# data[].attributes.body
2. American nationalism rising in 1812 makes sense considering their victory against the British (even though it happened after the treaty was signed.) It had shown to the world that America was a world power just like Britain and France, and to the American people it had shown them that America is able to fight these superpowers and become established in the world. But, what should have been noticed by the American people is that the war was ended in a stalemate and nothing further happened to either country.

# data[].attributes.body
The American nationalism rose as an effect of the war of 1812 because American citizens began to view the war as a victory for them. The battle of New Orleans which was the last battle before both the British and the Americans recognized the end of the war, was an American victory. However, it was one of very few throughout the war of 1812. After we won the battle of New Orleans and the news of the Treaty of Ghent came through to the United States Americans began to think that Great Britain could not handle the American power and signed the treaty of Ghent because they were not strong enough to fight us. This is far from the truth and these falsehoods make the timing of our rise in nationalism unjustified.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The war of 1812 should be referred to as the second war of Independence because the first war for independence was the American Rev. This war also had America and Great Britain battling against one another.

2. The war of 1812 lead to a rise in nationalism because the Americans viewed the war as a victory for themselves since they were able to stand up and fight against Great Britain in New Orleans. This allowed them to be seen as a World Power giving Americans pride.

# data[].attributes.body
1) I think the War of 1812 Shouldn't be referred to as the second war of independence because the war was more of a tie, even though America felt as though they won over Britain. We already had independence before this war was declared.

2) The War of 1812 led to a rise of nationalism because, Andrew led Americans to a victory in the battle of New Orleans. I do not think this is justified because Britain had won more wars than America, even though America won the last war the battle of New Orleans.

# data[].attributes.body
1. The War of 1812 should not be referred to as the "Second War for Independence" as Britain wasn't trying to completely take over America for a second time. I believe it should be called the "War for Independent Commerce" as Britain was trying to control America's trading.

# data[].attributes.body
1.I think the war of 1812 should be referred to as the second war of independence America was fighting with Britain  for the second time and America was able to fight back and control it, This showed Americas strength and ability to fight large forces.
2.The war of 1812 led to a rise of nationalism because we had beat Britain in the war which showed their strength and power. There was another battle after the peace treaty was signed. This made our country a world power. I think it was justified because both sides wanted out of the war so by ending it and signing the treaty, they accomplished that.

# data[].attributes.body
1) I think the war of 1812 should not be considered the " second war for independence" because we already had our independence and were not in danger of losing it.
2) I think after the war there was a rise of nationalism because Americans believed that they had defeated Britain. I don't think was justified because we had only won a few battles and the treaty was already signed.

# data[].attributes.body
1) The War of 1812 should be referred to as the second war of Independence because the Americans had to fight with Britain to regain their right to trade without the British impressing American sailors. Also, the American military was greatly outmatched by the British, especially by their Royal Navy. Even though both countries reached a stalemate, it was still impressive for the Americans to put up a fight to Britain. After the Treaty of Ghent was signed and the Battle of New Orleans, the United States were seen as a world power across the globe.

2) The War of 1812 inspired nationalism because the Americans were able to hold off one of the best militaries and keep their territory. This wave of nationalism spread after the Battle of New Orleans, a crushing victory for the Americans. Despite the war being over by the time this battle took place, the Americans were able to defeat Britain's army with only a few casualties, causing pride to overflow the United States. This nationalism is justified because the Americans should be proud with the accomplishments they achieved throughout the War of 1812.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think that this war should be considered the second war for independence because of many reasons. It started for a lot of the same reasons that the first war did. With Britain having control of a lot of things in America such as impressment/ trade tax and France doing a lot of the same thing. This made two of our congressmen very mad and they pushed for war; They and their followers being called war hawks. But after the war America was put on the board as a world power stating again that we will not be taken over by any country and not just Britain.

2. The war of 1812 sparked nationalism. This is because we beat Britain once and left the second war without consequence even after we had a battle after the treaty was made. This made our country a world power and something the people could show pride in. This was what sparked nationalism after the war. It was justified because neither side wanted to fight in this war and ending it was the only real good way out.

# data[].attributes.body
1.  The War of 1812 should not be referred to as the "second war of Independence because we already were an independent country.  Also, after the Treaty of Ghent was signed everything went back to how it was, nobody gained or suffered consequences for any actions.
2. The rise of nationalism after the war was due to the misconception that the Battle of New Orleans was Britain's' surrenderment, which in fact the peace treaty had already been signed before the battle had even started. I don't think this nationalism was justified because we had only one a handful of battles besides this great victory. Because this victory happened after the Treaty of Ghent was signed I don't think the victory of New Orleans is justified to lead to such big comings of nationalism.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think the war of 1812 shouldn't be considered as the "second war for independence" because we already had our independence and were no longer in danger of losing it.
2. After the war there was a rise in nationalism because when American won the final battle (even after the treaty was signed) Americans believed that they had defeated the British and that the they were too weak to fight against American anymore. However, neither side won in the end. I think the nationalism wasn't justified because the British had won most of the battles and the treaty had already been signed so technically the war was over.

