# data[].attributes.body
Dre made some great points

everyone was participating

awkward silence at time

dre lead the conversation

great thoughts all around

# data[].attributes.body
1--Great Nonverbal behavior, everybody isn't breathing to loudly, and good eye contact
2--Only one person talking, good staying on topic of the conversation
3--I was amazed by Ravin's quote, "and jail is like, like you won't ever forget jail." This quote shows that jail is unforgettable and is't a good place to be
4--I wanted to respond to when somebody said books teach you more, and I would've said that books teach, but don't impact
5--ask more questions

# data[].attributes.body
1. No interruptions
2. Preach Nick Sus
3. Respect for each other's opinions

# data[].attributes.body
nobody is interrupting each other

speaking clearly

very focused

a lot of "I agree" "I disagree"

really good verbal communication

stayed on track with the topic

# data[].attributes.body
I rate the nonverbal behavior a 5 because there was nothing out of the normal but sometimes people would show how bored they were

I rate the conversation an 4 because a few people were interupted and sometmes while the person was talking the same person talking was also collecting their thoughts in the middle of the words.

one thing that surprised me was how are they going to monitor their computers if they were to research, or use spark notes. They could easily just fake it and mess around and not take it seriously.

It doesnt matter what the kids thought about the punishmnet its what was right, which is jail in my opinion. I wish i had time to say htis but I didnt htink about this in the moment.

I would tell the group to maybe stop saying the same things over again but im pretty sure my group did this also. They would keep repeating their same thoughts and after a while It would just become an argument over the same thing

# data[].attributes.body
~nO INteRuptIONS
~THey AdD on tO eAchOtHeR
~ 10/10 very great thoughts
~ 10/10 eye contact and hand motions
~I like how kenz brang up how as you get older you have yur own ideas and beliefs
-I would like to respond to the what wahid said about them caring about the books. I would have said that they don't care and they will believe what they believe.
- I would recommend them to use more hand motions to agree.

# data[].attributes.body
Outstanding nonverbal-The people in the inner circle listen carefully
Outstanding verbal- explain their claim of why they agree or disagree.
USed real life examples to contribute to the conversation.
I would've responded to the people who disagree with the punishment,and explained another reason of why this punishment was reasonable.One thing that surprised me was the household perspective of how a person was raised, that's how they would be in the future because that's a somewhat true fact.I would also responded to the part when someone said how u do something and later on forget about it because it really depends on the sitation

# data[].attributes.body
1) Satisfactory; Teddy made good eye contact
2) Outstanding; Wazz used quotes
3) Teddy would rather go to prison then read a book
4) There was never talk of the kids going to jail.Only probation
5) Instead of repeating the same facts use different ones

# data[].attributes.body
They had satisfactory nonverbal behavior. They paid attention to each other and didnt do stuff with their papers.

Their spoken contribution was outstanding because everybody pretty much talked evenly and they had good points.

One thing that surprised me is when wahid said how people in prison often come back to prison .

I wish i could respond on how they said prison impacts.

Have kunal talk more.

# data[].attributes.body
1. One thing they said that surprised me was when Wahid used himslef about his life to make a text to self evidence to explain his point

2. If I were ti give them a reating, I would have gaven them a 4.5 out of 5 because they didn't talk over eachother, they talked their opinions respectfully and they included everyone

3. There isn't anything I would say to improve on them

1. Drake says that the teens weren't aware of what they were doing. If this is true then why would they do it.

2. Wahid respectfully disagrees and gives his insight on it saying that they might have gotten this from the internet. Meaning that they act on what they see on the internet

3. Teddy says that prison time would be suitable because they say jail will actually make them realize their errors instead of the book

4. The argument here is just debating whether or not jail time is more suitable because they say if you read books, you can figure out what they were doing and what the meaning was

5. Wahid did text to self, connections, and pulled evidence out of the text

6. They could improve if they didn't talk over each other but they did so respectfully

7. Did McKenzie change her opinion?

8. Wahid seems to use his evidence from the real world

9. “I agree /I disagree

10. Sometimes they wouldn’t explain their thinking. At times they get straight to the point

11. McKenzie also uses evidence from the real world

12. If one of them was confused, others would help out to make it more clear

13. They talked about the teenagers perspective

14. They give their opinion that are based to themselves, not others. For example, they say that I wouldn't do this, but they see to forget the situation they’d be in  and as of they would have a choice.

# data[].attributes.body
-outstanding nonverbal, because everyone is making eye contact with the person who is talking .
-Satisfactory verbal, because they explain their opinions and build off of what the person before said, but they do restate a few things.
-It impacted me when some people said that the kids wouldn't learn anything from jail.
-I wish I could have responded to when someone said how they should have gone to jail, because I wanted to say that they could have just became worse or not have learned anything from it.
-I would tell them to stay a little bit more on topic and not keep restating the same thing.

# data[].attributes.body
Outstanding nonverbal behavior- the people in the inner circle listen attentively and pay attention

Outstanding spoken contributions- they kindly disagree with a point or chime in when they agree with a peer's point

One thing that surprised me is a point that a student made which I highly disagreed with.

I wish i could've responded to the kids who said the kids should've gone to jail by saying that they would be shaken and would be afraid to do it again, because that is not true, the kids would just be even  more upset that they were on juvie.

some reccomendations i would give to the group is back up their statements more to make a stronger point, which some students did