# data[].attributes.body
I learned a lot about victims while reading these two books mainly because pretty much everyone was a victim for example Arn and his family and friends victims. Matt and his friends and family victims but in the two books there was definitely lots of upstanders for example Arn was a upstander because he gave food to his family and friends before he ate some for himself he used what little power he had that he played the concerts at the camp to save peoples lives and many more equations. Matt was also a upstander because h helped out his friends at the plankton factory Filedeto was going to get hit with a stick but Matt knew that because how skinny he was and how young he would die so Matt took that hit himself. There was nor short of any perpetrators in this book and one big thing i learned about perpetrators is you can be one but be a upstander at the same time. What i mean is Peter Pond was helping Arn a lot by taking him to America and giving him food but he was also a bit of a perpetrator because sometimes he would tell Arn to do something and yell very loud at him for doing it. I learned a lot about human rights because in both books both of the boys human rights were violated countless times and that just kept showing me that were privileged and shouldn't take advantage of it because some people in the world think Human Rights don't mean anything. There was a good amount of bystanders in these books because for example Arn was like the only upstander for the kids because no one else for example dared to travel at night and risk of getting caught while he tried to get food for everyone they just waited and watched. A lot of human nature came up in this book because after the war all Arn wanted to do was kill people that was his human nature but he had to hold it back I learned that a war could really change your human nature as if did for Arn.

# data[].attributes.body
1. For the most part my reading and discussion confirmed my thinking about in topics we discussed in class but not all. A couple times during our discussion my group members mentioned A lot of characters that were being bystanders, upstanders, perpetrators and victims and I didn't catch some of them. For example at the funeral El Patron didn't really understand at the time but he was in a way being a bit of a perpetrator. He is used to having all the attention go to him so when everyone was paying attention to El vievejo and not him he was angry nd walked into the crowd to get back his attention. Another thing my group reminded me about was that Felicia was also a perpetrator she killed Marias dog and made sure that Matt took all the blame and she made everyone hate Matt and this whole time Matt liked Felicia. Just one more thing to say my thinking was never challenged me and my group were always on the same page and thought the same things just about. My thinking again was confirmed but made me look at it at a different point of view. For example I would think Matt is the victim but my group would make me think of a way that Matt possibly could have been the upstander for example.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  So far my reading is going great I love my book and am enjoying reading it so far. For me at least its awesome when the teachers pick out the book that we are going to read because if they didn't I would never have even thought about reading the house of the scorpion.
2. Our conversation went amazing everyone had their own opinion on things and everyone was talking and joining the discussion. One thing that I thought we did really well was change the idea when there was nothing else to talk about.
3. Some examples of our group changing the topic are when we talked about everything we wanted to talk about and then there would be a silence for a bit and that's when we Knew that we should change the topic and talk about something else.
4. Like I said for the last question I would say we changed our ideas very well and for our next meeting we should replicate that. A thing that we could work on is maybe talking about the parts more in order. For example we just started off talking about the beginning then we started to talk about the end of what we read which I guess is fine but I think it would be more beneficial to go in order of the events.

# data[].attributes.attachment_link.title
Dukagjin Rexhepi - Human Rights Book Club Bookmark 1 - 726591