# data[].attributes.body
The second war should be referred to as the second war of Independence. Although America had won against Britain in the Revolutionary War, they still felt tied to Britain. Some of the Federalists were still loyal to Britain and they valued GB as a trading partner. After GB had been impressing American soldiers, the War of 1812 was fought. The way America declared war was their way of telling GB they were independent and would fight against anyone who stood in their way. This war was the war that truly established America as  a world power and separate from GB.

2.) The War of 1812's final battle of New Orleans was what inspired American nationalism. Although the Treaty of Ghent was already signed, there was that battle where America completely destroyed the British. It was seen as the final battle of the war, and because America won, nationalism blossomed in America. However, I don't believe that this is justified because no one won the war, and also because America lost way more battles than Britain.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think the War of 1812 should be referred to as the second war of independence because it was the second time Britain went to war with America. Britain was trying to control America.

2. The rise in nationalism occurred after the War of 1812 was because of the victory of New Orleans.

# data[].attributes.body
1) The War of 1812 was the second time America went to war with Britain because it was trying to control them so it should be called the second war of Independence.  The first time America went to war because it wanted separate from Britain.  The second time America went to war was because they wanted to stop Britain from controlling who they traded with, and to stop the impressment of American sailors.

2) The rise of nationalism that occured after the War of 1812 was because of the victory in New Orleans. Andrew Jackson led American soldiers into a fight with the British and they soundly defeated them. This was huge because it was one of their only victories during this war, but also because so many British had died at the cost of nearly no American lives. Shortly after this, news of the Treaty of Ghent spread so to Americans it had seemed that they had won the war as a result of the large victory. I don't think this was justified seeing how the battle happened after the treaty was signed. Also, there were so many other losses for the Americans during the war, plus the treaty didn't result in much change. It really wasn't a win overall.

# data[].attributes.body
1. Yes it should because this is the 2nd time Britain tried to take over America for itself and for a 2nd time America was able to stop this from happening and allowed things to go back the way they were before. This war showed that America is powerful and can fend for itself. This war sparked nationalism in America that would become very important later on. Britain burned Washington D.C and caused a lot of damage in America during this 2nd war so I think it is worthy of the 2nd war for independence, as Britain was trying to control American seas by capturing sailors also known as impressment.
2. The 2nd war led to nationalism because after the peace treaty was made we won the battle of New Orleans and this showed America that we re powerful, strong, and Independent. Most of the country was delighted by this win and sparked love for their country because of this. I do not think the battle should be justified because the battle should not have happened in the first place but even thought it did, Americans were very happy to win it and were proud of themselves.

# data[].attributes.body
No, the war of 1812 should not be referred to as the "second war for independence". There was nothing hanging in the balance when the Americans declared war on Britain. We were in no danger, prior to the declaration of war, of losing our independence as a nation. The war did finalize our place as a world power and put us at the table of other powerful nations, however we would not have been subjected to another nations leadership if we had not fought in this war.

# data[].attributes.body
1. I think that the War of 1812 shouldn't be referred to as the second war of Independence because we were already an independent country at that time. We weren't under an occupying force and we were running our own affairs.

2. The rise of nationalism can be accredited to America being recognized as a world power and Americans seeing themselves as just Americans. I don't think this rise of American nationalism is justifiable as it led to beliefs such as Manifest Destiny which led to the brutal subjugation of indigenous peoples and American colonization of indigenous land.

# data[].attributes.body
1) I think that the War Of 1812 should be referred to as the Second War of Independence because up till that point in America history it was seen as a minor nation and weak. I think the war 1812 soon ended that and cemented The United States as world power on the rise. Last I think holds many of the themes with the American Revolution on how at the time the Americans could lose the war any battle with the amount they were losing.
2) The Battle of New Orleans which was led by future President Andrew Jackson was victory for the United States and was seen as the U.S ending the war as the news of peace soon came after. Which leads to my next point of it being not justified as the War at that point had ended already and for Jackson to be a War Hero when he in reality fired on a nation that they have just come to peace with.

# data[].attributes.body
1) I don't think the War of 1812 should have been referred to as the Second War for Independence because I think the U.S. already had independence by that time. The main cause of the war was because of the impressment of American sailors. This was not an issue regarding the freedom of America.

2) The rise of nationalism was due to America winning the final battle so most Americans believed that America had won the war. However, it was a stalemate and neither side won the war. I think the nationalism wasn't justified because the British won most of the battles yet Americans still felt as if they won because America won the Battle of New Orleans which was the last battle.