useful link towards understanding punctuation marks.  

# data[].attributes.body
https://www.ef.com/wwen/english-resources/english-grammar/punctuation/

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
BEST 9 SPEAKING TRICKS TO EXPAND ANSWERS

# data[].attributes.body
Click on the link below to access to the listening mock test: remember to check your answers and get overall result at the end.
https://ielts-up.com/listening/ielts-listening-sample-3.1.html

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Free IELTS Academic Reading sample #1 - IELTS-up

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
IELTS Academic Reading practice test: sample 1, section 1. Read the text and answer the questions online. Finish full IELTS Reading sample to get your score.

# data[].attributes.body
Click on the following link to find sections in order for a mock  test:
Section 1
http://ielts-up.com/reading/academic-reading-sample-3.1.html

# data[].attributes.body
Questions 1-7

Complete the sentences below.

Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.

Indoor farming

1) Some food plants, including ............., are already grown indoors.

2) Vertical farms would be located in ............., meaning that there would be less need to take them long distances to customers.

3) Vertical farms could use methane from plants and animals to produce ..............

4) The consumption of ............. would be cut because agricultural vehicles would be unnecessary.

5) The fact that vertical farms would need ............. light is a disadvantage.

6) One form of vertical farming involves planting in ............. which are not fixed.

7) The most probable development is that food will be grown on ............. in towns and cities.

Questions 8-13

Do the following statements agree with the views of the writer in the Reading Passage? Write:

| TRUE | if the statement agrees with the views of the writer.
| FALSE | if the statement contradicts what the writer thinks.
| NOT GIVEN | if it is impossible to know what the writer's point of view is.

8) Methods for predicting the Earth's population have recently changed.

9) Human beings are responsible for some of the destruction to food-producing land.

10) The crops produced in vertical farms will depend on the season.

11) Some damage to food crops is caused by climate change.

12) Fertilisers will be needed for certain crops in vertical farms.

13) Vertical farming will make plants less likely to be affected by infectious diseases.

# data[].attributes.body
Crop-growing skyscrapers

By the year 2050, nearly 80% of the Earth's population will live in urban centres. Applying the most conservative estimates to current demographic trends, the human population will increase by about three billion people by then. An estimated 10 hectares of new land (about 20% larger than Brazil) will be needed to grow enough food to feed them, if traditional farming methods continue as they are practised today. At present, throughout the world, over 80% of the land that is suitable for raising crops is in use. Historically, some 15% of that has been laid waste by poor management practices. What can be done to ensure enough food for the world's population to live on?

The concept of indoor farming is not new, since hothouse production of tomatoes and other produce has been in vogue for some time. What is new is the urgent need to scale up this technology to accommodate another three billion people. Many believe an entirely new approach to indoor farming is required, employing cutting-edge technologies. One such proposal is for the 'Vertical Farm'. The concept is of multi-storey buildings in which food crops are grown in environmentally controlled conditions. Situated in the heart of urban centres, they would drastically reduce the amount of transportation required to bring food to consumers. Vertical farms would need to be efficient, cheap to construct and safe to operate. If successfully implemented, proponents claim, vertical farms offer the promise of urban renewal, sustainable production of a safe and varied food supply (through year-round production of all crops), and the eventual repair of ecosystems that have been sacrificed for horizontal farming.

It took humans 10,000 years to learn how to grow most of the crops we now take for granted. Along the way, we despoiled most of the land we worked, often turning verdant, natural ecozones into semi-arid deserts. Within that same time frame, we evolved into an urban species, in which 60% of the human population now lives vertically in cities. This means that, for the majority, we humans have shelter from the elements, yet we subject our food-bearing plants to the rigours of the great outdoors and can do no more than hope for a good weather year. However, more often than not now, due to a rapidly changing climate, that is not what happens. Massive floods, long droughts, hurricanes and severe monsoons take their toll each year, destroying millions of tons of valuable crops.

The supporters of vertical farming claim many potential advantages for the system. For instance, crops would be produced all year round, as they would be kept in artificially controlled, optimum growing conditions. There would be no weather-related crop failures due to droughts, floods or pests. All the food could be grown organically, eliminating the need for herbicides, pesticides and fertilisers. The system would greatly reduce the incidence of many infectious diseases that are acquired at the agricultural interface. Although the system would consume energy, it would return energy to the grid via methane generation from composting non-edible parts of plants. It would also dramatically reduce fossil fuel use, by cutting out the need for tractors, ploughs and shipping.

A major drawback of vertical farming, however, is that the plants would require artificial light. Without it, those plants nearest the windows would be exposed to more sunlight and grow more quickly, reducing the efficiency of the system. Single-storey greenhouses have the benefit of natural overhead light: even so, many still need artificial lighting. A multi-storey facility with no natural overhead light would require far more. Generating enough light could be prohibitively expensive, unless cheap, renewable energy is available, and this appears to be rather a future aspiration than a likelihood for the near future.

One variation on vertical farming that has been developed is to grow plants in stacked trays that move on rails. Moving the trays allows the plants to get enough sunlight. This system is already in operation, and works well within a single-storey greenhouse with light reaching it from above: it is not certain, however, that it can be made to work without that overhead natural light.

Vertical farming is an attempt to address the undoubted problems that we face in producing enough food for a growing population. At the moment, though, more needs to be done to reduce the detrimental impact it would have on the environment, particularly as regards the use of energy. While it is possible that much of our food will be grown in skyscrapers in future, most experts currently believe it is far more likely that we will simply use the space available on urban rooftops.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
IELTS SPEAKING VIDEO || 2018 || ULTIMATE || BAND 9

# data[].attributes.body
Sheet 1

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
✔ IELTS SPEAKING TEST TIPS | Band 9 | ULTIMATE SUCCESS !!

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.description
IELTS ACADEMIC band 9 material. ( PLEASE CLICK ON 'CC' UNDER THE VIDEO TO SEE THE SUBTITLES ) Speaking is in three parts. The examiner wants to know what is your level of English. The questions are already set. Your response is recorded. Your score depends upon how clearly the examiner can understand you.

# data[].attributes.body
http://ieltsliz.com/linking-words-for-writing/

https://www.ielts-exam.net/grammar/linking-words.html

# data[].attributes.body
Many people believe that formal “pen and paper” examinations are not the best method of assessing educational achievement.

Discuss this view and give your own opinion.

# data[].attributes.body
Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.

Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children?

Read sample and create the outline the writer must have written:

The question of whether we should oblige parents to immunise their children against common diseases is a social rather than a medical one. Since we are free to choose what we eat or drink or how much exercise we take, why should the medical treatment we decide to undergo be any different?
(Introduction poses a new question to introduce the topic)

Medical researchers and governments are primarily interested in overall statistics and trends and in money-saving schemes, which fail to take into consideration the individual's concerns and rights. While immunisation against diseases such as tetanus and whooping cough may be effective, little information is released about the harmful effects of vaccinations, which can sometimes result in growth problems in children or even death.
(Concessional argument)

The body is designed to resist disease and to create its own natural immunity through contact with that disease. When children are given artificial immunity, we create a vulnerable society, which is entirely dependent on immunisation. In the event that mass immunisation programmes were to cease, the society as a whole would be more at risk than ever before.
(Writer's opinion stated plainly and forcefully-as fact)

In addition there is the issue of the rights of the individual. As members of a society, why should we be obliged to subject our children to this potentially harmful practice? Some people may also be against immunisation on religious grounds and their needs must be considered when any decisions are made.
(Main idea with supporting arguments)

For these reasons I feel strongly that immunisation programmes should not be obligatory and that the individual should have the right to choose whether or not to participate.
(Personal opinion to sum up. Re-statement of original question in own words.)